The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 100 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Casablanca 表现出色 在 onboarding 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile App and On premise.
Shiji Group 表现出色 在 易于使用 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest profiles and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
基于 HTR 上 100 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $1,200/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 66 | 34 |
在分析了 100 条经验证的评价后,Casablanca 用户最看重其 支持质量, 用户友好性, 持续改进,而 Shiji Group 用户则强调 易于使用, 支持团队, 执行。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持质量
▾
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
+
用户友好性
▾
|
+
支持团队
▾
|
|
+
持续改进
▾
|
+
执行
▾
|
|
+
定制和灵活性
▾
|
+
培训材料
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
额外费用
▾
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
−
收益管理和收入优化
▾
|
−
系统速度
▾
|
|
−
集成能力
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #21 44 条评价 | #53 2 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #34 14 条评价 | #31 17 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #11 13 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #22 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #42 11 条评价 | #33 17 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #36 8 条评价 | #24 25 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #37 6 条评价 | #22 19 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #33 5 条评价 | #45 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #55 2 条评价 | #33 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #13 62 条评价 | #30 8 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #14 5 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #5 14 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel's operations and guest experience. Both Casablanca and Shiji Group aim to streamline hotel management, but they cater to different needs and hotel types. Casablanca offers a more established, regionally focused solution with extensive support and features, while Shiji Group emphasizes a modern, cloud-native approach with a broad global reach. Which one aligns better with your hotel's goals?
Both Casablanca and Shiji Group address core hotel management challenges like reservations, guest data, and operational efficiency. Casablanca’s platform is designed for fully digital, all-in-one management—especially strong for European hotels—offering extensive integrations, automated invoicing, and yield management tools. Conversely, Shiji Group’s Daylight PMS is built for hotels of all sizes, emphasizing a user-friendly, cloud-based experience with features like centralized guest profiles and automation.
While Casablanca’s software is praised for its intuitive interface and excellent support, it’s primarily used in Europe and has a smaller global presence. Shiji Group’s solution benefits from a broader international footprint, with more integrations and a larger feature set, but some users note performance issues and customization limitations. Which factors matter most for your hotel’s daily operations?
If your hotel needs a highly integrated, all-in-one platform with robust automation, especially in Europe, Casablanca is the better fit. It’s well-suited for small to large independent hotels or boutique properties seeking comprehensive management, with a focus on revenue optimization and guest interaction.
If your hotel requires a scalable, cloud-native system capable of supporting multiple locations worldwide with ease of training and management, Shiji's Daylight PMS should be your pick. It’s ideal for hotels looking for a modern, flexible solution that simplifies operations through centralized guest data and seamless integration with other systems.
For hotels that prioritize support and regional features, Casablanca’s larger review base and recent positive feedback make it the stronger choice. Conversely, if global scalability and modern interfaces are your priorities, Shiji Group’s broader feature set and international presence may be more appealing.
Both platforms are highly rated for ease of use, but Casablanca slightly edges out with a 4.8/5 rating versus Shiji Group’s 4.63/5. Users highlight Casablanca’s intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process, often describing it as easy for both seasoned staff and new hires, with many praising the quick, friendly support.
Shiji Group also receives praise for its user-friendly design, especially its training materials, which include helpful videos and guides. However, some users report that system speed and occasional performance hiccups can hinder ease of daily use. Overall, Casablanca’s higher recent review count and support ratings give it the edge.
Edge: Casablanca
Casablanca offers 6 unique features, including a channel manager, mobile app, guest CRM, booking engine, wellness planner, and on-premise deployment—focusing on hotel-specific needs and automation.
Shiji Group’s platform boasts 64 features, including advanced guest profiles, multi-lingual support, task management, online check-in/out, integrated CRS, automated reminders, detailed reporting, and extensive integrations like payment terminals and EPoS.
While Casablanca covers core hotel operations with essential features, Shiji provides a broader, more customizable array of tools suited for larger, multi-property setups. The sheer number of features and integrations in Shiji give it the edge for hotels seeking an all-encompassing platform.
Edge: Shiji Group
Casablanca’s support is highly rated at 4.82/5, with reviews emphasizing rapid, competent assistance that often goes beyond expectations. Users frequently describe Casablanca’s support as personable, responsive, and available 365 days a year, which significantly reassures hoteliers.
Shiji Group’s support scores 4.53/5, with praise for its knowledgeable team and helpful training materials. However, some users mention occasional delays and a desire for faster response times, especially during peak periods.
