The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Samenvatting
We hebben 887 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen geanalyseerd, functiesets, prijzen en praktijkcasestudies vergeleken om te bepalen waar elk platform uitblinkt. De juiste keuze hangt af van uw type accommodatie en prioriteiten:
Mews blinkt uit in ease of use and customer support — vooral voor independent accommodaties (4.9/5) , met exclusieve functies zoals Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Travel Tripper blinkt uit .
Zij-aan-zij beoordelingen op basis van 887 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen op HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen |
|
|
| Gebruiksgemak |
|
|
| Klantenondersteuning |
|
|
| Prijs-kwaliteitverhouding |
|
|
| Vanafprijs | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Geverifieerde beoordelingen | 887 | 0 |
Na analyse van 887 geverifieerde beoordelingen waarderen Mews-gebruikers vooral de ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, terwijl Travel Tripper-gebruikers de benadrukken. Klik op een thema om te zien wat beoordelaars zeggen.
|
|
Travel Tripper |
|---|---|
| Voordelen | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Inwerken en ondersteuning
▾
|
|
| Nadelen | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapportage en analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Hoe elk product scoort onder Vastgoedbeheersystemen-leveranciers voor verschillende accommodatiegroottes, -typen en regio's — op basis van geverifieerde beoordelingen van hoteliers in elk segment.
Op hotelgrootte
| Segment |
|
Travel Tripper |
|---|---|---|
| Klein (10-24 kamers) ▾ | #3 329 beoordelingen | — |
| Middelgroot (25-74 kamers) ▾ | #1 397 beoordelingen | — |
| Groot (75-199 kamers) ▾ | #3 45 beoordelingen | — |
| Extra groot (200+ kamers) ▾ | #3 49 beoordelingen | — |
Op accommodatietype
| Segment |
|
Travel Tripper |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 beoordelingen | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #5 220 beoordelingen | — |
| Merk / Keten ▾ | #2 170 beoordelingen | — |
| Langverblijf ▾ | #1 130 beoordelingen | — |
Op regio
| Segment |
|
Travel Tripper |
|---|---|---|
| Noord-Amerika ▾ | #8 106 beoordelingen | — |
| Europa ▾ | #1 660 beoordelingen | — |
| Azië-Pacific ▾ | #10 17 beoordelingen | — |
| Midden-Oosten ▾ | #28 8 beoordelingen | — |
Choosing between Mews PMS by Mews and Travel Tripper hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and growth goals. Mews is a full-suite property management system that automates and streamlines daily hotel operations, while Travel Tripper primarily focuses on booking, distribution, and revenue management aimed at maximizing direct reservations.
If your aim is to overhaul core hotel operations and improve guest experiences with a versatile, all-in-one platform, Mews is the clear frontrunner. But if your priority is enhancing your distribution channels and boosting direct bookings through sophisticated rate and availability management, Travel Tripper might seem attractive—yet, the lack of recent reviews and user feedback makes it less reliable.
Mews and Travel Tripper serve different primary functions within hotel tech stacks. Mews offers a comprehensive cloud-based property management system with over 750 reviews, a high overall rating of 4.62/5, and recent reviews from the last six months—indicating ongoing support and development. Conversely, Travel Tripper has no recent reviews or ratings, suggesting little current market presence or user engagement.
Both products aim to optimize hotel performance, but Mews covers from booking to check-out, including guest management, housekeeping, billing, and integrations. Travel Tripper, meanwhile, concentrates on distribution and revenue management, helping hotels direct traffic and control rates but lacks core PMS functionalities.
Would you prefer a unified platform that manages your hotel end-to-end, or a specialized tool that maximizes your booking channels? Mews’s recent reviews and high ratings strongly suggest it’s the more trustworthy choice for comprehensive hotel management.
If your hotel needs a central system that automates guest check-ins, improves operational efficiency, and offers a broad suite of features—like multi-lingual support, guest CRM, housekeeping modules, and extensive integrations—then Mews is the clear pick. Its user-friendly interface, high customer satisfaction, and robust automation make it suitable for boutique hotels, hostels, and small chains seeking operational agility.
On the other hand, if your hotel’s primary goal is to optimize distribution, rate management, and reduce reliance on OTAs to increase direct bookings, Travel Tripper’s platform could be appealing. It specializes in channel management, advanced revenue management, and offers tools for rate and availability control, though it lacks the comprehensive PMS features found in Mews.
