The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
まとめ
251件の認証済みホテル経営者レビューを分析し、機能セット、料金、実際の導入事例を比較して、各プラットフォームの強みを明らかにしました。最適な選択は、施設の種類と優先事項によって異なります:
Infor 優れています 、Meal Planningなどの独自機能を備えています.
Tripleseat 優れています ease of use and customer supportにおいて — 特にbrandの施設に (5.0/5) 、PCI Compliant Paymentsなどの独自機能を備えています.
HTRの251件の認証済みホテル経営者レビューに基づく並列評価。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推奨度 |
|
|
| 使いやすさ |
|
|
| カスタマーサポート |
|
|
| コストパフォーマンス |
|
|
| 開始価格 | Contact sales | From $400/mo |
| 認証済みレビュー | 3 | 248 |
251件の認証済みレビューを分析した結果、Inforのユーザーはを最も評価し、Tripleseatのユーザーはonboarding and support, event management efficiency, user-friendly interfaceを高く評価しています。各テーマをクリックすると、レビュー投稿者の声をご覧いただけます。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 長所 | |
|
+
Onboarding and Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Event Management Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform Customization
▾
|
|
| 短所 | |
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Proposal and Communication Tools
▾
|
|
|
−
ドキュメント管理
▾
|
|
各セグメントのホテル経営者による認証済みレビューに基づく、施設規模・タイプ・地域別のイベント管理ソフトウェアベンダー内ランキング。
ホテル規模別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小規模(10〜24室) ▾ | #6 2件のレビュー | #1 52件のレビュー |
| 中規模(25〜74室) ▾ | #8 1件のレビュー | #2 152件のレビュー |
| 大規模(75〜199室) ▾ | — | #3 17件のレビュー |
| 特大規模(200室以上) ▾ | — | #2 9件のレビュー |
施設タイプ別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| ブティック ▾ | — | #2 155件のレビュー |
| ラグジュアリー ▾ | — | #2 93件のレビュー |
| ブランド/チェーン ▾ | #9 1件のレビュー | #2 55件のレビュー |
| 長期滞在型 ▾ | — | #2 12件のレビュー |
地域別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北米 ▾ | #7 1件のレビュー | #1 224件のレビュー |
| ヨーロッパ ▾ | #7 2件のレビュー | #4 8件のレビュー |
| アジア太平洋 | — | #4 1件のレビュー |
Choosing between Infor Sales & Catering and Tripleseat hinges on your hotel’s specific needs around event management. Both platforms aim to streamline event planning, sales, and coordination, but they do so with different strengths. Infor appeals with its deep integration capabilities and broader industry focus, while Tripleseat shines with its user-friendly interface and extensive reviews. Which will suit your team better?
While Infor’s comprehensive approach promises a high level of control, Tripleseat’s simplicity and recent user growth suggest a more immediate impact. Do you need a robust, enterprise-grade tool or a more accessible, widely adopted system?
Infor Sales & Catering offers a full-scale platform designed to centralize and automate booking, catering, and event execution from inquiry through invoicing. Its key strength lies in its integration with other enterprise systems, accommodating large resorts, stadiums, and convention centers that demand high customization.
Tripleseat, on the other hand, is tailored for hotels managing events and group sales in a straightforward, web-based interface. With over 219 recent reviews and a 96.7 score, Tripleseat’s user feedback emphasizes ease of use, quick implementation, and high customer satisfaction.
Infor’s limited review count (only 3 reviews, none recent) makes it harder to gauge current user sentiment, whereas Tripleseat’s recent reviews (62 in the last six months) and high recommendation rate (91%) suggest a more reliable, tested solution. Do you prioritize a deep, integrated management system or a fast-to-adopt platform with recent positive feedback?
If your hotel operates at a large scale, managing complex events across multiple departments or locations, Infor’s extensive feature set and integration options make it the better fit. Its ability to connect with over 113 verified partners and customize workflows benefits resorts, stadiums, and conference centers seeking precision.
Conversely, if your hotel needs a flexible, intuitive, and fast onboarding platform to handle a mix of small and medium-sized events, Tripleseat offers a more suitable choice. Its core features, including lead forms, customizable proposals, and digital signatures, are highly rated, especially among boutique and mid-sized hotels. For properties that want quick results with minimal training, Tripleseat’s proven ease of use and recent growth are advantageous.
In summary, choose Infor if your hotel’s event management demands sophistication, deep system integrations, and enterprise control. Opt for Tripleseat if your priority is a user-friendly, rapidly deployable platform with high satisfaction among similar hotel segments.
Tripleseat’s UI scores 4.53 out of 5, with many reviews praising its intuitiveness and straightforward navigation. New users often find onboarding smooth, with the platform earning a 4.45/5 rating for onboarding support, and support staff frequently cited as responsive and helpful.
