The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 382 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
ASA Hotelsoftware 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 On premise and Guest CRM.
Stayntouch 表现出色 在 用户友好界面 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Tablet/Kiosk Check-in and Lobby Kiosk.
基于 HTR 上 382 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $1,000/mo | From $800/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 11 | 371 |
在分析了 382 条经验证的评价后,ASA Hotelsoftware 用户最看重其 ,而 Stayntouch 用户则强调 用户友好界面, 整合与入职, 系统性能和可靠性。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
|
+
整合与入职
▾
|
|
|
+
系统性能和可靠性
▾
|
|
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
客房管理和客房服务
▾
|
|
|
−
预订管理
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #49 4 条评价 | #18 51 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #43 6 条评价 | #5 208 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #7 29 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 58 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #61 1 条评价 | #6 220 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #51 2 条评价 | #6 180 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #59 1 条评价 | #3 152 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #39 2 条评价 | #14 17 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #4 262 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #27 11 条评价 | #12 64 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #21 3 条评价 |
When selecting a property management system (PMS), your hotel needs a solution that balances comprehensive features, ease of use, and support. ASA Hotelsoftware and Stayntouch both aim to streamline operations but serve different hotel types and operational scales. ASA’s platform is more established in Europe with a focus on resorts and smaller properties, while Stayntouch’s cloud-based system is favored worldwide for its scalability and mobile capabilities. Which platform aligns better with your hotel’s growth plans and operational needs?
Both ASA Hotelsoftware and Stayntouch address core PMS functions such as reservations, front desk, and housekeeping. However, ASA offers an on-premise solution with a broader feature set, including guest CRM, gift vouchers, and a spa & wellness module, making it suitable for hotels seeking deep customization and multi-department management. Conversely, Stayntouch is cloud-based, emphasizing multi-property management, mobile access, and integrations that support remote hotel operations.
While ASA boasts a flawless 5/5 overall rating based on 11 reviews, most recent in the last six months, it’s a niche player with a limited global footprint. Stayntouch, with a 4.56/5 rating from 317 reviews, primarily in North America and beyond, provides a more data-backed, scalable option for hotels of various sizes. Do you prioritize a proven track record in multiple regions or a specialized system tailored for your property type?
If your hotel operates primarily in Europe or is a resort seeking robust departmental modules, ASA Hotelsoftware is an ideal fit. Its extensive features—guest CRM, gift vouchers, EPoS, and wellness modules—support diverse hotel operations, and its high customer satisfaction reflects stability and versatility.
If your hotel needs a flexible, cloud-based platform that enables mobile check-in, multi-property management, and seamless third-party integrations, Stayntouch is the superior choice. It’s better suited for hotels looking to scale, reduce manual work, and enhance guest experiences via contactless solutions and remote management.
For boutique hotels or chains prioritizing scalability, user-friendly interfaces, and integrations, Stayntouch’s recent reviews and extensive partner network make it the recommended option. ASA’s smaller user base and European focus limit its appeal for hotels aiming at rapid growth or global expansion.
ASA Hotelsoftware scores slightly higher in ease of use at 4.73/5 versus Stayntouch’s 4.7/5, based on user ratings. ASA’s interface is praised for its logical structure and straightforward management, with reviews describing it as “easy for career changers” and “logical for all staff levels.” Its onboarding process is rated 4.6/5, with users highlighting the availability of dedicated contacts for support.
Stayntouch’s cloud platform is lauded for its intuitive screens and mobile functionality, making day-to-day operations smooth for staff. Its training support is also highly rated, although some users mention that speed in support could improve. Edge: ASA.
ASA Hotelsoftware offers seven exclusive features, including a spa & wellness module, guest CRM, gift vouchers, EPoS, and native email marketing, totaling 46 features when combined with shared functionalities. Stayntouch boasts 10 unique features such as tablet check-in, online checkout, a booking engine, and guest messaging, alongside 39 shared features.
If your hotel requires robust front-end features like online check-in, booking engine, and guest messaging, Stayntouch provides a more extensive suite. However, ASA’s specialized modules for spa and wellness, CRM, and gift vouchers are unmatched for resorts or properties emphasizing those services.
Edge: Stayntouch for its broader and more modern set of guest engagement features, while ASA’s niche modules cater well to resorts and multi-department needs.