For most hotels seeking a full operational platform with proven reviews and ongoing support, Mews’s broad feature set and recent positive feedback make it the safer, more reliable choice.
Mews’s ease of use is highly rated at 4.7/5, with recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, streamlined onboarding, and mobile app capabilities. Many users highlight how staff can quickly adapt, often in just days, thanks to clear workflows and proactive support.
Travel Tripper, lacking recent reviews and detailed user feedback, does not offer comparable insights into usability. Its minimal online presence suggests it may not prioritize user experience or ongoing customer support, which are critical factors for hotel teams.
Edge: Mews
Mews offers over 59 features exclusive to its platform—including multi-currency support, revenue management modules, booking engine, guest CRM, automated night audit, integrated payment processing, and mobile housekeeping. It also supports digital registration, guest messaging, online check-in/out, and centralized role management.
Travel Tripper’s core focus appears to be on booking and distribution, with no detailed feature list or comparable functionalities available publicly. Its specialization in rate control, channel management, and revenue optimization is valuable but does not replace the comprehensive operational tools in Mews.
Edge: Mews
Mews has a strong support reputation, rated 4.27/5, with recent reviews emphasizing responsive, proactive assistance and effective onboarding. Customers note that support can resolve issues quickly, and the company frequently updates its platform based on user feedback.
Travel Tripper’s support ratings and recent user feedback are unavailable, making it difficult to assess their responsiveness. Given the lack of recent reviews, confidence in ongoing support and product evolution favors Mews.
Edge: Mews
Mews connects to over 336 verified partners, including channel managers, point-of-sale systems, payment providers, and other hotel tech solutions. Its open API and extensive marketplace facilitate tailored integrations to meet diverse operational needs.
Travel Tripper currently has no verified partners, limiting its ability to integrate with other systems. This significantly reduces flexibility for hotels looking to build a connected, automated tech ecosystem.
Edge: Mews
Mews’s review count of 758, with 98 recent reviews, and a 93% likelihood to recommend, demonstrate strong, current user satisfaction. Hotels across segments—independent, boutique, city center, hostels—rate it highly, with an average rating of 4.64/5 among reviews, mainly praising its usability and automation.
Travel Tripper has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. The absence of feedback over time raises questions about its continued relevance or support.
Edge: Mews
Mews’s pricing starts at a base fee of $900 per month, with no freemium or free trial options. This flat rate covers core PMS functionalities, with additional costs potentially arising from integrations or add-ons.
Travel Tripper’s pricing details are not publicly available, and there is no information on trial or subscription models. The lack of transparency makes it difficult to compare value directly, but the available data favors Mews’s clear pricing structure.
Mews is a comprehensive cloud-based PMS that covers your entire hotel operation, from reservations to housekeeping, with a proven track record and recent positive reviews. Its extensive integrations and user-friendly design make it suitable for a broad range of hotel types, especially those seeking operational efficiency and a future-proof tech stack.
Travel Tripper specializes in distribution and revenue management, focusing on boosting direct bookings and controlling rates across channels. However, the lack of recent reviews and a limited feature set make it less reliable for hotels needing an all-encompassing management platform.
For most hotels, especially those wanting a trusted, well-reviewed solution with ongoing support and extensive features, Mews is the clear choice. If your core goal is to optimize your distribution channels and you’re comfortable with niche tools, Travel Tripper may be worth exploring, but the current data favors Mews.
Prijzen voor Vastgoedbeheersystemen zijn zelden eenvoudig. Dit is wat we weten op basis van de openbare prijsgegevens van elke leverancier. Vraag altijd een offerte op maat aan voor uw accommodatie.
|
|
Travel Tripper | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
Volgens de productdatabase van HTR delen Mews PMS en Travel Tripper 0 functies. Dit zijn de belangrijkste verschillen — functies die de een wel heeft en de ander niet.
| Functie |
|
Travel Tripper |
|---|---|---|
| Boekingsmodule | ||
| Gast-CRM | ||
| Gastprofielen | ||
| Meerdere valuta | ||
| Meertalig | ||
| Module voor inkomstenbeheer |
De belangrijkste verschillen worden getoond. 47 meer functies verschillen tussen deze producten.
We hebben 8 geverifieerde casestudies geanalyseerd om te vergelijken wat hotels daadwerkelijk bereiken met elk platform op vier belangrijke bedrijfsdoelstellingen.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nog geen gepubliceerde casestudy voor dit doel.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nog geen gepubliceerde casestudy voor dit doel.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Nog geen gepubliceerde casestudy voor dit doel.