Infor’s user rating is lower at 3.67, with reviews pointing to a steep learning curve and difficulties during setup. Support ratings are also weaker at 3.33, and users report long response times with inconsistent assistance. Many find the interface less intuitive, making staff adoption more challenging.
Edge: Tripleseat.
Infor Sales & Catering offers a unique feature—Meal Planning—that is absent in Tripleseat. It also provides extensive automation for booking, catering, and event lifecycle management, with advanced customization options.
Tripleseat surpasses Infor with features like Lead Forms, eSignatures, PCI-compliant payments, and customizable BEOs, totaling four unique capabilities. Its ability to incorporate digital contracts and streamline client communications is a significant advantage.
Both products share seven core features, including CRM, event scheduling, and reporting. However, Tripleseat’s additional features and its focus on ease of use give it the edge for hotels seeking quick-to-implement, flexible tools.
Edge: Tripleseat.
Tripleseat’s customer support scores 4.55, with reviews highlighting rapid responses, helpfulness, and ongoing educational support. Clients often mention the support team’s responsiveness, especially during onboarding or troubleshooting.
Infor’s support ratings are lower at 3.33, with reviews citing slow response times, difficulty reaching knowledgeable staff, and inconsistent assistance. Users report that issues sometimes remain unresolved for extended periods.
Given recent reviews, Tripleseat’s support quality is significantly higher, making it the safer choice for hotels that depend on quick and reliable help.
Edge: Tripleseat.
Infor boasts 113 verified integrations, including major hospitality and enterprise partners like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, Maestro PMS, and others. Its extensive network supports complex workflows and large-scale operations.
Tripleseat offers 15 verified integrations, including Opera, Stripe, and WebRezPro, with six shared partners. While fewer in number, these integrations cover key tools for small to medium-sized hotels, making setup easier and more reliable for those segments.
For hotels needing deep, broad system connectivity, Infor’s superior partner network is advantageous. For those prioritizing straightforward, reliable integrations, Tripleseat’s selection is sufficient.
Edge: Infor.
Tripleseat’s overall rating of 4.78/5 is based on 219 recent reviews, with a 91% likelihood to recommend. Hotels across boutique, independent, and branded segments praise its ease of use, customer service, and feature set.
Infor’s rating is 5/5 but based on only 3 reviews, with no recent feedback. The limited data makes it difficult to gauge current user satisfaction, though existing reviews mention a functional but less intuitive system.
Given the volume and recency of reviews, Tripleseat’s rating reflects a broader, more positive user experience.
Edge: Tripleseat.
Infor does not publicly list pricing, indicating a customized quote based on hotel size and needs. No free trial or freemium option is available, which could be a barrier for smaller hotels or those testing systems.
Tripleseat charges a flat fee of $400 per month, with no free trial. Its straightforward pricing and transparent model make budgeting predictable, especially for small to mid-sized hotels.
For hotels seeking clear, predictable costs, Tripleseat’s pricing is advantageous. Infor’s custom approach may be suitable for large organizations willing to negotiate.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Not ideal if your hotel:
The core difference between these two platforms lies in their scope and user experience. Infor provides a highly customizable, system-integrated solution suited for large, complex operations, while Tripleseat offers a streamlined, intuitive platform favored by hotels valuing ease of use and rapid deployment.
If your hotel requires enterprise-grade features, extensive integration options, and customization, Infor is the right choice. Its larger footprint and broader industry focus support complex event logistics and large-scale operations effectively.
However, if your hotel values a simple, quick-to-start platform with high recent ratings and excellent support, Tripleseat is the better option. Its focus on user experience and recent growth make it a practical choice for a wide range of properties, especially in the boutique and mid-market segments.
In conclusion, for most hotels actively seeking a modern, highly-rated event management tool with recent feedback and proven user satisfaction, Tripleseat emerges as the stronger candidate. It is more accessible, better supported, and more aligned with current user expectations.
イベント管理ソフトウェア の料金はわかりにくいことが多いです。各ベンダーの公開料金データから判明している情報をまとめました。施設の規模に合わせたカスタム見積もりを必ずご依頼ください。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $400/mo |
HTRの製品データベースによると、Infor Sales & CateringとTripleseatは7個の機能を共有しています。以下は主な違い — 一方にあって他方にない機能です。
| 機能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| PCI準拠の支払い | ||
| eSignatures | ||
| カスタマイズ可能なBEO、提案書、契約書 | ||
| リードフォーム | ||
| 食事の計画 |
1件の認証済みケーススタディを分析し、4つの主要ビジネス目標において各プラットフォームでホテルが実際に達成した成果を比較しました。
この目標に関するケーススタディはまだ公開されていません。
"Tripleseat provides the best ROI of any system."
