The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 187 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 表现出色 在 易于使用且界面直观 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 On premise and Online Check-in.
Preno 表现出色 在 user-friendly interface 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 EPoS and GDPR Compliant.
基于 HTR 上 187 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $300/mo | From $800/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 27 | 160 |
在分析了 187 条经验证的评价后,Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 用户最看重其 易于使用且界面直观, 预订和前台管理, 产品稳定性和可靠性,而 Preno 用户则强调 user-friendly interface, 客户支持, channel management。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用且界面直观
▾
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
+
预订和前台管理
▾
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
+
产品稳定性和可靠性
▾
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
+
详细全面的报告
▾
|
+
报告和分析
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
技术支持质量
▾
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
−
与第三方平台集成
▾
|
−
移动应用程序
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #74 0 条评价 | #13 80 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #74 0 条评价 | #32 15 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #46 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #19 2 条评价 | #39 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #72 1 条评价 | #14 65 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #51 2 条评价 | #12 53 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #67 0 条评价 | #21 17 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #48 1 条评价 | #8 26 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #44 0 条评价 | #27 7 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #25 13 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #27 1 条评价 | #20 3 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #13 2 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for streamlining your hotel operations, improving guest experiences, and increasing revenue. Both ASI PMS by Anand Systems Inc. and Preno aim to simplify hotel management, but they differ in focus, features, and market presence. ASI is a longstanding, comprehensive platform with a broad feature set and wide regional reach, while Preno emphasizes user-friendly design and ease of integration. Which system aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
Both ASI PMS and Preno serve as cloud-based management tools designed to centralize operations, but they target slightly different hotel profiles. ASI offers extensive features like multi-lingual support, integrated ID scanners, and on-premise options, ideal for larger or multi-property hotels. Preno, on the other hand, boasts an intuitive interface with seamless integrations, making it appealing for boutique hotels, motels, and properties prioritizing simplicity.
ASI’s strength lies in its broad feature coverage, including shift planning, digital registration, automated reminders, and guest communication via SMS. Preno emphasizes ease of use with features like integrated channel management and a powerful booking engine, but it has fewer advanced tools. Do you need a feature-rich system or a straightforward, easy-to-learn platform?
If your hotel needs advanced tools for multi-currency, multi-lingual operations, or on-premise deployment, ASI is the clear choice. Its feature set includes 19 exclusive capabilities like integrated ID and passport scanners, digital registration, and housekeeper mobile apps, suitable for larger or more complex property portfolios.
Conversely, if your hotel values a highly intuitive, web-based platform with excellent integration with tools like Xero and SiteMinder, Preno is the better fit. It suits boutique hotels, motels, and properties that prioritize streamlined booking, guest communication, and quick onboarding. For properties aiming for fast deployment with integrated channel management, Preno’s simplicity wins.
Both platforms score highly on ease of use, with ASI at 4.88/5 and Preno at 4.78/5. ASI’s interface is praised for its straightforward workflow and user-friendly design, making daily operations, check-ins, and reporting accessible even for staff with limited technical skills. Preno’s clean, intuitive layout is equally appreciated, with users highlighting its quick learning curve, especially for staff familiar with cloud-based solutions.
While both are easy to adopt, ASI’s extensive feature set can introduce some complexity for first-time users. Preno’s streamlined design and focus on core functions reduce training time. Edge: ASI.
ASI offers a broader set of features—28 shared with Preno and 19 exclusive to it—covering advanced functions like multi-lingual support, on-premise deployment, integrated ID scanners, digital registration, online check-in, shift planning, automated reminders, guest SMS messaging, and housekeeper mobile apps. Preno, with only 2 unique features (EPoS and GDPR compliance), remains more streamlined but less feature-dense.
If advanced tools such as integrated ID scanning, digital registration, and multi-currency management are vital, ASI is superior. If core PMS functions with ease and integration matter most, Preno’s limited but effective feature set suffices. Edge: ASI.
Both products are highly rated for support, with ASI at 4.73/5 and Preno at 4.8/5. AN user reviews praise ASI’s prompt technical support, professionalism, and helpfulness, though some users note occasional delays. Preno’s support team is frequently commended for responsiveness and personalized assistance, with reviews describing their support as “brilliant” and “helpful,” especially during onboarding.
