Goguest Hotel Guest App (by Easygoband) vs. STAY Guest App: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 16, 2026  ·  已分析 238 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 238 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

Easygoband 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Payments.

STAY 表现出色 在 customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile App and Guest Messaging.

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Goguest Hotel Guest App (by Easygoband) 与 STAY Guest App 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 238 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
0
47
推荐可能性
98%
96%
易用性
4.8/5
4.8/5
客户支持
4.5/5
4.8/5
性价比
4.5/5
4.6/5
起始价格 From $400/mo From $300/mo
经验证的评价 23 215

Goguest Hotel Guest App (by Easygoband) 与 STAY Guest App 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 238 条经验证的评价后,Easygoband 用户最看重其 ,而 STAY 用户则强调 客户体验优化, 移动和用户体验, 运营效率。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Easygoband Easygoband STAY STAY
优点
+ 客户体验优化
+ 移动和用户体验
+ 运营效率
+ 支持和服务
缺点
CMS 和定制
集成能力
分析和报告

Easygoband 对比 STAY:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 Easygoband Easygoband STAY STAY
小型(10-24 间客房) #21 2 条评价 #9 10 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #27 2 条评价 #4 83 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #5 13 条评价 #2 89 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #7 6 条评价 #2 24 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 Easygoband Easygoband STAY STAY
精品酒店 #11 14 条评价 #2 77 条评价
豪华酒店 #11 16 条评价 #2 88 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #14 7 条评价 #3 91 条评价
长住酒店 #6 7 条评价

按区域

细分市场 Easygoband Easygoband STAY STAY
北美 #6 15 条评价 #5 27 条评价
欧洲 #24 1 条评价 #3 112 条评价
亚太 #6 3 条评价
中东 #7 2 条评价

The Decision

Choosing between Goguest by Easygoband and STAY Guest App hinges on your hotel's priorities for guest engagement, operational efficiency, and integration needs. Both solutions aim to digitize guest services and streamline hotel operations, but they diverge significantly in features, user reviews, and market presence. Your team must evaluate which platform aligns better with your property’s size, target segment, and technological landscape.

Goguest is often praised for its straightforward interface and robust support in Latin America, but it has a limited review base and no recent customer feedback. STAY, on the other hand, boasts a considerable number of recent reviews, high ratings, and proven success in large hotel chains worldwide. Which platform will be a better fit for your unique needs?

Is Goguest or STAY Better for Hotels?

Both Goguest and STAY serve the core purpose of enhancing guest experiences through mobile apps, but they approach this goal differently. Goguest offers features like in-room controls, tailored promotions, and detailed reports, emphasizing connectivity and customization. STAY prioritizes a comprehensive guest experience OS that integrates multiple hotel services, reduces queues, and boosts operational efficiency.

While Goguest's reviews and ratings are minimal—22 reviews with no recent feedback—its strengths lie in its notable support for payments and integration with a few key partners. STAY, with 206 reviews and recent feedback, is highly rated (3/5) and excels in reducing wait times, increasing guest satisfaction, and offering extensive integrations. Do you prefer a platform with proven recent success or one still gaining traction?

Goguest vs STAY: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a customizable guest app focused on in-room services, tailored promotions, and detailed analytics—especially if you operate in Latin America—Goguest is worth considering. Its ability to integrate with key hotel systems like SIHOT and offer payment functionalities makes it suitable for mid-sized to large resorts and hotel groups.

If you require a comprehensive guest experience platform that reduces queues, streamlines internal operations, and provides a proven track record across 1,000 hotels globally, STAY is the better choice. Its user-friendly interface, extensive integrations, and recent reviews indicating high satisfaction make it ideal for large chains and properties seeking operational efficiency.

Is Goguest or STAY Easier to Use?

Goguest boasts an impressive ease of use rating of 4.82/5, with positive reviews highlighting its intuitive interface and simple onboarding process. Customers mention that adapting to the system has been straightforward, making staff training minimal. However, its limited review count means there's less insight into long-term user experiences.

STAY’s UI scores similarly high at 4.78/5, with reviews emphasizing its straightforward CMS, simple content updates, and guest engagement features. Users appreciate the app's intuitiveness for both staff and guests, with particular praise for its real-time updates and ease of navigation.

