The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Samenvatting
We hebben 57 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen geanalyseerd, functiesets, prijzen en praktijkcasestudies vergeleken om te bepalen waar elk platform uitblinkt. De juiste keuze hangt af van uw type accommodatie en prioriteiten:
Counter blinkt uit in ease of use and customer support , met exclusieve functies zoals Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Hogatex blinkt uit .
Zij-aan-zij beoordelingen op basis van 57 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen op HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen |
|
|
| Gebruiksgemak |
|
|
| Klantenondersteuning |
|
|
| Prijs-kwaliteitverhouding |
|
|
| Vanafprijs | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Geverifieerde beoordelingen | 57 | 0 |
Na analyse van 57 geverifieerde beoordelingen waarderen Counter-gebruikers vooral de gebruikersinterface en bruikbaarheid, klantenservice, geautomatiseerde functies, terwijl Hogatex-gebruikers de benadrukken. Klik op een thema om te zien wat beoordelaars zeggen.
|
|
Hogatex |
|---|---|
| Voordelen | |
|
+
Gebruikersinterface en bruikbaarheid
▾
|
|
|
+
Klantenservice
▾
|
|
|
+
Geautomatiseerde functies
▾
|
|
|
+
Platformintegratie
▾
|
|
| Nadelen | |
|
−
Bug-problemen
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapportage en opbrengstbeheer
▾
|
|
|
−
Prijzen
▾
|
|
Hoe elk product scoort onder Vastgoedbeheersystemen-leveranciers voor verschillende accommodatiegroottes, -typen en regio's — op basis van geverifieerde beoordelingen van hoteliers in elk segment.
Op hotelgrootte
| Segment |
|
Hogatex |
|---|---|---|
| Klein (10-24 kamers) ▾ | #26 28 beoordelingen | — |
| Middelgroot (25-74 kamers) | #46 4 beoordelingen | — |
| Groot (75-199 kamers) | #32 2 beoordelingen | — |
| Extra groot (200+ kamers) | #31 1 beoordelingen | — |
Op accommodatietype
| Segment |
|
Hogatex |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #31 16 beoordelingen | — |
| Luxe | #44 4 beoordelingen | — |
| Merk / Keten | #43 4 beoordelingen | — |
| Langverblijf ▾ | #32 5 beoordelingen | — |
Op regio
| Segment |
|
Hogatex |
|---|---|---|
| Noord-Amerika ▾ | #25 8 beoordelingen | — |
| Europa ▾ | #20 25 beoordelingen | — |
| Azië-Pacific | #16 4 beoordelingen | — |
| Midden-Oosten | #11 2 beoordelingen | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Hogatex PMS hinges on your hotel's specific needs, size, and operational priorities. Both aim to streamline property management, but Counter’s focus on hostels and its more extensive feature set make it the more complete solution. Hogatex, with no current reviews or ratings, offers a broader but less proven platform. Which system will truly elevate your hotel’s operations?
Counter’s comprehensive, user-rated platform offers a proven track record, whereas Hogatex remains untested in recent deployments. Are you prioritizing reliability and community feedback or exploring new options?
Counter excels in supporting hostel operations with an intuitive interface, automation features, and extensive integrations, making it ideal for budget accommodations and hostels. Hogatex claims to be a full-scale PMS but has no recent reviews or user feedback to verify its effectiveness.
Counter’s 54 reviews over the past six months, with an overall rating of 4.73/5, reflect strong user confidence, especially in ease of use and support. Hogatex’s absence of recent reviews suggests it’s either less adopted or less active in customer engagement, raising questions about ongoing support and reliability.
Counter’s interface is rated 4.6/5 and customer support 4.96/5, praised for responsiveness and helpfulness. Hogatex’s lack of publicly available ratings means you have no recent data on user satisfaction, support quality, or ease of onboarding.
Counter features 19 distinct functionalities, including channel management, payment processing, booking engine, and automated night audits. Hogatex’s feature set remains undefined, with no publicly listed capabilities, making Counter’s offering the more transparent and proven choice.
