The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 339 条经验证的评价后,Amadeus 用户最看重其 易于使用, 增加收入, 客户服务,而 innRoad 用户则强调 客户支持质量, 定制和灵活性, 预订仪表板和报告。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
+
客户支持质量
▾
|
|
+
增加收入
▾
|
+
定制和灵活性
▾
|
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
+
预订仪表板和报告
▾
|
|
+
高级报告和分析
▾
|
+
胶带图表和颜色编码
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
集成能力
▾
|
−
费率和付款管理
▾
|
|
−
复杂性和可用性问题
▾
|
−
用户界面故障
▾
|
|
−
功能实现滞后
▾
|
−
移动可访问性和应用程序功能
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #22 11 条评价 | #4 150 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #15 36 条评价 | #13 41 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #7 26 条评价 | #15 7 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #9 6 条评价 | #16 3 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #17 32 条评价 | #9 86 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #12 41 条评价 | #13 37 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #10 34 条评价 | #12 33 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #14 11 条评价 | #7 18 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #7 39 条评价 | #1 229 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #19 14 条评价 | #29 6 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #16 10 条评价 | #26 1 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 8 条评价 | #25 0 条评价 |
Choosing the right booking engine is crucial for your hotel's revenue and operational efficiency. Both Amadeus’ iHotelier® Booking Engine and innRoad offer solutions aimed at increasing bookings and simplifying management, but they diverge significantly in features, usability, and market reach. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize a globally integrated platform with extensive features or a more straightforward, user-friendly system.
Amadeus has a more established global presence and boasts more reviews, especially recent ones, giving it a clearer edge in market confidence. innRoad, while rated slightly higher in overall satisfaction, has fewer reviews but a strong track record in increasing direct bookings. Which product aligns better with your hotel’s specific needs?
Both products address booking automation, revenue management, and guest experiences, but Amadeus emphasizes its integration with global distribution channels and advanced marketing tools. innRoad, on the other hand, focuses on ease of use, operational efficiency, and local support, making it more approachable for small-to-mid-sized hotels.
Amadeus offers a more extensive feature set, including loyalty programs, A/B testing, and alternative accommodation suggestions, which are absent from innRoad. Conversely, innRoad’s interface is praised for simplicity and its effective group booking and multi-room management capabilities. With more recent reviews backing innRoad's ease of use, it may be preferable for hotels seeking a straightforward implementation.
Do you want a globally recognized platform with a broad feature set or a system that prioritizes simplicity and speed?
If your hotel requires advanced integration, such as loyalty programs, multi-currency support, or sophisticated marketing automation, Amadeus is the clear choice. Its extensive partner network and features like booking abandonment recapture are ideal for larger properties or those looking to optimize direct bookings at scale.
If ease of use, faster onboarding, and a focus on increasing direct bookings are your priorities, innRoad is better suited. Its high user satisfaction, especially among small and independent properties, makes it a strong candidate for hotels seeking quick, reliable results without extensive training or complexity.
For hotels aiming for global reach and advanced marketing tools, go with Amadeus. For those valuing simplicity and immediate booking increases, innRoad is the better option.
Amadeus has a UI rated at 4.25/5, with reviews indicating some complexity, especially around onboarding and understanding features. Multiple users mention the platform’s rich functionalities but also note a steep learning curve, and that support can sometimes be slow or inconsistent.
innRoad scores slightly higher at 4.44/5, with reviews emphasizing its intuitive design and straightforward setup process. Many users highlight that their staff adapted quickly, and the system’s simplicity contributed to faster onboarding.
Edge: innRoad.
Amadeus offers 36 features, including loyalty program integration, A/B testing, alternative accommodation recommendations, and payment options like Apple Pay and PayPal. These can help optimize revenue, personalization, and guest experience.
innRoad provides 27 core features, such as multi-currency, multi-lingual support, group booking, and native email marketing. Its features are geared toward operational efficiency and increasing direct bookings.
While Amadeus offers more advanced marketing and revenue tools, innRoad’s features excel at simplifying day-to-day management. The edge goes to Amadeus for breadth and depth of features.
innRoad’s support ratings are significantly higher, at 4.44/5, with reviews praising its responsiveness and 24/7 live support. Hoteliers describe their support as helpful, with some noting quick resolutions and effective onboarding.
