The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
まとめ
549件の認証済みホテル経営者レビューを分析し、機能セット、料金、実際の導入事例を比較して、各プラットフォームの強みを明らかにしました。最適な選択は、施設の種類と優先事項によって異なります:
HOTELTIME 優れています ease of use and customer supportにおいて — 特にbrandの施設に (4.9/5) 、Ancillary revenue tracking and Guest profilesなどの独自機能を備えています.
Tesipro 優れています 、Centralized Messaging and Guest Messagingなどの独自機能を備えています.
549件の認証済みレビューを分析した結果、HOTELTIMEのユーザーはuser interface and learning curve, テクニカルサポート, reporting and analyticsを最も評価し、Tesiproのユーザーはを高く評価しています。各テーマをクリックすると、レビュー投稿者の声をご覧いただけます。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 長所 | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
テクニカルサポート
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| 短所 | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
モバイル最適化
▾
|
|
各セグメントのホテル経営者による認証済みレビューに基づく、施設規模・タイプ・地域別の不動産管理システムベンダー内ランキング。
ホテル規模別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小規模(10〜24室) ▾ | #5 219件のレビュー | — |
| 中規模(25〜74室) ▾ | #3 238件のレビュー | — |
| 大規模(75〜199室) ▾ | #2 46件のレビュー | — |
| 特大規模(200室以上) ▾ | #8 7件のレビュー | — |
施設タイプ別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| ブティック ▾ | #5 239件のレビュー | — |
| ラグジュアリー ▾ | #3 241件のレビュー | — |
| ブランド/チェーン ▾ | #4 143件のレビュー | — |
| 長期滞在型 ▾ | #4 49件のレビュー | — |
地域別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北米 | #52 4件のレビュー | — |
| ヨーロッパ ▾ | #2 384件のレビュー | — |
| アジア太平洋 ▾ | #5 111件のレビュー | — |
| 中東 ▾ | #1 21件のレビュー | — |
Choosing between HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME and Tesipro by Tesipro involves evaluating how each platform addresses your hotel’s operational needs. HotelTime offers a broad, feature-rich system with extensive integrations and a strong reputation, while Tesipro emphasizes straightforward setup and centralized management suited for large groups. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize proven versatility and user satisfaction or streamlined implementation and central control.
Both products aim to simplify hotel management, but they diverge significantly in scale, feature depth, and regional coverage. Does your team need a system with a proven track record in diverse markets or a solution that emphasizes rapid deployment and centralized control? Let’s explore how they compare.
HotelTime PMS is a comprehensive cloud-based platform favored for its broad range of features, high review count, and recent positive feedback—433 reviews with many from the last six months. Its overall rating of 4.83/5 and a 93% likelihood to recommend reflect strong confidence from users. Tesipro, on the other hand, lacks publicly available recent reviews and scores zero, making HotelTime the more dependable choice based on recent user experiences.
HotelTime’s extensive feature set—39 shared features plus 12 unique—supports operations from boutique hotels to resorts worldwide, especially in Europe, the Middle East, and Asia Pacific. Tesipro’s focus on centralized management for big groups and independent properties caters to a different segment but lacks recent reviews or regional presence data. Does your hotel value a system proven in diverse markets? If so, HotelTime’s recent positive reviews and broad regional footprint give it a clear edge.
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, scalable solution with proven customer satisfaction, choose HotelTime. Its extensive integrations, more than 650 properties in over 20 countries, and high review scores make it suitable for properties of all sizes. For large hotel groups seeking centralized management and quick setup, Tesipro’s promise of easy environment configuration and core functionalities might seem attractive—but the lack of recent reviews diminishes confidence.
For properties seeking proven operational efficiency, advanced reporting, and support across multiple regions, HotelTime stands out. Conversely, if your team prioritizes rapid deployment tailored for large chains or independent properties with less emphasis on extensive features, Tesipro’s centralized approach could be appealing. Ultimately, HotelTime’s recent reviews and extensive track record make it the more reliable option for most hotels.