Support-wise, Counter’s support team is highly rated, with users highlighting quick, helpful assistance from staff like Evelyn and Max. Hogatex’s support details and customer feedback are unavailable, indicating uncertainty in service quality.
Counter’s integrations include seven verified partners like SiteMinder, Stripe, and Cloudbeds—covering key channels and payment solutions. Hogatex has no verified integrations, limiting its connectivity options for now.
Hoteliers rate Counter highly across segments, especially in hostels, with a 91% likelihood to recommend. Hogatex’s lack of reviews prevents any assessment of user satisfaction, making Counter the safer bet for assured positive feedback.
Pricing details for Counter are unavailable, but its no-cost model for core features, plus optional paid integrations, suggests flexibility. Hogatex’s pricing remains undisclosed, which complicates direct cost comparisons.
Counter is ideal for hostels, boutique hotels, city-center properties, and independent inns—particularly those needing a straightforward, feature-rich system that supports mobile management. Not recommended if your property requires extensive automation or a broader property type beyond hostels.
Hogatex might appeal if your hotel is larger or needs a full PMS, but the absence of reviews makes this uncertain. It’s not ideal if you prioritize proven customer support, recent user feedback, or robust integrations.
Counter vs Hogatex: The Bottom Line for Hotels
Counter’s large, recent review base and high ratings confirm its reliability and effectiveness in hostel management and small hotel operations. Hogatex, with no recent reviews or community feedback, remains an untested option in today’s market.
If your hotel needs a proven, easy-to-use PMS with built-in automation, integrations, and strong support, go with Counter. Its extensive features and positive user feedback make it a dependable choice for properties seeking operational efficiency.
Choose Hogatex if you are exploring new vendors and are willing to accept the risk of limited real-world validation. Its lack of recent reviews and unknown support quality make it a less certain investment.
In conclusion, Counter clearly stands out as the more dependable, reviewed, and feature-rich choice, especially for hostels and small hotels. Hogatex’s potential is unverified, and without recent customer insights, it’s harder to recommend confidently.
Counter by Counter offers a feature-rich, user-rated platform with recent positive reviews, making it ideal for hostels and small hotels looking for proven operational tools. Hogatex PMS, with no recent feedback or ratings, remains an untested option that lacks demonstrated support and integrations.
Counter’s strong community feedback, multiple integrations, and ease of use make it the top choice. Hogatex’s lack of recent customer reviews and unknown capabilities place it at a disadvantage for hoteliers seeking reliable, current solutions.
Counter’s intuitive interface simplifies daily tasks like check-ins, reservations, and reporting, helping your team manage operations efficiently with minimal training. Its automation features—like automatic night audits and integrated POS—reduce manual work, freeing staff to focus on guest interactions.
Hogatex claims to streamline reservations, front desk, housekeeping, and billing but provides no recent user feedback to confirm these efficiencies. Without current reviews, it’s unclear if Hogatex reduces workload or improves guest satisfaction like Counter does.
Counter’s mobile-friendly design ensures your team can manage the property from anywhere, offering flexibility that’s especially valuable for small or busy hotels. Hogatex’s platform lacks publicly available usability data, making it uncertain whether it can deliver similar operational gains.
Support at Counter is highly rated, with quick responses and proactive problem-solving. Hogatex provides no recent support reviews, so your team might face challenges in onboarding and troubleshooting.
Counter’s integrations with key partners like SiteMinder and Stripe facilitate daily operations by consolidating bookings and payments. Hogatex’s integrations are nonexistent in available data, limiting its immediate usefulness for integrated workflows.
Overall, if your staff values ease of use, automation, and reliable support, Counter will likely improve your daily operations. Hogatex’s untested platform leaves its impact on daily management uncertain.
Counter’s support team scores 4.96/5, with reviewers praising their quick, friendly assistance. Testimonials highlight staff like Evelyn and Max as go-to contacts who resolve issues promptly, boosting team confidence.
