项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #27 28 条评价 | #50 5 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #48 4 条评价 | #71 0 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #34 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #28 1 条评价 | — |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #33 16 条评价 | #55 3 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | #45 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | #65 1 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | #47 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | #50 1 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #17 4 条评价 | #16 4 条评价 |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Counter by Counter and Prostay by Prostay both address the operational needs of hotels but diverge sharply in their core target markets and feature sets. Counter is tailored primarily for hostels, with 83% of its users from that segment and 50 verified reviews rating hostels at 4.7/5. In contrast, Prostay focuses on resorts and boutique hotels, with 80% of users in resorts and a perfect 5/5 rating from 4 resort reviews. Both systems aim to simplify property management through automation and integration, streamlining tasks like reservations, guest communication, and billing.
Where they overlap, both systems reduce manual workload by automating key workflows, such as payment processing and booking management. However, Counter centers on simplicity and mobility for hostel environments, while Prostay provides a broader, more sophisticated toolset suitable for full-service hotels and resorts, including on-premise deployment and extensive reporting capabilities.
If your property is a hostel or small budget accommodation with a focus on ease of use and mobile access, choose Counter. This is supported by Counter’s user base where 83% are hostels and its 50 reviews scoring 4.7/5 in that segment, reflecting strong operational fit. For boutique hotels or resorts seeking a comprehensive system with advanced features like native email marketing, integrated POS, and revenue management, Prostay is the stronger choice. Prostay’s perfect 5/5 rating from boutique and resort hotels, though limited to fewer than 10 reviews, indicates high satisfaction within these segments.
Data is thin for mid-sized limited service hotels and multi-property chains on both products, but Prostay’s multi-property support and offline mode suggest suitability for larger or more complex operations. Counter’s absence of multi-property capabilities and fewer integrations limit its fit for these properties.
Counter and Prostay both score highly on ease of use and onboarding, with Counter rated 4.6 and 4.7 respectively and Prostay slightly higher at 4.8 for both metrics. Reviewers emphasize Counter’s clean, intuitive interface, especially its mobile-friendly design, which simplifies training and daily management for hostel staff. Users highlight rapid staff adoption and minimal learning curves, a key operational advantage in high-turnover environments.
Prostay users also praise the system’s intuitive workflows and faster staff training, noting well-designed automation that expedites daily tasks. However, Prostay’s more complex feature set may require longer initial familiarization at larger properties.
Despite these nuances, the difference in ratings is less than 0.3 and both products have over 10 reviews, so ease of use is essentially comparable.
Edge: Even.
Prostay offers 21 unique features that Counter lacks, including transactional emails for bookings and folios, native email marketing, centralized messaging, task management, automated reminders and payment requests, automated space optimization, real-time status updates, drag-and-drop tapechart, rules-based room assignments, and a revenue management module. These features empower hotel managers and front desk staff to automate guest communications, optimize room allocation, and manage revenue dynamically, critical for resorts and boutique hotels with complex operations.
Counter’s unique features include group booking functionality, an automated night audit, and a mobile app that allows property management on the go. These simplify hostel operations by streamlining group check-ins and nightly financial reconciliation, with mobility enhancing frontline staff flexibility.
Since Prostay’s additional features directly impact operational efficiency and revenue optimization in full-service hotels, and it offers a broader set of integrated tools, it has a clear advantage in features.
Edge: Prostay by Prostay.
Both products receive excellent customer support ratings: Counter scores 4.9/5 and Prostay 5/5, with onboarding scores at 4.7 and 4.8 respectively. Counter reviewers frequently mention specific support staff by name (Evelyn, Max, José) and praise their responsiveness and helpfulness, although some note slower support in certain time zones. Prostay users describe support as professional and responsive, with the onboarding process aided significantly by Prostay’s team during migration.
Given the minimal rating differences and high praise for support teams on both sides, customer support quality is effectively even.
Edge: Even.
Counter leads with 7 verified integrations compared to Prostay’s 2. Both share Stripe for payment processing, but Counter uniquely integrates with WuBook, FLYR Hospitality, SiteMinder, Cloudbeds, Channex, and Goki, providing connectivity with major channel managers and access control systems that benefit properties with diverse distribution needs.
Prostay’s integrations are limited to Stripe and STAAH, the latter a channel manager but less widespread than those Counter supports.
Hotels relying on extensive OTA connections and multiple platforms will find Counter’s integration portfolio more flexible. Prostay’s fewer integrations may constrain connectivity, though its native features cover many operational areas.
Edge: Counter by Counter.
Counter has 57 reviews averaging 4.6/5 overall, with 50 reviews from hostels at 4.7/5 and 35 from limited service hotels at 4.6/5. Prostay’s rating is a perfect 5/5 but based on only 5 total reviews, with 4 from resorts and 3 from boutique hotels.
Due to Prostay’s limited review volume, its rating may not fully reflect the current product experience, especially as no reviews are from the last six months for either product. Counter’s review volume provides a more reliable performance indicator, especially for hostels.
Given the data, hoteliers in hostels and limited service hotels rate Counter highly with a substantial sample; boutique hotels and resorts rate Prostay perfectly but from a small sample.
Edge: Even.
Counter does not publish pricing details and offers no free trial, monthly flat fee, per-room pricing, or implementation fees. It is described as a free PMS designed for hostels.
Prostay sets a base price of $600.00 with no published per-room or monthly fees and no trial offered. No implementation fees are listed.
The lack of transparent pricing from Counter and the fixed base price from Prostay make direct cost comparison difficult. Hostels benefit from Counter’s free access, while Prostay’s fee structure suits full-service hotels expecting a broader feature set.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Counter by Counter and Prostay by Prostay serve distinct hotel segments with some feature overlap but clear operational differences. Counter focuses on hostels with a straightforward, mobile-accessible platform and multiple integrations optimizing online distribution. Prostay targets resorts and boutique hotels demanding sophisticated automation, revenue management, and multi-property support.
Choose Counter if your property is a hostel or limited budget hotel valuing ease of use, mobile flexibility, and broad channel management integration. The free pricing model and high review volume in this segment confirm its operational fit and value.
Choose Prostay if you operate a full-service resort or boutique hotel requiring advanced features like centralized guest messaging, revenue management, integrated POS, and offline capabilities. Prostay’s perfect ratings in boutique and resort segments reflect satisfaction with its comprehensive toolset despite limited review volume.
This comparison is definitive where segment data is sufficient: Counter excels in hostels and entry-level properties; Prostay is better for larger, full-service hotels needing extensive operational control.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Prostay 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Prostay 提供 2 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Prostay 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Prostay:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 14,Prostay 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