The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 923 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
RoomRaccoon 表现出色 在 易用性 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Post-stay emails and Pre-stay emails.
ThinkReservations 表现出色 在 technical support limitations 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Messaging and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
基于 HTR 上 923 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $1,000/mo | From $1,100/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 572 | 351 |
在分析了 923 条经验证的评价后,RoomRaccoon 用户最看重其 易用性, 客户服务, 持续改进,而 ThinkReservations 用户则强调 technical support limitations, user-friendly interface, 宾客沟通。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易用性
▾
|
+
Technical Support Limitations
▾
|
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
+
持续改进
▾
|
+
宾客沟通
▾
|
|
+
集成与自动化
▾
|
+
自定义选项
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
关键问题
▾
|
−
日历功能
▾
|
|
−
定价问题
▾
|
|
|
−
访客数据库透明度
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #5 214 条评价 | #4 129 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #8 50 条评价 | #5 15 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 18 条评价 | #2 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #8 2 条评价 | #1 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #3 245 条评价 | #4 92 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #4 149 条评价 | #5 72 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #5 70 条评价 | #4 22 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #3 72 条评价 | #9 8 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #14 11 条评价 | #1 332 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #1 445 条评价 | #36 2 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #8 9 条评价 | #24 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | #17 3 条评价 | #20 0 条评价 |
Choosing between RoomRaccoon HMS and ThinkReservations All-in-1 HMS hinges on your hotel’s size, geographic presence, and feature needs. Both platforms aim to streamline operations, boost revenues, and improve guest experiences, but they diverge significantly in market focus, features, and user feedback.
RoomRaccoon offers a broader international reach, a richer feature set, and a larger, more recent review base, making it the more reliable choice for small to medium independent hotels. ThinkReservations, while highly rated in North America, has fewer reviews and a narrower regional footprint, which impacts its suitability.
Are you ready to determine which system aligns best with your hotel’s operational complexity and growth plans?
Both systems serve small to medium independent hotels, but RoomRaccoon shines with a higher review count and a more recent review base, indicating a stronger current user experience. While RoomRaccoon offers 484 reviews and an overall rating of 4.95/5, ThinkReservations has 312 reviews and a rating of 4.88/5.
RoomRaccoon provides a suite of native features—including automated reporting, multi-currency management, and guest apps—absent in ThinkReservations. Conversely, ThinkReservations offers strong guest messaging and centralized communication, features not present in RoomRaccoon.
Given the recent and more numerous reviews, is your preference for a system with proven, current user satisfaction?
Edge: RoomRaccoon
If your hotel needs a comprehensive system with extensive native features, over 300 integrations, and global reach, RoomRaccoon is the better fit. Its focus on independent hotels, especially in Europe and other regions outside North America, makes it ideal if international expansion and multi-currency support are priorities.
On the other hand, if your hotel operates primarily in North America and values straightforward, robust OTA management, upselling, and automation with a simpler platform, ThinkReservations might suit you well. However, for scalability and feature depth, RoomRaccoon remains the stronger choice.
For most small hotels seeking growth, RoomRaccoon’s richer feature set and international presence make it the recommended option.
Edge: RoomRaccoon
RoomRaccoon maintains a high ease-of-use rating at 4.87/5 and is praised for its intuitive, user-friendly interface, especially by small hotel operators. Its onboarding rating of 4.81/5 suggests most users find the setup straightforward, though some mention initial complexity in configuration.
ThinkReservations also rates well at 4.8/5 for ease of use, with users highlighting its straightforward navigation and quick learning curve. Support reviews indicate that both platforms are accessible, but RoomRaccoon’s modern design and mobile responsiveness give it an edge in usability.
Edge: RoomRaccoon
RoomRaccoon boasts 22 features exclusive to it, including automated reporting, loyalty program integration, multi-lingual support, online checkout, and guest apps—features that significantly extend operational capabilities. ThinkReservations offers 8 unique features like guest messaging, kiosk check-in, and automated assignments, which are useful but less extensive.
While both systems share 35 core features, RoomRaccoon’s additional native capabilities allow for more automation and guest engagement tools. Its feature depth makes it suitable for hoteliers seeking to enhance guest personalization and operational efficiency.
Therefore, for feature richness and operational versatility, RoomRaccoon is preferable.
Edge: RoomRaccoon
RoomRaccoon’s support rating is 4.74/5, with reviewers appreciating its responsiveness and dedication, though some mention room for improvement in after-sales care. Testimonials praise the patience and helpfulness of support staff, especially during onboarding.
ThinkReservations scores slightly higher at 4.79/5, with users highlighting its accessible, knowledgeable support team and quick responses. Many reviews note the support team’s proactive approach, especially during setup and integration.
