Sorry, this functionality is only available for verified hoteliers
The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
CiHMS vs. Stayntouch:
哪个更适合您？
摘要
我们分析了 490 条经验证的酒店从业者评价，比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究，以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项：
CiHMS 表现出色 在 operational efficiency 方面 — 尤其适合 Resorts 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ，拥有独特功能如 Spa & Wellness Module and EPoS.
Stayntouch 表现出色 在 用户友好界面 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ，拥有独特功能如 Tablet/Kiosk Check-in and Lobby Kiosk.
CiHMS 与 Stayntouch 相比如何？
基于 HTR 上 490 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $900/mo | From $800/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 120 | 370 |
CiHMS 与 Stayntouch 的优缺点是什么？
在分析了 490 条经验证的评价后，CiHMS 用户最看重其 operational efficiency, 高级报告, 任务和资源管理，而 Stayntouch 用户则强调 用户友好界面, 整合与入职, 系统性能和可靠性。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
+
高级报告
▾
|
+
整合与入职
▾
|
|
+
任务和资源管理
▾
|
+
系统性能和可靠性
▾
|
|
+
基于云的可访问性
▾
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
高级报告
▾
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
−
用户培训和入职
▾
|
−
客房管理和客房服务
▾
|
|
−
移动功能
▾
|
−
预订管理
▾
|
CiHMS 对比 Stayntouch：按酒店细分市场排名
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型（10-24 间客房） ▾ | #45 8 条评价 | #18 51 条评价 |
| 中型（25-74 间客房） ▾ | #20 31 条评价 | #5 208 条评价 |
| 大型（75-199 间客房） ▾ | #4 43 条评价 | #7 29 条评价 |
| 超大型（200+ 间客房） ▾ | #4 31 条评价 | #2 58 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #15 65 条评价 | #6 220 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #10 83 条评价 | #6 180 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #15 40 条评价 | #3 152 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #17 15 条评价 | #14 17 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #65 0 条评价 | #4 262 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #58 2 条评价 | #12 64 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #6 117 条评价 | #21 3 条评价 |
| 中东 | #24 1 条评价 | — |
The Decision
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel's efficiency, guest experience, and revenue. Both CiHMS by CiHMS and Stayntouch by Stayntouch aim to streamline operations, but they address different hotel needs and operational scales. While CiHMS offers a comprehensive management platform with deep customization, Stayntouch emphasizes ease of use, mobile functionality, and extensive integrations. How do they compare across key hotel management aspects?
Is CiHMS or Stayntouch Better for Hotels?
Both products solve core PMS challenges—reservation management, guest communication, and operational oversight—but they diverge in focus. CiHMS’s strength lies in detailed customization, advanced reporting, and multi-channel integration, making it attractive for larger, complex hotels or resorts. Conversely, Stayntouch prioritizes user-friendliness, mobile capabilities, and rapid onboarding, ideal for properties seeking quick deployment and seamless staff adoption.
Stayntouch has more recent reviews (26 in the last 6 months versus none for CiHMS), giving it a more current pulse on customer satisfaction and evolving features. Which product aligns better with your hotel’s particular operational complexity and growth trajectory?
CiHMS vs Stayntouch: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?
If your hotel needs a highly customizable system capable of managing large portfolios with complex revenue strategies, CiHMS is the better fit. Its robust reporting, multi-channel reservations, and added modules like Spa & Wellness or EPoS suit resorts and large chains.
If simplicity, rapid onboarding, mobile check-in, and extensive third-party integrations are priorities, then Stayntouch is your best option. It’s especially suitable for boutique hotels, independent properties, or hotels prioritizing guest digital engagement and staff mobility.
In essence, choose CiHMS for tailored management and deep control. Opt for Stayntouch if quick deployment, mobile tools, and scalability matter most for your operation.
Is CiHMS or Stayntouch Easier to Use?
User ratings favor CiHMS slightly with a 4.9/5 ease-of-use score, compared to Stayntouch’s 4.7/5. CiHMS’s interface is praised for its intuitiveness and stability, while Stayntouch’s design is lauded for its friendliness, especially for staff new to PMS software.
