The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 385 条经验证的评价后,Clock 用户最看重其 ease of use and intuitive design, 预订和客房管理, 集成与自动化,而 Counter 用户则强调 用户界面和可用性, 自动化功能, 平台集成。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Intuitive Design
▾
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
+
预订和客房管理
▾
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
|
+
集成与自动化
▾
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
|
+
培训和入职
▾
|
+
价格
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
功能更新和可用性
▾
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
|
−
连接性和同步性
▾
|
−
价格
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #11 117 条评价 | #26 28 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #7 157 条评价 | #46 4 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #17 9 条评价 | #32 2 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #11 5 条评价 | #31 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #8 165 条评价 | #31 16 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #11 80 条评价 | #44 4 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #8 62 条评价 | #43 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #9 27 条评价 | #32 5 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #17 30 条评价 | #25 8 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #3 228 条评价 | #20 25 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #11 13 条评价 | #16 4 条评价 |
| 中东 | #17 2 条评价 | #11 2 条评价 |
Choosing between Clock PMS by Clock and Counter by Counter hinges on your property’s size, complexity, and guest service needs. Both systems aim to streamline operations, but Clock PMS offers a broad, feature-rich platform geared toward hotels of various types, while Counter is tailored specifically for hostels seeking simplicity and mobility. How do these differences align with your hotel’s operational priorities?
Clock PMS tackles the challenge of managing a wide array of hotel operations—from reservations and rates to guest communication and analytics—within a single platform. Counter, on the other hand, simplifies hostel management with an intuitive, mobile-friendly interface focused on guest check-in, check-out, and reservations. Do you prioritize extensive features or ease of use?
Clock PMS and Counter aim to improve your hotel’s daily workflow, but they diverge significantly in scope and target market. Clock PMS is an extensive, multi-functional system suited to properties that need deep customization, automation, and integrations, especially in higher-end, multi-property, or complex environments. Counter is designed for hostels, emphasizing straightforward operations, quick onboarding, and mobility, ideal for small-scale, high-volume hostels with a preference for minimal manual work.
Clock PMS boasts a review count of 251 with recent reviews, reflecting a mature, well-supported system. Counter has only 54 reviews, with no reviews in the last six months, indicating a smaller, perhaps less tested platform. Given the more recent and numerous reviews, Clock PMS’s data should be considered more reliable for decision-making. Are you looking for a comprehensive hotel management solution or a lightweight system for a hostel?
If your property is a large, full-service hotel, chain, or resort that requires extensive automation, multi-channel distribution, and in-depth reporting, Clock PMS is the clear choice. It supports multiple currencies, languages, and integrations, making it suitable for properties with international guests or multiple locations. Its features like digital check-in, guest portals, and revenue management modules cater to complex operational environments.
Conversely, if your property is a hostel or small accommodation that values simplicity, mobility, and quick training, Counter is more appropriate. It’s free, easy to set up, and works seamlessly on mobile browsers, making it perfect for hostels with high guest turnover. If you need advanced revenue management or multi-property support, Counter’s capabilities are limited.
In summary, go with Clock PMS if your hotel needs robust features and customization. Choose Counter if you prioritize ease of use, speed, and affordability for a hostel environment.
Clock PMS scores a 4.78/5 for ease of use based on user reviews, praised for its intuitive interface and simple staff training. Its onboarding experience is rated 4.71/5, but some users note the extensive features can be overwhelming initially. The system’s complexity sometimes leads to longer setup times, and occasional cryptic error messages have been reported.
Counter scores a 4.6/5 for ease of use, with reviews emphasizing its straightforward, mobile-friendly interface that staff find easy to learn. Its minimalist design and high responsiveness make daily operations smooth for small teams. Support responsiveness is excellent, with many users citing quick assistance from the Counter team.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS offers 39 features exclusive to its platform, including integrated CRS, revenue management, guest profiles, multi-currency/language support, digital registration, integrated payment terminals, guest app, online check-in/out, and task management. These features support complex hotel operations and automation, providing a comprehensive management environment.
