The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Samenvatting
We hebben 887 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen geanalyseerd, functiesets, prijzen en praktijkcasestudies vergeleken om te bepalen waar elk platform uitblinkt. De juiste keuze hangt af van uw type accommodatie en prioriteiten:
Mews blinkt uit in ease of use and customer support — vooral voor independent accommodaties (4.9/5) , met exclusieve functies zoals Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Roombler blinkt uit .
Zij-aan-zij beoordelingen op basis van 887 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen op HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen |
|
|
| Gebruiksgemak |
|
|
| Klantenondersteuning |
|
|
| Prijs-kwaliteitverhouding |
|
|
| Vanafprijs | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Geverifieerde beoordelingen | 887 | 0 |
Na analyse van 887 geverifieerde beoordelingen waarderen Mews-gebruikers vooral de ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, terwijl Roombler-gebruikers de benadrukken. Klik op een thema om te zien wat beoordelaars zeggen.
|
|
Roombler
|
|---|---|
| Voordelen | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Inwerken en ondersteuning
▾
|
|
| Nadelen | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapportage en analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Hoe elk product scoort onder Vastgoedbeheersystemen-leveranciers voor verschillende accommodatiegroottes, -typen en regio's — op basis van geverifieerde beoordelingen van hoteliers in elk segment.
Op hotelgrootte
| Segment |
|
Roombler
|
|---|---|---|
| Klein (10-24 kamers) ▾ | #3 329 beoordelingen | — |
| Middelgroot (25-74 kamers) ▾ | #1 397 beoordelingen | — |
| Groot (75-199 kamers) ▾ | #3 45 beoordelingen | — |
| Extra groot (200+ kamers) ▾ | #3 49 beoordelingen | — |
Op accommodatietype
| Segment |
|
Roombler
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 beoordelingen | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #5 220 beoordelingen | — |
| Merk / Keten ▾ | #2 170 beoordelingen | — |
| Langverblijf ▾ | #1 130 beoordelingen | — |
Op regio
| Segment |
|
Roombler
|
|---|---|---|
| Noord-Amerika ▾ | #8 106 beoordelingen | — |
| Europa ▾ | #1 660 beoordelingen | — |
| Azië-Pacific ▾ | #10 17 beoordelingen | — |
| Midden-Oosten ▾ | #28 8 beoordelingen | — |
Choosing between Mews PMS and Roombler hinges on your hotel's size, operational complexity, and growth ambitions. Mews offers a comprehensive, scalable platform with extensive integrations and a proven track record, whereas Roombler is tailored for small accommodation owners seeking simple, mobile management from their iPhone or iPad. Do you need a robust system capable of supporting multiple properties, or are your operations straightforward enough to benefit from a lightweight app?
Both products aim to streamline daily management and improve guest experiences, but they differ significantly in scope. Mews provides an all-in-one cloud-based solution with advanced automation and extensive features, while Roombler offers a mobile-centric approach focused on ease of use for small-scale operations. Which aligns better with your current needs and future plans?
Mews and Roombler address different hotel management needs. Mews is designed to serve a wide array of hotel types—from boutique to large chains—offering over 59 exclusive features, extensive integrations, and multi-property capabilities. Roombler, on the other hand, targets small accommodation owners who want to manage their lodgings from a mobile device, focusing on simplicity and ease of access.
While Mews boasts a 4.62/5 overall rating based on 758 reviews with recent feedback from nearly 100 users, Roombler’s reviews are unavailable, but its reputation centers on user-friendly, mobile operation. If your hotel requires a scalable, feature-rich system, Mews is clearly the superior choice. Are you ready to handle the complexity of a modern, integrated PMS, or do you prefer a straightforward app for your small property?
If your hotel needs a full-featured, scalable PMS capable of managing multiple properties, revenue management, guest profiles, and extensive integrations, go with Mews. It’s ideal for hotels aiming to enhance operational efficiency and guest satisfaction across diverse property portfolios.
If you operate a small lodging—such as a B&B, hostel, or vacation rental—and prioritize mobility, quick setup, and ease of management, Roombler is the better option. Its app-based system allows you to oversee bookings and guest stays directly from your smartphone or tablet, perfect for solo operators or small teams.