ホテル経営者が高く評価する点
Despite some initial onboarding challenges, users commend the support team for their responsiveness and effectiveness in solving issues and providing... Despite some initial onboarding challenges, users commend the support team for their responsiveness and effectiveness in solving issues and providing assistance throughout the setup process.
Tripleseat is praised for streamlining event management, making it easier to handle communication, details, and coordination across teams, leading to... Tripleseat is praised for streamlining event management, making it easier to handle communication, details, and coordination across teams, leading to time savings and better team alignment.
Reviewers consistently mention the ease of use and intuitive design of Tripleseat, highlighting its capacity to simplify complex tasks and improve use... Reviewers consistently mention the ease of use and intuitive design of Tripleseat, highlighting its capacity to simplify complex tasks and improve user experience for both clients and staff.
ホテル経営者が指摘する課題
While users appreciate the platform's core features, they express a desire for better integration with other systems like revenue management tools and... While users appreciate the platform's core features, they express a desire for better integration with other systems like revenue management tools and billing to enhance overall workflow efficiency.
Tripleseat simplifies creating proposals and facilitates consistent client communication with features like integrated communication tools and real-ti... Tripleseat simplifies creating proposals and facilitates consistent client communication with features like integrated communication tools and real-time updates across platforms.
高評価の分野
独自の機能
評価が最も分かれる分野
お客様の要件次第です。Infor Sales & CateringとTripleseatは多くの主要なEvent Management Software機能を共有していますが、それぞれに独自の機能があります。Infor Sales & Cateringは113件の認証済み連携パートナーを持ち、Tripleseatは15件を持っています。切り替え前に、上記の機能比較で違いをご確認ください。
小規模ホテルは使いやすさと迅速なオンボーディングを優先すべきです。Tripleseatは使いやすさで4.5/5対3.7/5とリードしています。透明性のある料金設定とトライアルまたはデモのオプションを探しましょう。各製品ページで施設規模別にレビューをフィルタリングして、同様のホテルからの声を確認してください。
Infor Sales & Catering:いいえ。Tripleseat:いいえ。 どちらの製品も現在無料ティアを提供していません。ほとんどのEvent Management Softwareベンダーはデモまたはトライアルを提供しています — コミットする前に各社にご依頼ください。
HT Scoreは、ホテル経営者がホテルテクノロジー製品を客観的に比較できるよう、4個の基準グループと十数の変数を考慮した総合ランキングです。InforのHT Scoreは0、Tripleseatは97です。以下がスコアの算出方法です。
| 基準グループ | ウェイト | 測定内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 顧客評価とレビュー |
|
ユーザーはこの製品をどの程度推奨していますか? 評価スコア、レビュー数、シェアオブボイス、レビューの深さ、レビューの新しさ、成功事例 ▾ 最も重みの大きい要素です。平均満足度評価(推奨度、使いやすさ、サポート、ROI)、カテゴリー内の競合に対するレビュー総数、レビューの新しさ(直近6か月間に20件以上のレビュー)、固有のホテルクライアント全体のシェアオブボイスを分析して選択バイアスを検出します。 |
| パートナーエコシステム |
|
テクノロジーパートナーはこの企業をどの程度推奨していますか? パートナー推奨、連携数、連携品質 ▾ パートナー推奨を専門家の信頼票として評価し、認証済み連携の数、エコシステムの品質 — 連携パートナーの平均HT Scoreを評価します。より高品質な連携エコシステムを持つ製品は、接続されたテックスタックを提供する可能性が高くなります。 |
| 顧客中心主義 |
|
この組織はどの程度顧客中心ですか? 認定サポート、レビューの一貫性、プロフィールの完全性 ▾ 企業がHTRカスタマーサポート認定を取得しているか、長期にわたり一貫したレビュー収集を維持しているか(フィードバック主導の文化の指標)、機能、スクリーンショット、料金、特徴を含む完全な製品プロフィールを維持しているかを評価します。 |
| リーチ、継続性、リソース |
|
この企業のリーチとリソースはどの程度広範ですか? 地理的リーチ、継続性、企業リソース、トレンドスコア ▾ グローバルプレゼンス(対応国・地域)、安定性の指標としての事業年数、リソースの指標としてのチーム人数、直近12か月の購入者からの問い合わせ・レビュー・パートナー推奨・プレス活動に基づくトレンドスコアを測定します。 |
顧客評価とレビューは、HT Scoreアルゴリズムにおいて最も重要な要素です。HTRはランキング向上のための支払いを受け付けていません。すべてのレビューは認証済みです — 所属が確認されたホテル業界の実務者のみが評価を投稿できます。 HT Scoreの詳細な算出方法を見る →
製品推奨アドバイザー