The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Samenvatting
We hebben 887 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen geanalyseerd, functiesets, prijzen en praktijkcasestudies vergeleken om te bepalen waar elk platform uitblinkt. De juiste keuze hangt af van uw type accommodatie en prioriteiten:
Mews blinkt uit in ease of use and customer support — vooral voor independent accommodaties (4.9/5) , met exclusieve functies zoals Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Roomsy blinkt uit .
Zij-aan-zij beoordelingen op basis van 887 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen op HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen |
|
|
| Gebruiksgemak |
|
|
| Klantenondersteuning |
|
|
| Prijs-kwaliteitverhouding |
|
|
| Vanafprijs | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Geverifieerde beoordelingen | 887 | 0 |
Na analyse van 887 geverifieerde beoordelingen waarderen Mews-gebruikers vooral de ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, terwijl Roomsy-gebruikers de benadrukken. Klik op een thema om te zien wat beoordelaars zeggen.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Voordelen | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Inwerken en ondersteuning
▾
|
|
| Nadelen | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapportage en analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Hoe elk product scoort onder Vastgoedbeheersystemen-leveranciers voor verschillende accommodatiegroottes, -typen en regio's — op basis van geverifieerde beoordelingen van hoteliers in elk segment.
Op hotelgrootte
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Klein (10-24 kamers) ▾ | #3 329 beoordelingen | #78 0 beoordelingen |
| Middelgroot (25-74 kamers) ▾ | #1 397 beoordelingen | — |
| Groot (75-199 kamers) ▾ | #3 45 beoordelingen | — |
| Extra groot (200+ kamers) ▾ | #3 49 beoordelingen | — |
Op accommodatietype
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 beoordelingen | #77 0 beoordelingen |
| Luxe ▾ | #5 220 beoordelingen | — |
| Merk / Keten ▾ | #2 170 beoordelingen | — |
| Langverblijf ▾ | #1 130 beoordelingen | #52 0 beoordelingen |
Op regio
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Noord-Amerika ▾ | #8 106 beoordelingen | #62 0 beoordelingen |
| Europa ▾ | #1 660 beoordelingen | — |
| Azië-Pacific ▾ | #10 17 beoordelingen | — |
| Midden-Oosten ▾ | #28 8 beoordelingen | — |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) is a critical step for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Both Mews PMS and Roomsy aim to streamline your processes, but they differ significantly in maturity, features, and user feedback. Mews, with over 750 reviews and recent feedback, offers a well-established platform, while Roomsy remains relatively new with limited review data. Do you prioritize proven scale or simplicity?
Mews's extensive features, robust integrations, and global presence make it a compelling choice for hotels seeking a comprehensive solution. Roomsy, on the other hand, emphasizes ease of use and straightforward management, appealing to smaller or tech-savvy properties. Which aligns best with your hotel's needs?
Mews has established itself as a leading cloud PMS in the hospitality industry, boasting a 4.62/5 overall rating based on 758 reviews, with 98 recent reviews. Its users praise its reliability, feature richness, and extensive integrations, especially for medium to large properties and multi-property groups.
Roomsy, with a 0/5 rating and zero reviews, offers an online management platform promising simplicity and mobility. However, the lack of reviews and market presence raises questions about its maturity, reliability, and support infrastructure. Are you comfortable trusting a solution without a substantial track record?
Mews’s strong market presence and recent reviews underscore its stable performance, while Roomsy’s minimal feedback suggests limited proven effectiveness. Do you want a tried-and-true platform or a newer tool still gaining traction?
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich PMS capable of supporting complex operations, multi-property management, and integrations with over 336 partners, Mews is the clear choice. Its extensive automation, guest management, and revenue features serve large and boutique hotels alike.
If your hotel prioritizes a simplified, mobile-friendly solution with straightforward operations, and you’re comfortable with a less proven platform, Roomsy might appeal. However, given its lack of reviews and limited regional presence, Mews’s proven reliability and broad feature set make it the safer, more strategic investment for most hotels.
For hoteliers seeking stability and advanced capabilities, Mews’s comprehensive platform outperforms Roomsy’s limited market footprint. Which approach aligns with your growth plans?
