RoomRaccoon HMS vs. ThinkReservations All-in-1 HMS: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 21, 2026  ·  已分析 923 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 923 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

RoomRaccoon 表现出色 在 易用性 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Post-stay emails and Pre-stay emails.

ThinkReservations 表现出色 在 technical support limitations 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Messaging and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).

查看下方完整分析 ↓

RoomRaccoon HMS 与 ThinkReservations All-in-1 HMS 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 923 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
86
87
推荐可能性
97%
97%
易用性
4.9/5
4.8/5
客户支持
4.7/5
4.8/5
性价比
4.7/5
4.7/5
起始价格 From $1,000/mo From $1,100/mo
经验证的评价 572 351

RoomRaccoon HMS 与 ThinkReservations All-in-1 HMS 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 923 条经验证的评价后,RoomRaccoon 用户最看重其 易用性, 客户服务, 持续改进,而 ThinkReservations 用户则强调 technical support limitations, user-friendly interface, 宾客沟通。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

RoomRaccoon RoomRaccoon ThinkReservations ThinkReservations
优点
+ 易用性
+ Technical Support Limitations
+ 客户服务
+ User-Friendly Interface
+ 持续改进
+ 宾客沟通
+ 集成与自动化
+ 自定义选项
缺点
关键问题
日历功能
定价问题
访客数据库透明度

RoomRaccoon 对比 ThinkReservations:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 RoomRaccoon RoomRaccoon ThinkReservations ThinkReservations
小型(10-24 间客房) #5 214 条评价 #4 129 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #8 50 条评价 #5 15 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #4 18 条评价 #2 3 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #8 2 条评价 #1 1 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 RoomRaccoon RoomRaccoon ThinkReservations ThinkReservations
精品酒店 #3 245 条评价 #4 92 条评价
豪华酒店 #4 149 条评价 #5 72 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #5 70 条评价 #4 22 条评价
长住酒店 #3 72 条评价 #9 8 条评价

按区域

细分市场 RoomRaccoon RoomRaccoon ThinkReservations ThinkReservations
北美 #14 11 条评价 #1 332 条评价
欧洲 #1 445 条评价 #36 2 条评价
亚太 #8 9 条评价 #24 0 条评价
中东 #17 3 条评价 #20 0 条评价

The Decision

Choosing between RoomRaccoon HMS and ThinkReservations All-in-1 HMS hinges on your hotel’s size, geographic presence, and feature needs. Both platforms aim to streamline operations, boost revenues, and improve guest experiences, but they diverge significantly in market focus, features, and user feedback.

RoomRaccoon offers a broader international reach, a richer feature set, and a larger, more recent review base, making it the more reliable choice for small to medium independent hotels. ThinkReservations, while highly rated in North America, has fewer reviews and a narrower regional footprint, which impacts its suitability.

Are you ready to determine which system aligns best with your hotel’s operational complexity and growth plans?


Is RoomRaccoon or ThinkReservations Better for Hotels?

Both systems serve small to medium independent hotels, but RoomRaccoon shines with a higher review count and a more recent review base, indicating a stronger current user experience. While RoomRaccoon offers 484 reviews and an overall rating of 4.95/5, ThinkReservations has 312 reviews and a rating of 4.88/5.

RoomRaccoon provides a suite of native features—including automated reporting, multi-currency management, and guest apps—absent in ThinkReservations. Conversely, ThinkReservations offers strong guest messaging and centralized communication, features not present in RoomRaccoon.

Given the recent and more numerous reviews, is your preference for a system with proven, current user satisfaction?

Edge: RoomRaccoon


RoomRaccoon vs ThinkReservations: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a comprehensive system with extensive native features, over 300 integrations, and global reach, RoomRaccoon is the better fit. Its focus on independent hotels, especially in Europe and other regions outside North America, makes it ideal if international expansion and multi-currency support are priorities.

On the other hand, if your hotel operates primarily in North America and values straightforward, robust OTA management, upselling, and automation with a simpler platform, ThinkReservations might suit you well. However, for scalability and feature depth, RoomRaccoon remains the stronger choice.

For most small hotels seeking growth, RoomRaccoon’s richer feature set and international presence make it the recommended option.