Given the higher support rating and recent reviews, Casablanca’s customer service is the stronger choice.
Edge: Casablanca
Casablanca has more reviews (60) and more recent feedback (2 in the last 6 months), with a remarkable 98% likelihood to recommend, indicating strong satisfaction. Users across various hotel types, especially boutique and independent properties, appreciate its support and comprehensive features.
Shiji Group’s 32 reviews, with no recent feedback, show a 90% recommendation rate. Its user base comprises mainly larger, branded hotels and resorts, which tend to rate the platform favorably for its advanced functionalities.
Overall, Casablanca’s higher review volume and recent positive comments make it the more trusted option among hoteliers.
Edge: Casablanca
Casablanca’s pricing is not publicly listed, which is typical for bespoke enterprise solutions. Pricing can vary based on hotel size, features, and support needs, often involving custom quotes.
Shiji Group charges $1,200 per month for its Daylight PMS, with no additional implementation or setup fees listed. This flat monthly fee offers transparency but might be costly for smaller hotels, depending on required features.
If budget transparency is crucial, Shiji’s clear monthly fee may be advantageous, but Casablanca’s value depends on tailored packages.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Not ideal if your hotel:
Casablanca and Shiji Group serve different hotel segments and operational styles. Casablanca excels with its regional focus, strong support, and all-in-one features, making it ideal for boutique and independent hotels in Europe seeking a straightforward, reliable PMS.
Shiji Group offers a broad, flexible, and scalable platform, perfect for larger hotel groups or properties with complex needs that benefit from extensive integrations and automation. Its cloud-native design suits hotels aiming for rapid deployment and global expansion.
If your hotel prioritizes support, regional features, and a proven track record, Casablanca is the clear choice. However, if your focus is on a modern, scalable system with diverse features and international reach, Shiji’s Daylight PMS is the better option.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,200/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS) 和 Shiji Daylight PMS 共享 34 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 任务管理 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助值机 | ||
| 水疗和健康模块 | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 集中用户和角色管理 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 58 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 5 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."
"In the last two years, we have intensively worked with the hotelsoftware and analyzed all processes down to the smallest detail and, based on this, implemented the appropriate resu..."
"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多评论都强调了卡萨布兰卡的出色支持,指出其响应时间快、员工能力强、友好。用户对即使在周末和节假日也能提供支持表示赞赏,这让许多酒店经营者感到放心,他... 许多评论都强调了卡萨布兰卡的出色支持,指出其响应时间快、员工能力强、友好。用户对即使在周末和节假日也能提供支持表示赞赏,这让许多酒店经营者感到放心,他们可以获得持续可靠的帮助。
评论一致称赞 Casablanca 易于使用且直观的界面,让经验丰富的员工和新员工都能快速上手。一些用户指出,随着软件的发展,它有时会对新手用户变得有点复杂。
用户对 Casablanca 不断添加新功能并根据客户反馈改进其可用性表示赞赏。不过,一些人指出,他们希望新功能的实施时间更加透明,并有时间表。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户普遍担心的是更新和新界面带来的额外成本,这对规模较小的酒店来说可能是个问题。尽管人们对该软件的功能普遍满意,但这一方面被认为是缺点。
许多用户强调卡萨布兰卡的收益管理和动态定价工具对于增加收入至关重要。收益价格、图形预订路线和追加销售机会等功能有助于提高财务业绩。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户经常称赞石基 PMS 的用户界面友好,简化了日常操作,降低了新用户的学习难度。评论中强调了其易用性,指出其培训材料易懂、设计直观、任务执行高效。
石基PMS支持团队的支持和响应能力一直受到好评。用户赞赏支持人员的专业性和乐于助人的精神,这对更顺利地运营有很大帮助。
一些评论者认为石基 PMS 的实施过程流畅高效,他们赞赏知识渊博、积极主动的实施团队。不过,一些用户建议缩短实施时间以进一步改善体验。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
尽管石基 PMS 的详细报告功能广受好评,但一些用户仍希望获得更先进、更快速的报告工具。具体要求包括增强的汇总报告、详细的账单和更快的报告生成流程。
与系统速度和一致性相关的性能问题是用户普遍关心的问题,一些用户指出在高峰操作期间响应时间很慢。用户敦促提高系统速度以提高整体效率。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS) 和 Shiji Daylight PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS) 提供 46 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Shiji Daylight PMS 提供 64 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS):否。Shiji Daylight PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Casablanca 的 HT Score 为 68,Shiji Group 的为 75。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问