The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Samenvatting
We hebben 549 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen geanalyseerd, functiesets, prijzen en praktijkcasestudies vergeleken om te bepalen waar elk platform uitblinkt. De juiste keuze hangt af van uw type accommodatie en prioriteiten:
CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) blinkt uit .
HOTELTIME blinkt uit in ease of use and customer support — vooral voor brand accommodaties (4.9/5) , met exclusieve functies zoals Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Zij-aan-zij beoordelingen op basis van 549 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen op HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen |
|
|
| Gebruiksgemak |
|
|
| Klantenondersteuning |
|
|
| Prijs-kwaliteitverhouding |
|
|
| Vanafprijs | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Geverifieerde beoordelingen | 0 | 549 |
Na analyse van 549 geverifieerde beoordelingen waarderen CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix)-gebruikers vooral de , terwijl HOTELTIME-gebruikers de user interface and learning curve, technische ondersteuning, reporting and analytics benadrukken. Klik op een thema om te zien wat beoordelaars zeggen.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Voordelen | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Technische ondersteuning
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Nadelen | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobiele optimalisatie
▾
|
|
Hoe elk product scoort onder Vastgoedbeheersystemen-leveranciers voor verschillende accommodatiegroottes, -typen en regio's — op basis van geverifieerde beoordelingen van hoteliers in elk segment.
Op hotelgrootte
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Klein (10-24 kamers) ▾ | — | #5 219 beoordelingen |
| Middelgroot (25-74 kamers) ▾ | — | #3 238 beoordelingen |
| Groot (75-199 kamers) ▾ | — | #2 46 beoordelingen |
| Extra groot (200+ kamers) ▾ | — | #8 7 beoordelingen |
Op accommodatietype
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #5 239 beoordelingen |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #3 241 beoordelingen |
| Merk / Keten ▾ | — | #4 143 beoordelingen |
| Langverblijf ▾ | — | #4 49 beoordelingen |
Op regio
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Noord-Amerika | — | #52 4 beoordelingen |
| Europa ▾ | — | #2 384 beoordelingen |
| Azië-Pacific ▾ | — | #5 111 beoordelingen |
| Midden-Oosten ▾ | — | #1 21 beoordelingen |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) is a critical step in streamlining hotel operations and improving guest experiences. You’re evaluating CMS Hospitality’s GuestCentrix and HotelTime PMS, both designed to automate and organize hotel workflows, but they diverge significantly in features, customer feedback, and regional presence. While GuestCentrix offers a legacy solution with enterprise-level capabilities, HotelTime is a modern, cloud-based platform with a rapidly growing user base and recent positive reviews.
Can your hotel afford to overlook the latest user feedback? Are you prepared to invest in a system that’s proven in diverse markets and with a broad feature set?
GuestCentrix by CMS Hospitality has been on the market for over 30 years, emphasizing stable, enterprise-grade solutions for multi-property operators, ski resorts, and national chains. It boasts a broad suite of features, including trust accounting, central reservations, and conference management, aimed at larger hotels or groups seeking comprehensive control.
In contrast, HotelTime offers a cloud-based, all-in-one platform with over 650 properties in more than 20 countries, focusing on ease of use and rapid deployment. Its extensive feature list includes POS, guest CRM, revenue management, and integrated channel management, making it suitable for a variety of property types, from resorts to boutique hotels.
GuestCentrix’s review count is zero, and its rating is unavailable, indicating limited recent feedback or active users. HotelTime, with 433 reviews and a 4.83/5 rating—including a 93% likelihood to recommend—demonstrates clear customer satisfaction. Given the latest reviews, HotelTime’s user confidence is stronger and more current.
Are you comfortable choosing a system with no recent reviews? Or do recent, verified user experiences influence your decision more?
If your hotel needs a cloud-based platform that offers extensive automation, real-time reporting, and strong user support, HotelTime is the clear choice. It’s ideal for properties that prioritize ease of use, rapid onboarding, and modular features—especially with positive reviews highlighting its intuitive interface and responsive support.
However, if your hotel operates multiple properties, requires advanced enterprise features like trust accounting, conference management, or complex integrations, GuestCentrix’s longer industry presence and proprietary nature might appeal. But be aware—its lack of recent reviews suggests limited current support or user engagement.
Given the review data, HotelTime’s recent positive feedback and extensive feature set make it the more reliable choice for most hoteliers today. GuestCentrix’s reputation appears outdated or under-supported in the current market.
