The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 329 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
CiHMS 表现出色 在 customer support and ROI 方面 — 尤其适合 Resorts 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Spa & Wellness Module and Online 24/7 support.
RoomRaccoon 表现出色 在 用户界面和体验 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.1/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Guest CRM.
基于 HTR 上 329 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $900/mo | From $1,000/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 120 | 209 |
在分析了 329 条经验证的评价后,CiHMS 用户最看重其 operational efficiency, 高级报告, 任务和资源管理,而 RoomRaccoon 用户则强调 用户界面和体验, 一体化系统, 自动发送电子邮件和文档。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
+
用户界面和体验
▾
|
|
+
高级报告
▾
|
+
一体化系统
▾
|
|
+
任务和资源管理
▾
|
+
自动发送电子邮件和文档
▾
|
|
+
基于云的可访问性
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
高级报告
▾
|
−
服务和支持
▾
|
|
−
用户培训和入职
▾
|
−
集成限制
▾
|
|
−
移动功能
▾
|
−
系统错误和稳定性问题
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #45 8 条评价 | #10 90 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #20 31 条评价 | #17 27 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 43 条评价 | #14 7 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #4 31 条评价 | #19 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #15 65 条评价 | #9 100 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #10 83 条评价 | #9 64 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #15 40 条评价 | #14 29 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #17 15 条评价 | #7 28 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #65 0 条评价 | #24 7 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #58 2 条评价 | #5 123 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #6 117 条评价 | #31 4 条评价 |
| 中东 | #24 1 条评价 | #31 1 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can transform your hotel’s operations, guest experience, and revenue. Both CiHMS by CiHMS and RoomRaccoon PMS aim to simplify management tasks but approach this goal differently. While CiHMS offers a more comprehensive, multi-channel management platform, RoomRaccoon provides a streamlined, all-in-one solution designed for smaller hotels and independents. Which software aligns better with your hotel's needs?
Both CiHMS and RoomRaccoon serve the core function of hotel management, but their strengths diverge significantly. CiHMS, with a focus on advanced features like multi-channel reservations, flexible rate plans, and integrations, is ideal for larger or chain hotels seeking detailed control. RoomRaccoon, on the other hand, emphasizes simplicity and automation tailored for smaller hotels managing fewer units. Do your management priorities lean more toward complex multi-channel operations or effortless automation?
The recent reviews favor RoomRaccoon, with a higher overall rating and more recent feedback, indicating it has a stronger track record in current user satisfaction. CiHMS's reviews are comparatively sparse and older, making its real-world performance less clear. Would you rather invest in a system with a proven, recent user base or a more comprehensive but less reviewed platform?
If your hotel operates as an independent property, boutique, or small chain, RoomRaccoon is the better fit. Its intuitive interface, automation features, and strong reviews—169 reviews, with recent activity—demonstrate its effectiveness for smaller teams. Conversely, if your hotel is part of a larger chain, resort, or requires extensive multi-channel management, CiHMS’s feature set and wider regional presence make it more suitable, despite fewer recent reviews.
For hotels prioritizing rapid onboarding, user-friendly management, and guest communication automation, RoomRaccoon’s high ease-of-use ratings and recent positive reviews position it as the optimal choice. If your team needs advanced rate management, multi-channel distribution, and customization, CiHMS’s deeper feature set and focus on complex operations might be more appropriate.
RoomRaccoon earns a slightly higher ease-of-use rating (4.74/5 versus CiHMS’s 4.9/5), but both are highly rated for user experience. RoomRaccoon’s interface is praised for its simplicity and quick learning curve, making staff adoption straightforward, especially for small teams. CiHMS's lean UI is intuitive, although its broader feature set can introduce complexity during onboarding.
Recent reviews highlight that RoomRaccoon’s onboarding is smoother, with some users noting it takes less time to get staff up to speed. CiHMS's more extensive features may require more training and support to maximize its potential. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
CiHMS boasts 33 features, including modules for Spa & Wellness, digital registration, and PCI compliance, that RoomRaccoon lacks. Conversely, RoomRaccoon offers 24 features unique to its platform like integrated payment processing, guest CRM, online check-in, and dynamic pricing tools.
Shared features—27 in total—cover core property management needs such as reservations, billing, and reporting. For properties needing specialized modules like spa management or advanced rate plans, CiHMS's unique features are advantageous. If automation, guest management, and revenue tools are paramount, RoomRaccoon’s broader suite of automations and integrations give it a clear edge.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
CiHMS’s support ratings are exceptional at 4.92/5, with reviews emphasizing professional, responsive assistance and comprehensive onboarding. Customers praise CiHMS’s 24/7 online support and detailed help resources, especially during implementation.
RoomRaccoon scores 4.53/5, with some reviews mentioning delays in support response times and occasional difficulties resolving bugs. While many users appreciate their support team, recent reviews indicate a slight decline in responsiveness compared to CiHMS. Edge: CiHMS.
RoomRaccoon significantly outperforms CiHMS in integrations, with 88 verified partners versus CiHMS’s 3. Shared integrations include SiteMinder and Easyway, but RoomRaccoon also offers a rich marketplace for additional plugins like Sage, Paxxio, and RevControl.