In summary, choose Mews if scalability, automation, and comprehensive features are your priorities. Opt for Roombler if your focus is on simple, mobile management with minimal setup.
Mews has a 4.7/5 ease of use rating from 98 recent reviews, with many users praising its intuitive, modern interface. Onboarding can be smooth, especially for larger teams, but some mention a learning curve due to its extensive features.
Roombler’s strength lies in its mobile app, which is designed for simplicity and quick access, although review data is unavailable. Its user-friendly interface on iPhone or iPad makes daily operations straightforward for small operators.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers a suite of 59 exclusive features, including multi-lingual and multi-currency support, revenue management modules, guest CRM, online check-in, integrated CRS, automated night audit, and a cloud-based architecture. It also provides advanced reporting, task management, and a wide array of integrations—over 336 verified partners.
Roombler, by comparison, offers core functionalities suitable for small accommodations—booking management, guest stay oversight, and visitor welcoming—from a mobile app. It does not provide the extensive automation, reporting, or integrations that Mews offers.
Edge: Mews.
Mews maintains a support rating of 4.27/5 based on recent reviews, with users describing its support team as responsive and proactive. Support experiences range from smooth onboarding to quick resolution of issues, although some users report occasional bugs.
Roombler's support ratings are not publicly available, but as a small app designed for individual proprietors, it likely offers more direct, personalized support via app stores or email. Given the scale, support may not be as extensive or multi-channel as Mews.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts a verified partner network of 336 integrations, including channel managers, payment gateways, and revenue tools like Criton, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing. This extensive ecosystem allows hotels to customize their tech stack effectively.
Roombler offers no verified integrations, focusing instead on core booking and management functions within its app. It is suitable for straightforward operations without complex system requirements.
Edge: Mews.
Mews enjoys a 4.62/5 overall rating, with recent reviews highlighting its user-friendly interface, automation, and support. Hotels of all sizes, from boutique to large chains, rate it highly for operational efficiency and guest experience improvements.
Roombler lacks publicly available user ratings or recent reviews, but its reputation among small accommodation owners centers on simplicity and mobility rather than extensive functionality.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s pricing starts at $900 per month, with no freemium or trial options publicly indicated. Its cost reflects its enterprise-oriented features and extensive integrations.
Roombler does not publicly disclose pricing, but as a mobile app targeted at small operators, it is expected to be more affordable, possibly with a simple subscription or one-time fee.
Not ideal if you run a very small operation with minimal tech infrastructure or prefer a simple mobile app for day-to-day management.
Not ideal if your hotel requires multi-property management, automation, or advanced reporting.
Mews presents a full-fledged, scalable PMS backed by extensive features, integrations, and proven customer satisfaction. Its broad ecosystem makes it suitable for hotels with growth ambitions or complex operational requirements.
Roombler offers a simplified, mobile-first approach ideal for small accommodations and individual operators who value ease, flexibility, and immediate access. Its limited feature set and lack of integrations make it less suitable for larger or multi-property hotels.
In conclusion, if you need a powerful, customizable, and scalable system, Mews is the clear choice. For small-scale operations looking for straightforward, mobile management, Roombler may suffice—though it lacks the robustness of its competitor.
Volgens de productdatabase van HTR delen Mews PMS en Roombler 0 functies. Dit zijn de belangrijkste verschillen — functies die de een wel heeft en de ander niet.
| Functie |
|
Roombler
|
|---|---|---|
| Boekingsmodule | ||
| Gast-CRM | ||
| Gastprofielen | ||
| Meerdere valuta | ||
| Meertalig | ||
| Module voor inkomstenbeheer |
De belangrijkste verschillen worden getoond. 47 meer functies verschillen tussen deze producten.
We hebben 8 geverifieerde casestudies geanalyseerd om te vergelijken wat hotels daadwerkelijk bereiken met elk platform op vier belangrijke bedrijfsdoelstellingen.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Roombler
Nog geen gepubliceerde casestudy voor dit doel.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Roombler
Nog geen gepubliceerde casestudy voor dit doel.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Roombler
Nog geen gepubliceerde casestudy voor dit doel.
