The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Samenvatting
We hebben 550 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen geanalyseerd, functiesets, prijzen en praktijkcasestudies vergeleken om te bepalen waar elk platform uitblinkt. De juiste keuze hangt af van uw type accommodatie en prioriteiten:
HOTELTIME blinkt uit in ease of use and customer support — vooral voor brand accommodaties (4.9/5) , met exclusieve functies zoals Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Marriott International blinkt uit .
Zij-aan-zij beoordelingen op basis van 550 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen op HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen |
|
|
| Gebruiksgemak |
|
|
| Klantenondersteuning |
|
|
| Prijs-kwaliteitverhouding |
|
|
| Vanafprijs | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Geverifieerde beoordelingen | 549 | 1 |
Na analyse van 550 geverifieerde beoordelingen waarderen HOTELTIME-gebruikers vooral de user interface and learning curve, technische ondersteuning, reporting and analytics, terwijl Marriott International-gebruikers de benadrukken. Klik op een thema om te zien wat beoordelaars zeggen.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Voordelen | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Technische ondersteuning
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Nadelen | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobiele optimalisatie
▾
|
|
Hoe elk product scoort onder Vastgoedbeheersystemen-leveranciers voor verschillende accommodatiegroottes, -typen en regio's — op basis van geverifieerde beoordelingen van hoteliers in elk segment.
Op hotelgrootte
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Klein (10-24 kamers) ▾ | #5 219 beoordelingen | — |
| Middelgroot (25-74 kamers) ▾ | #3 238 beoordelingen | #59 1 beoordelingen |
| Groot (75-199 kamers) ▾ | #2 46 beoordelingen | — |
| Extra groot (200+ kamers) ▾ | #8 7 beoordelingen | — |
Op accommodatietype
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #5 239 beoordelingen | #68 1 beoordelingen |
| Luxe ▾ | #3 241 beoordelingen | — |
| Merk / Keten ▾ | #4 143 beoordelingen | #60 1 beoordelingen |
| Langverblijf ▾ | #4 49 beoordelingen | — |
Op regio
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Noord-Amerika | #52 4 beoordelingen | #43 1 beoordelingen |
| Europa ▾ | #2 384 beoordelingen | — |
| Azië-Pacific ▾ | #5 111 beoordelingen | — |
| Midden-Oosten ▾ | #1 21 beoordelingen | — |
Choosing between HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME and FOSSE by Marriott International hinges on your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and your team's needs. Both systems aim to streamline hotel operations, but they differ significantly in features, user experience, and support. HotelTime offers a comprehensive, cloud-based platform with a high user rating, whereas FOSSE is a proprietary system with limited recent reviews and a narrower feature set. Which aligns better with your hotel’s goals?
HotelTime PMS stands out with over 430 recent reviews, a 4.83/5 overall rating, and a 93% likelihood to recommend, making it the more trusted and validated option. FOSSE, by contrast, has only a single review in the past six months and a low 2/5 rating, indicating limited recent user satisfaction. For hotels seeking a proven, well-supported PMS, HotelTime is the more reliable choice.
HotelTime PMS and FOSSE are designed to automate and simplify hotel management, but they approach this goal differently. HotelTime provides a feature-rich, cloud-based system with extensive integrations, automation, and a broad user base. FOSSE, as Marriott’s proprietary solution, offers core reservation and guest management capabilities but lacks many advanced features found in HotelTime.
Where they diverge most sharply is in user feedback and system maturity. HotelTime’s recent reviews emphasize its stability, customer support, and ease of use, while FOSSE’s reviews are sparse, older, and critical of usability. Do you prioritize a system with a significant, recent user base and continuous improvements? Or are you comfortable with a more limited, internally managed solution?
If your hotel needs a flexible, scalable PMS with extensive third-party integrations, choose HotelTime. It’s suitable for properties of all sizes, including resorts, boutique hotels, and chains, thanks to its 51 unique features and widespread adoption across 20+ countries.
If your hotel is part of Marriott’s ecosystem and you prioritize a system designed for motels or similar properties, FOSSE might seem appropriate. However, given its limited reviews and low satisfaction ratings, HotelTime’s proven track record makes it the safer investment for most hotels.
HotelTime’s user interface is highly rated at 4.66/5, with many reviews praising its intuitive design and quick onboarding process. Its support team is known for responsiveness, helping staff adopt the system efficiently.
