The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 292 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Hop Software 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Native Email Marketing and Payment Requests.
innRoad 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.6/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Housekeeping module and Native Email Marketing.
基于 HTR 上 292 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $300/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 292 |
在分析了 292 条经验证的评价后,Hop Software 用户最看重其 ,而 innRoad 用户则强调 客户支持, 报告和收入管理, 预订引擎和 ota 集成。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
报告和收入管理
▾
|
|
|
+
预订引擎和 OTA 集成
▾
|
|
|
+
磁带图
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
系统故障
▾
|
|
|
−
信用卡处理
▾
|
|
|
−
移动兼容性和应用程序
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #6 179 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #16 47 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #13 11 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #9 5 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #12 96 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #15 45 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #16 33 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #13 17 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #3 275 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #34 5 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #39 1 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #34 0 条评价 |
Choosing between Hop PMS by Hop Software and innRoad by innRoad hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and growth ambitions. Both products aim to streamline hotel management, boost revenue, and improve guest experiences, but they approach these goals differently. Hop PMS emphasizes affordability and simplicity with fewer features and a limited review base, while innRoad offers a feature-rich, globally-supported platform with a robust customer base and more recent, positive reviews. Are you ready to prioritize depth of features and proven support, or do you prefer a budget-friendly, straightforward system?
Hop PMS is designed to be an all-in-one management system focused on reducing costs and increasing direct bookings through features like a booking engine, channel manager, and integrated payments. InnRoad, on the other hand, offers a broad suite of over 29 unique features—including a revenue management module, Housekeeping app, and booking engine—that cater to hotels seeking a comprehensive management solution. Since Hop PMS has no recent reviews and a 0/5 rating, while innRoad boasts a 4.7/5 overall with 238 reviews—most recent—the evidence strongly favors innRoad’s reliability and user satisfaction. Do you want a proven system with recent, high ratings, or are you considering a less-reviewed, potentially untested alternative?
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, widely adopted property management system with strong support, innRoad is the clear choice. Its extensive feature set, including multi-currency, channel management, and guest messaging, makes it ideal for hotels that prioritize operational efficiency and revenue growth. Conversely, if your team is looking for a simple, low-cost option with basic functionalities, Hop PMS might seem appealing; however, its lack of recent reviews and a zero-star rating suggest it’s not a dependable option. Given the data, innRoad’s proven track record and ongoing support make it the superior choice for most hotels seeking reliable, scalable PMS software.
InnRoad’s ease-of-use scores are notably high at 4.49/5, with reviews highlighting its intuitive interface, straightforward reservation management, and strong onboarding support. Conversely, Hop PMS scores a 0/5, with no recent reviews or user feedback to validate its usability, suggesting it may be difficult or unreliable to adopt. InnRoad’s recent reviews describe the system as “easy to navigate,” and users appreciate its mobile optimization, despite some glitches. Edge: innRoad.
InnRoad outstrips Hop PMS significantly in features, offering 29 unique functionalities such as a reservation management system, Revenue Management Module, Housekeeping Mobile App, and integrated ID scanners—none of which are available in Hop PMS. Hop PMS offers only 4 exclusive features, including EPoS and Guest App, but these are relatively basic. InnRoad’s broad feature set directly supports diverse hotel operations, making it more suitable for properties aiming for comprehensive management. Edge: innRoad.
InnRoad’s reviews highlight its 24/7 live support, with many users describing it as “stellar,” “reliable,” and “prompt,” often citing quick resolution times. Hop PMS provides no recent reviews or support ratings, which raises concerns about its support quality. InnRoad’s support team is frequently praised for their responsiveness and professionalism, critical for maintaining smooth operations. Edge: innRoad.
InnRoad’s platform connects with 34 verified partners, including major OTAs like SiteMinder and Booking.com, plus integrated credit card processing and revenue tools. Hop PMS’s seven verified partners are limited, with notable integrations like WuBook and GuestRevu but fewer options overall. InnRoad’s broader integration ecosystem provides more flexibility and automation options for your hotel. Edge: innRoad.
InnRoad’s recent reviews—most within the last six months—highlight high satisfaction, with a 4.7/5 rating from 238 reviewers and an 89% likelihood to recommend. Hotels in multiple segments, including boutique hotels and resorts, consistently praise its user-friendliness and support. Hop PMS’s total lack of reviews and a 0/5 rating make it impossible to assess customer satisfaction. Given recent, detailed feedback, innRoad clearly holds the higher regard among hoteliers. Edge: innRoad.
Hop PMS does not show any pricing details, suggesting it may lack transparency or is not actively marketed for direct purchase. InnRoad’s pricing starts at $300 per month, with no hidden fees or extra charges, making costs predictable. For hotels evaluating ROI, innRoad’s transparent pricing and proven revenue improvements make it easier to justify the investment.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
InnRoad offers a comprehensive, well-supported PMS that has been proven to boost revenue and streamline operations. Its broad feature set, high satisfaction ratings, and active support make it suitable for hotels of all sizes looking to grow and automate.
Hop PMS appears to be a simplified, budget-oriented solution, but the lack of recent reviews and a zero-star rating raise questions about its reliability and effectiveness. For most hoteliers, innRoad’s proven track record, extensive features, and positive user feedback make it the safer, better investment.
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, trusted platform with recent high ratings, innRoad is the clear choice. However, if your focus is on quick, basic management at the lowest cost, Hop PMS might be worth considering—though its unverified status makes it risky. In nearly all cases, innRoad’s recent reviews and high scores affirm it as the stronger option for your hotel’s growth.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $300/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Hop PMS 和 innRoad 共享 27 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 团体预订引擎 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 21 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然总体上是正面的,但一些评论提到需要加快解决问题的速度,并更好地沟通更新和修复。尽管如此,用户发现全天候支持对于解决任何问题都非常有用。
报告功能详细且可定制,有助于财务跟踪和决策。收益管理工具有助于动态调整房价并提高盈利能力。一些用户建议进一步定制报告以获得更个性化的见解。
用户喜欢与 OTA 的无缝集成以及响应式预订引擎,该引擎可推动直接预订并减少超额预订。这为许多酒店带来了显着的收入增长。然而,第三方集成有时会丢失详细信息... 用户喜欢与 OTA 的无缝集成以及响应式预订引擎,该引擎可推动直接预订并减少超额预订。这为许多酒店带来了显着的收入增长。然而,第三方集成有时会丢失详细信息,这引起了一些问题。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户报告称,系统偶尔会出现故障,例如 Tape Chart 冻结、费率变更不方便用户使用以及整个系统有时运行缓慢。这些问题偶尔会影响预订和办理登机手续。
InnRoad 的集成信用卡处理功能广受好评,尽管用户指出需要更好地处理退款和纠纷。PCI 合规性和安全支付处理功能值得赞赏。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Hop PMS 和 innRoad 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Hop PMS 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 innRoad 提供 34 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。innRoad 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Hop PMS:否。innRoad:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Hop Software 的 HT Score 为 0,innRoad 的为 31。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问