HotelTime’s user interface generally earns a 4.66/5 rating, with numerous reviews praising its intuitive design and ease of onboarding. Support for new users is well-rated, with onboarding averaging 4.63/5 and positive feedback on training and support responsiveness. Users emphasize that once familiar, staff can operate the system efficiently, reducing training time.
Tesipro, however, offers less detailed information on usability or onboarding, with no recent reviews or ratings available to assess. Given HotelTime’s extensive positive feedback, it’s clear the platform is easier to adopt and navigate. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime boasts a total of 39 shared features plus 12 exclusive, including guest profiles, revenue management, gift vouchers, and native email marketing—many features tailored for diverse hotel operations. Tesipro offers 5 unique features, such as centralized messaging and shift planning, focusing on streamlined communication and management for large groups.
HotelTime’s broader features support multi-department management, automation, and marketing, giving your team more tools to optimize operations. Tesipro’s features are more centered on central management and automation but lack the depth and variety seen in HotelTime. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s support ratings average 4.73/5, with many reviews highlighting prompt, helpful responses and thorough onboarding. Users describe the team as responsive, with some mentioning that support could extend operating hours for international clients, but overall satisfaction remains high.
There are no recent customer support reviews for Tesipro, making it impossible to compare support quality. Given HotelTime’s consistently high ratings and positive testimonials, it’s clear the support experience is a strength. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime integrates with 58 verified partners, including key channel managers, revenue tools, and other third-party systems—more than double Tesipro’s 25. Shared integrations include SiteMinder, RateGain, and Cendyn, with HotelTime boasting unique partnerships like Profitroom and RevControl.
Tesipro offers essential integrations for large chains but has fewer verified partners overall, limiting flexibility. If your hotel relies on diverse third-party tools, HotelTime’s extensive integration network provides a significant advantage. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s recent reviews predominantly come from hotels in Europe, the Middle East, and Asia Pacific, with an overall rating of 4.83/5 from 433 reviews, many within the last six months. Its users span boutique hotels, resorts, and city-center properties, giving it broad appeal with high satisfaction scores.
Tesipro’s absence of recent reviews and ratings makes comparison difficult, but the lack of publicly available recent data suggests less confidence in current user sentiment. Based on recent feedback and review volume, HotelTime is clearly the higher-rated product. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s base price is $600 per month, with no indication of additional implementation fees or freemium options. Tesipro’s starting price is $1,300 per month, also without details on implementation or discounts.
HotelTime’s lower price point combined with its extensive features offers better value for most hotels. Tesipro’s higher cost might reflect its targeting of large chains, but without detailed pricing options, HotelTime’s competitive pricing makes it the more attractive choice for most users.
Not ideal if your hotel operates with very simple needs or has a tightly constrained budget for basic operations.
Not ideal if you require a broad feature set, regional support in Europe, Middle East, Asia Pacific, or value extensive integrations.
HotelTime offers a detailed, proven platform with a broad feature set, strong regional coverage, and recent high scores that reflect user satisfaction. Its extensive integrations, ease of use, and positive reviews make it suitable for hotels of all sizes seeking operational efficiency and growth.
Tesipro, while promising centralized management and quick setup, lacks recent reviews and detailed user feedback, raising concerns about current performance and support. Its focus on large chains and independent hotels may suit specific needs but offers less assurance for most hoteliers right now.
If your hotel values proven performance backed by recent reviews, HotelTime is the clear choice. For large hotel groups that need a centralized, straightforward management platform, Tesipro could be appropriate—if you’re comfortable with limited recent feedback.