Mews’s user interface scores an impressive 4.7/5, with many reviews highlighting its intuitive design, modern appearance, and ease of onboarding. Support for staff adoption is reinforced by a 4.39/5 onboarding rating, and reviews mention quick setup and minimal training.
Roomsy, lacking review data and detailed user feedback, offers claims of simplicity and mobility. However, without user ratings or testimonials, it’s impossible to assess whether Roomsy truly delivers a smoother user experience.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 unique features, including multi-lingual, multi-currency capabilities, revenue management, booking engine, guest CRM, automated night audit, integrated POS, digital registration, and more. Many of these features are absent from Roomsy, which does not publicly list comparable functionalities.
Roomsy’s value proposition centers on simplicity and automation, but it lacks the extensive suite available in Mews. For hotels needing comprehensive operational tools, Mews’s feature depth provides a decisive advantage.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support ratings are solid, with a 4.27/5 rating and numerous reviews praising its responsiveness and helpfulness. Users mention that Mews support teams are quick to resolve bugs and assist with onboarding, despite occasional reports of bugs that are addressed swiftly.
Roomsy, with no available reviews or support ratings, offers no verifiable data on its support quality. Given Mews’s proven track record, it’s the more reliable option for ongoing assistance.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts over 336 verified partners, including major channel managers like SiteMinder, and offers seamless integrations with payment systems, CRS, housekeeping, and ancillary services. Its open API and Marketplace facilitate extensive customization.
Roomsy reports only 2 verified partners, with one shared (SiteMinder). The limited integration ecosystem suggests a less flexible platform that may not meet complex hotel needs, especially as your operation scales.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s 4.62/5 rating reflects a broad base of hotelier reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use, automation, and support. Hotels across segments, from boutique to larger chains, appreciate its stability and comprehensive features.
Roomsy’s zero reviews prevent any reliable rating or property-level insights. Without recent or detailed feedback, Mews’s proven satisfaction level clearly outweighs Roomsy’s unverified claims.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s pricing starts at $900/month, with no freemium or free trial available, indicating a premium product designed for serious hotel operations. Pricing details for Roomsy are not publicly disclosed, which can complicate budgeting decisions.
While Mews’s cost may seem high, it aligns with its extensive feature set and support, offering better ROI for established hotels. Roomsy’s lack of price transparency makes it harder to evaluate value.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small, budget-restricted, or primarily regional with minimal tech needs.
Not ideal if you need extensive features, multi-property support, or proven reliability.
Mews offers a mature, feature-rich platform trusted by hundreds of hotels worldwide, consistently receiving positive recent reviews for its ease of use, support, and integrations. Its versatility supports a wide range of hotel types and sizes, making it suitable for hotels aiming for operational excellence and scalability.
Roomsy, with minimal market presence and no recent reviews, appears focused on simplicity and mobility. However, the lack of proven feedback and fewer features suggests it’s better suited for very small properties or those testing digital management.
If your hotel requires a reliable, comprehensive PMS with ongoing support, Mews is the clear choice. For basic operations with a focus on ease, Roomsy might suffice, but with significant risk due to limited data.
In conclusion, for most hotels seeking a dependable, feature-rich, and scalable PMS, Mews stands out as the superior choice. Its extensive reviews, recent positive feedback, and proven track record make it the safer, more strategic investment for your hotel’s digital future.
Volgens de productdatabase van HTR delen Mews PMS en Roomsy 0 functies. Dit zijn de belangrijkste verschillen — functies die de een wel heeft en de ander niet.
| Functie |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boekingsmodule | ||
| Gast-CRM | ||
| Gastprofielen | ||
| Meerdere valuta | ||
| Meertalig | ||
| Module voor inkomstenbeheer |
De belangrijkste verschillen worden getoond. 47 meer functies verschillen tussen deze producten.
We hebben 8 geverifieerde casestudies geanalyseerd om te vergelijken wat hotels daadwerkelijk bereiken met elk platform op vier belangrijke bedrijfsdoelstellingen.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nog geen gepubliceerde casestudy voor dit doel.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nog geen gepubliceerde casestudy voor dit doel.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Nog geen gepubliceerde casestudy voor dit doel.