Edge: RoomRaccoon


Is RoomRaccoon or ThinkReservations Easier to Use?

RoomRaccoon maintains a high ease-of-use rating at 4.87/5 and is praised for its intuitive, user-friendly interface, especially by small hotel operators. Its onboarding rating of 4.81/5 suggests most users find the setup straightforward, though some mention initial complexity in configuration.

ThinkReservations also rates well at 4.8/5 for ease of use, with users highlighting its straightforward navigation and quick learning curve. Support reviews indicate that both platforms are accessible, but RoomRaccoon’s modern design and mobile responsiveness give it an edge in usability.

Edge: RoomRaccoon


Which Has Better Features: RoomRaccoon or ThinkReservations?

RoomRaccoon boasts 22 features exclusive to it, including automated reporting, loyalty program integration, multi-lingual support, online checkout, and guest apps—features that significantly extend operational capabilities. ThinkReservations offers 8 unique features like guest messaging, kiosk check-in, and automated assignments, which are useful but less extensive.

While both systems share 35 core features, RoomRaccoon’s additional native capabilities allow for more automation and guest engagement tools. Its feature depth makes it suitable for hoteliers seeking to enhance guest personalization and operational efficiency.

Therefore, for feature richness and operational versatility, RoomRaccoon is preferable.

Edge: RoomRaccoon


Which Has Better Customer Support: RoomRaccoon or ThinkReservations?

RoomRaccoon’s support rating is 4.74/5, with reviewers appreciating its responsiveness and dedication, though some mention room for improvement in after-sales care. Testimonials praise the patience and helpfulness of support staff, especially during onboarding.

ThinkReservations scores slightly higher at 4.79/5, with users highlighting its accessible, knowledgeable support team and quick responses. Many reviews note the support team’s proactive approach, especially during setup and integration.

Given recent reviews, ThinkReservations edges out slightly due to its higher support rating and perceived responsiveness.

Edge: ThinkReservations


Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: RoomRaccoon or ThinkReservations?

RoomRaccoon’s reviews, especially recent ones, tend to be more positive, with a 97% likelihood to recommend and an average rating of 4.95/5. Its user base in Europe, Africa, and Asia-Pacific indicates broad international satisfaction.

ThinkReservations’ ratings are slightly lower, at 4.88/5, with a focus on North American properties, including small inns and B&Bs. Its users appreciate ease of use and excellent support, but the smaller global review base makes RoomRaccoon the more highly-rated overall.

For overall hoteliers’ satisfaction based on recent feedback, RoomRaccoon holds the higher rating.

Edge: RoomRaccoon


How Much Do RoomRaccoon and ThinkReservations Cost?

RoomRaccoon’s pricing starts at $1,000 per month, with no mention of a trial or freemium options, positioning it as a premium solution. ThinkReservations’ base fee is $1,100 per month, also without a free trial, making both comparable in cost.

Neither offers a monthly per-room fee, and both seem geared toward small to medium properties looking for an all-in-one platform. Given their similar pricing, the decision hinges on features and regional support rather than cost.


What Type of Hotel Should Use RoomRaccoon?

  • Hotels seeking a flexible, feature-rich PMS with integrated channel management and booking engine.
  • Small to medium independent hotels, boutique hotels, and inns aiming for automation and guest engagement.
  • Hotels in regions outside North America, especially in Europe, Africa, or Asia Pacific.
  • Properties planning to scale and needing native features like loyalty programs, multi-currency, and automated upselling.

Not ideal if:

  • Your hotel is a large chain requiring enterprise-level solutions.
  • You operate exclusively in North America and prefer a system with deeper OTA integrations.
  • You need extensive group booking or corporate travel features.

What Type of Hotel Should Use ThinkReservations?

  • Small hotels, B&Bs, and inns primarily in North America, especially those valuing simplicity and quick onboarding.
  • Properties seeking a strong OTA management and upselling features to maximize revenue.
  • Hotels that want a user-friendly, reliable platform with excellent guest communication.
  • Businesses prioritizing automation of routine tasks like check-in, payments, and guest messaging.

Not ideal if:

  • You need multi-region support or multi-currency features.
  • Your hotel is part of a larger chain or has complex multi-property management needs.
  • You require extensive native automation features beyond guest messaging and OTA integrations.

