项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #27 28 条评价 | #41 9 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #48 4 条评价 | #36 14 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #34 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #28 1 条评价 | — |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #33 16 条评价 | #39 14 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | #45 4 条评价 | #56 2 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | #54 2 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | #24 23 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #17 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | #15 2 条评价 |
Counter and Noovy PMS serve distinct hotel segments, reflecting their design priorities and feature sets. Counter is tailored almost exclusively for hostels, with 83% of its 57 reviews coming from that segment and a strong 4.7/5 rating in hostels, making it a natural choice for properties focused on shared accommodations and simple front desk workflows. Noovy PMS, with 25 reviews and a perfect 5/5 overall rating, targets independent hotels including city center, boutique, and airport/conference hotels, where its richer feature set and integrated modules address more complex operational needs.
Both products solve the fundamental problem of property management by streamlining reservations, front desk operations, and guest communication. However, Counter emphasizes simplicity and ease of use on mobile devices for hostel operations, while Noovy offers an end-to-end solution with advanced capabilities like digital registration and revenue management tailored for small to mid-sized independent hotels.
If your property is a hostel or a small shared accommodation primarily needing straightforward reservation management and quick staff onboarding, Counter’s 4.7/5 ease of use rating and mobile-friendly design make it the better fit. Its 50 hostel reviews averaging 4.7/5 demonstrate operational reliability in this segment. Conversely, Noovy PMS is better suited for boutique, city center, and airport hotels requiring an all-in-one system. Its 17 city center hotel reviews at a perfect 5/5 and inclusion of 29 unique features—such as integrated revenue management and digital guest registration—support more complex workflows and guest services, backed by a 4.9/5 ease of use score.
Limited data on small hotels outside hostels for Counter and the absence of recent reviews for both products suggest buyers should weigh feature needs and segment fit heavily. For properties wanting advanced automation and channel management, Noovy’s extensive integration network and features justify its $600 base price.
Noovy PMS leads slightly on ease of use with a 4.9/5 rating versus Counter’s 4.6/5, both based on sufficient review counts (25 and 57 respectively). Reviewers praise Noovy for intuitive design that simplifies training, and a smooth onboarding process that accelerates staff adoption, especially for inexperienced teams. Counter users highlight the platform’s clear, simple interface with no teaching necessary, particularly appreciating the mobile accessibility which benefits hostel staff on the move.
Both systems score identically on onboarding (4.7/5), but Noovy’s higher ease of use reflects its polished experience across diverse hotel types. The slightly steeper feature set in Noovy does not compromise usability according to reviews, whereas Counter’s simplicity appears optimized for hostel environments.
Edge: Noovy.
Noovy PMS offers 29 unique hotel-relevant features that Counter lacks, including an integrated CRS, digital registration, revenue management tools, tablet/kiosk check-in, guest messaging with SMS, and an integrated payment terminal. These features automate key workflows for front desk teams, revenue managers, and guest services, reducing manual tasks and improving operational accuracy. For example, Noovy’s rules-based room assignments and drag-and-drop tapechart facilitate efficient room management and rate optimization, critical for boutique and city center hotels.
Counter does not list any unique features beyond the 19 shared with Noovy, indicating a leaner feature set focused on core hostel needs. This limits Counter’s ability to support complex pricing, reporting, or guest engagement workflows beyond basic PMS functions.
Edge: Noovy.
Both Counter and Noovy score equally high on customer support with a 4.9/5 rating and identical onboarding scores of 4.7/5. Counter reviews frequently mention responsiveness and professionalism from support agents like Evelyn and Max, with users appreciating quick replies and personalized assistance. Noovy users similarly highlight helpful and courteous support, with no significant complaints.
Despite this parity, Counter users note some time zone-based delays, while Noovy’s 24/7 phone and chat support promises continuous availability. Overall, support quality is a strong point for both.
Edge: Even.
Noovy PMS has a clear advantage with 41 verified partners compared to Counter’s 7. Both support key integrations like SiteMinder and Stripe, but Noovy also connects with major OTAs and reputation platforms such as Omnibees, Bookboost, RevControl, and Customer Alliance. These integrations extend Noovy’s functionality across distribution, guest feedback, and revenue management better suited for hotels reliant on multiple channels and online presence.
Counter’s smaller integration ecosystem focuses on core hostel tools, including Cloudbeds and Channex, but lacks the breadth to support large-scale distribution or advanced guest engagement platforms.
Edge: Noovy.
Noovy PMS achieves a perfect 5/5 overall rating across 25 reviews, with a 99% likelihood to recommend, while Counter holds a strong but lower 4.6/5 with 57 reviews and a 91% recommendation rate. Noovy’s user base skews toward boutique (32%), city center (36%), and airport/conference hotels (10 reviews at 5/5). Counter is primarily rated by hostels (83%) with a 4.7/5 average rating.
Recent review volume is stagnant for both, with zero new reviews in the last six months, so current ratings reflect stable but dated impressions. Noovy’s higher rating and recommendation percentage indicate stronger customer satisfaction in more complex hotel environments.
Edge: Noovy.
Counter does not publish any pricing information and does not offer a free trial, monthly flat rate, or per-room pricing, making cost evaluation difficult. Noovy PMS has a published base price of $600 with no implementation fee and no free trial, offering a transparent upfront cost.
Noovy’s pricing model is competitive for an integrated PMS with channel management and revenue tools, especially for independent hotels that benefit from all-in-one capabilities. Counter’s pricing remains unclear, but review themes suggest it may be more accessible to budget-conscious hostels.
Not ideal if…
Not ideal if…
Counter and Noovy PMS diverge fundamentally in their market focus and feature scope. Counter targets hostels with a straightforward, mobile-optimized PMS that simplifies daily front desk operations and reduces training needs. Noovy serves independent hotels demanding a comprehensive, integrated system that manages everything from digital registration to revenue management with a modern UI and extensive integrations.
Choose Counter if your property is a hostel prioritizing ease of use, mobile access, and responsive support within a focused feature set that supports core hostel operations. This choice is supported by its 83% hostel user base and 4.7/5 hostel rating. Choose Noovy PMS if your hotel needs a full-featured, all-in-one platform with advanced automation, revenue tools, and broad OTA connectivity, as reflected in its perfect 5/5 rating among boutique and city center hotels and 41 verified integrations.
Noovy’s higher ease of use rating (4.9/5 vs 4.6/5), significantly larger feature set (29 unique features), and integration network make it the stronger choice for independent hotels with complex operational demands. Counter remains a valid option for hostels seeking simplicity and focused support but lacks the breadth required for hotels operating beyond that segment.
Edge: Noovy.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
排名更高的方面
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
许多评论称赞该系统的易用性,指出其用户友好的设计和直观的界面可以快速培训新员工并减少操作错误。
优质的客户服务经常被提及,用户欣赏快速的响应和有效的解决方案,这有助于对产品的整体满意度。
该系统支持自动付款请求和处理,大大简化了计费流程并降低了错误率。此功能还因其在处理不可退款预订方面的效率而受到好评。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
用户很欣赏该软件的功能,但注意到其设计略显过时,但预计重新设计将解决这个问题。
该软件提供强大的报告工具,可以深入了解酒店运营的各个方面,帮助做出更好的管理决策。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Noovy PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Noovy PMS 提供 41 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Noovy PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Noovy PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 14,Noovy 的为 76。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