However, CiHMS’s onboarding experience scores slightly higher at 4.84/5 versus Stayntouch’s 4.58/5, reflecting a more structured training process. Both systems are user-centric, but CiHMS’s lean UI and straightforward navigation give it a slight edge.
Edge: CiHMS
Which Has Better Features: CiHMS or Stayntouch?
CiHMS offers 3 unique features—Spa & Wellness Module, EPoS, and Gift Vouchers—that cater to specific hotel services. Stayntouch, with 19 exclusive features, provides extensive functionalities like Tablet/Kiosk Check-in, Guest App, Online Check-in/Checkout, Transactional Emails, and integrated Payment Processing.
While CiHMS’s features enhance operational complexity and service diversity, Stayntouch’s broader feature set supports guest engagement, contactless experiences, and staff mobility. The sheer number of features in Stayntouch makes it more versatile for modern hotels.
Edge: Stayntouch
Which Has Better Customer Support: CiHMS or Stayntouch?
Customer support ratings favor CiHMS at 4.92/5, with reviewers emphasizing professional, prompt assistance and effective onboarding. Users describe the support team as responsive and capable of resolving issues quickly, which is critical during busy periods.
Stayntouch scores 4.68/5; users appreciate friendly, helpful support but note occasional delays during rapid growth phases. Given the recent review activity and high satisfaction, CiHMS’s support network is more robust.
Edge: CiHMS
Which Has More Integrations: CiHMS or Stayntouch?
Stayntouch leads significantly with 188 verified integrations, including popular third-party tools like RoomPriceGenie, STAAH, and others. It also offers unlimited interfaces and open APIs, making it highly adaptable.
CiHMS offers only 3 verified partners, including SiteMinder and DerbySoft, with a few exclusive integrations like Easyway. For hotels needing extensive third-party connectivity, Stayntouch’s ecosystem is the clear winner.
Edge: Stayntouch
Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: CiHMS or Stayntouch?
Stayntouch’s overall rating of 4.56/5 is supported by 317 reviews, with recent feedback highlighting its ease of use, mobile capabilities, and flexibility. Hoteliers in North America and Europe particularly favor it, often citing faster onboarding and better guest experience features.
CiHMS’s rating is 0/5 based on 101 reviews, mostly older, with some appreciation for its advanced features but limited recent feedback. Its niche appeal is evident, but Stayntouch’s higher ratings and recent reviews give it a stronger reputation among current users.
Edge: Stayntouch
How Much Do CiHMS and Stayntouch Cost?
CiHMS’s pricing starts at $900 per month, with no free trial or freemium option, indicating a higher entry cost. Stayntouch’s base price is slightly lower at $800 per month, also without a free trial, making it financially accessible.
Both systems charge monthly fees without implementation fees, but the cost difference is minimal. The decision should focus on features and scalability rather than price alone.
What Type of Hotel Should Use CiHMS?
- Hotels that operate multiple revenue channels and need customization, such as resorts, large city hotels, or properties with complex rate plans.
- Teams that require advanced reporting and detailed operational control.
- Hotels seeking modules like Spa & Wellness or EPoS for integrated services.
- Properties that value deep customization and multi-channel distribution management.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, highly mobile, or prioritizes rapid deployment without extensive customization.
What Type of Hotel Should Use Stayntouch?
- Boutique hotels, independents, or properties emphasizing guest digital engagement.
- Hotels seeking quick onboarding with minimal training.
- Multi-property chains needing centralized management.
- Hotels prioritizing mobile check-in, contactless solutions, and extensive integrations.
- Properties that want to scale seamlessly with cloud-based tools.
Not ideal if your hotel relies heavily on in-depth custom features unavailable in Stayntouch or requires extensive on-premise solutions.
Stayntouch vs CiHMS: The Bottom Line for Hotels
The core difference is in scope: CiHMS offers a deeply customizable, feature-rich platform suited to large, complex operations. Stayntouch emphasizes ease of use, flexible integrations, and mobile friendliness, making it ideal for hotels looking for quick results and guest-centric features.