RoomRaccoon vs ThinkReservations: The Bottom Line for Hotels

RoomRaccoon offers a broader feature set, more regional support, and a larger, more recent review base, making it the more comprehensive choice for independent hotels wanting to scale internationally. Its native features, over 300 integrations, and focus on automation appeal to hotels aiming to grow efficiently.

ThinkReservations excels in simplicity, guest communication, and North American OTA management. It is ideal for small, regional properties that prioritize ease of use and quick setup but may fall short in global reach and native automation depth.

For most hotels looking to future-proof their operations with a flexible, feature-rich system, RoomRaccoon is the recommended choice. However, if your focus is on North American markets with straightforward needs, ThinkReservations remains a solid contender.

In conclusion, the decision depends on your property’s location, growth ambitions, and feature requirements. Based on recent and total reviews, RoomRaccoon’s stronger user feedback and richer feature set make it the more reliable option for ambitious independent hoteliers.

RoomRaccoon HMS 和 ThinkReservations All-in-1 HMS 的价格是多少?

酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

RoomRaccoon RoomRaccoon ThinkReservations ThinkReservations
Starting Price From $1,000/mo From $1,100/mo

RoomRaccoon HMS 有哪些 ThinkReservations All-in-1 HMS 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,RoomRaccoon HMS 和 ThinkReservations All-in-1 HMS 共享 35 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 RoomRaccoon RoomRaccoon ThinkReservations ThinkReservations
入住前电子邮件
入住后电子邮件
关税
宾客沟通(短信)
宾客留言
平板电脑/自助值机
特别优惠和折扣
直接计费
移动优化/响应式
自动分配
自动报告
集中消息传递

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 18 项功能存在差异。

实际成果:RoomRaccoon 对比 ThinkReservations(按业务目标)

我们分析了 16 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

增加收入和降低成本
RoomRaccoon Buff and Fellow 小型
+ 60% increase in RevPAR in a year by implementing RoomRaccoon
+ �s dynamic pricing tools.
+ 781% ROI on RaccoonUpsell subscription - RoomRaccoon

"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."

Frikkie du Toit
Frikkie du Toit
Hotel Owner
ThinkReservations Blue Tang Inn 中型
+ Blue Tang Inn was able to significantly increase its bottom line after implementing ThinkReservations, with 52% year on year increase during Q1.
+ The property capitalized on upsell opportunities, offering a wide variety of activities (snorkeling, scuba diving, sailing, fishing) as well as F&B packages. Upsell revenue increased 80% in Q1 2023 vs the previous year
+ Blue Tang Inn management was pleased to see the property booked more nights in Q1 2023, at a significant higher rate while the market maintained the previous year's numbers.

"I became aware of ThinkReservations at a trade show in the US, and I could see right away that it would help Blue Tang Inn streamline our operations, increase our booking and upsel..."

Kristin Fisher
Kristin Fisher
Sales and Marketing Director
提高运营效率
RoomRaccoon O'Two Boutique Hotel 小型
+ 307% ROI on Annual RaccoonUpsell subscription just from ancillary revenue
+ 46% direct bookings
+ Reduced human error by automating payments

"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."

Jayson van Noordwyk
Jayson van Noordwyk
General Manager
ThinkReservations Yara Palm Springs 小型
+ 17.3% of revenue in 2024 came from items and packages, growing their revenue without additional capital investments.
+ Yara Palm Springs consistently has 62% of their bookings through their direct channels, saving thousands of dollars that would otherwise go to OTA commisions.
+ Yara Palm Springs has automated their guest journey and made it easy for guests to enjoy a personalized stay through technology, making it easier for the owners to operate their propertyremotely. "Living in another city from my hotel, working remotely on my hotel, being a mother, trying to have a social life...ThinkReservations makes it so I can still do all those things and be a hotel operator from wherever I am" said Kate.

"ThinkReservations Digital Registration has streamlined our check in process, making my job so much easier. Being able to ask guests for their ID and credit card ahead of time, agre..."

改善宾客体验
RoomRaccoon Steenhof Suites 小型
+ 1836% ROI on RaccoonUpsell
+ 50% of guests check-in online
+ 127% increase in RevPAR

"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."