FOSSE, with a 2/5 ease-of-use rating and no recent reviews, faces criticism for its lack of a graphical user interface and complex, menu-heavy operation. Users report that FOSSE is less accessible and more time-consuming to learn and operate.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime boasts 51 exclusive features, including integrated CRS, payment processing, guest CRM, automated night audits, mobile check-in, and more—covering operational needs comprehensively. It also supports ancillary revenue tracking, custom rates, and real-time reporting.
FOSSE offers the core functions—reservations, check-ins, billing—but lacks many of the advanced capabilities available in HotelTime. Its feature set appears minimal and not well documented, which limits its usefulness for complex operations.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime’s support team scores 4.73/5, with reviews highlighting quick responses, helpful training, and ongoing assistance. Users commend its responsiveness, especially for international hotels needing timely help.
FOSSE’s support ratings and recent feedback are unavailable, and the limited reviews suggest a less proactive or responsive support system. Given the importance of reliable support for hotel operations, HotelTime’s customer service provides a decisive advantage.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime integrates with 58 verified partners, including third-party booking engines, revenue management tools, and POS systems. Its wide-ranging integrations allow hotels to customize their tech stack effectively.
FOSSE, with only 2 verified partners, offers limited connectivity, primarily within the Marriott ecosystem. Its narrow integration scope constrains flexibility and adaptability for hotels using multiple third-party solutions.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime’s recent reviews indicate a 4.83/5 rating, with 27 reviews in the last six months, and a 93% likelihood to recommend, showing strong, current user satisfaction. Hotels across various segments, especially boutique and resort properties, praise its ease of use and support.
FOSSE has only one recent review, rating it 2/5, and no current feedback, reflecting limited or declining satisfaction. Hotels seeking a highly-rated system should favor HotelTime.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime charges a flat monthly fee of $600, with no implementation or trial fees. Pricing includes a broad set of features appropriate for diverse property types.
FOSSE’s pricing details are unavailable publicly, but as a Marriott proprietary system, it’s likely included within broader corporate agreements or licensing fees. The explicit cost is less transparent and may involve contractual commitments.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small or operates with minimal technology needs, as HotelTime’s extensive features may be more than necessary.
Not ideal if your hotel requires modern UI, extensive integrations, or comprehensive automation—FOSSE’s limited features and older review data suggest it may not meet evolving hotel needs.
The core difference is that HotelTime offers a modern, cloud-based, feature-packed system with a strong user base and recent positive reviews. FOSSE, by comparison, is an older, internal Marriott system with limited recent feedback and fewer features.
For hotels seeking a proven, versatile, and well-supported PMS, HotelTime is the clear winner due to its extensive features, ease of use, and recent high ratings. It suits properties of all sizes, especially those wanting to automate and integrate their operations.
If your hotel is part of Marriott and your needs are basic, FOSSE might suffice, but its limited recent reviews and user dissatisfaction suggest it’s not the best choice for most independent or competitive properties.
In summary, HotelTime provides a more reliable, scalable, and user-rated solution, making it the better investment for most hotels aiming to improve operational efficiency and guest experience.
Prijzen voor Vastgoedbeheersystemen zijn zelden eenvoudig. Dit is wat we weten op basis van de openbare prijsgegevens van elke leverancier. Vraag altijd een offerte op maat aan voor uw accommodatie.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
Volgens de productdatabase van HTR delen HotelTime PMS en FOSSE 0 functies. Dit zijn de belangrijkste verschillen — functies die de een wel heeft en de ander niet.
| Functie |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Aanvullende inkomsten bijhouden | ||
| Epos | ||
| Gast-CRM | ||
| Geïntegreerd CRS | ||
| Kalenderweergave | ||
| Verwerking van betalingen |
De belangrijkste verschillen worden getoond. 39 meer functies verschillen tussen deze producten.
We hebben 8 geverifieerde casestudies geanalyseerd om te vergelijken wat hotels daadwerkelijk bereiken met elk platform op vier belangrijke bedrijfsdoelstellingen.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Nog geen gepubliceerde casestudy voor dit doel.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Nog geen gepubliceerde casestudy voor dit doel.
