The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Samenvatting
We hebben 23 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen geanalyseerd, functiesets, prijzen en praktijkcasestudies vergeleken om te bepalen waar elk platform uitblinkt. De juiste keuze hangt af van uw type accommodatie en prioriteiten:
Elavon blinkt uit .
roommaster blinkt uit in ease of use and customer support , met exclusieve functies zoals Contactless Payments and Payment Tokenization.
Zij-aan-zij beoordelingen op basis van 23 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen op HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen |
|
|
| Gebruiksgemak |
|
|
| Klantenondersteuning |
|
|
| Prijs-kwaliteitverhouding |
|
|
| Vanafprijs | Contact sales | From $300/mo |
| Geverifieerde beoordelingen | 0 | 23 |
Hoe elk product scoort onder Software voor betalingsverwerking-leveranciers voor verschillende accommodatiegroottes, -typen en regio's — op basis van geverifieerde beoordelingen van hoteliers in elk segment.
Op hotelgrootte
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Klein (10-24 kamers) ▾ | — | #2 6 beoordelingen |
| Middelgroot (25-74 kamers) ▾ | — | #3 7 beoordelingen |
| Groot (75-199 kamers) | — | #4 1 beoordelingen |
| Extra groot (200+ kamers) | — | #4 0 beoordelingen |
Op accommodatietype
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #4 7 beoordelingen |
| Luxe | — | #5 0 beoordelingen |
| Merk / Keten | — | #4 1 beoordelingen |
| Langverblijf | — | #4 0 beoordelingen |
Op regio
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Noord-Amerika ▾ | — | #4 14 beoordelingen |
| Europa | — | #5 0 beoordelingen |
| Midden-Oosten | — | #3 0 beoordelingen |
Choosing between Elavon by Elavon and roommaster Payments by roommaster hinges on your hotel’s specific needs for payment processing. Both aim to streamline transactions, but their approaches, features, and support levels differ sharply. Elavon, despite a lack of recent reviews, is a global leader with extensive industry experience, while roommaster Payments boasts a strong recent review presence and high support ratings. Your decision should consider what matters most—comprehensive features, ease of use, or proven support.
Elavon’s primary strength is its extensive hospitality experience, offering end-to-end payment solutions with a global presence. Conversely, roommaster Payments excels in integration and operational efficiency, particularly within property management workflows. Do you need a broad, reliable platform backed by a long track record, or a system that emphasizes integration and user satisfaction? Let’s unpack these options.
Elavon and roommaster Payments both address hotel payment challenges but diverge significantly in execution and recent performance. Elavon’s focus is on secure, scalable transactions, supporting a wide array of payment methods and international markets, but it has no recent reviews or ratings to validate current performance. Roommaster Payments, on the other hand, scores highly in customer support and ease of use, with 20 recent reviews and an average NPS of 8.4, indicating strong user satisfaction.
Elavon’s absence of recent reviews and ratings suggests a lack of current customer feedback, making it difficult to assess performance today. Roommaster Payments’s recent reviews highlight its intuitive interface and responsive support, making it a more reliable choice for hotels looking for proven service. Are you prepared to rely on a platform with historical reputation but no recent validation, or do you prefer a solution actively praised by users?
If your hotel needs a payment system tightly integrated with your property management operations, go with roommaster Payments. It offers 13 unique features like refund management, contactless payments, and chargeback handling that are crucial for daily hotel transactions. If your priority is a broad, established payment brand with international reach, and you’re comfortable with the lack of recent user feedback, then Elavon might appeal.
Hotels that value operational efficiency and high support ratings should lean toward roommaster Payments, especially if reducing staff workload is a priority. Conversely, if your hotel operates across multiple countries and needs compliance with global transaction standards, Elavon’s extensive experience might be more suitable. Which of these priorities aligns best with your hotel’s current strategic goals?
Based on current reviews, roommaster Payments scores a 4.4/5 for ease of use, while Elavon’s usability rating is unreported. Hotel staff highlight roommaster’s intuitive interface, straightforward onboarding, and minimal training needs. In contrast, Elavon’s lack of recent reviews or ratings makes it impossible to gauge its current user experience or onboarding quality.