Edge: Goguest.

Which Has Better Features: Goguest or STAY?

Both platforms share seven core features, including guest messaging, activity booking, and communication tools. Goguest stands out with its unique addition of payment integration, allowing guests to charge services directly to their rooms—a feature only available in Goguest.

STAY offers seven features exclusive to its platform, such as a mobile app, chatbot, automated replies, message routing, mobile checkout, and app download options. Its focus on automation and seamless communication tools makes it particularly suited for properties emphasizing operational streamlining.

Edge: STAY, with its extensive exclusive features supporting automation and guest communication.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Goguest or STAY?

Goguest’s support rating is 4.5/5, with reviews indicating a helpful team and strong onboarding. However, some users note limited support channels, and recent feedback is scarce, making it hard to judge long-term support quality.

STAY’s customer support is rated slightly higher at 4.83/5, with reviews praising quick, helpful responses and proactive assistance. Hoteliers mention that STAY’s team has played a key role in successful implementations, especially with large chains. The more recent and numerous reviews favor STAY’s support quality.

Edge: STAY.

Which Has More Integrations: Goguest or STAY?

Goguest has partnerships with 6 verified providers, including SIHOT, and integrations with key lock brands. Its integration scope is narrower but focused on core hotel systems, mainly in Latin America.

STAY offers 20 verified integrations, including major PMS, CRM, and channel management systems like Hotelkit, Apaleo, and SiteMinder. Its broader integration ecosystem suits larger hotels or chains seeking connectivity across multiple systems.

Edge: STAY.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Goguest or STAY?

Goguest has only 22 reviews, with no recent feedback, and a 0/5 overall rating—indicating very limited data and no recent endorsement.

STAY’s 206 reviews, with a 3/5 rating, reflect more recent and consistent feedback, especially from large hotel chains like NH Hotels and Barceló. Hoteliers appreciate its ability to improve operational efficiency and guest satisfaction, making STAY the more trusted option.

Edge: STAY.

How Much Do Goguest and STAY Cost?

Goguest’s pricing starts at $400 for the base plan, with no free tier or trial. There are no monthly flat fees or per-room charges, but the pricing model is straightforward and may suit mid-sized hotels.

STAY’s base price is $300, also without a free tier or trial. Its pricing structure is similar, with no additional fees for implementation or monthly costs, making it a cost-effective option for many hotels.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Goguest?

  • Hotels that prioritize customization and integration with Latin American systems.
  • Resorts and large hotel groups seeking in-depth analytics and tailored promotions.
  • Properties needing in-room controls, guest messaging, and payment functionalities.
  • Teams that want an app with a focus on operational insights and guest engagement.

Not ideal if:

  • You need a proven, highly-rated platform with recent customer feedback.
  • Your property operates outside Latin America or seeks extensive third-party integrations.
  • You prefer a platform with more automation, chatbots, or mobile checkout features.

What Type of Hotel Should Use STAY?

  • Large hotel chains aiming for chain-wide digital guest experiences.
  • Hotels seeking to reduce queues, increase revenue, and improve operational efficiency.
  • Properties that want extensive integrations with PMS, CRM, and channel managers.
  • Hotels interested in a platform with proven success in reducing wait times and boosting guest satisfaction.

Not ideal if:

  • You operate a small property with minimal digital service needs.
  • You require a platform with a very low budget or a free trial period.
  • Your primary focus is on in-room controls without broader guest service automation.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

Goguest by Easygoband offers a solid, customizable guest app with payment options and strong Latin American support, but it suffers from a limited review base and no recent customer feedback. Its core strengths are in tailored solutions for resorts and properties that operate primarily in Spanish-speaking regions.

STAY, with over 200 recent reviews, excels in supporting large hotel chains with a broad set of features, extensive integrations, and proven results in operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Its high ratings, large global presence, and positive customer testimonials make it the more reliable choice for most hotels today.

If your hotel needs a trusted, highly-rated platform with recent feedback and extensive integrations, STAY should be your pick. However, if customization in Latin America and in-depth analytics are your priorities, Goguest remains a worthy consideration.