Choose CiHMS if your hotel needs a tailored management system capable of handling complex portfolios and detailed reporting. Opt for Stayntouch if you prioritize mobility, fast onboarding, and extensive third-party integrations for a modern, scalable operation.
In conclusion, for hotels with large operations, complex needs, and a focus on customization, CiHMS is the more suitable choice. For properties seeking simplicity, speed, and guest engagement, Stayntouch offers a compelling, user-friendly solution.
CiHMS 和 Stayntouch 的价格是多少？
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $800/mo |
CiHMS 有哪些 Stayntouch 没有的功能（反之亦然）？
根据 HTR 的产品数据库，CiHMS 和 Stayntouch 共享 30 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 水疗和健康模块 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 10 项功能存在差异。
实际成果：CiHMS 对比 Stayntouch（按业务目标）
我们分析了 7 个经验证的案例研究，比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"CiHMS was able to fulfill the needs of loyalty management of The Hanoi Club & Residences. The team has perfectly adapted and customized CiHMS to match the specific needs with a 24/..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Before leveraging Stayntouch PMS and Owner Relations, much of our old accounting processes were completed manually, including printing and hand-delivering statements to units, and..."
"I was impressed by CiHMS's capability to integrate all our properties into one cohesive system," said Mr. Nam Le, General Manager of Cityhouse. "The user-friendly interface and rob..."
"As an independent hotel that runs above 100% occupancy on many nights, the TWA Hotel finds Stayntouch integral to our operations."
CiHMS 对比 Stayntouch：总结
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement re... CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement reduces manual errors and saves time, which is especially crucial during busy periods.
用户非常欣赏 CIHMS 的全面报告功能，它能够深入分析绩效、收入和入住率。然而，许多用户希望进一步定制报告，以满足特定需求。
该软件因其任务分配功能而备受赞誉，支持客房服务等员工的独立管理。此功能简化了操作流程，并提高了各部门的生产力。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户非常欣赏 CIHMS 的全面报告功能，它能够深入分析绩效、收入和入住率。然而，许多用户希望进一步定制报告，以满足特定需求。
CIHMS 虽然用户友好，但由于系统功能繁多，初始培训和入职培训可能会比较复杂。用户建议使用更全面的培训资源和更详细的指南。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
该系统直观的设计便于操作，非常适合快速培训新员工。其醒目的视觉和组织元素有助于加快任务执行速度，提升员工能力，从而改善与顾客的互动体验。
Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称，这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵，尤其是在系统过渡和设... Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称，这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵，尤其是在系统过渡和设置方面。
Stayntouch 的服务总体可靠，很少出现重大故障，并通过云端提供持续支持。尽管总体评价良好，但一些用户也对公司快速发展背景下解决复杂问题的速度表示担忧。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然用户普遍称赞其易于访问且支持运营的报告，但他们也指出需要更具适应性的报告功能。一些报告缺乏细节或难以操作，凸显了可定制分析解决方案的必要性。
客房分配和客房服务功能因提升运营效率而获得积极反馈。然而，用户希望客房日志查看和任务安排功能能够得到改进，以满足特定的管理需求。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
关于 CiHMS 与 Stayntouch 的常见问题
CiHMS 能否替代 Stayntouch？
这取决于您的需求。CiHMS 和 Stayntouch 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能，但各有独特的能力。CiHMS 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴，而 Stayntouch 提供 187 个。在切换之前，请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
哪个更适合小型或独立酒店？
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。CiHMS 在易用性方面领先，评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价，了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
CiHMS 或 Stayntouch 是否提供免费方案？
CiHMS：否。Stayntouch：否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前，请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HTR 如何评估和排名 CiHMS 和 Stayntouch？
HT Score 是一个综合排名，考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量，帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。CiHMS 的 HT Score 为 81，Stayntouch 的为 91。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何？ 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分（推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率）、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性（最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价）以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何？ 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何？ 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集（反馈驱动文化的指标）以及产品资料是否完整，包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛？ 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖（服务的国家和区域）、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标，以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
酒店从业者还在阅读哪些 物业管理系统 对比？
探索更多基于经验证酒店从业者评价的一对一对比。
获取个性化的产品推荐
产品推荐顾问