Both platforms score highly for support, with ASA at 4.73/5 and Stayntouch at 4.68/5 based on recent reviews. ASA users appreciate the dedicated contact persons and quick problem resolution, noting “very few problems” and “high-level support.” Stayntouch is praised for its onboarding process, with clients citing “efficient training” and “support that goes out of their way,” although some mention occasional delays.
Given the recent review count and more recent reviews, ASA’s support appears slightly more responsive and personalized. Edge: ASA.
Stayntouch integrates with 188 verified partners, significantly more than ASA’s 49. Shared integrations include major brands like Fairmas, Vingcard, and Vertical Booking. Unique to ASA are integrations with Customer Alliance, RateBoard, and Smart Host, while Stayntouch partners with systems like Zaplox, RevControl, and Volo, emphasizing mobile and contactless tech.
If extensive third-party integration is critical, particularly with global vendors and contactless solutions, Stayntouch has the edge. ASA’s fewer but still significant integrations suit properties with specific legacy systems or regional partners.
Edge: Stayntouch for broader integration options.
Stayntouch’s 4.56/5 rating from 317 reviews significantly surpasses ASA’s 5/5 from only 11 reviews, most of which are older. Stayntouch’s recent reviews highlight its ease of use, mobile features, and strong support, especially in North America. ASA’s reviews, although perfect, are limited in volume and recent feedback.
Given the volume and recency of reviews, Stayntouch’s higher rating reflects broader user satisfaction and trust. Edge: Stayntouch.
ASA’s pricing starts at $1,000 per month, with no mention of a trial or freemium option. Stayntouch costs $800 per month, also without a trial, but includes remote installation, which can save onboarding costs.
While ASA’s higher price might reflect its extensive modules and on-premise stability, Stayntouch’s slightly lower cost and cloud approach can reduce upfront expenses and scaling costs.
Not ideal if your hotel seeks rapid scalability, extensive third-party integrations, or cloud-based flexibility.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers an on-premise system or has very specific niche modules like spa & wellness embedded.
ASA Hotelsoftware excels in scalability within European resort markets, offering rich modules like CRM, gift vouchers, and on-premise stability. Its support and feature set are suited for hotels that want a traditional, customizable system deeply integrated into their operations.
Stayntouch is better suited for hotels seeking rapid growth, mobile-friendly management, and extensive multi-property capabilities. Its cloud-based design, broad integrations, and user satisfaction ratings make it a compelling choice for modern, tech-forward hotels.
Choose ASA if you want a proven, niche-focused system with high stability. Opt for Stayntouch if you need flexibility, ease of use, and global scalability. Your decision should hinge on your operational scale, technical preferences, and growth plans.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | From $800/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,ASA Hotel Software 和 Stayntouch 共享 39 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 在前提 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 水疗和健康模块 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 预订引擎 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 5 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 5 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Before leveraging Stayntouch PMS and Owner Relations, much of our old accounting processes were completed manually, including printing and hand-delivering statements to units, and..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"As an independent hotel that runs above 100% occupancy on many nights, the TWA Hotel finds Stayntouch integral to our operations."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
该系统直观的设计便于操作,非常适合快速培训新员工。其醒目的视觉和组织元素有助于加快任务执行速度,提升员工能力,从而改善与顾客的互动体验。
Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称,这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵,尤其是在系统过渡和设... Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称,这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵,尤其是在系统过渡和设置方面。
Stayntouch 的服务总体可靠,很少出现重大故障,并通过云端提供持续支持。尽管总体评价良好,但一些用户也对公司快速发展背景下解决复杂问题的速度表示担忧。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然用户普遍称赞其易于访问且支持运营的报告,但他们也指出需要更具适应性的报告功能。一些报告缺乏细节或难以操作,凸显了可定制分析解决方案的必要性。
客房分配和客房服务功能因提升运营效率而获得积极反馈。然而,用户希望客房日志查看和任务安排功能能够得到改进,以满足特定的管理需求。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。ASA Hotel Software 和 Stayntouch 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。ASA Hotel Software 提供 49 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Stayntouch 提供 187 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。ASA Hotel Software 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
ASA Hotel Software:否。Stayntouch:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。ASA Hotelsoftware 的 HT Score 为 0,Stayntouch 的为 91。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问