The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Samenvatting
We hebben 26 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen geanalyseerd, functiesets, prijzen en praktijkcasestudies vergeleken om te bepalen waar elk platform uitblinkt. De juiste keuze hangt af van uw type accommodatie en prioriteiten:
Folio blinkt uit in ease of use and customer support .
roommaster blinkt uit , met exclusieve functies zoals Contactless Payments and Payment Tokenization.
Zij-aan-zij beoordelingen op basis van 26 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen op HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen |
|
|
| Gebruiksgemak |
|
|
| Klantenondersteuning |
|
|
| Prijs-kwaliteitverhouding |
|
|
| Vanafprijs | Contact sales | From $300/mo |
| Geverifieerde beoordelingen | 3 | 23 |
Hoe elk product scoort onder Software voor betalingsverwerking-leveranciers voor verschillende accommodatiegroottes, -typen en regio's — op basis van geverifieerde beoordelingen van hoteliers in elk segment.
Op hotelgrootte
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Klein (10-24 kamers) ▾ | — | #2 6 beoordelingen |
| Middelgroot (25-74 kamers) ▾ | — | #3 7 beoordelingen |
| Groot (75-199 kamers) | #4 3 beoordelingen | #4 1 beoordelingen |
| Extra groot (200+ kamers) | — | #4 0 beoordelingen |
Op accommodatietype
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #4 7 beoordelingen |
| Luxe | #5 1 beoordelingen | #5 0 beoordelingen |
| Merk / Keten | #5 2 beoordelingen | #4 1 beoordelingen |
| Langverblijf | — | #4 0 beoordelingen |
Op regio
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Noord-Amerika ▾ | #5 3 beoordelingen | #4 14 beoordelingen |
| Europa | — | #5 0 beoordelingen |
| Midden-Oosten | — | #3 0 beoordelingen |
Choosing between Folio Pay by Folio and roommaster Payments by roommaster hinges on your hotel’s specific needs for payment processing. Folio Pay offers a modern, cloud-based solution focused on streamlining supplier payments and maximizing rebates, while roommaster Payments emphasizes seamless integration within your PMS to handle deposits, pre-authorizations, and operational workflows. As a hotelier, your decision should reflect whether you prioritize financial control and cashback incentives or integrated operational efficiency.
Both products aim to improve payment workflows, but their core approaches diverge. Folio Pay’s strength lies in transforming accounts payable into a strategic financial tool with rebates, whereas roommaster Payments emphasizes reducing manual effort and chargebacks through tight integration. Which approach aligns better with your hotel’s operational priorities?
Folio Pay and roommaster Payments are designed to address different hotel payment challenges. Folio Pay is ideal if your hotel needs a comprehensive platform to manage supplier payments, improve cash flow, and earn rebates—especially if you’re looking to modernize your accounts payable process. Conversely, roommaster Payments targets hotels seeking to streamline internal payment workflows within their existing property management system, with a focus on deposits, pre-authorizations, and reducing manual labor.
Folio Pay’s cloud-based nature offers greater flexibility, with an all-in-one payment hub that consolidates scheduling and execution of supplier payments, supported by features like ACH transfers and Mastercard® prepaid options. Roommaster Payments, on the other hand, emphasizes operational integration, automating deposits and pre-authorizations directly within your PMS, which can be crucial for daily hotel operations.
The reviews reveal that Folio Pay's recent updates and high customer satisfaction—rated 5/5 for ease of use and support—make it a more reliable choice for hotels seeking financial control. Roommaster’s mixed reviews about system outages and support issues suggest that while it’s feature-rich, it may face stability challenges.
Are your hotel’s core needs financial management and rebates, or operational efficiency and system stability?
If your hotel prioritizes strategic financial management, cash rebates, and modern supplier payment workflows, Folio Pay is the clear choice. Its recent review count of 3, all within the last six months, coupled with a perfect 100% likelihood to recommend, indicates strong current confidence among users.
For hotels that require an integrated payments solution primarily to handle deposits, pre-authorizations, and reduce manual processing within their PMS, roommaster Payments is suitable. However, it has a limited review base—20 reviews, with only 9 recent ones—and a slightly lower likelihood to recommend at 89%. Its more extensive feature set (13 features exclusive to it) makes it attractive for hotels with complex payment needs but also exposes it to potential stability issues noted in user feedback.
