The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 355 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 表现出色 在 易于使用且界面直观 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 On premise and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
Clock 表现出色 在 功能丰富 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.8/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest profiles and Centralized Messaging.
基于 HTR 上 355 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $300/mo | From $600/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 27 | 328 |
在分析了 355 条经验证的评价后,Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 用户最看重其 易于使用且界面直观, 预订和前台管理, 产品稳定性和可靠性,而 Clock 用户则强调 功能丰富, 运营效率, 响应式支持和定期更新。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用且界面直观
▾
|
+
功能丰富
▾
|
|
+
预订和前台管理
▾
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
|
+
产品稳定性和可靠性
▾
|
+
响应式支持和定期更新
▾
|
|
+
详细全面的报告
▾
|
+
易于培训使用
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
技术支持质量
▾
|
−
错误消息
▾
|
|
−
与第三方平台集成
▾
|
−
报告功能
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #74 0 条评价 | #11 117 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #74 0 条评价 | #7 157 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #17 9 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #19 2 条评价 | #11 5 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #72 1 条评价 | #8 165 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #51 2 条评价 | #11 80 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #67 0 条评价 | #8 62 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #48 1 条评价 | #9 27 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #44 0 条评价 | #17 30 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #3 228 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #27 1 条评价 | #11 13 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #17 2 条评价 |
As you evaluate property management systems, your primary goal is to find a solution that simplifies operations, enhances guest experience, and offers reliable support. Both ASI PMS and Clock PMS aim to meet these needs, but they differ significantly in features, user experience, and market presence. Understanding these differences can help you choose the right fit for your hotel’s current needs and growth plans.
ASI PMS, created by Anand Systems Inc., has been serving the hospitality industry for over 26 years and is used by over 7,000 hotels worldwide. Its focus on detailed customizations and deep reporting appeals to hotels seeking stability and comprehensive control. Conversely, Clock PMS boasts a broader feature set, faster innovation, and a higher user rating, making it more appealing for hotels that want an all-in-one, cloud-based solution that evolves rapidly.
What are the key factors that will determine the best PMS for your property? Let’s compare.
ASI PMS is a cloud-based platform designed for hotels that prioritize operational stability, detailed data, and robust reporting. Its strengths lie in its user-friendly interface, comprehensive reservation management, and solid customer support, with a focus on scalability and stability, especially for larger or multi-property hotels. However, it has fewer integrations—only 18 verified partners—and a higher price point at $300/month.
Clock PMS, on the other hand, is a feature-rich solution supporting everything from reservations and invoicing to guest messaging and event management. It is built for hotels that need a flexible, constantly improving platform with extensive integrations—over 111 verified partners—and a robust API. Clock tends to attract boutique hotels, hostels, and properties that value automation and guest engagement, with a recent higher rating at 84/100 and more recent reviews, indicating ongoing satisfaction and innovation.
Given their different focuses, your choice hinges on whether stability and simplicity or flexibility and innovation matter most.
If your hotel needs a highly stable, easy-to-learn PMS with proven reporting and support, ASI PMS is a strong candidate. It suits properties that value reliability, detailed analytics, and a straightforward onboarding process. Its all-in-one dashboard offers real-time inventory, rate control, and basic automation, ideal for hotels with predictable operations.
If your hotel requires a modern, customizable platform that adapts quickly to market changes, Clock PMS is preferable. It offers extensive features like online check-in, guest portals, and event management, alongside a proven API for integrations. Boutique hotels and properties with complex workflows will find Clock’s flexibility and frequent updates advantageous.
In summary, choose ASI if stability and detailed reporting are your priorities. Opt for Clock if you need innovation, automation, and a broad feature set.
ASI PMS scores slightly higher in ease of use at 4.88/5 versus Clock’s 4.78/5, reflecting its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding. Users praise ASI for its user-friendly setup, especially for staff unfamiliar with hotel systems, and seamless daily operations.
Clock PMS, however, is praised for its simplicity and quick training—many users report that new employees can be up and running in no time. Its interface is designed for busy operations, with a focus on automating routine tasks and reducing manual input.
Edge: ASI PMS.
Clock PMS offers 45 shared features plus 13 unique functionalities, including EPoS, guest profiles, multi-currency, and online checkout, making it a comprehensive solution. It also supports guest apps, GDPR compliance, and employee messaging—features that are missing from ASI.
