The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 153 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Beds24 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile App and Housekeeping Mobile App.
roommaster 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Native Email Marketing and Revenue Management Module.
基于 HTR 上 153 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $100/mo | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 153 |
在分析了 153 条经验证的评价后,Beds24 用户最看重其 ,而 roommaster 用户则强调 技术支援, 预订管理, 用户友好界面。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
技术支援
▾
|
|
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
系统稳定性
▾
|
|
|
−
可自定义报告
▾
|
|
|
−
集成能力
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #48 0 条评价 | #14 47 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #7 66 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #6 10 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #14 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #44 0 条评价 | #11 46 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #17 15 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #12 20 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #11 14 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #30 0 条评价 | #8 102 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #18 7 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #17 0 条评价 |
Choosing between Beds24 and roommaster HMS hinges on your hotel's specific needs, budget, and operational complexity. Beds24 offers a broad, flexible platform suited to vacation rentals, B&Bs, and smaller hotels, while roommaster HMS excels in multi-property management, especially for larger or chain hotels. Both aim to streamline operations, but their approaches and strengths differ significantly. Which system aligns best with your operational scale and growth plans?
Beds24 is a versatile, all-in-one platform that centralizes booking, channel management, guest communication, and payments, making it ideal for vacation rentals, B&Bs, and small to mid-sized hotels. Conversely, roommaster HMS emphasizes reservation management, front desk workflows, and financial oversight, with a strong focus on multi-property and chain hotel management.
Beds24 provides a wide array of integrations and automation, which benefit independent properties or property managers looking for a flexible, cost-effective solution. roommaster, however, features more built-in modules, including revenue management, POS, guest feedback, and extensive reporting, catering to larger hotels needing comprehensive control.
Your decision depends on whether you prioritize a customizable, multi-channel platform (Beds24) or a deeply integrated, feature-rich PMS (roommaster). Are you looking for a broad, adaptable system or a specialized, all-in-one management solution?
If your hotel needs a budget-friendly, straightforward solution for managing multiple booking channels and direct reservations, Beds24 is the better choice. It suits property managers with a focus on automation and ease of access, especially if your team values lower upfront costs and flexible integrations.
If your hotel requires detailed reservation management, extensive reporting, and robust operational control across multiple properties, roommaster HMS is the superior pick. Its advanced modules like revenue management and POS integration make it ideal for hotels aiming to optimize revenue and streamline complex workflows.
For small hotels or vacation rentals prioritizing channel integration and automation, Beds24 is the most suitable. Larger properties or chains seeking comprehensive management capabilities should lean toward roommaster.
Based on recent reviews, roommaster HMS has a higher ease-of-use rating (4.41/5) with more recent feedback indicating a simple, intuitive interface and smooth onboarding. Customers praise its attractive design and straightforward workflows, with many mentioning that staff training is quick and reliable support enhances user adoption.
Beds24, however, receives no recent reviews and has a zero rating, reflecting a lack of current data. Historically, it’s been noted that the platform, while flexible, can be complex for new users and may have a steeper learning curve.
Edge: roommaster HMS.
roommaster HMS offers a wider range of features, with 43 exclusive modules like Point of Sale, Revenue Management, Guest Feedback, Rate Shopping, and Digital Registration, surpassing Beds24's six unique features such as Mobile App, Automated Assignments, and Drag-n-Drop Tapechart.
Beds24 excels in channel management and guest communication but lacks the depth of operational and revenue tools found in roommaster. Conversely, roommaster’s extensive modules enable more comprehensive management, from ancillary revenue tracking to customizable reports and integrated POS.
Edge: roommaster HMS.
roommaster HMS has a strong support reputation, with recent reviews rating it 4.34/5 and praising its 24/7 assistance and knowledgeable staff. Customers report quick responses and a helpful support team that assists with onboarding and troubleshooting.
Beds24 lacks recent reviews and a rating, making it impossible to assess current support quality. Historically, it’s had limited customer feedback, suggesting roommaster is currently the more reliable support choice.
Edge: roommaster HMS.
roommaster HMS boasts 56 verified partners, including major OTAs, POS, and revenue tools, with notable integrations like Sage, GuestRevu, and Volo, and comprehensive channel management. Beds24 has 19 verified partners, including TripAdvisor, Vrbo, and Google Vacation Rentals, but fewer overall integrations.