Hogatex offers no recent review data on support quality. Without current feedback, it’s difficult to gauge whether their support team is responsive or provides effective onboarding, making Counter the more dependable choice.
Counter’s onboarding experience is rated 4.7/5, and its user interface is praised for being clean and intuitive. Hogatex’s onboarding process and usability remain unverified due to lack of recent reviews.
Support features like 24/7 online assistance and dedicated account help set Counter apart. Without recent Hogatex customer feedback, its support quality remains unknown, posing a potential risk for new users.
In terms of staff adoption, Counter’s straightforward interface and positive onboarding ratings lead to faster staff training and higher user satisfaction. Hogatex’s unreviewed support and usability leave its ease of adoption in question.
Edge: Counter
Counter boasts 19 unique features, including a built-in channel manager, payment processing, booking engine, automated night audit, guest CRM, and multi-currency support. These features are well-documented, with many praised for their practicality and ease of use.
Hogatex’s feature set remains undisclosed, and no recent reviews or detailed descriptions are available. Without verified features, it’s impossible to compare comprehensively, but Counter’s transparent feature list makes it a safer, more predictable choice.
Counter’s integrated POS and revenue tracking modules support a broader range of operational needs. Hogatex, lacking public feature details, does not currently demonstrate the same level of functional depth.
Edge: Counter
Counter’s customer support is rated 4.96/5, with users consistently praising its responsiveness and helpfulness. Positive reviews cite quick solutions to issues and proactive communication, especially during onboarding.
Hogatex offers no recent reviews or ratings, leaving its support quality and responsiveness unverified. Without community feedback, your hotel risks uncertain assistance, which can be critical during system issues or training.
Counter’s support team is known for addressing bugs swiftly and providing ongoing assistance, which contributes to high user satisfaction. Hogatex’s lack of recent support reviews and data makes it impossible to assess whether it can meet your hotel’s service needs.
Support quality is crucial for smooth daily operations; with Counter’s proven record, your team will likely experience fewer disruptions. Hogatex’s support remains an unknown factor, making it a less reliable choice.
Edge: Counter
Counter integrates with seven verified partners, including prominent platforms like SiteMinder, Stripe, Cloudbeds, and Goki. These integrations allow for streamlined bookings, payments, and access control, making daily operations smoother.
Hogatex currently has no verified integrations publicly listed. This limits its connectivity to essential third-party tools, potentially requiring manual processes that counteract efficiency.
Counter’s open partner ecosystem helps expand your hotel’s market reach and operational flexibility. Hogatex’s limited connectivity reduces its appeal for properties relying on multiple channels or payment providers.
Edge: Counter
Counter’s user base, primarily hostels and small hotels, rates it at 4.73/5 based on 54 recent reviews, with a 91% likelihood to recommend. Hotels praise its ease of use, support, and automation features.
Hogatex lacks recent reviews and ratings, making it impossible to assess user satisfaction. Its absence from community feedback implies it’s less proven or less adopted in today’s hotel market.
Counter’s recent feedback confirms its strengths in usability, support, and feature set, especially for budget and hostel accommodations. Hogatex’s unverified reputation means it cannot be confidently recommended based on current user experiences.
Edge: Counter
Counter’s pricing details are not publicly disclosed, but its free core features and optional paid services suggest a flexible, scalable approach for small to medium-sized properties.
Hogatex does not list any pricing information, leaving hoteliers to guess about costs or negotiate directly. The absence of transparent pricing may complicate budgeting decisions.
Counter’s lack of upfront costs and modular pricing make it suitable for properties seeking predictable investments. Hogatex’s undisclosed fees mean you should be cautious about potential hidden costs or lack of affordability.
Counter is best for properties that prioritize ease of use, rapid onboarding, and automation without complex customization needs. It’s not suited for larger, enterprise-level hotels seeking highly tailored systems.
Hogatex might fit larger-scale operations, but the current lack of community feedback makes it a risky choice for hoteliers requiring proven support and functionality.