8件の認証済みケーススタディを分析し、4つの主要ビジネス目標において各プラットフォームでホテルが実際に達成した成果を比較しました。
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
この目標に関するケーススタディはまだ公開されていません。
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
この目標に関するケーススタディはまだ公開されていません。
ホテル経営者が高く評価する点
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
サポート チームの応答性と親切さは高く評価されていますが、一部のレビューでは、テクニカル サポートの時間を延長することで、特に海外のユーザーに対して常時... サポート チームの応答性と親切さは高く評価されていますが、一部のレビューでは、テクニカル サポートの時間を延長することで、特に海外のユーザーに対して常時サポートが提供され、ユーザー エクスペリエンスがさらに向上すると指摘されています。
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
ホテル経営者が指摘する課題
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
独自の機能
独自の機能
評価が最も分かれる分野
お客様の要件次第です。HotelTime PMSとTesiproは多くの主要なProperty Management Systems機能を共有していますが、それぞれに独自の機能があります。HotelTime PMSは58件の認証済み連携パートナーを持ち、Tesiproは25件を持っています。切り替え前に、上記の機能比較で違いをご確認ください。
小規模ホテルは使いやすさと迅速なオンボーディングを優先すべきです。HotelTime PMSは使いやすさで4.7/5対0.0/5とリードしています。透明性のある料金設定とトライアルまたはデモのオプションを探しましょう。各製品ページで施設規模別にレビューをフィルタリングして、同様のホテルからの声を確認してください。
HotelTime PMS:いいえ。Tesipro:いいえ。 どちらの製品も現在無料ティアを提供していません。ほとんどのProperty Management Systemsベンダーはデモまたはトライアルを提供しています — コミットする前に各社にご依頼ください。
HT Scoreは、ホテル経営者がホテルテクノロジー製品を客観的に比較できるよう、4個の基準グループと十数の変数を考慮した総合ランキングです。HOTELTIMEのHT Scoreは91、Tesiproは0です。以下がスコアの算出方法です。
| 基準グループ | ウェイト | 測定内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 顧客評価とレビュー |
|
ユーザーはこの製品をどの程度推奨していますか? 評価スコア、レビュー数、シェアオブボイス、レビューの深さ、レビューの新しさ、成功事例 ▾ 最も重みの大きい要素です。平均満足度評価(推奨度、使いやすさ、サポート、ROI)、カテゴリー内の競合に対するレビュー総数、レビューの新しさ(直近6か月間に20件以上のレビュー)、固有のホテルクライアント全体のシェアオブボイスを分析して選択バイアスを検出します。 |
| パートナーエコシステム |
|
テクノロジーパートナーはこの企業をどの程度推奨していますか? パートナー推奨、連携数、連携品質 ▾ パートナー推奨を専門家の信頼票として評価し、認証済み連携の数、エコシステムの品質 — 連携パートナーの平均HT Scoreを評価します。より高品質な連携エコシステムを持つ製品は、接続されたテックスタックを提供する可能性が高くなります。 |
| 顧客中心主義 |
|
この組織はどの程度顧客中心ですか? 認定サポート、レビューの一貫性、プロフィールの完全性 ▾ 企業がHTRカスタマーサポート認定を取得しているか、長期にわたり一貫したレビュー収集を維持しているか(フィードバック主導の文化の指標)、機能、スクリーンショット、料金、特徴を含む完全な製品プロフィールを維持しているかを評価します。 |
| リーチ、継続性、リソース |
|
この企業のリーチとリソースはどの程度広範ですか? 地理的リーチ、継続性、企業リソース、トレンドスコア ▾ グローバルプレゼンス(対応国・地域)、安定性の指標としての事業年数、リソースの指標としてのチーム人数、直近12か月の購入者からの問い合わせ・レビュー・パートナー推奨・プレス活動に基づくトレンドスコアを測定します。 |
顧客評価とレビューは、HT Scoreアルゴリズムにおいて最も重要な要素です。HTRはランキング向上のための支払いを受け付けていません。すべてのレビューは認証済みです — 所属が確認されたホテル業界の実務者のみが評価を投稿できます。 HT Scoreの詳細な算出方法を見る →
製品推奨アドバイザー