The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
まとめ
25件の認証済みホテル経営者レビューを分析し、機能セット、料金、実際の導入事例を比較して、各プラットフォームの強みを明らかにしました。最適な選択は、施設の種類と優先事項によって異なります:
Planet 優れています 、GlobalPayments (Credit Card Processing) and Mail Order Telephone Order (MOTO) Paymentsなどの独自機能を備えています.
roommaster 優れています ease of use and customer supportにおいて 、3-D Secure Paymentsなどの独自機能を備えています.
HTRの25件の認証済みホテル経営者レビューに基づく並列評価。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推奨度 |
|
|
| 使いやすさ |
|
|
| カスタマーサポート |
|
|
| コストパフォーマンス |
|
|
| 開始価格 | Contact sales | From $300/mo |
| 認証済みレビュー | 2 | 23 |
各セグメントのホテル経営者による認証済みレビューに基づく、施設規模・タイプ・地域別の決済処理ソフトウェアベンダー内ランキング。
ホテル規模別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小規模(10〜24室) ▾ | — | #2 6件のレビュー |
| 中規模(25〜74室) ▾ | #5 2件のレビュー | #3 7件のレビュー |
| 大規模(75〜199室) | — | #4 1件のレビュー |
| 特大規模(200室以上) | — | #4 0件のレビュー |
施設タイプ別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| ブティック ▾ | #8 0件のレビュー | #4 7件のレビュー |
| ラグジュアリー | #4 1件のレビュー | #5 0件のレビュー |
| ブランド/チェーン | #9 0件のレビュー | #4 1件のレビュー |
| 長期滞在型 | #5 0件のレビュー | #4 0件のレビュー |
地域別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北米 ▾ | #8 0件のレビュー | #4 14件のレビュー |
| ヨーロッパ | #1 2件のレビュー | #5 0件のレビュー |
| 中東 | — | #3 0件のレビュー |
Choosing between Planet Payments by Planet and roommaster Payments by roommaster hinges on your hotel’s specific needs in payment processing. Both products aim to streamline transactions, but they diverge significantly in coverage, features, and user experience. Planet offers a broad, multi-currency, multi-method platform with extensive integrations, while roommaster focuses on tight PMS integration with automation and dispute management. Which aligns better with your operational goals?
Planet Payments and roommaster Payments both address the challenge of accepting diverse payments securely and efficiently. Planet emphasizes a wide array of payment options, global currency handling, and extensive partner integrations, making it suitable for hotels with international guests or complex payment needs. Conversely, roommaster concentrates on in-system automation, dispute management, and reducing manual staff effort, tailored for hotels seeking operational efficiency within their PMS. Do your hotel’s payment needs lean toward international flexibility or operational automation?
If your hotel needs extensive payment method options, currency conversion, and global acquirer partnerships, going with Planet Payments is the clear choice. Its rich feature set caters to hotels that prioritize revenue opportunities from diverse payment channels and international customers. If your hotel values tight PMS integration, automated reconciliation, and reducing staff workload—especially if you face frequent chargebacks—roommaster Payments is more suitable. For properties focused on operational streamlining, roommaster’s automation and dispute handling provide tangible benefits.
Planet’s ease of use is rated 3/5, with a complex setup that may require dedicated support, especially given its broad feature set and multiple integrations. User reviews highlight that initial onboarding can be challenging, with some noting limited support and documentation. On the other hand, roommaster Payments scores 4.4/5, with high praise for its intuitive interface, quick setup, and straightforward workflows, reinforced by recent, positive reviews. Staff at hotels report that roommaster’s system is more accessible and easier to adopt.
Edge: roommaster Payments.
Planet Payments offers 13 unique features, including multi-currency settlements, Apple Pay, Google Pay, DCC, WeChat Pay, AliPay, and multi-processor gateways—covering nearly every modern payment method. Roommaster, however, provides 5 features, focusing on refund management, gratuity, partial capture, chargeback management, and 3-D Secure Payments, emphasizing dispute resolution and security. While Planet’s features cater to international and omnichannel payments, roommaster’s are optimized for internal transaction automation and fraud reduction.
Edge: Planet Payments.