Wat hoteliers waarderen
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Waar hoteliers kritiek op hebben
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Hoewel Mews degelijke rapportage- en analysefunctionaliteiten biedt, geven verschillende gebruikers aan dat er behoefte is aan meer aanpasbare en flex... Hoewel Mews degelijke rapportage- en analysefunctionaliteiten biedt, geven verschillende gebruikers aan dat er behoefte is aan meer aanpasbare en flexibele rapportagemogelijkheden. Gebruikers geven aan dat ze graag gedetailleerdere data-inzichten willen, met name op het gebied van reserveringen en omzetanalyse.
Scoort hoger op
Unieke mogelijkheden
Waar de beoordelingen het meest uiteenlopen
Dat hangt af van uw eisen. Mews PMS en Roomsy delen veel kern-Property Management Systems-functies, maar elk heeft unieke mogelijkheden. Mews PMS biedt 336 geverifieerde integratiepartners, terwijl Roomsy er 2 biedt. Bekijk de functievergelijking hierboven om te zien waar ze verschillen voordat u overstapt.
Kleine hotels moeten prioriteit geven aan gebruiksgemak en snelle onboarding. Mews PMS scoort het hoogst op gebruiksgemak met 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Let op transparante prijzen en de mogelijkheid van een proefperiode of demo. Filter beoordelingen op elke productpagina op accommodatiegrootte om te horen van hotels zoals het uwe.
Mews PMS: Nee. Roomsy: Nee. Geen van beide producten biedt momenteel een gratis abonnement aan. De meeste Property Management Systems-leveranciers bieden demo's of proefperiodes aan — vraag er bij beide een aan om te evalueren voordat u zich vastlegt.
De HT Score is een samengestelde ranglijst die 4 criteriagroepen en meer dan tien variabelen meeweegt om hoteliers te helpen hoteltechnologieproducten objectief te vergelijken. Mews heeft een HT Score van 99 en Roomsy heeft 0. Zo wordt de score berekend.
| Criteriagroep | Weging | Wat het meet |
|---|---|---|
| Klantbeoordelingen & reviews |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen gebruikers dit product? Beoordelingsscore, reviewvolume, marktaandeel, reviewdiepte, reviewrecentheid, succesverhalen ▾ De zwaarst gewogen factor. Analyseert gemiddelde tevredenheidsbeoordelingen (waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen, gebruiksgemak, ondersteuning, ROI), het totale aantal reviews ten opzichte van categoriegenoten, recentheid van reviews (minimaal 20 reviews in de afgelopen 6 maanden) en marktaandeel over unieke hotelklanten om selectiebias te detecteren. |
| Partnerecosysteem |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen technologiepartners dit bedrijf? Partneraanbevelingen, integratieaantal, integratiekwaliteit ▾ Evalueert partneraanbevelingen als expertstemmen van vertrouwen, het aantal geverifieerde integraties en ecosysteemkwaliteit — de gemiddelde HT Scores van integratiepartners. Producten met een kwalitatief beter integratie-ecosysteem leveren waarschijnlijker een verbonden technologiearchitectuur. |
| Klantgerichtheid |
|
Hoe klantgericht is deze organisatie? Gecertificeerde ondersteuning, reviewconsistentie, profielvolledigheid ▾ Beoordeelt of het bedrijf HTR Customer Support-certificering heeft verdiend, consistente reviewverzameling in de loop der tijd onderhoudt (een indicator van feedbackgedreven cultuur) en productprofielen compleet houdt met mogelijkheden, schermafbeeldingen, prijzen en functies. |
| Bereik, stabiliteit & middelen |
|
Hoe uitgebreid is het bereik en de middelen van dit bedrijf? Geografisch bereik, stabiliteit, bedrijfsmiddelen, trendscore ▾ Meet wereldwijde aanwezigheid (bediende landen en regio's), aantal jaren in bedrijf als stabiliteitsindicator, teamgrootte als middelenproxy en een trendscore op basis van kopersaanvragen, reviews, partneraanbevelingen en persactiviteit in de afgelopen twaalf maanden. |
Klantbeoordelingen en reviews zijn veruit de belangrijkste factor in het HT Score-algoritme. HTR accepteert geen betaling voor hogere ranglijstposities. Alle reviews zijn geverifieerd — alleen professionals uit de hotelbranche met bevestigde affiliaties kunnen beoordelingen indienen. Bekijk de volledige HT Score-methodologie →
Adviseur productaanbevelingen