Roommaster Payments’s high ease-of-use rating reflects its design for hospitality workflows, reducing staff errors and speeding up payments. Elavon’s complex global infrastructure may be more difficult to navigate without recent feedback. Edge: roommaster Payments.
roommaster Payments offers 13 features specifically tailored for hotel payments, including authorization adjustments, contactless payments, PCI compliance, and payment splitting—features that are absent from Elavon’s offering. Elavon primarily provides end-to-end payment processing solutions without the detailed features list available from roommaster.
The feature set in roommaster Payments directly addresses common hotel needs such as dispute management, flexible deposit scheduling, and secure card storage, making it a comprehensive tool for daily operations. Elavon’s lack of detailed features or recent user feedback makes it less transparent what functionalities are currently supported. Edge: roommaster Payments.
roommaster Payments’s recent reviews highly praise its support, with a 4.45/5 support rating and an NPS score of 8.4, indicating strong customer satisfaction. Users mention responsive, knowledgeable staff, and quick issue resolution. In contrast, Elavon has no recent reviews or ratings, and its support quality remains unverified.
Given the importance of reliable support in payment processing, roommaster’s recent positive feedback makes it the safer choice for hotels that depend on timely assistance. Without current data on Elavon support, you risk facing unresolved issues or delays. Edge: roommaster Payments.
roommaster Payments has a clear advantage, with 20 recent reviews and an overall NPS score of 8.4. Support ratings and user testimonials confirm a high level of satisfaction among hotel staff, especially in North America and Europe. Elavon’s absence of recent reviews or ratings means its current user sentiment is unknown, making it impossible to determine hotel satisfaction.
Hotels prioritizing proven user experience should opt for roommaster Payments, given its recent positive feedback. Elavon’s long-standing reputation isn’t enough without current validation. Edge: roommaster Payments.
Elavon does not publicly disclose pricing details, which is typical for large, global payment providers—costs are likely negotiated based on volume and needs. roommaster Payments charges a $300 monthly fee, with no mention of additional setup or transaction fees, suggesting a straightforward pricing model.
Your hotel’s size and transaction volume will influence costs with Elavon, but without transparent pricing, comparison is difficult. Conversely, roommaster Payments’s fixed monthly fee provides clarity for budgeting. Which pricing structure fits your hotel’s financial planning better?
Hotels that operate internationally or require a broad payment acceptance network should consider Elavon. It’s suited for:
Not ideal if your hotel:
Hotels that prioritize global reach and scalability should lean toward Elavon, but be aware of the lack of recent user validation.
Hotels that value operational simplicity and high user satisfaction should choose roommaster Payments. It’s ideal for:
Not ideal if your hotel:
Hotels focused on operational efficiency and support responsiveness should consider roommaster Payments.
The core difference lies in their validation: roommaster Payments boasts a recent, highly positive review base and support ratings, while Elavon’s reputation is based on longstanding industry presence, with no recent feedback. If your hotel needs a straightforward, well-supported payment system, roommaster Payments is the better choice.
Choose Elavon if your hotel operates internationally at scale and requires a provider with global infrastructure, despite the lack of recent reviews. For most hotels prioritizing support, ease of use, and recent satisfaction, roommaster Payments offers a clearer, more dependable path forward.
In conclusion, if recent credibility and user experience matter most, roommaster Payments wins decisively. However, if your hotel’s focus is on a globally recognized provider with extensive reach, Elavon remains a contender, provided you accept the unknowns of current customer support quality.
Prijzen voor Software voor betalingsverwerking zijn zelden eenvoudig. Dit is wat we weten op basis van de openbare prijsgegevens van elke leverancier. Vraag altijd een offerte op maat aan voor uw accommodatie.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $300/mo |
Volgens de productdatabase van HTR delen Elavon en roommaster Payments 0 functies. Dit zijn de belangrijkste verschillen — functies die de een wel heeft en de ander niet.
| Functie |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Accepteert Visa | ||
| Autorisatie aanpassingen | ||
| Betalen via link | ||
| Fooi functie: | ||
| Gedeeltelijke opname | ||
| Restitutiebeheer |
De belangrijkste verschillen worden getoond. 1 meer functies verschillen tussen deze producten.