Given the more recent reviews and a slightly higher rating, Preno’s support is marginally better. Edge: Preno.
ASI integrates with 18 verified partners, including major OTAs, payment systems, and third-party tools like Duetto, Sojern, and Inn-Flow, providing extensive options for automation and revenue management. Preno supports 17 verified partners, including key integrations like Xero, SiteMinder, and Revinate, with some notable unique partners such as Lightspeed and GuestTraction.
While both offer rich integration options, ASI’s broader partner network slightly edges out Preno, especially for complex or multi-channel setups. Edge: ASI.
Preno holds a slight edge in recent reviews, with an overall rating of 4.73/5 based on 144 reviews, compared to ASI’s 0/5 rating from 26 reviews. User feedback for Preno highlights its ease of use, helpful support, and effective features across various hotel segments, especially boutique hotels, motels, and inns. ASI’s reviews, although fewer, emphasize stability, detailed reporting, and operational efficiency, but with less recent data.
Because recent reviews and higher ratings are more indicative of current performance, Preno is rated higher by hoteliers. Edge: Preno.
ASI pricing starts at $300, with no freemium model, monthly flat fee, or per-room charges. Preno charges $800 with no mention of flexible pricing tiers or discounts, making it pricier upfront.
While ASI offers a lower entry price, Preno’s higher cost reflects its focus on ease of use and integration. Your choice depends on your budget and feature needs.
The core difference is that ASI PMS offers a broad, feature-rich platform suited for larger or multi-property hotels, while Preno emphasizes simplicity and ease, making it ideal for smaller, boutique, or motels. ASI’s extensive tools support complex operations, but require more training and investment.
Choose ASI if you need deep functionality, multi-lingual support, and advanced automation—especially for larger hotels or chains. Opt for Preno if your focus is quick deployment, straightforward management, and excellent integration with popular tools.
If your property requires a comprehensive, scalable PMS with advanced features and regional coverage, ASI is the stronger choice. But if you want a user-friendly system with excellent integration, support, and recent high ratings, Preno is the better option.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | From $800/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,ASI PMS 和 Preno 共享 28 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 在前提 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 9 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"We needed a system that removed our dependency on remote desktop and made daily operations simpler for the team. ASI 7.0 gave us direct access, a familiar setup, and a much smoothe..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户一致称赞ASI拥有友好直观的界面,能够简化预订管理流程,简化日常操作。对于没有酒店行业经验的用户来说,它尤其方便易用。
ASI 系统在管理前台任务和预订方面表现出色,提供各种工具来提高入住/退房流程和房间分配的效率。
ASI系统以其稳健可靠的性能而备受赞誉,确保了持续稳定的运行。尤其在运行需求较高的环境中,该系统更显优势。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
ASI的技术支持因其响应迅速、解决问题高效而广受好评,尽管也有部分用户反映响应时间有所延迟。培训方面的专业性和乐于助人也备受赞誉。
反复出现的批评意见强调了与第三方平台(特别是会计和库存管理平台)更好地集成能力的必要性,这可以简化更广泛的业务流程。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it... Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it easy to learn and use, which reduces the time and cost associated with staff training.
支持团队通常因其响应迅速、乐于助人而备受赞誉,尽管一些评论指出,他们可能会出现延迟,尤其是在周末或繁忙时段。响应速度和与支持人员的直接联系至关重要。
Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings... Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings. Users commend this functionality for improving operational efficiency and enhancing bookings management.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Preno 的报告功能褒贬不一,一些用户对其易用性感到满意,而另一些用户则希望获得更深入的分析,以便做出更明智的战略决策。一些用户表示需要定制报告功能。
尽管一些用户对 Preno 的功能表示赞赏,但也有人呼吁其移动应用功能更加强大。评论表明,增强移动应用的离线功能和更丰富的功能将提升其可用性,尤其对于经常出... 尽管一些用户对 Preno 的功能表示赞赏,但也有人呼吁其移动应用功能更加强大。评论表明,增强移动应用的离线功能和更丰富的功能将提升其可用性,尤其对于经常出差的管理人员而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。ASI PMS 和 Preno 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。ASI PMS 提供 18 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Preno 提供 17 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。ASI PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
ASI PMS:否。Preno:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 的 HT Score 为 77,Preno 的为 80。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问