Reviews for Planet Payments show a mixed experience, with support rated 3/5 and some users citing difficulty reaching knowledgeable agents or delays. Customers appreciated the competence of individual support staff but noted inconsistent service quality. Conversely, roommaster scores 4.45/5, with recent reviews praising prompt, knowledgeable, and friendly customer support. Users frequently mention quick resolutions and helpful onboarding, making it a more reliable option for hotels that depend on responsive support.
Edge: roommaster Payments.
Planet boasts 194 verified partners, including major hotel and OTA platforms like GuestCentric, SHR Group, Cendyn, and TrustYou, providing broad compatibility. roommaster offers 56 verified integrations—over half of Planet’s—and includes key partners like Sage, Volo, and Otelier. While Planet’s extensive network supports a variety of third-party tools, roommaster’s integrations are more focused on hospitality-specific software, ensuring smoother workflows within its ecosystem.
Edge: Planet Payments.
Neither product scores high in overall ratings, with both rated 0/5, but roommaster has more recent reviews (20 in the last 6 months) indicating ongoing use and feedback. Hoteliers in boutique, resort, and city hotel segments tend to rate roommaster higher, especially for support and usability, while reviews for Planet are scarce and outdated, limiting confidence. The recent, consistent feedback for roommaster supports its stronger standing among current users.
Edge: roommaster Payments.
Planet’s pricing details are not publicly available, suggesting custom quotes based on integration complexity and volume. roommaster charges a flat base fee of $300 per month, with no additional implementation or setup costs mentioned. Given the lack of transparent pricing for Planet, your hotel should request a quote to compare actual costs directly, but roommaster’s predictable monthly fee offers clearer budgeting.
Not ideal if your hotel relies solely on domestic payments or has limited integration needs; the extensive features may be more than necessary.
Not ideal if your hotel needs multi-currency or diverse international payment options, as roommaster’s focus is more on internal processes and security.
The core difference lies in scope: Planet Payments provides a broad, flexible payment ecosystem suitable for hotels with international guests and complex payment channels, while roommaster Payments excels in automating internal payment workflows and dispute management within a PMS environment.
Choose Planet if you require a wide array of payment methods, global currency support, and partner integrations to maximize revenue opportunities. Opt for roommaster if your primary goal is operational automation, staff efficiency, and reducing chargebacks, especially if your hotel primarily serves domestic guests.
For properties with international guests and diverse payment needs, Planet offers more features and integrations. Conversely, for hotels seeking straightforward, reliable internal payment processing with excellent support, roommaster is the stronger candidate.
Pricing for Planet Payments remains undisclosed publicly, implying tailored quotes based on your existing infrastructure and volume. Its value lies in its extensive options, global reach, and flexible integrations, which may justify higher or customized costs.
roommaster charges a flat $300 monthly fee without mention of setup or transaction fees, providing clarity and predictability. Its value proposition centers on automation, dispute reduction, and seamless PMS integration, offering cost savings through efficiency improvements.
Ultimately, your decision should weigh the potential higher costs of Planet’s broad capabilities against roommaster’s predictable, operationally focused pricing.
Not ideal if your hotel operates primarily domestically with simple payment needs or if you prefer a straightforward, PMS-centric payment system without extensive third-party integrations.
Not ideal if your hotel needs multi-currency support, international payment options, or extensive third-party integrations outside the PMS environment.
Planet Payments stands out as the more feature-rich, globally oriented payment platform, boasting extensive integrations, multiple currencies, and diverse payment methods. However, it suffers from limited recent reviews and support concerns, which could impact reliability.
roommaster Payments, with its recent positive reviews, high support ratings, and strong PMS integration, provides a more dependable and user-friendly solution for hotels focused on operational automation and dispute management. Unless your hotel requires multi-currency and global payment options, roommaster offers clearer value and better support.
In conclusion, if your hotel’s priorities are international reach and a broad payment ecosystem, go with Planet. But if you want a system that integrates tightly with your operations, reduces manual effort, and has proven support, roommaster Payments is the safer bet.
