项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 469 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Counter 表现出色 在 用户界面和可用性 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest CRM.
Stayntouch 表现出色 在 实施、培训和过渡支持 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的住宿设施 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
基于 HTR 上 469 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 联系销售 | 起价 $800/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 57 | 412 |
在分析了 469 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 Stayntouch 用户则强调 实施、培训和过渡支持, 易用性和快速的员工培训, 前台操作与预订管理。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
+
实施、培训和过渡支持
▾
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
+
易用性和快速的员工培训
▾
|
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
+
前台操作与预订管理
▾
|
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
+
集成与连接
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
−
报告与分析
▾
|
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
−
定制和工作流程的灵活性
▾
|
|
−
价格
▾
|
−
账单、账页和支付流程
▾
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #27 28 条评价 | #19 58 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #48 4 条评价 | #5 223 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #34 2 条评价 | #5 49 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #28 1 条评价 | #2 59 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #33 16 条评价 | #6 247 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #45 4 条评价 | #6 195 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #44 4 条评价 | #3 159 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | #14 18 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | #3 298 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | #13 65 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #17 4 条评价 | #23 3 条评价 |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Deciding between Counter by Counter and Stayntouch by Stayntouch hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational scope. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but they target different hotel types and offer distinct features. If your property is a hostel or small guesthouse seeking a straightforward, cost-effective solution, Counter might be appealing. Conversely, for hotels that require extensive integrations, multi-property management, and advanced automation, Stayntouch is likely the better fit.
Counter and Stayntouch both address core PMS functions like reservations, check-in/out, and guest management, but they diverge significantly in feature depth and scalability. Do you need a simple, dedicated hostel PMS, or a robust platform capable of supporting a growing hotel chain?
Counter is designed primarily for hostels, inns, and small hotels that prioritize ease of use and quick setup. Its free, mobile-friendly interface simplifies daily operations like check-ins, reservations, and POS integration, making it ideal for budget-conscious or small-scale properties. Stayntouch, on the other hand, offers a cloud-based platform with extensive automation, revenue management, and multi-property capabilities, suitable for mid-sized and large hotels aiming for operational efficiency and scalability.
Counter’s review count (54 reviews) is significantly lower than Stayntouch’s (317 reviews), but recent reviews are more robust for Stayntouch—26 in the last six months versus zero for Counter—giving Stayntouch a stronger, more current data set. Which platform aligns better with your property’s growth plans and operational complexity?
If your hotel needs a simple, fast-to-deploy PMS with a focus on hostel or small property management, go with Counter. Its easy interface and POS integration make it an excellent choice for small owners with limited technical resources. If your hotel requires extensive automation, multi-property oversight, and integration with third-party systems like revenue management tools, Stayntouch is the more comprehensive option, especially given its larger user base and recent positive reviews.
Counter’s primary strengths lie in its simplicity and cost-effectiveness, making it suitable for properties with straightforward needs. Conversely, Stayntouch’s broader feature set and proven scalability make it ideal for brands or chains looking to grow without changing systems later.
Counter scores 4.6/5 for ease of use and has a reputation for its intuitive, mobile-friendly interface, ideal for staff training and quick onboarding. Users highlight its straightforward setup, especially for hostel operations, with many describing it as “clear,” “simple,” and “easy to understand,” which minimizes training time.
Stayntouch, with a 4.7/5 rating, is also praised for its user-friendliness, particularly its mobile interface and smooth onboarding process. Reviewers mention that its screens are “the most user-friendly out there,” and training is described as “easy” with consistent support.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch offers 31 features exclusive to its platform, including revenue management, online check-in/out, guest app, shift planning, integrated CRS, and real-time reporting. These tools support a broad range of hotel operations and automation, making it suitable for larger or more complex properties.
Counter has only 1 exclusive feature: Guest CRM, but shares 18 features with Stayntouch, such as reservations and POS. While it covers core hostel needs well, it lacks the advanced modules found in Stayntouch.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Counter’s reviews consistently praise its support team, with a 4.96/5 rating, and mention specific staff members like Evelyn and Max for their responsiveness and professionalism. Users appreciate quick responses, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting, though some note support can slow in certain time zones.
Stayntouch’s support is strong with a 4.68/5 rating, and users commend its onboarding process and ongoing assistance. However, some reviews mention delays in addressing complex issues as the company expands rapidly.
Edge: Counter.
Stayntouch boasts 188 verified integrations, including popular systems like RoomPriceGenie, STAAH, and various channel managers, giving you flexibility to connect with numerous third-party tools. Its open API approach supports extensive customization and automation.
