项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 1,395 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 易用性和员工培训 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的住宿设施 (4.6/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Mobile App.
Shiji Group 表现出色 在 易于使用 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest profiles and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
基于 HTR 上 1,395 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $600/月 | 起价 $1,200/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 1,358 | 37 |
在分析了 1,395 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 易用性和员工培训, pms日历和预订管理, 报告与分析,而 Shiji Group 用户则强调 易于使用, 支持团队, 执行。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易用性和员工培训
▾
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
+
PMS日历和预订管理
▾
|
+
支持团队
▾
|
|
+
报告与分析
▾
|
+
执行
▾
|
|
+
渠道管理和OTA连接
▾
|
+
培训材料
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
支持响应速度和人工协助
▾
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
−
移动应用和远程访问限制
▾
|
−
系统速度
▾
|
|
−
账单、支付和发票设置
▾
|
−
集成能力
▾
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #1 592 条评价 | #53 2 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #4 212 条评价 | #31 17 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #5 42 条评价 | #11 13 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #13 4 条评价 | #22 2 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 473 条评价 | #33 17 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #4 228 条评价 | #24 25 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #6 116 条评价 | #22 19 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 93 条评价 | #45 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 435 条评价 | #33 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #7 163 条评价 | #30 8 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 226 条评价 | #14 5 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 11 条评价 | #5 14 条评价 |
Choosing between Cloudbeds PMS and Shiji Daylight PMS hinges on your property's size, complexity, and your specific operational needs. Cloudbeds offers a streamlined, all-in-one platform with a broad user base, while Shiji emphasizes scalability and in-depth guest data management, especially suited for larger or multi-property groups. Which system aligns better with your current and future growth ambitions?
Both systems aim to simplify your hotel management but diverge in their approach. Cloudbeds provides a user-friendly, integrated ecosystem with high user satisfaction and recent growth in reviews, whereas Shiji offers a robust, scalable platform focusing on sophisticated data centralization and automation. Are you prioritizing ease of use or advanced customization?
Cloudbeds is widely appreciated for its simplicity, making it ideal for small to medium hotels, hostels, and boutique properties seeking a straightforward, all-in-one management system. It has the highest review count (1,071) with recent feedback, and a score of 4.63/5, indicating strong, current user satisfaction.
Shiji, on the other hand, is built for hotel groups of all sizes, from independents to chains, with a focus on centralized guest profiles and operational coherence. Its review count is significantly lower (32), and it has a lower overall rating (75.14 out of 100), with many users highlighting its scalability rather than ease of use. Given the recent reviews and higher overall rating, Cloudbeds provides more reliable, up-to-date feedback for hoteliers.
Do you need a system that’s easy to implement and operate daily, or a flexible backbone for large-scale operations?
Cloudbeds scores a 4.61/5 in ease of use, with many reviews praising its intuitive, straightforward interface that simplifies reservations, housekeeping, and reporting. Its onboarding process is rated 4.45/5, and users frequently mention how staff adoption is quick due to its user-friendly design. Customer support is also highly rated at 4.41/5, reinforcing its accessibility.
Shiji’s interface is similarly rated at 4.63/5, with users appreciating its clarity and ease of learning, especially for staff. Its onboarding score is 4.38/5, and users mention the comprehensive training resources and support team. The main edge here is the recent surge in Cloudbeds reviews, indicating more current positive experiences.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds offers 14 features exclusive to its platform, including a comprehensive channel manager, booking engine, revenue management, and integrations with popular systems like QuickBooks and PayPal. Its features focus on simplifying distribution, reservations, and financial tracking.
Shiji provides 48 features unique to its platform, such as advanced group booking, digital registration, automated reminders, task management, and extensive housekeeping modules. It also supports online check-in/out, integrated payment terminals, and detailed guest profiles.
While Shiji’s extensive feature set caters to complex, multi-property operations, Cloudbeds’s rich, targeted features support fast, efficient management for smaller properties.
Edge: Shiji Group.
Cloudbeds is rated 4.41/5 for customer support, with users citing prompt responses and reliable assistance. Recent reviews praise its support team for empathy and technical expertise, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting.
Shiji’s support score is slightly higher at 4.53/5, with users appreciating the 24/7 availability and knowledgeable staff. Many reviews mention the support team’s professionalism and quick resolutions, vital for larger operations requiring complex integrations.
Edge: Shiji Group.
Cloudbeds boasts 190 verified partners, including industry-standard integrations like SiteMinder, Expedia, and Umi Digital, with 27 shared partners with Shiji. Its ecosystem covers a broad range of booking, payment, and revenue tools, supporting extensive customization.
Shiji has 64 verified partners, with notable integrations like Amadeus, SALTO, and Onity, catering to large hotel chains with specific needs. Its API approach supports advanced automation, but the smaller partner network indicates a narrower focus compared to Cloudbeds.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s recent reviews show a 4.63/5 rating, with many praising its ease of use and support, especially among boutique, hostel, and independent hotels. The 81 recent reviews in the last six months reinforce its current relevance and user satisfaction.