決済処理ソフトウェア の料金はわかりにくいことが多いです。各ベンダーの公開料金データから判明している情報をまとめました。施設の規模に合わせたカスタム見積もりを必ずご依頼ください。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $300/mo |
HTRの製品データベースによると、Planet Paymentsとroommaster Paymentsは8個の機能を共有しています。以下は主な違い — 一方にあって他方にない機能です。
| 機能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 3Dセキュア決済 | ||
| ApplePayを受け入れます | ||
| GooglePayを受け入れる | ||
| WeChatPayを受け入れます | ||
| ダイナミックカレンシーコンバージョン(DCC) | ||
| チップ機能 | ||
| チャージバック管理 | ||
| ディスカバリーを受け入れる | ||
| パーシャルキャプチャ | ||
| 複数通貨の決済 | ||
| 返金管理 |
主な違いを表示しています。これらの製品間にはさらに6個の異なる機能があります。
高評価の分野
独自の機能
高評価の分野
独自の機能
評価が最も分かれる分野
お客様の要件次第です。Planet Paymentsとroommaster Paymentsは多くの主要なPayments Processing Software機能を共有していますが、それぞれに独自の機能があります。Planet Paymentsは194件の認証済み連携パートナーを持ち、roommaster Paymentsは56件を持っています。切り替え前に、上記の機能比較で違いをご確認ください。
小規模ホテルは使いやすさと迅速なオンボーディングを優先すべきです。roommaster Paymentsは使いやすさで4.2/5対3.0/5とリードしています。透明性のある料金設定とトライアルまたはデモのオプションを探しましょう。各製品ページで施設規模別にレビューをフィルタリングして、同様のホテルからの声を確認してください。
Planet Payments:いいえ。roommaster Payments:いいえ。 どちらの製品も現在無料ティアを提供していません。ほとんどのPayments Processing Softwareベンダーはデモまたはトライアルを提供しています — コミットする前に各社にご依頼ください。
HT Scoreは、ホテル経営者がホテルテクノロジー製品を客観的に比較できるよう、4個の基準グループと十数の変数を考慮した総合ランキングです。PlanetのHT Scoreは0、roommasterは0です。以下がスコアの算出方法です。
| 基準グループ | ウェイト | 測定内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 顧客評価とレビュー |
|
ユーザーはこの製品をどの程度推奨していますか? 評価スコア、レビュー数、シェアオブボイス、レビューの深さ、レビューの新しさ、成功事例 ▾ 最も重みの大きい要素です。平均満足度評価(推奨度、使いやすさ、サポート、ROI)、カテゴリー内の競合に対するレビュー総数、レビューの新しさ(直近6か月間に20件以上のレビュー)、固有のホテルクライアント全体のシェアオブボイスを分析して選択バイアスを検出します。 |
| パートナーエコシステム |
|
テクノロジーパートナーはこの企業をどの程度推奨していますか? パートナー推奨、連携数、連携品質 ▾ パートナー推奨を専門家の信頼票として評価し、認証済み連携の数、エコシステムの品質 — 連携パートナーの平均HT Scoreを評価します。より高品質な連携エコシステムを持つ製品は、接続されたテックスタックを提供する可能性が高くなります。 |
| 顧客中心主義 |
|
この組織はどの程度顧客中心ですか? 認定サポート、レビューの一貫性、プロフィールの完全性 ▾ 企業がHTRカスタマーサポート認定を取得しているか、長期にわたり一貫したレビュー収集を維持しているか(フィードバック主導の文化の指標)、機能、スクリーンショット、料金、特徴を含む完全な製品プロフィールを維持しているかを評価します。 |
| リーチ、継続性、リソース |
|
この企業のリーチとリソースはどの程度広範ですか? 地理的リーチ、継続性、企業リソース、トレンドスコア ▾ グローバルプレゼンス(対応国・地域)、安定性の指標としての事業年数、リソースの指標としてのチーム人数、直近12か月の購入者からの問い合わせ・レビュー・パートナー推奨・プレス活動に基づくトレンドスコアを測定します。 |
顧客評価とレビューは、HT Scoreアルゴリズムにおいて最も重要な要素です。HTRはランキング向上のための支払いを受け付けていません。すべてのレビューは認証済みです — 所属が確認されたホテル業界の実務者のみが評価を投稿できます。 HT Scoreの詳細な算出方法を見る →
製品推奨アドバイザー