The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 52 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 表现出色 在 ease of use and ROI 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 On premise and Native Email Marketing.
Jonas Hospitality 表现出色 在 客户服务 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest App and Guest Messaging.
基于 HTR 上 52 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $300/mo | From $1,100/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 27 | 25 |
在分析了 52 条经验证的评价后,Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 用户最看重其 易于使用且界面直观, 预订和前台管理, 产品稳定性和可靠性,而 Jonas Hospitality 用户则强调 客户服务, 易于使用, 持续改进。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用且界面直观
▾
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
+
预订和前台管理
▾
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
+
产品稳定性和可靠性
▾
|
+
持续改进
▾
|
|
+
详细全面的报告
▾
|
+
高级报告
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
技术支持质量
▾
|
−
用户界面和可访问性
▾
|
|
−
与第三方平台集成
▾
|
−
支付处理器集成
▾
|
|
−
可靠性
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #74 0 条评价 | #70 1 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #74 0 条评价 | #28 21 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #37 2 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #19 2 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #72 1 条评价 | #49 6 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | #51 2 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #67 0 条评价 | #23 18 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #48 1 条评价 | #21 9 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #44 0 条评价 | #20 24 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #27 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing between ASI PMS by Anand Systems Inc. and Jonas Chorum by Jonas Hospitality hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational priorities. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, yet they differ significantly in user experience, feature depth, and recent customer feedback. ASI boasts a higher review count and recent reviews, making its data more reliable for decision-making. Which system aligns better with your hotel’s current and future requirements?
Both ASI and Jonas offer comprehensive property management functionalities designed to simplify daily operations and improve revenue management. ASI, with its 26 recent reviews, has a strong reputation for stability, detailed reporting, and ease of use, especially in larger or multi-property hotels. Jonas Chorum, on the other hand, is praised for its intuitive interface and broad integration options, yet suffers from frequent system freezes, which users find disruptive. Are system stability and detailed analytics your top priorities?
If your hotel needs a mature, robust PMS with extensive reporting, multi-lingual support, and multi-currency handling, go with ASI. Its higher review count and recent ratings (overall rating of 0/5 but with a strong user sentiment) reflect a reliable, scalable platform suited for larger properties or those that require deep data insights. Conversely, if your hotel requires flexible mobile access, a guest-facing app, and seamless OTA integrations, Jonas Chorum is a compelling choice, especially if your property is smaller or in North America. However, be mindful of the recurring system freezes and the enforced payment processor.
Both products are rated highly for ease of use, with ASI scoring 4.88/5 and Jonas 4.35/5. ASI's interface is praised for its straightforward workflow and user-friendly front desk functions, making onboarding smoother for teams new to PMS software. Jonas users find its web-based platform intuitive, with quick access to key functions like rate changes and group bookings. Yet, ASI's onboarding score (4.69/5) indicates slightly more polished initial training. Edge: ASI.
ASI offers 7 features exclusive to its platform, including multi-lingual support, native email marketing, guest CRM, and integrated payment terminals. Jonas provides 9 unique features such as a guest app, online checkout, and employee messaging, adding more guest engagement tools. Both systems share 40 features, but ASI's advanced reporting and multi-currency capabilities are notable. Jonas's integrated POS and GDPR compliance enhance operational flexibility. Edge: Jonas.
Both products receive high marks for support, with ASI rated 4.73/5 and Jonas 4.6/5. ASI's reviews highlight its prompt technical resolution, though some note slower response times. Jonas support is praised for responsiveness and personalized service, with user comments like “the team really loves their jobs” and “timely online chat help.” ASI’s slightly higher support rating and longer market presence give it a slight edge. Edge: ASI.
Jonas Chorum connects with 28 verified partners, including key integrations like Hotel Investor Apps, Revinate, and Oracle Hospitality, supporting a broad range of operational needs. ASI has 18 verified partners, sharing popular integrations like SiteMinder and Cendyn but fewer overall. The wider array of integrations in Jonas could reduce third-party development costs and streamline operational workflows. Edge: Jonas.
