The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 428 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Clock 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.8/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Ancillary revenue tracking and Guest profiles.
roommaster 表现出色 在 客户支持 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue Management Module and Native Email Marketing.
基于 HTR 上 428 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $600/mo | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 328 | 100 |
在分析了 428 条经验证的评价后,Clock 用户最看重其 功能丰富, 运营效率, 响应式支持和定期更新,而 roommaster 用户则强调 客户支持, 预订管理, 集中式数据管理。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
功能丰富
▾
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
+
响应式支持和定期更新
▾
|
+
集中式数据管理
▾
|
|
+
易于培训使用
▾
|
+
云和移动访问
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误消息
▾
|
−
报告生成
▾
|
|
−
报告功能
▾
|
−
用户界面体验
▾
|
|
−
团体预订功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #11 117 条评价 | #30 26 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #7 157 条评价 | #13 54 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #17 9 条评价 | #31 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #11 5 条评价 | #32 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #8 165 条评价 | #22 35 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #11 80 条评价 | #34 8 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #8 62 条评价 | #24 15 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #9 27 条评价 | #27 6 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #17 30 条评价 | #10 62 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #3 228 条评价 | #29 11 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #11 13 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #17 2 条评价 | #27 0 条评价 |
Choosing between Clock PMS and roommaster PMS hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and growth plans. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but Clock PMS offers a broader set of features backed by extensive recent reviews, making it a more attractive option for modern hoteliers. Your decision should weigh the specific strengths of each platform against your property's size, complexity, and future ambitions.
Clock PMS is designed to serve busy, multi-faceted hotels that need an all-in-one platform capable of managing reservations, rates, invoicing, and guest interactions from a single dashboard. roommaster PMS, on the other hand, is favored by hotels seeking centralized data management and straightforward workflows, especially in multi-property or independent hotel settings. Which approach aligns better with your operational style?
Both Clock PMS and roommaster PMS are built to improve operational efficiency, but they approach this goal differently. Clock PMS provides a comprehensive, feature-rich environment with advanced integrations and automation, making it ideal for hotels that want to automate guest communications, handle complex bookings, and manage multiple revenue streams. Conversely, roommaster focuses on centralizing core functions like reservations, front desk, and financial management, with a strong emphasis on reducing clicks and manual errors.
Clock PMS’s recent reviews highlight its high overall rating, a 4.8/5 score based on 251 reviews, with a notable 95% likelihood to recommend. Hoteliers praise its ease of use, recent updates, and extensive feature set, although some mention its complexity can be overwhelming. roommaster has a solid rating of 4.33/5 from 83 reviews, with an 91% recommendation rate, valued for its simplicity and robust reporting. But which system’s strengths match your hotel’s specific challenges?
If your team prioritizes automation, guest engagement, and a broad integration ecosystem, Clock PMS is likely the better fit. If your hotel needs a reliable, straightforward management system that simplifies daily tasks and offers detailed reporting, roommaster might be preferable. Do your operational priorities lean toward automation and customization, or simplicity and centralization?
If your hotel requires a comprehensive solution that covers reservations, guest messaging, online check-in, and ancillary revenue tracking, Clock PMS is the clear choice. Its wide feature set (10 unique features only in Clock) supports complex workflows and offers extensive customization, making it suitable for hotels that want to manage everything from a single platform.
If your hotel needs a reliable, easy-to-learn platform with core features like reservations, front desk, and financial management, roommaster is better suited. Its emphasis on centralized data, over 270 built-in reports, and deep integration capabilities are ideal for hotels that prioritize operational control and data-driven insights.
Hotels that operate at scale, require automation, and want to reduce manual work should go with Clock PMS. If your property values straightforward workflows, reliable reporting, and multi-property management, roommaster is the more strategic option. Which of these operational philosophies best aligns with your hotel’s growth plans?
Clock PMS holds a slight advantage here, with a 4.78/5 ease-of-use rating based on recent reviews, and a 4.71/5 onboarding score. Users praise its intuitive interface, quick learning curve, and efficient training process, especially for new staff. Support responsiveness and regular updates also contribute to a smooth onboarding experience.
roommaster, rated at 4.22/5 for ease of use, is valued for its straightforward workflows and centralized data, but some users find the system a bit clunky and slow, especially when navigating reports or handling group bookings. Customer support inconsistencies also affect user experience.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS offers 10 features unique to its platform, including ancillary revenue tracking, multi-lingual support, tablet and kiosk check-in, and housekeeper mobile apps. It also supports integrations with numerous booking engines, channel managers, and payment systems, with no connection fees or markup on payments.
roommaster features 12 unique offerings, such as a robust channel manager, built-in booking engine, revenue management, guest feedback, and native email marketing. Its 270+ reports provide real-time insights, and automation of guest communications simplifies daily operations.
While Clock has more innovative guest-focused features, roommaster’s comprehensive reporting and built-in channel management give it an edge for operational control. Which set of features is more critical for your property’s success?
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS’s support is highly rated at 4.75/5, with recent reviews emphasizing quick and helpful responses. Users often quote support staff as proactive and responsive, with some mentioning that issues are resolved efficiently, contributing to less downtime.
roommaster support scores 4.25/5, with some users praising its reliability, but others note difficulties reaching support and inconsistent expertise. The slower response times and limited help over the phone have been highlighted as areas for improvement.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS boasts 111 verified partner integrations, including popular systems like SiteMinder, TrustYou, and Revinate. It offers extensive API capabilities, with no connection fees, facilitating seamless third-party integrations tailored to your hotel’s needs.
roommaster has 56 verified integrations, including major GDS and booking engines like Vertical Booking and GuestTraction. Although its integration ecosystem is smaller, it covers critical channels for many independent and chain hotels.