Goguest Hotel Guest App (by Easygoband) 和 STAY Guest App 的价格是多少?

酒店客人应用程序 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

Easygoband Easygoband STAY STAY
Starting Price From $400/mo From $300/mo

Goguest Hotel Guest App (by Easygoband) 有哪些 STAY Guest App 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Goguest Hotel Guest App (by Easygoband) 和 STAY Guest App 共享 7 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 Easygoband Easygoband STAY STAY
付款
应用下载
来宾消息
消息路由
移动应用
聊天机器人
自动回复

实际成果:Easygoband 对比 STAY(按业务目标)

我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

提高运营效率
Easygoband Easygoband

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

STAY Barceló Hoteles 大型
+ Room Service is faster. It's more comfortable. For the guests. And for the staff too
+ Barceló can make better decisions in real time
+ Through live surveys, Barceló can detect pain points more easily and streamline processes

"Thanks to STAY, we offer our guests an interaction tool with our staff. We can make real-time decisions with it. This simplifies our staff's duties at the same time. The guest expe..."

Álvaro Montalvo
Álvaro Montalvo
Project Manager Innovation
改善宾客体验
Easygoband Easygoband

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

STAY AMR Collection 中型
+ The app pays for itself according to AMR's Product Manager. "Spa services, gourmet dinners, wine sales, and other premium services have seen significant increases since we implemented the app.
+ The implementation of STAY skyrocketed the number of users of AMR's app. Increasing them by 50% was their goal. However, they "far exceeded that goal.
+ AMR's users rate the app 4.7 out of 5 on average. The app has been downloaded tens of thousands of times in 50 AMR hotels.

"Implementing STAY contributed to a significant increase in our revenue and customer satisfaction. The app pays for itself. We have seen significant increases in consumption for all..."

Yudy Mora
Yudy Mora
Product Owner Manager

Easygoband 对比 STAY:总结

Easygoband
Easygoband
4.9/5 来自 23 条评价

独特功能

付款
4.8/5 易用性 4.5/5 客户支持 6 个集成
查看资料
STAY
STAY
4.8/5 来自 215 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

客户体验优化 97% 正面

多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便... 多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便利。

移动和用户体验 90% 正面

该应用的用户界面和移动体验因其直观和易于操作而广受好评。无论是酒店员工还是客人,用户都发现更新信息和管理内容非常简单。

运营效率 96% 正面

STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现... STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现可持续发展目标。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

CMS 和定制 41% 负面

CMS 的亮点在于它的易用性和定制功能,但用户也指出了一些需要改进的地方,特别是在设计和功能方面的灵活性。

集成能力 50% 负面

用户对 STAY 与各种内部应用程序和系统(包括 PMS 和 CRM 系统)的强大集成功能表示赞赏。这些集成简化了数据管理,并有助于为员工和客人提供无缝体验。

排名更高的方面

大型(75-199 间客房) #2 vs #5
中型(25-74 间客房) #4 vs #27
小型(10-24 间客房) #9 vs #21
超大型(200+ 间客房) #2 vs #7

独特功能

移动应用 聊天机器人 自动回复 消息路由 来宾消息
4.8/5 易用性 4.8/5 客户支持 20 个集成
查看资料

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 STAY 3.0 vs 0.0 (+3)
客户支持 STAY 4.8 vs 4.5 (+0.3)

关于 Goguest Hotel Guest App (by Easygoband) 与 STAY Guest App 的常见问题

Goguest Hotel Guest App (by Easygoband) 能否替代 STAY Guest App?

这取决于您的需求。Goguest Hotel Guest App (by Easygoband) 和 STAY Guest App 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Goguest Hotel Guest App (by Easygoband) 提供 6 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 STAY Guest App 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Goguest Hotel Guest App (by Easygoband) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Goguest Hotel Guest App (by Easygoband) 或 STAY Guest App 是否提供免费方案?

Goguest Hotel Guest App (by Easygoband):否。STAY Guest App:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Goguest Hotel Guest App (by Easygoband) 和 STAY Guest App?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Easygoband 的 HT Score 为 0,STAY 的为 47。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息