Meanwhile, ASI PMS has two exclusive features—on-premise deployment and guest communication via SMS—that may appeal to properties with specific needs. Its core strengths lie in reservation management, reporting, and multi-property scalability.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Both platforms are highly rated for support, but ASI’s support score is 4.73/5 with recent reviews praising its professionalism and quick resolution times. Users highlight prompt responses and effective troubleshooting, although some mention delays during high-volume periods.
Clock’s customer support scores 4.75/5, with reviewers noting the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team. Many praise Clock for continuous improvements and proactive communication, contributing to smoother operations.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS boasts a significantly larger ecosystem, with 111 verified integrations—including popular partners like SiteMinder, Cendyn, and TrustYou—versus ASI’s 18. Both systems share six common partners, but Clock’s extensive API facilitates customization and third-party extensions.
If your hotel relies heavily on integrations, automation, and third-party tools, Clock’s broader ecosystem offers more options and flexibility.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock’s overall rating is 84/100, with recent reviews confirming high satisfaction, especially among boutique hotels and properties focused on operational flexibility. Its recent reviews emphasize ongoing improvements and a wide feature set.
ASI’s rating is lower, at 77/100, and with only 26 reviews—most older—its score reflects stability but less recent positive momentum.
Edge: Clock PMS.
ASI PMS is priced at $300/month, offering a predictable fee for its comprehensive features. Clock PMS costs $600/month, reflecting its broader features, extensive integrations, and continuous updates.
Both follow a subscription model with no setup fees or hidden costs. Your choice depends on the value you place on features versus budget.
Hotels that benefit from ASI PMS typically:
Not ideal if your hotel relies heavily on third-party integrations or requires rapid feature updates.
Clock PMS is suited for:
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a simple, minimal setup or has budget constraints that make the higher subscription less attractive.
Clock PMS stands out for its extensive features, rapid innovation, and large integration ecosystem, making it ideal for hotels that want a versatile, future-proof system. Its high user ratings and recent positive reviews reinforce its appeal for properties that prioritize automation, guest engagement, and flexibility.
ASI PMS offers a more traditional, stable solution focused on detailed reporting, ease of use, and multi-property management. It’s best suited for properties that value reliability, deep analytics, and a straightforward onboarding process, especially in larger or multi-location hotels.
Choose ASI if your hotel values stability, detailed data, and simplicity. Opt for Clock if you need a flexible, innovative system designed for rapid growth and complex operations.
This detailed comparison should help you confidently select the property management system that best fits your hotel's unique needs and vision.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | From $600/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,ASI PMS 和 Clock PMS 共享 45 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 在前提 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 礼品券和预付体验 | ||
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 集中消息传递 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 3 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 7 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."
"We needed a system that removed our dependency on remote desktop and made daily operations simpler for the team. ASI 7.0 gave us direct access, a familiar setup, and a much smoothe..."
"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户一致称赞ASI拥有友好直观的界面,能够简化预订管理流程,简化日常操作。对于没有酒店行业经验的用户来说,它尤其方便易用。
ASI 系统在管理前台任务和预订方面表现出色,提供各种工具来提高入住/退房流程和房间分配的效率。
ASI系统以其稳健可靠的性能而备受赞誉,确保了持续稳定的运行。尤其在运行需求较高的环境中,该系统更显优势。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
ASI的技术支持因其响应迅速、解决问题高效而广受好评,尽管也有部分用户反映响应时间有所延迟。培训方面的专业性和乐于助人也备受赞誉。
反复出现的批评意见强调了与第三方平台(特别是会计和库存管理平台)更好地集成能力的必要性,这可以简化更广泛的业务流程。
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Clock PMS+ 提供丰富的功能,有助于管理酒店运营和活动。然而,一些用户发现功能繁多,难以管理,建议改进其组织方式。
该软件通过节省时间并简化部门之间的沟通和协调,显著提高了运营效率,为员工和客人带来更顺畅的体验。
用户对响应式支持服务和定期更新表示赞赏,这些更新引入了新功能和改进,确保了系统的可靠性和与用户需求的相关性。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户偶尔会遇到以代码形式显示的错误消息,这让他们难以快速解决问题。直接从错误消息导航到问题可以提升用户体验。
报告功能虽然全面,但速度较慢,限制了其目前的有效性。用户建议进行优化,以解锁更多强大的功能。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。ASI PMS 和 Clock PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。ASI PMS 提供 18 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Clock PMS 提供 111 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。ASI PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
ASI PMS:否。Clock PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 的 HT Score 为 77,Clock 的为 84。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问