For hotels seeking broad, flexible integration options, Clock PMS’s ecosystem is more extensive. Which ecosystem aligns with your current and future technology needs?
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS’s recent reviews and 251 total reviews paint a clearer picture. Its users, notably in boutique and city-center hotels, rate it at 4.8/5, with high scores from independent hotels and small chains. Reviewers highlight its ease of onboarding, comprehensive features, and strong support.
roommaster’s 4.33/5 rating from 83 reviews is solid but lags behind Clock’s recent performance. Its users in resorts and larger properties appreciate its simplicity and reporting, but some mention slower support and less frequent updates.
Given the recent review volume and higher ratings, Clock PMS clearly has a stronger reputation among hoteliers. Which user feedback resonates more with your hotel’s expectations?
Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS is priced at $600 per month, with no free tier, trials, or hidden fees. Its flat monthly fee covers all features and integrations, making it straightforward but potentially costly for smaller properties.
roommaster’s base price is $500 per month, also without a free tier or trial, and covers core functionalities. Both systems lack monthly per-room fees or implementation costs, but pricing can vary based on specific needs or additional modules.
Your budget should consider the scope of features and integrations you need, but Clock’s slightly higher price may reflect its broader capabilities. Are you willing to invest more upfront for extensive automation and integrations?
Not ideal if your hotel:
Not ideal if your hotel:
Clock PMS and roommaster PMS both serve hotel management needs but cater to different operational philosophies. Clock’s extensive feature set, recent reviews, and broader integrations make it the more robust choice for hotels seeking automation, guest engagement, and scalability.
Hotels that want a system with a proven track record, high user ratings, and ongoing innovation should choose Clock PMS. Its ability to simplify complex workflows and support rapid growth makes it ideal for dynamic, multi-asset properties.
Meanwhile, roommaster excels in core reservation management and data centralization, making it suitable for independent hotels or properties with straightforward operational requirements. It’s a dependable system for properties prioritizing ease of use, detailed reporting, and multi-property oversight.
In summary, if your hotel values innovation, automation, and a large support ecosystem, Clock PMS stands out. If your focus is on simplicity, reliable core features, and centralized data, roommaster remains a strong, cost-effective option. Which system aligns more closely with your hotel’s strategic goals?
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Clock PMS 和 roommaster PMS 共享 48 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| 礼品券和预付体验 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 销售点 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 10 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 10 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."
"From my point of view as an asset manager that has the responsibility to tell the owners about their investment, roommaster gives me all that information. It's easy to report and e..."
"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"
"We’re an independent hotel surrounded by giants, but roomMaster gave us the tools we needed to stand tall alongside them."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Clock PMS+ 提供丰富的功能,有助于管理酒店运营和活动。然而,一些用户发现功能繁多,难以管理,建议改进其组织方式。
该软件通过节省时间并简化部门之间的沟通和协调,显著提高了运营效率,为员工和客人带来更顺畅的体验。
用户对响应式支持服务和定期更新表示赞赏,这些更新引入了新功能和改进,确保了系统的可靠性和与用户需求的相关性。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户偶尔会遇到以代码形式显示的错误消息,这让他们难以快速解决问题。直接从错误消息导航到问题可以提升用户体验。
报告功能虽然全面,但速度较慢,限制了其目前的有效性。用户建议进行优化,以解锁更多强大的功能。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然有些用户体验到了优质的客户支持,但也有一些用户反映服务存在不一致之处。他们认为,需要提升客服人员的专业水平和对用户问题的理解,才能提供更令人满意的... 虽然有些用户体验到了优质的客户支持,但也有一些用户反映服务存在不一致之处。他们认为,需要提升客服人员的专业水平和对用户问题的理解,才能提供更令人满意的服务体验。
预订管理被认为是RoomMaster的一大优势,用户普遍认为它操作简便、高效,能够妥善管理包括团体预订在内的各种预订。然而,部分用户也指出,RoomMaster在房间分配... 预订管理被认为是RoomMaster的一大优势,用户普遍认为它操作简便、高效,能够妥善管理包括团体预订在内的各种预订。然而,部分用户也指出,RoomMaster在房间分配列表和团体入住登记方面仍有改进空间。
RoomMaster从分散的人工操作方式转向集中式数据管理,因其减少错误、提高酒店运营可靠性而备受赞誉。用户非常欣赏将所有预订、宾客信息和财务数据集中在一个安全... RoomMaster从分散的人工操作方式转向集中式数据管理,因其减少错误、提高酒店运营可靠性而备受赞誉。用户非常欣赏将所有预订、宾客信息和财务数据集中在一个安全平台上的做法,这显著提升了工作流程效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
RoomMaster的报告生成功能虽然实用,但仍被认为有待改进。用户希望在创建和导出报告方面获得更高的效率和效果,这表明改进功能可以简化分析任务。
一些用户指出需要改进用户体验,尤其强调需要消除重复性任务,例如频繁登录,这会影响日常使用该软件的流畅性。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Clock PMS 和 roommaster PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Clock PMS 提供 111 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 roommaster PMS 提供 56 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Clock PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.1/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Clock PMS:否。roommaster PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Clock 的 HT Score 为 84,roommaster 的为 83。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问