ThinkReservations Inn on Main 小型
+ Increased Repeat Guests - The inn has seen a notable rise in repeat bookings, including guests who have stayed over 20 times since implementing ThinkReservations.
+ Boosted Upsell Revenue - Upselling opportunities through the booking engine have resulted in a 15% increase in additional revenue from services like late check-ins and special packages.
+ Improved Efficiency - Administrative tasks have been reduced by 30%, allowing staff to dedicate more time to creating memorable guest experiences.

"We try to take care of all the needs of our guests so that they have an experience rather than just a stay"

Chris Kennedy
Chris Kennedy
Co-Owner

RoomRaccoon 对比 ThinkReservations:总结

RoomRaccoon
RoomRaccoon
4.9/5 来自 572 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

易用性 100% 正面

许多用户称赞 RoomRaccoon 具有用户友好的界面和直观的设计,这减少了培训时间,并能顺利融入日常操作,从而提高了整体效率。

客户服务 63% 正面

虽然一些用户称赞支持团队的响应速度和专业水平,但另一些用户则批评售后服务和响应效率不足,这表明客户服务质量存在不一致之处。

持续改进 67% 正面

用户赞赏 RoomRaccoon 的持续发展,包括 AI 的增强,这些都有助于提高销售和运营功能,展现了其对长期适应性的承诺。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

关键问题 100% 负面

多篇评论指出,售后支持不力、技术问题悬而未决等关键问题严重影响了用户满意度和对系统的信任度。

定价问题 100% 负面

一些用户,尤其是那些经营季节性业务的用户,认为该系统的定价过高,这影响了他们的决策,尽管他们认为该系统包含的功能很有价值。

排名更高的方面

长住酒店 #3 vs #9
青年旅舍 #4 vs #18
其他 #3 vs #11
AR #4 vs #6

独特功能

特别优惠和折扣 入住后电子邮件 入住前电子邮件 自动报告 关税
4.9/5 易用性 4.7/5 客户支持 88 个集成
查看资料
ThinkReservations
ThinkReservations
4.9/5 来自 351 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

Technical Support Limitations 100% 正面

A few reviews suggested limitations in technical support, specifically mentioning non-24/7 availability and response delays. Users occasionally felt i... A few reviews suggested limitations in technical support, specifically mentioning non-24/7 availability and response delays. Users occasionally felt improvements could be made in this area for quicker resolutions.

User-Friendly Interface 100% 正面

The interface is intuitive and easy to navigate for staff and customers. This transparency ensures a smooth booking process and simplifies management... The interface is intuitive and easy to navigate for staff and customers. This transparency ensures a smooth booking process and simplifies management tasks, benefiting tech and non-tech-savvy users alike.

宾客沟通 77% 正面

该平台支持自动消息传递、可自定义的电子邮件模板以及住客入住后的评论,从而提升宾客的参与度和满意度。它有效地促进了入住前、入住中和入住后的沟通。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

日历功能 40% 负面

日历功能虽然强大,但缺乏连续滚动功能,有时会使长期规划变得复杂,并且需要输入日期才能导航。

排名更高的方面

大型(75-199 间客房) #2 vs #4
中型(25-74 间客房) #5 vs #8
超大型(200+ 间客房) #1 vs #8
超小型(少于 10 间客房) #2 vs #4

独特功能

宾客留言 直接计费 宾客沟通(短信) 集中消息传递 平板电脑/自助值机
4.8/5 易用性 4.8/5 客户支持 16 个集成
查看资料

关于 RoomRaccoon HMS 与 ThinkReservations All-in-1 HMS 的常见问题

RoomRaccoon HMS 能否替代 ThinkReservations All-in-1 HMS?

这取决于您的需求。RoomRaccoon HMS 和 ThinkReservations All-in-1 HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。RoomRaccoon HMS 提供 88 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 ThinkReservations All-in-1 HMS 提供 16 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。RoomRaccoon HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

RoomRaccoon HMS 或 ThinkReservations All-in-1 HMS 是否提供免费方案?

RoomRaccoon HMS:否。ThinkReservations All-in-1 HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 RoomRaccoon HMS 和 ThinkReservations All-in-1 HMS?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。RoomRaccoon 的 HT Score 为 86,ThinkReservations 的为 87。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息