Given recent reviews, ThinkReservations edges out slightly due to its higher support rating and perceived responsiveness.
Edge: ThinkReservations
RoomRaccoon’s reviews, especially recent ones, tend to be more positive, with a 97% likelihood to recommend and an average rating of 4.95/5. Its user base in Europe, Africa, and Asia-Pacific indicates broad international satisfaction.
ThinkReservations’ ratings are slightly lower, at 4.88/5, with a focus on North American properties, including small inns and B&Bs. Its users appreciate ease of use and excellent support, but the smaller global review base makes RoomRaccoon the more highly-rated overall.
For overall hoteliers’ satisfaction based on recent feedback, RoomRaccoon holds the higher rating.
Edge: RoomRaccoon
RoomRaccoon’s pricing starts at $1,000 per month, with no mention of a trial or freemium options, positioning it as a premium solution. ThinkReservations’ base fee is $1,100 per month, also without a free trial, making both comparable in cost.
Neither offers a monthly per-room fee, and both seem geared toward small to medium properties looking for an all-in-one platform. Given their similar pricing, the decision hinges on features and regional support rather than cost.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
RoomRaccoon offers a broader feature set, more regional support, and a larger, more recent review base, making it the more comprehensive choice for independent hotels wanting to scale internationally. Its native features, over 300 integrations, and focus on automation appeal to hotels aiming to grow efficiently.
ThinkReservations excels in simplicity, guest communication, and North American OTA management. It is ideal for small, regional properties that prioritize ease of use and quick setup but may fall short in global reach and native automation depth.
For most hotels looking to future-proof their operations with a flexible, feature-rich system, RoomRaccoon is the recommended choice. However, if your focus is on North American markets with straightforward needs, ThinkReservations remains a solid contender.
In conclusion, the decision depends on your property’s location, growth ambitions, and feature requirements. Based on recent and total reviews, RoomRaccoon’s stronger user feedback and richer feature set make it the more reliable option for ambitious independent hoteliers.
酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | From $1,100/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,RoomRaccoon HMS 和 ThinkReservations All-in-1 HMS 共享 35 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 入住前电子邮件 | ||
| 入住后电子邮件 | ||
| 关税 | ||
| 宾客沟通(短信) | ||
| 宾客留言 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助值机 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 自动报告 | ||
| 集中消息传递 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 18 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 16 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."
"I became aware of ThinkReservations at a trade show in the US, and I could see right away that it would help Blue Tang Inn streamline our operations, increase our booking and upsel..."
"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."
"ThinkReservations Digital Registration has streamlined our check in process, making my job so much easier. Being able to ask guests for their ID and credit card ahead of time, agre..."
"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."
"We try to take care of all the needs of our guests so that they have an experience rather than just a stay"
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多用户称赞 RoomRaccoon 具有用户友好的界面和直观的设计,这减少了培训时间,并能顺利融入日常操作,从而提高了整体效率。
虽然一些用户称赞支持团队的响应速度和专业水平,但另一些用户则批评售后服务和响应效率不足,这表明客户服务质量存在不一致之处。
用户赞赏 RoomRaccoon 的持续发展,包括 AI 的增强,这些都有助于提高销售和运营功能,展现了其对长期适应性的承诺。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
多篇评论指出,售后支持不力、技术问题悬而未决等关键问题严重影响了用户满意度和对系统的信任度。
一些用户,尤其是那些经营季节性业务的用户,认为该系统的定价过高,这影响了他们的决策,尽管他们认为该系统包含的功能很有价值。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
A few reviews suggested limitations in technical support, specifically mentioning non-24/7 availability and response delays. Users occasionally felt i... A few reviews suggested limitations in technical support, specifically mentioning non-24/7 availability and response delays. Users occasionally felt improvements could be made in this area for quicker resolutions.
The interface is intuitive and easy to navigate for staff and customers. This transparency ensures a smooth booking process and simplifies management... The interface is intuitive and easy to navigate for staff and customers. This transparency ensures a smooth booking process and simplifies management tasks, benefiting tech and non-tech-savvy users alike.
该平台支持自动消息传递、可自定义的电子邮件模板以及住客入住后的评论,从而提升宾客的参与度和满意度。它有效地促进了入住前、入住中和入住后的沟通。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
日历功能虽然强大,但缺乏连续滚动功能,有时会使长期规划变得复杂,并且需要输入日期才能导航。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。RoomRaccoon HMS 和 ThinkReservations All-in-1 HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。RoomRaccoon HMS 提供 88 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 ThinkReservations All-in-1 HMS 提供 16 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。RoomRaccoon HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
RoomRaccoon HMS:否。ThinkReservations All-in-1 HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。RoomRaccoon 的 HT Score 为 86,ThinkReservations 的为 87。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问