HotelTime’s interface scores a 4.66/5 for ease of use, supported by reviews praising its intuitive design and straightforward navigation. Users appreciate the smooth onboarding process, with an average rating of 4.63/5, and highlight how staff adapt quickly to its features.
GuestCentrix’s rating is 0/5, with no recent reviews or feedback, making it impossible to assess its current user-friendliness. Historically, enterprise systems like GuestCentrix tend to have steeper learning curves and longer onboarding times, which could hinder staff adoption today.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime offers 51 unique features, including EPoS, integrated CRS, guest CRM, online booking engine, automated night audit, mobile app, and comprehensive revenue management tools. Its extensive integration options support third-party systems like Sage, Profitroom, and STR, giving you flexibility.
GuestCentrix provides no specific feature count but offers core PMS functions like reservations and trust accounting, targeted at larger operations. Its lack of recent feature innovation, combined with no recent customer reviews, suggests it may not keep pace with evolving hotel technology needs.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s support ratings are high, with an average of 4.73/5, and reviews mentioning quick, responsive assistance. Customers say support “went above and beyond,” especially during onboarding and system troubleshooting, contributing to a 9.26/5 NPS score.
GuestCentrix’s support rating is unreported, and with no recent reviews, there’s little current data on support quality. Historically, CMS Hospitality emphasizes support but may not match HotelTime’s recent customer feedback levels.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime boasts 58 verified integrations, including popular partners like STAAH, SiteMinder, and Cendyn, with seven shared integrations with GuestCentrix. Its open API architecture allows seamless connection to revenue management, POS, and CRM systems.
GuestCentrix has just 12 verified partners, with integrations limited mainly to traditional enterprise systems like Sage and Infor. Its smaller partner network could restrict flexibility for hotels seeking comprehensive third-party connectivity.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s reviews indicate a 4.83/5 rating, with recent feedback emphasizing ease of use, support responsiveness, and operational improvements. Properties across various segments, especially resorts and city hotels, report high satisfaction levels.
GuestCentrix has no recent reviews, leaving potential users without recent data on hotel satisfaction. Its historical reputation was stable, but current performance remains unverified.
Edge: HotelTime.
GuestCentrix does not publicly list pricing; it typically offers bespoke quotes based on property size and needs. This makes direct comparison difficult, but it suggests a premium enterprise-level pricing model.
HotelTime charges $600 per month, with no free tier or trial, indicating an accessible price point for many hotels seeking a feature-rich PMS without large upfront investments.
In terms of transparency and value, HotelTime’s straightforward pricing allows easier budgeting and decision-making.
Edge: HotelTime.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The essential difference is that HotelTime is a modern, cloud-based PMS with a rapidly growing user base and high recent ratings, while GuestCentrix offers an older, enterprise-focused platform with no recent reviews.
If your hotel values ease of use, recent positive feedback, and extensive integrations, HotelTime should be your top choice. It’s especially suited for properties seeking a scalable solution with proven customer satisfaction.
GuestCentrix might be suitable for very large, multi-property operations with complex enterprise requirements, but its lack of current reviews and recent activity suggests it may not keep pace with evolving hotel tech landscapes.
For most hotels today, HotelTime offers a more reliable, user-friendly, and well-supported option.
Prijzen voor Vastgoedbeheersystemen zijn zelden eenvoudig. Dit is wat we weten op basis van de openbare prijsgegevens van elke leverancier. Vraag altijd een offerte op maat aan voor uw accommodatie.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
Volgens de productdatabase van HTR delen CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) en HotelTime PMS 0 functies. Dit zijn de belangrijkste verschillen — functies die de een wel heeft en de ander niet.
| Functie |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Aanvullende inkomsten bijhouden | ||
| Epos | ||
| Gast-CRM | ||
| Geïntegreerd CRS | ||
| Kalenderweergave | ||
| Verwerking van betalingen |
De belangrijkste verschillen worden getoond. 39 meer functies verschillen tussen deze producten.
We hebben 8 geverifieerde casestudies geanalyseerd om te vergelijken wat hotels daadwerkelijk bereiken met elk platform op vier belangrijke bedrijfsdoelstellingen.