Counter’s extensive recent reviews, high ratings, and proven track record make it the more reliable choice for small hotels and hostels. Its broad feature set, integrations, and support infrastructure directly address the needs of properties seeking operational efficiency and guest satisfaction.
Hogatex, without recent reviews or community feedback, remains an unverified contender. Its unknown support quality and features make it a risky option, especially when reliable service and proven results are critical.
If you need a trustworthy, well-supported platform with proven results, Counter is the clear winner. Hogatex might appeal if your hotel is larger, but it’s advisable to wait for more validation before choosing it.
Counter’s community-backed success and recent positive reviews give you confidence that it will meet your property’s operational needs. Its strong ecosystem of integrations and support makes it the safer, more strategic investment for your team.
Hogatex remains an unconfirmed candidate, with no recent user feedback to validate its claims. For now, Counter’s proven track record and high satisfaction scores make it the preferred option for hoteliers looking to enhance operational efficiency and guest experiences.
This comprehensive comparison should guide your decision toward a system that’s not only feature-rich but also trusted by your peers. Prioritize proven support, community reviews, and real-world functionality — Counter currently leads in all these areas.
Volgens de productdatabase van HTR delen Counter en Hogatex PMS 0 functies. Dit zijn de belangrijkste verschillen — functies die de een wel heeft en de ander niet.
| Functie |
|
Hogatex |
|---|---|---|
| Aangepaste tarieven | ||
| Boekingsmodule | ||
| Kalenderweergave | ||
| Kanaal manager | ||
| RevPaR- en ADR-rapporten | ||
| Verwerking van betalingen |
De belangrijkste verschillen worden getoond. 7 meer functies verschillen tussen deze producten.
Wat hoteliers waarderen
Hoteliers vinden de interface van Counter overzichtelijk, intuïtief en gebruiksvriendelijk, waardoor het eenvoudig is om nieuwe medewerkers snel op te... Hoteliers vinden de interface van Counter overzichtelijk, intuïtief en gebruiksvriendelijk, waardoor het eenvoudig is om nieuwe medewerkers snel op te leiden. De mobiele en desktopinterfaces werken goed, waardoor managers taken op afstand kunnen afhandelen. Het staat vooral bekend om zijn eenvoud in agenda- en agendabeheer.
Het supportteam bij Counter wordt vaak geprezen om zijn responsiviteit en behulpzaamheid. Medewerkers als Evelyn en Max worden specifiek genoemd voor... Het supportteam bij Counter wordt vaak geprezen om zijn responsiviteit en behulpzaamheid. Medewerkers als Evelyn en Max worden specifiek genoemd voor hun professionaliteit. Er zijn echter zorgen over tragere support in bepaalde tijdzones.
Gebruikers waarderen de geautomatiseerde functies van Counter, waaronder taken als contactloos inchecken, automatisering van creditcardkosten en het b... Gebruikers waarderen de geautomatiseerde functies van Counter, waaronder taken als contactloos inchecken, automatisering van creditcardkosten en het beheren van boekingen op verschillende platforms. Deze automatisering vermindert de werklast van het personeel en verbetert de operationele efficiëntie.
Waar hoteliers kritiek op hebben
Verschillende hoteliers melden hardnekkige bugs in het systeem, met name problemen met overboekingen, weergave van de beschikbaarheid van bedden en sy... Verschillende hoteliers melden hardnekkige bugs in het systeem, met name problemen met overboekingen, weergave van de beschikbaarheid van bedden en systeemfouten tijdens annuleringen van boekingen. Deze bugs hebben een negatieve impact op de dagelijkse activiteiten en de gastervaring.
Hoteliers waarderen de rapportagemogelijkheden van Counter, maar merken op dat de rapporten verbeterd kunnen worden voor betere inzichten. Revenue man... Hoteliers waarderen de rapportagemogelijkheden van Counter, maar merken op dat de rapporten verbeterd kunnen worden voor betere inzichten. Revenue management-functies worden gezien als gebrekkig, met name voor bedrijven die werken met meerdere tariefplannen of dynamische prijsstelling gebruiken.