Your decision hinges on whether you need a modern, rebate-optimized platform (Folio Pay) or a tightly integrated operational tool (roommaster Payments).
Folio Pay earns a perfect 5/5 in ease of use, supported by recent reviews praising its straightforward interface and intuitive workflows. Users highlight that “it’s an excellent tool” and “easy to purchase,” with onboarding rated 5/5, indicating quick adoption and minimal training hurdles.
Roommaster Payments scores 4.4/5, with reviews citing its ease of use but noting glitches during busy periods and some frustrations with system outages. Support staff are praised for helpfulness, but the overall user experience is marred by instability and slower workflows.
Edge: Folio Pay.
Folio Pay’s core offering is its all-in-one payment hub, with no additional features listed beyond payment processing. In contrast, roommaster Payments boasts 13 exclusive features, including authorization adjustments, refund management, contactless payments, tokenization, and PCI compliance—crucial for hotels requiring diverse payment options.
While Folio Pay excels in cash rebates and supplier payment control, roommaster Payments offers advanced features for deposit handling, chargeback management, and in-system payment splitting. Given the feature count and recent positive reviews, roommaster Payments has a slight edge for hotels seeking operational depth.
Edge: roommaster Payments.
Folio Pay’s reviews indicate a perfect 5/5 support rating, with comments like “support is great” and “they answer calls promptly.” The recent review count (3) suggests current positive experiences and high satisfaction.
roommaster Payments has a support rating of 4.45/5, with feedback pointing to helpful staff but also frustrations over outages and inconsistent issue resolution. The larger review base (20 reviews, with some highlighting system errors and slow support during outages) indicates lower overall confidence.
Edge: Folio Pay.
roommaster Payments integrates with 56 verified partners, including major hospitality technology providers such as Sage, Volo, GuestCentric, and Inntopia. This extensive network makes it suitable for hotels needing diverse third-party integrations within their PMS environment.
Folio Pay, with zero verified integrations, appears more standalone and less flexible if your hotel relies heavily on external systems. If seamless integration is a priority, roommaster Payments clearly leads.
Edge: roommaster Payments.
Folio Pay, with only 3 recent reviews, has a perfect 100% likelihood to recommend from all reviewers, suggesting high satisfaction when it is used. However, the limited review count makes this less conclusive.
roommaster Payments, with 20 reviews and an 89% likelihood to recommend, shows generally positive feedback but some frustrations with outages, stability, and support. Given the recent reviews, Folio Pay’s higher recent confidence makes it the stronger rated product currently.
Edge: Folio Pay.
Folio Pay’s pricing details are not publicly available, indicating it may follow a custom quote model suited to larger enterprise clients or those with significant supplier payment needs. No free trial or flat rate info is provided.
roommaster Payments charges a flat fee of $300/month, with no mention of tiered pricing. This straightforward pricing makes it easy to budget for, though it may be costly for smaller hotels relying on fewer transactions.
Folio Pay’s lack of transparent pricing suggests it’s aimed at hotels with higher transaction volumes or complex financial needs, while roommaster Payments offers predictable costs for operational integration.
The core difference is that Folio Pay emphasizes financial rewards and strategic accounts payable management, while roommaster Payments focuses on operational transaction efficiency within the PMS. Folio Pay, with a recent surge of reviews and perfect support ratings, offers a more current and reliable solution for hotels looking to modernize their financial workflows.
Choose Folio Pay if your hotel seeks rebates, transparent control over supplier payments, and a cloud-based, easy-to-use platform. Opt for roommaster Payments if your hotel needs comprehensive in-system payment features, extensive integrations, and a solution embedded within daily operations.
In conclusion, for hotels that want a modern, well-reviewed, and highly supported payment platform, Folio Pay stands out as the preferable choice. However, if your hotel’s primary focus is operational depth, integration, and automation, roommaster Payments remains a solid, feature-rich option—though with some caveats about stability and support.
