The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 402 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
apaleo GmbH 表现出色 在 频繁更新和社区参与 方面 .
Stayntouch 表现出色 在 用户友好界面 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
基于 HTR 上 402 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $900/mo | From $800/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 30 | 372 |
在分析了 402 条经验证的评价后,apaleo GmbH 用户最看重其 频繁更新和社区参与, 定制化和灵活性, open api and integration,而 Stayntouch 用户则强调 用户友好界面, 整合与入职, 系统性能和可靠性。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
频繁更新和社区参与
▾
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
+
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
+
整合与入职
▾
|
|
+
Open API and Integration
▾
|
+
系统性能和可靠性
▾
|
|
+
App Store and Third-Party Integrations
▾
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告功能
▾
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
−
团体和预订管理
▾
|
−
客房管理和客房服务
▾
|
|
−
预订管理
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #42 7 条评价 | #18 51 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #27 19 条评价 | #5 208 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #41 1 条评价 | #7 29 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #14 3 条评价 | #2 58 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #34 14 条评价 | #6 220 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #43 4 条评价 | #6 180 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #40 4 条评价 | #3 152 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #19 9 条评价 | #14 17 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #38 2 条评价 | #4 262 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #18 26 条评价 | #12 64 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #21 3 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel's operational success and guest experience. You’re deciding between Apaleo Open PMS and Stayntouch, both of which aim to streamline daily tasks, improve guest satisfaction, and facilitate growth. Apaleo offers an open API-first platform designed for flexibility and customization, while Stayntouch emphasizes ease of use, mobile management, and comprehensive features. Which system aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
Both Apaleo and Stayntouch aim to simplify hotel operations, but they approach this differently. Apaleo’s strength lies in its open API platform, allowing hotels to tailor integrations and workflows, whereas Stayntouch prioritizes an intuitive, user-friendly interface with a focus on mobile functionality. If your team needs the ability to customize and integrate extensively, Apaleo could be appealing; if quick onboarding and ease of use are your priorities, Stayntouch might be better. Do you want maximum flexibility or simplicity?
If your hotel is part of a chain, managing multiple properties, and values extensive integrations, Stayntouch’s proven multi-property management and 188 verified partners make it the clear choice. Conversely, if your hotel requires a highly customizable, API-driven platform for tailored workflows and future scalability, Apaleo’s open ecosystem with 120 verified partners is more suitable. For large chains, Stayntouch’s extensive third-party integrations and market presence favor it; for innovative, tech-forward properties, Apaleo’s flexibility wins.
Stayntouch holds a slight edge in user-friendliness, with an overall rating of 4.7/5 and praised for its intuitive screens, onboarding, and mobile capabilities. Apaleo scores a top 4.9/5 but is often noted for its complexity due to extensive customization options, which can steepen the learning curve. In reviews, Stayntouch's onboarding is described as quick and supportive, while Apaleo’s flexibility sometimes requires more technical setup. Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch offers 12 features exclusive to its platform, including revenue management, guest app, booking engine, guest messaging, and kiosk check-in, providing a broader range of operational tools. Apaleo’s 37 shared features focus on reservation management and integrations but relies on third-party apps for advanced solutions. If comprehensive guest engagement tools and automation are priorities, Stayntouch leads; for integrations and core PMS functions, Apaleo’s open API is advantageous. Edge: Stayntouch.
Both platforms are highly rated for support, but Apaleo’s reviews frequently cite exceptional responsiveness, with a 4.83/5 rating and comments like “best support” and “friendly community.” Stayntouch’s support is strong at 4.68/5 but is often praised for its onboarding and training, though some mention slower issue resolution during rapid growth. If ongoing responsive support is essential, Apaleo’s recent reviews and high NPS (9.69/10) give it an edge. Edge: Apaleo.
Stayntouch boasts 188 verified partners, surpassing Apaleo’s 120, with shared integrations like HQ revenue and RevControl. Stayntouch’s wider partner network, including unique integrations such as Zaplox, Tripleseat, and IVvy, enables more comprehensive third-party connectivity. If extensive integration options are critical, Stayntouch’s larger ecosystem makes it the better choice. Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch’s overall review score of 4.56/5 outperforms Apaleo’s 0/5, reflecting a significant difference in user satisfaction. Recent reviews highlight Stayntouch’s intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and mobile access, especially for independent, boutique, and resort properties. Apaleo’s reviews are limited but highly positive regarding community and API flexibility. Given the recent review volume, Stayntouch’s higher ratings and client feedback make it the more trusted option. Edge: Stayntouch.