Despite ASI’s larger number of reviews and recent feedback, Jonas Chorum scores notably higher at 4.59/5 in overall rating, especially in user-friendly features and reliability. ASI’s review count (26 recent reviews) and anecdotal stability suggest a more trusted platform for larger or multi-property hotels. Jonas’s positive user experiences stem from its straightforward interface and mobile features, though system freezes remain a concern. Edge: Jonas.
ASI is priced at a flat $300 monthly fee, with no implementation or trial options, providing predictable budgeting. Jonas does not list specific pricing but emphasizes no implementation fees or trials, which may suggest variable costs based on property size or features. Be cautious of potential hidden costs, especially with Jonas’s enforced payment processor and additional modules. Pricing transparency favors ASI for clarity and simplicity.
ASI presents a mature, feature-rich PMS ideal for hotels that need reliability, detailed analytics, and multi-lingual support. Its higher review volume and recent customer feedback make it a safer choice for larger properties or multi-property chains. Jonas Chorum, with its user-friendly interface, broad integrations, and mobile capabilities, appeals to smaller or tech-forward hotels that value ease of use and OTA connectivity.
Choose ASI if you prioritize stability, advanced reporting, and a proven track record. Opt for Jonas if you need a flexible, accessible system with good support for integrations and guest engagement. Ultimately, your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and growth plans should guide your decision.
Note: All data reflects recent reviews and verified features to help you make an informed choice aligned with your hotel’s strategic goals.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | From $1,100/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,ASI PMS 和 Jonas Chorum 共享 40 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 4 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"We needed a system that removed our dependency on remote desktop and made daily operations simpler for the team. ASI 7.0 gave us direct access, a familiar setup, and a much smoothe..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户一致称赞ASI拥有友好直观的界面,能够简化预订管理流程,简化日常操作。对于没有酒店行业经验的用户来说,它尤其方便易用。
ASI 系统在管理前台任务和预订方面表现出色,提供各种工具来提高入住/退房流程和房间分配的效率。
ASI系统以其稳健可靠的性能而备受赞誉,确保了持续稳定的运行。尤其在运行需求较高的环境中,该系统更显优势。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
ASI的技术支持因其响应迅速、解决问题高效而广受好评,尽管也有部分用户反映响应时间有所延迟。培训方面的专业性和乐于助人也备受赞誉。
反复出现的批评意见强调了与第三方平台(特别是会计和库存管理平台)更好地集成能力的必要性,这可以简化更广泛的业务流程。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Jonas Chorum 的客户服务因其响应迅速、知识渊博和解决问题的热情而受到高度赞誉。特别提到了模范员工,强调了许多用户所体验到的个性化支持。
PMS 的设计简单直观,员工(包括新员工)均可轻松使用,从而减少培训时间并提高运营效率。用户对该系统处理团体预订和费率的能力表示赞赏。
酒店经营者注意到 Jonas Chorum 积极寻求用户反馈,并经常实施改进建议。这种响应能力促进了公司与客户之间的合作关系,支持了服务的发展。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
许多用户都对 Jonas Chorum 易于导航的用户界面和跨平台可访问性表示赞赏。它高效地支持群组屏蔽和报告生成等功能,无论是新手还是经验丰富的员工都可以轻松使用... 许多用户都对 Jonas Chorum 易于导航的用户界面和跨平台可访问性表示赞赏。它高效地支持群组屏蔽和报告生成等功能,无论是新手还是经验丰富的员工都可以轻松使用。
Jonas Chorum 强制执行的支付处理器集成是一个重大的缺点。用户必须使用特定的处理器,这会产生额外费用,并且会面临运营中断。这种强制集成会影响多个物业,增... Jonas Chorum 强制执行的支付处理器集成是一个重大的缺点。用户必须使用特定的处理器,这会产生额外费用,并且会面临运营中断。这种强制集成会影响多个物业,增加财务和运营压力。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。ASI PMS 和 Jonas Chorum 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。ASI PMS 提供 18 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Jonas Chorum 提供 28 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。ASI PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.4/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
ASI PMS:否。Jonas Chorum:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 的 HT Score 为 77,Jonas Hospitality 的为 18。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问