Shiji, with a rating of 75.14/100, has fewer recent reviews (none in the last six months), mostly from larger hotel groups. Its users emphasize scalability and automation but note system speed issues.
Given the volume and recency of reviews, Cloudbeds is rated significantly higher by hoteliers today.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds charges a base fee of $600/month, with no freemium or per-room charges, reflecting a straightforward pricing model. Shiji’s base price is $1,200/month, with no trial or additional fees indicated, but it is generally positioned as a premium system.
While Cloudbeds offers a more accessible entry point, Shiji’s higher cost aligns with its enterprise features. Your choice depends on whether your hotel prioritizes affordability or comprehensive, scalable solutions.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive customization, complex automation, or enterprise-level analytics.
Not ideal if your property is small, or if you prefer a more intuitive, simplified interface without extensive automation.
Cloudbeds is a comprehensive, easy-to-use PMS that excels in delivering current, positive user experiences for small to medium properties. Its strong review count and recent feedback make it a reliable choice for hoteliers seeking efficiency, integration, and growth.
Shiji offers a robust, scalable system with extensive features tailored for larger hotel groups and properties demanding sophisticated automation and data management. Its lower recent review activity suggests it’s better suited for established, multi-property operations.
If your hotel values simplicity, current support, and rapid deployment, go with Cloudbeds. If your property needs a deeply customizable, enterprise-level platform capable of supporting complex operations, Shiji is the better choice.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
酒店运营软件(PMS) 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $600/月 | 起价 $1,200/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 12 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
一个反复强调的优势是Cloudbeds对非技术背景的酒店员工来说易于学习,这缩短了培训时间,并帮助小型酒店以更少的复杂度运营。评论者常提到教程、视频和简洁的界... 一个反复强调的优势是Cloudbeds对非技术背景的酒店员工来说易于学习,这缩短了培训时间,并帮助小型酒店以更少的复杂度运营。评论者常提到教程、视频和简洁的界面是系统加快采用和日常操作的原因。
用户通常将Cloudbeds的日历作为核心的日常工作区,用于查看房态、管理预订和处理入住/退房。他们重视清晰的房态概览、拖放编辑、拆分预订以及更快的前台工作流程... 用户通常将Cloudbeds的日历作为核心的日常工作区,用于查看房态、管理预订和处理入住/退房。他们重视清晰的房态概览、拖放编辑、拆分预订以及更快的前台工作流程,尽管有些用户希望点击次数更少、预订操作更安全。
支持服务是评论中的一个主要差异点,许多用户称赞快速的在线聊天帮助、良好的跟进以及帮助新员工快速上手的培训支持。同时,也有一些评论者批评响应时间慢、聊天... 支持服务是评论中的一个主要差异点,许多用户称赞快速的在线聊天帮助、良好的跟进以及帮助新员工快速上手的培训支持。同时,也有一些评论者批评响应时间慢、聊天机器人操作不顺畅,以及在紧急酒店问题上缺乏电话或真人支持。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
支持服务是评论中的一个主要差异点,许多用户称赞快速的在线聊天帮助、良好的跟进以及帮助新员工快速上手的培训支持。同时,也有一些评论者批评响应时间慢、聊天... 支持服务是评论中的一个主要差异点,许多用户称赞快速的在线聊天帮助、良好的跟进以及帮助新员工快速上手的培训支持。同时,也有一些评论者批评响应时间慢、聊天机器人操作不顺畅,以及在紧急酒店问题上缺乏电话或真人支持。
Cloudbeds 的云访问功能受到好评,因为管理者可以随时随地工作,但移动应用始终是一个薄弱环节。评测者希望实现真正的随时操作,比如创建预订、接收推送通知、查... Cloudbeds 的云访问功能受到好评,因为管理者可以随时随地工作,但移动应用始终是一个薄弱环节。评测者希望实现真正的随时操作,比如创建预订、接收推送通知、查看房态,以及拥有更稳定的应用体验。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
用户经常称赞石基 PMS 的用户界面友好,简化了日常操作,降低了新用户的学习难度。评论中强调了其易用性,指出其培训材料易懂、设计直观、任务执行高效。
石基PMS支持团队的支持和响应能力一直受到好评。用户赞赏支持人员的专业性和乐于助人的精神,这对更顺利地运营有很大帮助。
一些评论者认为石基 PMS 的实施过程流畅高效,他们赞赏知识渊博、积极主动的实施团队。不过,一些用户建议缩短实施时间以进一步改善体验。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
尽管石基 PMS 的详细报告功能广受好评,但一些用户仍希望获得更先进、更快速的报告工具。具体要求包括增强的汇总报告、详细的账单和更快的报告生成流程。
与系统速度和一致性相关的性能问题是用户普遍关心的问题,一些用户指出在高峰操作期间响应时间很慢。用户敦促提高系统速度以提高整体效率。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds PMS 和 Shiji Daylight PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds PMS 提供 203 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Shiji Daylight PMS 提供 72 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Cloudbeds PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds PMS:否。Shiji Daylight PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,Shiji Group 的为 77。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