Both platforms connect with popular booking channels, but roommaster's broader integration ecosystem offers more operational flexibility, especially for larger properties needing diverse third-party systems.
Edge: roommaster HMS.
Considering recent reviews and more extensive feedback, roommaster HMS is rated 4.32/5 with an 89% likelihood to recommend, especially among resorts, chain hotels, and mid-to-large properties. Independent hotels also rate it highly, with a 4.5/5 score.
Beds24’s reviews are absent or outdated, so current hotel ratings are unavailable. Its lack of recent feedback indicates that roommaster’s higher review volume and recency give it a clearer edge in user satisfaction.
Edge: roommaster HMS.
Beds24 charges a flat $100 monthly fee, with no free tier or setup costs, making it a budget-friendly option for small hotels and property managers. roommaster’s pricing starts at $500 per month, reflecting its more extensive feature set and enterprise focus.
Pricing for both is straightforward, but the higher initial cost of roommaster aligns with its advanced modules and multi-property management capabilities.
Not ideal if your hotel needs advanced revenue management, POS integration, or detailed reporting. Larger hotels or chains requiring extensive operational modules may find Beds24’s features insufficient.
Not ideal if your hotel operates a boutique or independent property with simple needs, or if you’re on a tight budget. Small hotels or vacation rentals may find roommaster’s extensive features unnecessary.
The core difference is that Beds24 offers a flexible, channel-focused management system suited for smaller or independent properties, while roommaster HMS provides a comprehensive, multi-module platform designed for larger, multi-property hotels. Beds24’s strengths lie in automation and integrations at a lower price point, but it lacks the advanced operational features of roommaster.
If your hotel needs a cost-effective, easy-to-adopt system with strong channel management, Beds24 is the better fit. For hotels aiming to streamline complex workflows, maximize revenue, and centralize operations across multiple locations, roommaster HMS is the superior choice.
Choose Beds24 if your focus is on affordability and simplicity. Opt for roommaster if your operation demands detailed management, extensive modules, and a proven track record in larger hotel settings.
酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Beds24 和 roommaster HMS 共享 26 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 客房服务手机应用程序 | ||
| 拖放式磁带图 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 移动应用程序 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 评分购物模块 | ||
| 销售点 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 37 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"From my point of view as an asset manager that has the responsibility to tell the owners about their investment, roommaster gives me all that information. It's easy to report and e..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We’re an independent hotel surrounded by giants, but roomMaster gave us the tools we needed to stand tall alongside them."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
技术支持团队的响应速度和专业水平一直备受赞誉,许多用户对问题的快速解决表示满意。然而,一些用户建议在更新前进行更充分的测试,以减少发布后出现的问题。
用户称赞 ROOMMASTER 的预订管理便捷,有助于实现流畅的预订流程和直接预订。然而,部分用户反映 OTA 集成存在问题,导致超额预订。增强自动化功能和实现无缝的... 用户称赞 ROOMMASTER 的预订管理便捷,有助于实现流畅的预订流程和直接预订。然而,部分用户反映 OTA 集成存在问题,导致超额预订。增强自动化功能和实现无缝的渠道管理将有助于提升整体效率。
用户称赞该软件的用户界面友好,操作便捷,尤其是在处理预订和交易方面。然而,一些反馈意见建议对某些功能进行改进,例如搜索菜单和运行时变量。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
多条评论都提到了系统宕机和偶尔出现的不稳定问题。用户建议改进云稳定性,以确保运行稳定,尤其是在预订或更新期间。
虽然 ROOMMASTER 提供报表功能,但用户通常觉得报表自定义选项有限,并且希望获得更灵活的筛选功能以及与其他系统的集成。改进的定制报表选项可以提升战略规划中... 虽然 ROOMMASTER 提供报表功能,但用户通常觉得报表自定义选项有限,并且希望获得更灵活的筛选功能以及与其他系统的集成。改进的定制报表选项可以提升战略规划中数据的整体利用率。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Beds24 和 roommaster HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Beds24 提供 19 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 roommaster HMS 提供 56 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。roommaster HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.4/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Beds24:否。roommaster HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Beds24 的 HT Score 为 0,roommaster 的为 84。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问