Amadeus’s ratings are lower at 3.22/5, with reviews citing slow responses and inconsistent support quality. Some users find the support experience frustrating, which can hinder problem resolution.
Edge: innRoad.
Amadeus boasts 104 verified partners, including key players like Tripadvisor, Expedia, and Oracle Hospitality, along with specialized integrations for marketing, revenue management, and distribution. This extensive network enables seamless connections with existing hotel systems.
innRoad has 34 verified partners, including popular tools like QuickBooks, RateGain, and Impulsify. Its integrations are solid but less comprehensive than Amadeus’s network.
Edge: Amadeus.
innRoad leads with an overall rating of 4.68/5 based on 200 reviews, with recent feedback highlighting its ease of use and impact on bookings. Many small and independent hotels appreciate its straightforward approach and helpful support.
Amadeus has a slightly lower overall rating of 4.39/5 from 93 reviews, with some praise for advanced features but concerns over support responsiveness. Larger hotels or those with complex needs tend to value its extensive capabilities more.
For user satisfaction, innRoad is favored overall.
Edge: innRoad.
Both products do not publicly list detailed pricing. They typically require contacting sales for custom quotes, with no free tiers or clear monthly fees posted. Expect to negotiate based on hotel size, features needed, and support levels.
Not ideal if you prioritize simplicity or have a tight budget, as Amadeus’s system can be complex and potentially costly.
Not ideal if your property requires extensive global distribution or advanced marketing automation features.
Amadeus provides a feature-rich platform with a global reach, suitable for larger, multi-property, or internationally focused hotels. Its extensive integrations support complex operations and marketing strategies, but support and usability can be challenging.
innRoad excels in simplicity, customer support, and delivering measurable increases in direct bookings. Its user-friendly design and strong review scores make it ideal for small to mid-sized hotels looking for reliable, immediate results.
If your hotel needs sophisticated tools and a worldwide presence, choose Amadeus. If ease of use, support, and quick booking growth matter most, innRoad is the superior choice.
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 和 innRoad Booking Engine 共享 27 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 人工智能优化 | ||
| 团体预订引擎 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 忠诚度计划整合 | ||
| 替代住宿建议(没有空房时) | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| 紧急信息 | ||
| 苹果支付 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 24 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
TravelClick 因其易用性而受到酒店员工和最终用户的一致好评。其预订引擎被描述为直观的,有助于顺利处理预订和价格管理。这种用户友好性是一个关键的卖点。
许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等... 许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等功能,这些功能显著提高了直接预订量和总体收入。
人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素... 人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
TravelClick 与各种系统(包括 PMS 和支付网关)的强大集成受到高度赞赏。许多评论都强调无缝连接支持各种功能,并通过统一界面简化管理。
尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验... 尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验不足的用户而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
客户支持服务通常因响应迅速、知识渊博、及时解决问题而受到称赞。然而,也有人提到响应速度慢,以及与英语不流利的支持人员沟通不畅,这可能会让用户感到沮丧。
用户经常提到 InnRoad 提供的高度定制和灵活性,特别是在房间外观、计费功能和报告方面。这使酒店能够根据其特定需求定制软件,从而提高运营效率和客人满意度。
预订仪表板和综合报告功能因其提供可操作见解和简化数据管理的能力而备受瞩目。这些工具可帮助酒店经理跟踪入住率、收入和其他关键绩效指标,从而更轻松地做出明... 预订仪表板和综合报告功能因其提供可操作见解和简化数据管理的能力而备受瞩目。这些工具可帮助酒店经理跟踪入住率、收入和其他关键绩效指标,从而更轻松地做出明智的决策并提高整体酒店绩效。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户对该系统管理费率和付款(包括费率变更和分期付款)的能力表示赞赏。然而,有些人认为这些功能复杂且耗时,这表明需要更精简的流程来提高效率和客户满意度。
一些用户报告称,用户界面出现故障且加载速度缓慢,这可能会扰乱日常操作。系统冻结和功能错误等问题表明需要增强稳定性和速度。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 和 innRoad Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 innRoad Booking Engine 提供 34 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。innRoad Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 4.3/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine:否。innRoad Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 72,innRoad 的为 34。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问