项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 446 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
apaleo GmbH 在频繁更新和社区参与方面表现出色,尤其适合民宿住宿设施(0.0/5)。
Stayntouch 在实施、培训和过渡支持方面表现出色,尤其适合青年旅舍住宿设施(4.8/5),并拥有收益管理模块以及平板电脑/自助服务终端值机等独家功能。
基于 HTR 上 446 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $900/月 | 起价 $800/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 30 | 416 |
在分析了 446 条经验证的评价后,apaleo GmbH 用户最看重其 频繁更新和社区参与, 定制化和灵活性, open api and integration,而 Stayntouch 用户则强调 实施、培训和过渡支持, 易用性和快速的员工培训, 前台操作与预订管理。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
频繁更新和社区参与
▾
|
+
实施、培训和过渡支持
▾
|
|
+
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
+
易用性和快速的员工培训
▾
|
|
+
Open API and Integration
▾
|
+
前台操作与预订管理
▾
|
|
+
App Store and Third-Party Integrations
▾
|
+
集成与连接
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告功能
▾
|
−
报告与分析
▾
|
|
−
团体和预订管理
▾
|
−
定制和工作流程的灵活性
▾
|
|
−
账单、账页和支付流程
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #44 7 条评价 | #19 58 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #26 19 条评价 | #5 223 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #43 1 条评价 | #5 49 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #13 3 条评价 | #2 59 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | #6 247 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #44 4 条评价 | #6 195 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #42 4 条评价 | #3 159 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #20 9 条评价 | #14 18 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #37 2 条评价 | #3 298 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #18 26 条评价 | #13 65 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #23 3 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel's operational success and guest experience. You’re deciding between Apaleo Open PMS and Stayntouch, both of which aim to streamline daily tasks, improve guest satisfaction, and facilitate growth. Apaleo offers an open API-first platform designed for flexibility and customization, while Stayntouch emphasizes ease of use, mobile management, and comprehensive features. Which system aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
Both Apaleo and Stayntouch aim to simplify hotel operations, but they approach this differently. Apaleo’s strength lies in its open API platform, allowing hotels to tailor integrations and workflows, whereas Stayntouch prioritizes an intuitive, user-friendly interface with a focus on mobile functionality. If your team needs the ability to customize and integrate extensively, Apaleo could be appealing; if quick onboarding and ease of use are your priorities, Stayntouch might be better. Do you want maximum flexibility or simplicity?
If your hotel is part of a chain, managing multiple properties, and values extensive integrations, Stayntouch’s proven multi-property management and 188 verified partners make it the clear choice. Conversely, if your hotel requires a highly customizable, API-driven platform for tailored workflows and future scalability, Apaleo’s open ecosystem with 120 verified partners is more suitable. For large chains, Stayntouch’s extensive third-party integrations and market presence favor it; for innovative, tech-forward properties, Apaleo’s flexibility wins.
Stayntouch holds a slight edge in user-friendliness, with an overall rating of 4.7/5 and praised for its intuitive screens, onboarding, and mobile capabilities. Apaleo scores a top 4.9/5 but is often noted for its complexity due to extensive customization options, which can steepen the learning curve. In reviews, Stayntouch's onboarding is described as quick and supportive, while Apaleo’s flexibility sometimes requires more technical setup. Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch offers 12 features exclusive to its platform, including revenue management, guest app, booking engine, guest messaging, and kiosk check-in, providing a broader range of operational tools. Apaleo’s 37 shared features focus on reservation management and integrations but relies on third-party apps for advanced solutions. If comprehensive guest engagement tools and automation are priorities, Stayntouch leads; for integrations and core PMS functions, Apaleo’s open API is advantageous. Edge: Stayntouch.
Both platforms are highly rated for support, but Apaleo’s reviews frequently cite exceptional responsiveness, with a 4.83/5 rating and comments like “best support” and “friendly community.” Stayntouch’s support is strong at 4.68/5 but is often praised for its onboarding and training, though some mention slower issue resolution during rapid growth. If ongoing responsive support is essential, Apaleo’s recent reviews and high NPS (9.69/10) give it an edge. Edge: Apaleo.
Stayntouch boasts 188 verified partners, surpassing Apaleo’s 120, with shared integrations like HQ revenue and RevControl. Stayntouch’s wider partner network, including unique integrations such as Zaplox, Tripleseat, and IVvy, enables more comprehensive third-party connectivity. If extensive integration options are critical, Stayntouch’s larger ecosystem makes it the better choice. Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch’s overall review score of 4.56/5 outperforms Apaleo’s 0/5, reflecting a significant difference in user satisfaction. Recent reviews highlight Stayntouch’s intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and mobile access, especially for independent, boutique, and resort properties. Apaleo’s reviews are limited but highly positive regarding community and API flexibility. Given the recent review volume, Stayntouch’s higher ratings and client feedback make it the more trusted option. Edge: Stayntouch.