Wat hoteliers waarderen
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Waar hoteliers kritiek op hebben
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Hoewel Mews degelijke rapportage- en analysefunctionaliteiten biedt, geven verschillende gebruikers aan dat er behoefte is aan meer aanpasbare en flex... Hoewel Mews degelijke rapportage- en analysefunctionaliteiten biedt, geven verschillende gebruikers aan dat er behoefte is aan meer aanpasbare en flexibele rapportagemogelijkheden. Gebruikers geven aan dat ze graag gedetailleerdere data-inzichten willen, met name op het gebied van reserveringen en omzetanalyse.
Unieke mogelijkheden
Waar de beoordelingen het meest uiteenlopen
Dat hangt af van uw eisen. Mews PMS en Travel Tripper delen veel kern-Property Management Systems-functies, maar elk heeft unieke mogelijkheden. Mews PMS biedt 335 geverifieerde integratiepartners, terwijl Travel Tripper er 0 biedt. Bekijk de functievergelijking hierboven om te zien waar ze verschillen voordat u overstapt.
Kleine hotels moeten prioriteit geven aan gebruiksgemak en snelle onboarding. Mews PMS scoort het hoogst op gebruiksgemak met 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Let op transparante prijzen en de mogelijkheid van een proefperiode of demo. Filter beoordelingen op elke productpagina op accommodatiegrootte om te horen van hotels zoals het uwe.
Mews PMS: Nee. Travel Tripper: Nee. Geen van beide producten biedt momenteel een gratis abonnement aan. De meeste Property Management Systems-leveranciers bieden demo's of proefperiodes aan — vraag er bij beide een aan om te evalueren voordat u zich vastlegt.
De HT Score is een samengestelde ranglijst die 4 criteriagroepen en meer dan tien variabelen meeweegt om hoteliers te helpen hoteltechnologieproducten objectief te vergelijken. Mews heeft een HT Score van 100 en Travel Tripper heeft 0. Zo wordt de score berekend.
| Criteriagroep | Weging | Wat het meet |
|---|---|---|
| Klantbeoordelingen & reviews |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen gebruikers dit product? Beoordelingsscore, reviewvolume, marktaandeel, reviewdiepte, reviewrecentheid, succesverhalen ▾ De zwaarst gewogen factor. Analyseert gemiddelde tevredenheidsbeoordelingen (waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen, gebruiksgemak, ondersteuning, ROI), het totale aantal reviews ten opzichte van categoriegenoten, recentheid van reviews (minimaal 20 reviews in de afgelopen 6 maanden) en marktaandeel over unieke hotelklanten om selectiebias te detecteren. |
| Partnerecosysteem |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen technologiepartners dit bedrijf? Partneraanbevelingen, integratieaantal, integratiekwaliteit ▾ Evalueert partneraanbevelingen als expertstemmen van vertrouwen, het aantal geverifieerde integraties en ecosysteemkwaliteit — de gemiddelde HT Scores van integratiepartners. Producten met een kwalitatief beter integratie-ecosysteem leveren waarschijnlijker een verbonden technologiearchitectuur. |
| Klantgerichtheid |
|
Hoe klantgericht is deze organisatie? Gecertificeerde ondersteuning, reviewconsistentie, profielvolledigheid ▾ Beoordeelt of het bedrijf HTR Customer Support-certificering heeft verdiend, consistente reviewverzameling in de loop der tijd onderhoudt (een indicator van feedbackgedreven cultuur) en productprofielen compleet houdt met mogelijkheden, schermafbeeldingen, prijzen en functies. |
| Bereik, stabiliteit & middelen |
|
Hoe uitgebreid is het bereik en de middelen van dit bedrijf? Geografisch bereik, stabiliteit, bedrijfsmiddelen, trendscore ▾ Meet wereldwijde aanwezigheid (bediende landen en regio's), aantal jaren in bedrijf als stabiliteitsindicator, teamgrootte als middelenproxy en een trendscore op basis van kopersaanvragen, reviews, partneraanbevelingen en persactiviteit in de afgelopen twaalf maanden. |
Klantbeoordelingen en reviews zijn veruit de belangrijkste factor in het HT Score-algoritme. HTR accepteert geen betaling voor hogere ranglijstposities. Alle reviews zijn geverifieerd — alleen professionals uit de hotelbranche met bevestigde affiliaties kunnen beoordelingen indienen. Bekijk de volledige HT Score-methodologie →
Adviseur productaanbevelingen