Unieke mogelijkheden
Waar de beoordelingen het meest uiteenlopen
Dat hangt af van uw eisen. Elavon en roommaster Payments delen veel kern-Payments Processing Software-functies, maar elk heeft unieke mogelijkheden. Elavon biedt 3 geverifieerde integratiepartners, terwijl roommaster Payments er 56 biedt. Bekijk de functievergelijking hierboven om te zien waar ze verschillen voordat u overstapt.
Kleine hotels moeten prioriteit geven aan gebruiksgemak en snelle onboarding. roommaster Payments scoort het hoogst op gebruiksgemak met 4.2/5 vs 0.0/5. Let op transparante prijzen en de mogelijkheid van een proefperiode of demo. Filter beoordelingen op elke productpagina op accommodatiegrootte om te horen van hotels zoals het uwe.
Elavon: Nee. roommaster Payments: Nee. Geen van beide producten biedt momenteel een gratis abonnement aan. De meeste Payments Processing Software-leveranciers bieden demo's of proefperiodes aan — vraag er bij beide een aan om te evalueren voordat u zich vastlegt.
De HT Score is een samengestelde ranglijst die 4 criteriagroepen en meer dan tien variabelen meeweegt om hoteliers te helpen hoteltechnologieproducten objectief te vergelijken. Elavon heeft een HT Score van 0 en roommaster heeft 0. Zo wordt de score berekend.
| Criteriagroep | Weging | Wat het meet |
|---|---|---|
| Klantbeoordelingen & reviews |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen gebruikers dit product? Beoordelingsscore, reviewvolume, marktaandeel, reviewdiepte, reviewrecentheid, succesverhalen ▾ De zwaarst gewogen factor. Analyseert gemiddelde tevredenheidsbeoordelingen (waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen, gebruiksgemak, ondersteuning, ROI), het totale aantal reviews ten opzichte van categoriegenoten, recentheid van reviews (minimaal 20 reviews in de afgelopen 6 maanden) en marktaandeel over unieke hotelklanten om selectiebias te detecteren. |
| Partnerecosysteem |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen technologiepartners dit bedrijf? Partneraanbevelingen, integratieaantal, integratiekwaliteit ▾ Evalueert partneraanbevelingen als expertstemmen van vertrouwen, het aantal geverifieerde integraties en ecosysteemkwaliteit — de gemiddelde HT Scores van integratiepartners. Producten met een kwalitatief beter integratie-ecosysteem leveren waarschijnlijker een verbonden technologiearchitectuur. |
| Klantgerichtheid |
|
Hoe klantgericht is deze organisatie? Gecertificeerde ondersteuning, reviewconsistentie, profielvolledigheid ▾ Beoordeelt of het bedrijf HTR Customer Support-certificering heeft verdiend, consistente reviewverzameling in de loop der tijd onderhoudt (een indicator van feedbackgedreven cultuur) en productprofielen compleet houdt met mogelijkheden, schermafbeeldingen, prijzen en functies. |
| Bereik, stabiliteit & middelen |
|
Hoe uitgebreid is het bereik en de middelen van dit bedrijf? Geografisch bereik, stabiliteit, bedrijfsmiddelen, trendscore ▾ Meet wereldwijde aanwezigheid (bediende landen en regio's), aantal jaren in bedrijf als stabiliteitsindicator, teamgrootte als middelenproxy en een trendscore op basis van kopersaanvragen, reviews, partneraanbevelingen en persactiviteit in de afgelopen twaalf maanden. |
Klantbeoordelingen en reviews zijn veruit de belangrijkste factor in het HT Score-algoritme. HTR accepteert geen betaling voor hogere ranglijstposities. Alle reviews zijn geverifieerd — alleen professionals uit de hotelbranche met bevestigde affiliaties kunnen beoordelingen indienen. Bekijk de volledige HT Score-methodologie →
Aanbevelingen op maat, afgestemd op uw woning.