Wat hoteliers waarderen
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Waar hoteliers kritiek op hebben
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Hoewel Mews degelijke rapportage- en analysefunctionaliteiten biedt, geven verschillende gebruikers aan dat er behoefte is aan meer aanpasbare en flex... Hoewel Mews degelijke rapportage- en analysefunctionaliteiten biedt, geven verschillende gebruikers aan dat er behoefte is aan meer aanpasbare en flexibele rapportagemogelijkheden. Gebruikers geven aan dat ze graag gedetailleerdere data-inzichten willen, met name op het gebied van reserveringen en omzetanalyse.
Unieke mogelijkheden
Waar de beoordelingen het meest uiteenlopen
Dat hangt af van uw eisen. Mews PMS en Roombler delen veel kern-Property Management Systems-functies, maar elk heeft unieke mogelijkheden. Mews PMS biedt 335 geverifieerde integratiepartners, terwijl Roombler er 0 biedt. Bekijk de functievergelijking hierboven om te zien waar ze verschillen voordat u overstapt.
Kleine hotels moeten prioriteit geven aan gebruiksgemak en snelle onboarding. Mews PMS scoort het hoogst op gebruiksgemak met 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Let op transparante prijzen en de mogelijkheid van een proefperiode of demo. Filter beoordelingen op elke productpagina op accommodatiegrootte om te horen van hotels zoals het uwe.
Mews PMS: Nee. Roombler: Nee. Geen van beide producten biedt momenteel een gratis abonnement aan. De meeste Property Management Systems-leveranciers bieden demo's of proefperiodes aan — vraag er bij beide een aan om te evalueren voordat u zich vastlegt.
De HT Score is een samengestelde ranglijst die 4 criteriagroepen en meer dan tien variabelen meeweegt om hoteliers te helpen hoteltechnologieproducten objectief te vergelijken. Mews heeft een HT Score van 100 en Roombler heeft 0. Zo wordt de score berekend.
| Criteriagroep | Weging | Wat het meet |
|---|---|---|
| Klantbeoordelingen & reviews |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen gebruikers dit product? Beoordelingsscore, reviewvolume, marktaandeel, reviewdiepte, reviewrecentheid, succesverhalen ▾ De zwaarst gewogen factor. Analyseert gemiddelde tevredenheidsbeoordelingen (waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen, gebruiksgemak, ondersteuning, ROI), het totale aantal reviews ten opzichte van categoriegenoten, recentheid van reviews (minimaal 20 reviews in de afgelopen 6 maanden) en marktaandeel over unieke hotelklanten om selectiebias te detecteren. |
| Partnerecosysteem |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen technologiepartners dit bedrijf? Partneraanbevelingen, integratieaantal, integratiekwaliteit ▾ Evalueert partneraanbevelingen als expertstemmen van vertrouwen, het aantal geverifieerde integraties en ecosysteemkwaliteit — de gemiddelde HT Scores van integratiepartners. Producten met een kwalitatief beter integratie-ecosysteem leveren waarschijnlijker een verbonden technologiearchitectuur. |
| Klantgerichtheid |
|
Hoe klantgericht is deze organisatie? Gecertificeerde ondersteuning, reviewconsistentie, profielvolledigheid ▾ Beoordeelt of het bedrijf HTR Customer Support-certificering heeft verdiend, consistente reviewverzameling in de loop der tijd onderhoudt (een indicator van feedbackgedreven cultuur) en productprofielen compleet houdt met mogelijkheden, schermafbeeldingen, prijzen en functies. |
| Bereik, stabiliteit & middelen |
|
Hoe uitgebreid is het bereik en de middelen van dit bedrijf? Geografisch bereik, stabiliteit, bedrijfsmiddelen, trendscore ▾ Meet wereldwijde aanwezigheid (bediende landen en regio's), aantal jaren in bedrijf als stabiliteitsindicator, teamgrootte als middelenproxy en een trendscore op basis van kopersaanvragen, reviews, partneraanbevelingen en persactiviteit in de afgelopen twaalf maanden. |
Klantbeoordelingen en reviews zijn veruit de belangrijkste factor in het HT Score-algoritme. HTR accepteert geen betaling voor hogere ranglijstposities. Alle reviews zijn geverifieerd — alleen professionals uit de hotelbranche met bevestigde affiliaties kunnen beoordelingen indienen. Bekijk de volledige HT Score-methodologie →
Adviseur productaanbevelingen