Apaleo’s base price is $900/month, with no freemium or tiered options mentioned. Stayntouch charges $800/month, also without free or trial options available. While pricing is close, the slight difference may reflect the value of features and support; your decision may hinge on specific operational needs versus budget flexibility.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
At its core, Apaleo offers a flexible, open platform for hotels that want to craft a unique digital infrastructure, supported by a strong community and a broad set of integrations. Stayntouch emphasizes ease of use, mobile capabilities, and a feature set that suits independent and boutique hotels, with a larger user base and higher recent reviews.
Choose Apaleo if your hotel values customization, is tech-savvy, and plans to develop a tailored tech ecosystem that can evolve over time. Opt for Stayntouch if your focus is on quick deployment, operational simplicity, and excellent guest experiences, especially across multiple properties.
In summary, for hotels that want a customizable backbone, Apaleo's open API and community support are unmatched. For properties seeking a proven, user-friendly solution with a wide array of features and integrations, Stayntouch is the clear winner.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $800/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Apaleo Open PMS 和 Stayntouch 共享 37 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 |
我们分析了 9 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"One of the biggest impacts for us has been the vast array of implementation options available on Apaleo. We’re now able to think outside the box and customise solutions in ways we..."
"Before leveraging Stayntouch PMS and Owner Relations, much of our old accounting processes were completed manually, including printing and hand-delivering statements to units, and..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"As an independent hotel that runs above 100% occupancy on many nights, the TWA Hotel finds Stayntouch integral to our operations."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
该平台致力于定期更新和社区参与,并广受好评,用户也非常重视平台对用户反馈和持续改进的关注。活跃的社区构建了一个支持网络,提升了用户体验。
用户高度评价 Apaleo 在定制化方面的优势,它支持定制化工作流程和流程自动化。这种灵活性有助于酒店创建完全符合其运营需求的系统,从而提高效率并改善宾客服务... 用户高度评价 Apaleo 在定制化方面的优势,它支持定制化工作流程和流程自动化。这种灵活性有助于酒店创建完全符合其运营需求的系统,从而提高效率并改善宾客服务。
Apaleo's open API is uniquely praised for enabling custom tech stacks and seamless integration with various systems, greatly enhancing efficiency and... Apaleo's open API is uniquely praised for enabling custom tech stacks and seamless integration with various systems, greatly enhancing efficiency and flexibility in operations. Reviewers appreciate the ability to create their own applications and tech ecosystems, significantly setting Apaleo apart from its competitors.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然用户重视基本的报告功能,但 Apaleo 的高级报告功能需求也十分明显。许多人发现当前的选项有限,因此不得不依赖其他工具进行更深入的分析。
Apaleo 的群组管理功能因其用户友好性而受到称赞,但一些评论指出仍有需要改进的地方,特别是在综合功能和直观性方面。
排名更高的方面
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
该系统直观的设计便于操作,非常适合快速培训新员工。其醒目的视觉和组织元素有助于加快任务执行速度,提升员工能力,从而改善与顾客的互动体验。
Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称,这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵,尤其是在系统过渡和设... Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称,这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵,尤其是在系统过渡和设置方面。
Stayntouch 的服务总体可靠,很少出现重大故障,并通过云端提供持续支持。尽管总体评价良好,但一些用户也对公司快速发展背景下解决复杂问题的速度表示担忧。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然用户普遍称赞其易于访问且支持运营的报告,但他们也指出需要更具适应性的报告功能。一些报告缺乏细节或难以操作,凸显了可定制分析解决方案的必要性。
客房分配和客房服务功能因提升运营效率而获得积极反馈。然而,用户希望客房日志查看和任务安排功能能够得到改进,以满足特定的管理需求。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Apaleo Open PMS 和 Stayntouch 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Apaleo Open PMS 提供 120 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Stayntouch 提供 187 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Apaleo Open PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Apaleo Open PMS:否。Stayntouch:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。apaleo GmbH 的 HT Score 为 78,Stayntouch 的为 91。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问