Wat hoteliers waarderen
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Hoewel de snelle reacties en behulpzaamheid van het supportteam gewaardeerd worden, suggereren sommige recensies dat ruimere openingstijden voor techn... Hoewel de snelle reacties en behulpzaamheid van het supportteam gewaardeerd worden, suggereren sommige recensies dat ruimere openingstijden voor technische ondersteuning de gebruikerservaring verder zouden verbeteren, zodat er altijd hulp beschikbaar is, met name voor internationale gebruikers.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Waar hoteliers kritiek op hebben
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Scoort hoger op
Unieke mogelijkheden
Scoort hoger op
Waar de beoordelingen het meest uiteenlopen
Dat hangt af van uw eisen. HotelTime PMS en FOSSE delen veel kern-Property Management Systems-functies, maar elk heeft unieke mogelijkheden. HotelTime PMS biedt 58 geverifieerde integratiepartners, terwijl FOSSE er 2 biedt. Bekijk de functievergelijking hierboven om te zien waar ze verschillen voordat u overstapt.
Kleine hotels moeten prioriteit geven aan gebruiksgemak en snelle onboarding. HotelTime PMS scoort het hoogst op gebruiksgemak met 4.7/5 vs 2.0/5. Let op transparante prijzen en de mogelijkheid van een proefperiode of demo. Filter beoordelingen op elke productpagina op accommodatiegrootte om te horen van hotels zoals het uwe.
HotelTime PMS: Nee. FOSSE: Nee. Geen van beide producten biedt momenteel een gratis abonnement aan. De meeste Property Management Systems-leveranciers bieden demo's of proefperiodes aan — vraag er bij beide een aan om te evalueren voordat u zich vastlegt.
De HT Score is een samengestelde ranglijst die 4 criteriagroepen en meer dan tien variabelen meeweegt om hoteliers te helpen hoteltechnologieproducten objectief te vergelijken. HOTELTIME heeft een HT Score van 92 en Marriott International heeft 0. Zo wordt de score berekend.
| Criteriagroep | Weging | Wat het meet |
|---|---|---|
| Klantbeoordelingen & reviews |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen gebruikers dit product? Beoordelingsscore, reviewvolume, marktaandeel, reviewdiepte, reviewrecentheid, succesverhalen ▾ De zwaarst gewogen factor. Analyseert gemiddelde tevredenheidsbeoordelingen (waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen, gebruiksgemak, ondersteuning, ROI), het totale aantal reviews ten opzichte van categoriegenoten, recentheid van reviews (minimaal 20 reviews in de afgelopen 6 maanden) en marktaandeel over unieke hotelklanten om selectiebias te detecteren. |
| Partnerecosysteem |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen technologiepartners dit bedrijf? Partneraanbevelingen, integratieaantal, integratiekwaliteit ▾ Evalueert partneraanbevelingen als expertstemmen van vertrouwen, het aantal geverifieerde integraties en ecosysteemkwaliteit — de gemiddelde HT Scores van integratiepartners. Producten met een kwalitatief beter integratie-ecosysteem leveren waarschijnlijker een verbonden technologiearchitectuur. |
| Klantgerichtheid |
|
Hoe klantgericht is deze organisatie? Gecertificeerde ondersteuning, reviewconsistentie, profielvolledigheid ▾ Beoordeelt of het bedrijf HTR Customer Support-certificering heeft verdiend, consistente reviewverzameling in de loop der tijd onderhoudt (een indicator van feedbackgedreven cultuur) en productprofielen compleet houdt met mogelijkheden, schermafbeeldingen, prijzen en functies. |
| Bereik, stabiliteit & middelen |
|
Hoe uitgebreid is het bereik en de middelen van dit bedrijf? Geografisch bereik, stabiliteit, bedrijfsmiddelen, trendscore ▾ Meet wereldwijde aanwezigheid (bediende landen en regio's), aantal jaren in bedrijf als stabiliteitsindicator, teamgrootte als middelenproxy en een trendscore op basis van kopersaanvragen, reviews, partneraanbevelingen en persactiviteit in de afgelopen twaalf maanden. |
Klantbeoordelingen en reviews zijn veruit de belangrijkste factor in het HT Score-algoritme. HTR accepteert geen betaling voor hogere ranglijstposities. Alle reviews zijn geverifieerd — alleen professionals uit de hotelbranche met bevestigde affiliaties kunnen beoordelingen indienen. Bekijk de volledige HT Score-methodologie →
Adviseur productaanbevelingen