Unieke mogelijkheden
Waar de beoordelingen het meest uiteenlopen
Dat hangt af van uw eisen. Counter en Hogatex PMS delen veel kern-Property Management Systems-functies, maar elk heeft unieke mogelijkheden. Counter biedt 7 geverifieerde integratiepartners, terwijl Hogatex PMS er 0 biedt. Bekijk de functievergelijking hierboven om te zien waar ze verschillen voordat u overstapt.
Kleine hotels moeten prioriteit geven aan gebruiksgemak en snelle onboarding. Counter scoort het hoogst op gebruiksgemak met 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Let op transparante prijzen en de mogelijkheid van een proefperiode of demo. Filter beoordelingen op elke productpagina op accommodatiegrootte om te horen van hotels zoals het uwe.
Counter: Nee. Hogatex PMS: Nee. Geen van beide producten biedt momenteel een gratis abonnement aan. De meeste Property Management Systems-leveranciers bieden demo's of proefperiodes aan — vraag er bij beide een aan om te evalueren voordat u zich vastlegt.
De HT Score is een samengestelde ranglijst die 4 criteriagroepen en meer dan tien variabelen meeweegt om hoteliers te helpen hoteltechnologieproducten objectief te vergelijken. Counter heeft een HT Score van 17 en Hogatex heeft 0. Zo wordt de score berekend.
| Criteriagroep | Weging | Wat het meet |
|---|---|---|
| Klantbeoordelingen & reviews |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen gebruikers dit product? Beoordelingsscore, reviewvolume, marktaandeel, reviewdiepte, reviewrecentheid, succesverhalen ▾ De zwaarst gewogen factor. Analyseert gemiddelde tevredenheidsbeoordelingen (waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen, gebruiksgemak, ondersteuning, ROI), het totale aantal reviews ten opzichte van categoriegenoten, recentheid van reviews (minimaal 20 reviews in de afgelopen 6 maanden) en marktaandeel over unieke hotelklanten om selectiebias te detecteren. |
| Partnerecosysteem |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen technologiepartners dit bedrijf? Partneraanbevelingen, integratieaantal, integratiekwaliteit ▾ Evalueert partneraanbevelingen als expertstemmen van vertrouwen, het aantal geverifieerde integraties en ecosysteemkwaliteit — de gemiddelde HT Scores van integratiepartners. Producten met een kwalitatief beter integratie-ecosysteem leveren waarschijnlijker een verbonden technologiearchitectuur. |
| Klantgerichtheid |
|
Hoe klantgericht is deze organisatie? Gecertificeerde ondersteuning, reviewconsistentie, profielvolledigheid ▾ Beoordeelt of het bedrijf HTR Customer Support-certificering heeft verdiend, consistente reviewverzameling in de loop der tijd onderhoudt (een indicator van feedbackgedreven cultuur) en productprofielen compleet houdt met mogelijkheden, schermafbeeldingen, prijzen en functies. |
| Bereik, stabiliteit & middelen |
|
Hoe uitgebreid is het bereik en de middelen van dit bedrijf? Geografisch bereik, stabiliteit, bedrijfsmiddelen, trendscore ▾ Meet wereldwijde aanwezigheid (bediende landen en regio's), aantal jaren in bedrijf als stabiliteitsindicator, teamgrootte als middelenproxy en een trendscore op basis van kopersaanvragen, reviews, partneraanbevelingen en persactiviteit in de afgelopen twaalf maanden. |
Klantbeoordelingen en reviews zijn veruit de belangrijkste factor in het HT Score-algoritme. HTR accepteert geen betaling voor hogere ranglijstposities. Alle reviews zijn geverifieerd — alleen professionals uit de hotelbranche met bevestigde affiliaties kunnen beoordelingen indienen. Bekijk de volledige HT Score-methodologie →
Adviseur productaanbevelingen