Apaleo’s base price is $900/month, with no freemium or tiered options mentioned. Stayntouch charges $800/month, also without free or trial options available. While pricing is close, the slight difference may reflect the value of features and support; your decision may hinge on specific operational needs versus budget flexibility.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
At its core, Apaleo offers a flexible, open platform for hotels that want to craft a unique digital infrastructure, supported by a strong community and a broad set of integrations. Stayntouch emphasizes ease of use, mobile capabilities, and a feature set that suits independent and boutique hotels, with a larger user base and higher recent reviews.
Choose Apaleo if your hotel values customization, is tech-savvy, and plans to develop a tailored tech ecosystem that can evolve over time. Opt for Stayntouch if your focus is on quick deployment, operational simplicity, and excellent guest experiences, especially across multiple properties.
In summary, for hotels that want a customizable backbone, Apaleo's open API and community support are unmatched. For properties seeking a proven, user-friendly solution with a wide array of features and integrations, Stayntouch is the clear winner.
酒店运营软件(PMS) 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $900/月 | 起价 $800/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 13 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We really like the ability to customize our setups as much as possible, and that was pretty important to us. Being able to have a lot of those main features already at our fingerti..."
"One of the biggest impacts for us has been the vast array of implementation options available on Apaleo. We’re now able to think outside the box and customise solutions in ways we..."
"Before leveraging Stayntouch PMS and Owner Relations, much of our old accounting processes were completed manually, including printing and hand-delivering statements to units, and..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"As an independent hotel that runs above 100% occupancy on many nights, the TWA Hotel finds Stayntouch integral to our operations."
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
该平台致力于定期更新和社区参与,并广受好评,用户也非常重视平台对用户反馈和持续改进的关注。活跃的社区构建了一个支持网络,提升了用户体验。
用户高度评价 Apaleo 在定制化方面的优势,它支持定制化工作流程和流程自动化。这种灵活性有助于酒店创建完全符合其运营需求的系统,从而提高效率并改善宾客服务... 用户高度评价 Apaleo 在定制化方面的优势,它支持定制化工作流程和流程自动化。这种灵活性有助于酒店创建完全符合其运营需求的系统,从而提高效率并改善宾客服务。
Apaleo's open API is uniquely praised for enabling custom tech stacks and seamless integration with various systems, greatly enhancing efficiency and... Apaleo's open API is uniquely praised for enabling custom tech stacks and seamless integration with various systems, greatly enhancing efficiency and flexibility in operations. Reviewers appreciate the ability to create their own applications and tech ecosystems, significantly setting Apaleo apart from its competitors.
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
虽然用户重视基本的报告功能,但 Apaleo 的高级报告功能需求也十分明显。许多人发现当前的选项有限,因此不得不依赖其他工具进行更深入的分析。
Apaleo 的群组管理功能因其用户友好性而受到称赞,但一些评论指出仍有需要改进的地方,特别是在综合功能和直观性方面。
排名更高的方面
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
一个主要的主题是Stayntouch在切换和培训方面的表现,许多评论者提到顺畅的过渡和现场指导的有效性。产品的上线体验似乎是一个关键的采购标准,因为用户反复称赞... 一个主要的主题是Stayntouch在切换和培训方面的表现,许多评论者提到顺畅的过渡和现场指导的有效性。产品的上线体验似乎是一个关键的采购标准,因为用户反复称赞培训师和实施专家帮助减轻压力、加快上线成功。
用户普遍反映Stayntouch界面直观,易于学习,即使是新员工或技术水平较低的员工也能快速掌握。这缩短了培训时间,帮助酒店更快让团队投入工作,减少错误。
评测者经常强调更快的入住办理、更便捷的预订查询、快速修改入住日期和房型,以及更顺畅的日常前台工作流程。这些功能帮助酒店加快宾客办理入住速度,确保在繁忙... 评测者经常强调更快的入住办理、更便捷的预订查询、快速修改入住日期和房型,以及更顺畅的日常前台工作流程。这些功能帮助酒店加快宾客办理入住速度,确保在繁忙时段运营井然有序。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
许多评价提到入住率、收入、税费、服务费和运营报告的价值,尤其是在日常管理决策中。然而,用户也希望拥有更灵活的筛选、更好的深入分析、更清晰的布局,以及更... 许多评价提到入住率、收入、税费、服务费和运营报告的价值,尤其是在日常管理决策中。然而,用户也希望拥有更灵活的筛选、更好的深入分析、更清晰的布局,以及更便捷地获取所需的具体报告。
许多用户重视根据运营需求定制设置、字段、价格逻辑、仪表盘和酒店工作流程的能力。但他们也希望在报告、界面布局和流程步骤上有更多的定制,显示出灵活性是一个... 许多用户重视根据运营需求定制设置、字段、价格逻辑、仪表盘和酒店工作流程的能力。但他们也希望在报告、界面布局和流程步骤上有更多的定制,显示出灵活性是一个差异化因素,但尚未完全实现。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Apaleo Open PMS 和 Stayntouch 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Apaleo Open PMS 提供 122 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Stayntouch 提供 200 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Apaleo Open PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Apaleo Open PMS:否。Stayntouch:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。apaleo GmbH 的 HT Score 为 75,Stayntouch 的为 95。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