Counter provides 19 shared features, including reservations, POS integration, automatic payments, and basic reporting. However, it lacks the extensive automation, multi-language support, and advanced revenue tools Clock offers. Its features are sufficient for small hostels but not comparable in depth or breadth.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS is rated 4.75/5 for customer support, praised for its responsive, proactive team that frequently responds quickly to queries. Users appreciate the ongoing updates and support, though some mention occasional delays in resolving reporting or error issues.
Counter exceeds with a 4.96/5 rating, with reviews emphasizing the support team’s helpfulness, quick responses, and professionalism. Users like Evelyn and Max for their consistent assistance, though some users note support can be slower in certain time zones.
Edge: Counter.
Clock PMS boasts 111 verified integrations, including major partners like SiteMinder, Stripe, Goki, and RevControl, with four shared partners. Its extensive API and large partner network enable seamless connectivity with numerous booking engines, revenue tools, and channel managers.
Counter has only 7 verified integrations, including Stripe, GOKI, and WuBook, with some notable regional channel limitations. Its smaller ecosystem means fewer options for expanding connectivity but may suffice for basic needs.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS has an overall rating of 4.8/5 based on 251 reviews, with recent feedback confirming its reliability, extensive features, and excellent support. Independent hotels and boutique properties particularly rate Clock highly, with some giving it near-perfect scores for operational efficiency and user experience.
Counter’s rating is 4.73/5 from 54 reviews, primarily from hostel operators. While highly rated for simplicity and support, its limited feature set means it’s often seen as suitable only for basic hostel operations without complex requirements.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS costs $600 per month with no freemium or tiered plans, representing a significant investment but with no hidden fees. Its pricing reflects its enterprise-level feature set, integrations, and support.
Counter is free to use, making it an attractive choice for hostels with tight budgets. However, its limited features and scalability may necessitate upgrades or additional tools as your property grows.
Not ideal if your property is very small or only needs basic reservation management.
Not ideal if you require multi-property management, detailed revenue analytics, or extensive automation.
Clock PMS offers a robust, feature-packed platform suitable for larger, complex hotels and chains. Its high review count, recent positive feedback, and extensive integrations make it a reliable choice for properties seeking automation and customization.
Counter excels in simplicity, affordability, and mobility for small hostels, especially those with high guest turnover and limited operational complexity. Its high support ratings and ease of use make it ideal for small teams prioritizing quick setup and operations.
If your hotel needs a full-featured, scalable PMS, go with Clock PMS. If you operate a hostel or small property that values simplicity and mobility, Counter is the better fit.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 6 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Many users are impressed with Clock PMS+ for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, which simplifies the training process for new employees... Many users are impressed with Clock PMS+ for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, which simplifies the training process for new employees and enhances operational efficiency. The software's straightforward navigation and learnability make it ideal for fast-paced environments.
评论者经常提到,Clock PMS+ 提供了高效的预订和客房管理工具。它将预订、客房管理和宾客沟通等各种运营环节整合到一个平台上,从而节省时间并减少错误。
用户非常欣赏 Clock PMS+ 的广泛集成和自动化功能,它可以与其他系统无缝连接,节省重复性任务的时间,并增强日常运营。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论者表示,他们在适应新功能更新方面遇到了一些挑战,他们认为,虽然这些改进是有益的,但有时会影响用户体验。因此,他们呼吁制定更平滑的过渡流程来更好... 一些评论者表示,他们在适应新功能更新方面遇到了一些挑战,他们认为,虽然这些改进是有益的,但有时会影响用户体验。因此,他们呼吁制定更平滑的过渡流程来更好地适应这些更新。
一些用户指出,虽然 Clock PMS+ 提供了全面的报告,但在数据收集和呈现方式方面仍有改进的空间,这可以增强收入管理和战略规划。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
排名更高的方面
这取决于您的需求。Clock PMS 和 Counter 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Clock PMS 提供 111 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Counter 提供 7 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Clock PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Clock PMS:否。Counter:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Clock 的 HT Score 为 87,Counter 的为 16。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案