Nog geen gepubliceerde casestudy voor dit doel.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Nog geen gepubliceerde casestudy voor dit doel.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Wat hoteliers waarderen
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Hoewel de snelle reacties en behulpzaamheid van het supportteam gewaardeerd worden, suggereren sommige recensies dat ruimere openingstijden voor techn... Hoewel de snelle reacties en behulpzaamheid van het supportteam gewaardeerd worden, suggereren sommige recensies dat ruimere openingstijden voor technische ondersteuning de gebruikerservaring verder zouden verbeteren, zodat er altijd hulp beschikbaar is, met name voor internationale gebruikers.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Waar hoteliers kritiek op hebben
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Unieke mogelijkheden
Waar de beoordelingen het meest uiteenlopen
Dat hangt af van uw eisen. CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) en HotelTime PMS delen veel kern-Property Management Systems-functies, maar elk heeft unieke mogelijkheden. CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) biedt 12 geverifieerde integratiepartners, terwijl HotelTime PMS er 58 biedt. Bekijk de functievergelijking hierboven om te zien waar ze verschillen voordat u overstapt.
Kleine hotels moeten prioriteit geven aan gebruiksgemak en snelle onboarding. HotelTime PMS scoort het hoogst op gebruiksgemak met 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Let op transparante prijzen en de mogelijkheid van een proefperiode of demo. Filter beoordelingen op elke productpagina op accommodatiegrootte om te horen van hotels zoals het uwe.
CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix): Nee. HotelTime PMS: Nee. Geen van beide producten biedt momenteel een gratis abonnement aan. De meeste Property Management Systems-leveranciers bieden demo's of proefperiodes aan — vraag er bij beide een aan om te evalueren voordat u zich vastlegt.
De HT Score is een samengestelde ranglijst die 4 criteriagroepen en meer dan tien variabelen meeweegt om hoteliers te helpen hoteltechnologieproducten objectief te vergelijken. CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) heeft een HT Score van 0 en HOTELTIME heeft 92. Zo wordt de score berekend.
| Criteriagroep | Weging | Wat het meet |
|---|---|---|
| Klantbeoordelingen & reviews |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen gebruikers dit product? Beoordelingsscore, reviewvolume, marktaandeel, reviewdiepte, reviewrecentheid, succesverhalen ▾ De zwaarst gewogen factor. Analyseert gemiddelde tevredenheidsbeoordelingen (waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen, gebruiksgemak, ondersteuning, ROI), het totale aantal reviews ten opzichte van categoriegenoten, recentheid van reviews (minimaal 20 reviews in de afgelopen 6 maanden) en marktaandeel over unieke hotelklanten om selectiebias te detecteren. |
| Partnerecosysteem |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen technologiepartners dit bedrijf? Partneraanbevelingen, integratieaantal, integratiekwaliteit ▾ Evalueert partneraanbevelingen als expertstemmen van vertrouwen, het aantal geverifieerde integraties en ecosysteemkwaliteit — de gemiddelde HT Scores van integratiepartners. Producten met een kwalitatief beter integratie-ecosysteem leveren waarschijnlijker een verbonden technologiearchitectuur. |
| Klantgerichtheid |
|
Hoe klantgericht is deze organisatie? Gecertificeerde ondersteuning, reviewconsistentie, profielvolledigheid ▾ Beoordeelt of het bedrijf HTR Customer Support-certificering heeft verdiend, consistente reviewverzameling in de loop der tijd onderhoudt (een indicator van feedbackgedreven cultuur) en productprofielen compleet houdt met mogelijkheden, schermafbeeldingen, prijzen en functies. |
| Bereik, stabiliteit & middelen |
|
Hoe uitgebreid is het bereik en de middelen van dit bedrijf? Geografisch bereik, stabiliteit, bedrijfsmiddelen, trendscore ▾ Meet wereldwijde aanwezigheid (bediende landen en regio's), aantal jaren in bedrijf als stabiliteitsindicator, teamgrootte als middelenproxy en een trendscore op basis van kopersaanvragen, reviews, partneraanbevelingen en persactiviteit in de afgelopen twaalf maanden. |
Klantbeoordelingen en reviews zijn veruit de belangrijkste factor in het HT Score-algoritme. HTR accepteert geen betaling voor hogere ranglijstposities. Alle reviews zijn geverifieerd — alleen professionals uit de hotelbranche met bevestigde affiliaties kunnen beoordelingen indienen. Bekijk de volledige HT Score-methodologie →
Adviseur productaanbevelingen