RoomRaccoon’s extensive integrations streamline operations, allowing you to connect your preferred tools, booking channels, and payment systems easily. CiHMS’s limited integration options mean more manual work or custom development for connecting other systems. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon consistently receives higher recent ratings, with an overall score of 4.88/5 from 169 reviews, compared to CiHMS’s 0/5 from 101 reviews (noting that the lack of recent reviews diminishes confidence). Hotel reviews for RoomRaccoon highlight its ease of use, automation, and customer support, particularly among small and independent hotels.
In contrast, CiHMS’s lack of recent reviews and a lower overall rating (81.25/100) suggest less current user satisfaction, especially in the context of ongoing tech support and usability. For hotel segments like boutique hotels and independents, RoomRaccoon’s ratings are more reflective of real performance today.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
CiHMS’s pricing starts at $900 per month, with no mention of discounts or tiered plans. RoomRaccoon’s pricing is slightly higher at $1,000 per month, but both systems do not specify additional implementation or setup fees.
Given the difference in regional coverage and feature sets, your hotel’s size and operational complexity should guide your choice. Smaller, independent hotels may find RoomRaccoon’s pricing justified by its ease of use and automation, while larger chains might see CiHMS’s comprehensive modules as a better long-term investment.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, boutique, or seeks rapid onboarding with minimal training.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive multi-region management or complex customization features.
The core difference lies in their target user base: CiHMS excels in managing multiple channels, complex rate plans, and a broad regional footprint, making it suitable for larger, multi-property operations. RoomRaccoon, with its high user ratings, automation, and extensive integrations, is tailored for small to medium-sized hotels that value simplicity and efficiency.
If your hotel needs detailed control, extensive customization, and regional management, CiHMS’s advanced modules and regional presence make it the strong choice. For smaller properties seeking quick deployment, better guest engagement, and automation, RoomRaccoon offers a more reliable, user-friendly solution.
In summary, choose CiHMS if operational complexity and multi-channel management are your priorities. Opt for RoomRaccoon if ease of use, automation, and recent customer satisfaction matter most.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $1,000/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,CiHMS 和 RoomRaccoon PMS 共享 27 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| PMS 连接性 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 分析仪表板 | ||
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
| 多币种支持 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 水疗和健康模块 | ||
| 符合 PCI 标准 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 18 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 10 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"CiHMS was able to fulfill the needs of loyalty management of The Hanoi Club & Residences. The team has perfectly adapted and customized CiHMS to match the specific needs with a 24/..."
"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."
"I was impressed by CiHMS's capability to integrate all our properties into one cohesive system," said Mr. Nam Le, General Manager of Cityhouse. "The user-friendly interface and rob..."
"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement re... CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement reduces manual errors and saves time, which is especially crucial during busy periods.
用户非常欣赏 CIHMS 的全面报告功能,它能够深入分析绩效、收入和入住率。然而,许多用户希望进一步定制报告,以满足特定需求。
该软件因其任务分配功能而备受赞誉,支持客房服务等员工的独立管理。此功能简化了操作流程,并提高了各部门的生产力。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户非常欣赏 CIHMS 的全面报告功能,它能够深入分析绩效、收入和入住率。然而,许多用户希望进一步定制报告,以满足特定需求。
CIHMS 虽然用户友好,但由于系统功能繁多,初始培训和入职培训可能会比较复杂。用户建议使用更全面的培训资源和更详细的指南。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多用户认为 RoomRaccoon 的用户界面直观易学,简化了日常操作和新员工入职培训。不过,也有改进建议,尤其是针对移动和平板电脑版本的系统,以进一步提高可用... 许多用户认为 RoomRaccoon 的用户界面直观易学,简化了日常操作和新员工入职培训。不过,也有改进建议,尤其是针对移动和平板电脑版本的系统,以进一步提高可用性。
RoomRaccoon 用户称赞该平台的一体化特性,它集成了预订引擎、渠道管理器、PMS 和会计功能。这种整合有助于简化操作并消除对多个软件解决方案的需求。许多评论强... RoomRaccoon 用户称赞该平台的一体化特性,它集成了预订引擎、渠道管理器、PMS 和会计功能。这种整合有助于简化操作并消除对多个软件解决方案的需求。许多评论强调此功能如何节省时间并使管理更加轻松。
酒店经营者认为自动电子邮件和文档功能特别有价值,并指出它可以节省时间并增强与客人的沟通。自动发票和入住前/入住后电子邮件是经常被提及的好处。用户还称赞... 酒店经营者认为自动电子邮件和文档功能特别有价值,并指出它可以节省时间并增强与客人的沟通。自动发票和入住前/入住后电子邮件是经常被提及的好处。用户还称赞这些自动化功能的自定义选项。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然有些用户赞赏个别客户支持代理的帮助,但许多评论都批评 RoomRaccoon 支持团队的可用性和响应能力。问题解决时间过长,尤其是在关键运营期间,是常见的投诉... 虽然有些用户赞赏个别客户支持代理的帮助,但许多评论都批评 RoomRaccoon 支持团队的可用性和响应能力。问题解决时间过长,尤其是在关键运营期间,是常见的投诉。
一些评论指出,RoomRaccoon 与其他系统(如支付网关(Stripe、会计软件)和 OTA)的集成存在局限性。用户表示希望实现更无缝的集成,以避免手动工作和额外费用。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。CiHMS 和 RoomRaccoon PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。CiHMS 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 RoomRaccoon PMS 提供 88 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。CiHMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
CiHMS:否。RoomRaccoon PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。CiHMS 的 HT Score 为 81,RoomRaccoon 的为 80。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问