Prijzen voor Software voor betalingsverwerking zijn zelden eenvoudig. Dit is wat we weten op basis van de openbare prijsgegevens van elke leverancier. Vraag altijd een offerte op maat aan voor uw accommodatie.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $300/mo |
Volgens de productdatabase van HTR delen Folio Pay en roommaster Payments 0 functies. Dit zijn de belangrijkste verschillen — functies die de een wel heeft en de ander niet.
| Functie |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Accepteert Visa | ||
| Autorisatie aanpassingen | ||
| Betalen via link | ||
| Fooi functie: | ||
| Gedeeltelijke opname | ||
| Restitutiebeheer |
De belangrijkste verschillen worden getoond. 1 meer functies verschillen tussen deze producten.
Scoort hoger op
Unieke mogelijkheden
Waar de beoordelingen het meest uiteenlopen
Dat hangt af van uw eisen. Folio Pay en roommaster Payments delen veel kern-Payments Processing Software-functies, maar elk heeft unieke mogelijkheden. Folio Pay biedt 0 geverifieerde integratiepartners, terwijl roommaster Payments er 56 biedt. Bekijk de functievergelijking hierboven om te zien waar ze verschillen voordat u overstapt.
Kleine hotels moeten prioriteit geven aan gebruiksgemak en snelle onboarding. Folio Pay scoort het hoogst op gebruiksgemak met 5.0/5 vs 4.2/5. Let op transparante prijzen en de mogelijkheid van een proefperiode of demo. Filter beoordelingen op elke productpagina op accommodatiegrootte om te horen van hotels zoals het uwe.
Folio Pay: Nee. roommaster Payments: Nee. Geen van beide producten biedt momenteel een gratis abonnement aan. De meeste Payments Processing Software-leveranciers bieden demo's of proefperiodes aan — vraag er bij beide een aan om te evalueren voordat u zich vastlegt.
De HT Score is een samengestelde ranglijst die 4 criteriagroepen en meer dan tien variabelen meeweegt om hoteliers te helpen hoteltechnologieproducten objectief te vergelijken. Folio heeft een HT Score van 0 en roommaster heeft 0. Zo wordt de score berekend.
| Criteriagroep | Weging | Wat het meet |
|---|---|---|
| Klantbeoordelingen & reviews |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen gebruikers dit product? Beoordelingsscore, reviewvolume, marktaandeel, reviewdiepte, reviewrecentheid, succesverhalen ▾ De zwaarst gewogen factor. Analyseert gemiddelde tevredenheidsbeoordelingen (waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen, gebruiksgemak, ondersteuning, ROI), het totale aantal reviews ten opzichte van categoriegenoten, recentheid van reviews (minimaal 20 reviews in de afgelopen 6 maanden) en marktaandeel over unieke hotelklanten om selectiebias te detecteren. |
| Partnerecosysteem |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen technologiepartners dit bedrijf? Partneraanbevelingen, integratieaantal, integratiekwaliteit ▾ Evalueert partneraanbevelingen als expertstemmen van vertrouwen, het aantal geverifieerde integraties en ecosysteemkwaliteit — de gemiddelde HT Scores van integratiepartners. Producten met een kwalitatief beter integratie-ecosysteem leveren waarschijnlijker een verbonden technologiearchitectuur. |
| Klantgerichtheid |
|
Hoe klantgericht is deze organisatie? Gecertificeerde ondersteuning, reviewconsistentie, profielvolledigheid ▾ Beoordeelt of het bedrijf HTR Customer Support-certificering heeft verdiend, consistente reviewverzameling in de loop der tijd onderhoudt (een indicator van feedbackgedreven cultuur) en productprofielen compleet houdt met mogelijkheden, schermafbeeldingen, prijzen en functies. |
| Bereik, stabiliteit & middelen |
|
Hoe uitgebreid is het bereik en de middelen van dit bedrijf? Geografisch bereik, stabiliteit, bedrijfsmiddelen, trendscore ▾ Meet wereldwijde aanwezigheid (bediende landen en regio's), aantal jaren in bedrijf als stabiliteitsindicator, teamgrootte als middelenproxy en een trendscore op basis van kopersaanvragen, reviews, partneraanbevelingen en persactiviteit in de afgelopen twaalf maanden. |
Klantbeoordelingen en reviews zijn veruit de belangrijkste factor in het HT Score-algoritme. HTR accepteert geen betaling voor hogere ranglijstposities. Alle reviews zijn geverifieerd — alleen professionals uit de hotelbranche met bevestigde affiliaties kunnen beoordelingen indienen. Bekijk de volledige HT Score-methodologie →
Adviseur productaanbevelingen