Counter’s 7 verified integrations are limited but include essential partners like Stripe, Cloudbeds, and Goki. Its integrations focus on core hostel needs, but it offers fewer options for scaling or expanding connectivity.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Counter’s user reviews, though fewer, are highly positive, especially among hostel operators—averaging 4.75/5 across 52 reviews. It is praised for its simplicity, speed, and customer support, making it ideal for budget or small-scale properties.
Stayntouch, with 280 reviews averaging 4.51/5 and many recent five-star ratings, is highly rated across various hotel segments, including boutique and independent hotels. Larger properties and chains tend to rate it more favorably for its extensive features and scalability.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Counter is offered without a clear pricing structure; it appears to be free, which is appealing for small operations or those with tight budgets. Its free model may include limitations, but details are scarce.
Stayntouch charges a base fee of $800 per month, with no additional implementation or recurring charges. Its pricing reflects its comprehensive feature set and enterprise-level capabilities, making it more suitable for hotels that see value in extensive automation and integrations.
Not ideal if:
Edge: Counter.
Not ideal if:
Edge: Stayntouch.
Counter by Counter is a straightforward, hostel-focused PMS that excels in ease of use, quick setup, and responsive support. Its core feature set supports daily hostel operations but falls short of the advanced automation and integrations that larger hotels require.
Stayntouch by Stayntouch is a scalable, feature-rich platform suited for larger properties or chains. Its extensive integrations, automation tools, and multi-property management capabilities make it a go-to choice for hotels aiming to grow and optimize operations.
If your property is a small hostel or inn, Counter is the clear winner for simplicity and cost. For hotels looking to expand, automate, and connect with a broad ecosystem of systems, Stayntouch is the more appropriate investment.
In conclusion, choose Counter if you prioritize a free, easy-to-use system tailored for hostels and small properties. Opt for Stayntouch if your hotel needs comprehensive features, scalability, and extensive third-party integrations to support ongoing growth.
酒店运营软件(PMS) 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | — | 起价 $800/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We really like the ability to customize our setups as much as possible, and that was pretty important to us. Being able to have a lot of those main features already at our fingerti..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Before leveraging Stayntouch PMS and Owner Relations, much of our old accounting processes were completed manually, including printing and hand-delivering statements to units, and..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"As an independent hotel that runs above 100% occupancy on many nights, the TWA Hotel finds Stayntouch integral to our operations."
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
一个主要的主题是Stayntouch在切换和培训方面的表现,许多评论者提到顺畅的过渡和现场指导的有效性。产品的上线体验似乎是一个关键的采购标准,因为用户反复称赞... 一个主要的主题是Stayntouch在切换和培训方面的表现,许多评论者提到顺畅的过渡和现场指导的有效性。产品的上线体验似乎是一个关键的采购标准,因为用户反复称赞培训师和实施专家帮助减轻压力、加快上线成功。
用户普遍反映Stayntouch界面直观,易于学习,即使是新员工或技术水平较低的员工也能快速掌握。这缩短了培训时间,帮助酒店更快让团队投入工作,减少错误。
评测者经常强调更快的入住办理、更便捷的预订查询、快速修改入住日期和房型,以及更顺畅的日常前台工作流程。这些功能帮助酒店加快宾客办理入住速度,确保在繁忙... 评测者经常强调更快的入住办理、更便捷的预订查询、快速修改入住日期和房型,以及更顺畅的日常前台工作流程。这些功能帮助酒店加快宾客办理入住速度,确保在繁忙时段运营井然有序。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
许多评价提到入住率、收入、税费、服务费和运营报告的价值,尤其是在日常管理决策中。然而,用户也希望拥有更灵活的筛选、更好的深入分析、更清晰的布局,以及更... 许多评价提到入住率、收入、税费、服务费和运营报告的价值,尤其是在日常管理决策中。然而,用户也希望拥有更灵活的筛选、更好的深入分析、更清晰的布局,以及更便捷地获取所需的具体报告。
许多用户重视根据运营需求定制设置、字段、价格逻辑、仪表盘和酒店工作流程的能力。但他们也希望在报告、界面布局和流程步骤上有更多的定制,显示出灵活性是一个... 许多用户重视根据运营需求定制设置、字段、价格逻辑、仪表盘和酒店工作流程的能力。但他们也希望在报告、界面布局和流程步骤上有更多的定制,显示出灵活性是一个差异化因素,但尚未完全实现。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Stayntouch 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Stayntouch 提供 201 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Stayntouch 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Stayntouch:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 15,Stayntouch 的为 95。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