The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 421 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Infor 表现出色 在 易于使用 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest profiles and Guest CRM.
Stayntouch 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Tablet/Kiosk Check-in and Lobby Kiosk.
基于 HTR 上 421 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 47 | 374 |
在分析了 421 条经验证的评价后,Infor 用户最看重其 易于使用, 报告, 一体化,而 Stayntouch 用户则强调 smooth transition and training, user experience and interface, 客房服务和运营效率。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
+
Smooth Transition and Training
▾
|
|
+
报告
▾
|
+
User Experience and Interface
▾
|
|
+
一体化
▾
|
+
客房服务和运营效率
▾
|
|
+
家政模块
▾
|
+
预订和价格管理
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
支持
▾
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
−
易于使用
▾
|
−
有限公司和发票管理
▾
|
|
−
更新问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #44 8 条评价 | #18 51 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #25 24 条评价 | #5 208 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #19 9 条评价 | #7 29 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #24 2 条评价 | #2 58 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #28 24 条评价 | #6 220 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #23 26 条评价 | #6 180 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #29 8 条评价 | #3 152 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #31 6 条评价 | #14 17 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #22 20 条评价 | #4 262 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #24 17 条评价 | #12 64 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #28 1 条评价 | #21 3 条评价 |
Choosing between Infor HMS and Stayntouch requires understanding how each addresses your hotel's unique needs. Both products aim to streamline operations and enhance guest experiences, but they diverge significantly in features, usability, and market focus. Stayntouch’s recent review volume and higher user satisfaction make it a clear leader, especially for hotels prioritizing ease of use and rapid deployment.
Your team must evaluate whether the more customizable, enterprise-oriented Infor suits your hotel’s complex workflows better than Stayntouch’s intuitive, guest-centric platform. Which aligns more closely with your current priorities?
Both Infor HMS and Stayntouch operate as cloud-based property management systems designed to optimize hotel operations. Infor HMS emphasizes detailed customization, extensive integration with operational systems, and robust reporting for large or complex properties. Stayntouch, in contrast, focuses on simplicity, speed, and mobile accessibility, making it ideal for hotels seeking a quick, user-friendly system.
While Infor’s solution caters well to large hotels and chains needing extensive control, Stayntouch appeals to smaller, mid-sized properties valuing ease of onboarding and operational agility. Do you need complex integration capabilities or a straightforward guest-focused interface?
If your hotel operates with intricate workflows, requires deep customization, and handles a broad guest database, Infor HMS is likely the better fit. It offers in-depth features like guest CRM, on-premise options, and tailored reporting. Conversely, if your hotel prioritizes ease of use, mobile check-in, and quick setup—especially if you manage multiple properties—Stayntouch provides a more streamlined, scalable solution.
For boutique hotels or properties with staff less familiar with complex systems, Stayntouch’s intuitive design and fast onboarding are compelling. Larger hotels needing extensive integrations and advanced revenue management may find Infor’s comprehensive feature set more appropriate.
Stayntouch leads decisively in user-friendliness, with a 4.7/5 ease of use rating and 26 recent reviews in the last six months indicating ongoing user satisfaction. Customers praise its intuitive screens, mobile capabilities, and quick onboarding, often citing "easy to learn" as a top benefit.
Infor HMS, with a 3.88/5 rating, offers a more traditional interface that some find less attractive and slightly less intuitive, though it is regarded as functional after some learning. Support and onboarding are rated strongly but lack the modern polish that Stayntouch provides.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch boasts 32 features exclusive to its platform, including integrated ID & passport scanners, online check-in/out, guest apps, digital registration, and real-time reporting. These features support contactless operations and guest engagement, which are increasingly vital.
Infor offers only three features unique to its system—guest profiles, guest CRM, and on-premise deployment—focusing more on traditional PMS functions. With 17 shared features, Stayntouch’s broader suite and newer capabilities give it a clear advantage.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch’s recent reviews highlight a 4.68/5 customer support rating with comments like "support team is excellent, friendly, and thorough." Users emphasize swift, effective help and detailed onboarding, especially appreciated during system launches.
Infor’s support, rated at 4.04/5, is generally responsive but less frequently reviewed in recent months, with some reports of delays during software updates. The overall sentiment favors Stayntouch’s support as more consistent and modern.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch integrates with 188 verified partners, including notable systems like RoomPriceGenie and STAAH, and offers open APIs for custom integrations. Its extensive third-party network supports a variety of operational needs.
Infor connects with 113 verified partners, including Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia, but falls short of Stayntouch’s breadth. For properties wanting seamless, flexible integrations, Stayntouch’s larger ecosystem is advantageous.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch has a higher overall rating (4.56/5) based on 317 reviews, with a recent surge in positive feedback. Hoteliers in boutique, independent, and branded segments consistently praise its ease of use and rapid onboarding.
Infor’s rating (4.04/5) stems from 46 reviews, with some mention of bugs and less intuitive design. Recent reviews underscore that Stayntouch’s higher review count and more recent feedback offer more reliable insights.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Infor does not publicly list its pricing; it likely customizes quotes based on property size and needs. Stayntouch charges a flat monthly fee of $800, with no additional implementation fees or tiered pricing, making costs predictable.
For budget-conscious hotels or those seeking transparent pricing, Stayntouch’s straightforward model is advantageous. Larger enterprises should inquire directly about Infor’s tailored quotes.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference lies in usability and feature scope. Stayntouch excels in simplicity, rapid deployment, and guest experience features, making it ideal for properties seeking agility and ease.
If your hotel needs advanced customization, on-premise options, and in-depth operational control, Infor HMS offers a broader set of traditional PMS features and integrations. But for most modern hotels, especially those prioritizing guest convenience and quick results, Stayntouch’s high reviews and recent momentum make it the smarter choice.
In summary, choose Stayntouch if your hotel values ease, speed, and mobile capabilities. Opt for Infor if your property demands extensive customization and integration, and your team can handle a steeper learning curve.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $800/mo |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 5 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Before leveraging Stayntouch PMS and Owner Relations, much of our old accounting processes were completed manually, including printing and hand-delivering statements to units, and..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"As an independent hotel that runs above 100% occupancy on many nights, the TWA Hotel finds Stayntouch integral to our operations."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
报告功能经常被强调。用户喜欢标准报告和创建自定义报告的功能,这有助于进行详细的性能跟踪。然而,有些人发现更新会破坏报告格式和功能。
Infor HMS 因其与 Booking.com、HRS 和 Expedia 等预订平台的无缝集成而受到称赞。这大大减少了手动输入错误并提高了管理预订的效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Infor HMS 的支持团队因其响应能力和专业性而备受赞誉,这对于快速解决问题至关重要。用户对支持代表如何指导他们解决问题表示赞赏。
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Stayntouch receives high praise for its seamless transition and training processes, greatly aided by trainers like David and Julia, who are consistent... Stayntouch receives high praise for its seamless transition and training processes, greatly aided by trainers like David and Julia, who are consistently mentioned for their support and comprehensive guidance. Many reviews highlight the ease of moving from previous systems, an aspect noted particularly for its stress-reduction during onboarding.
The software is largely favored for its intuitive and user-friendly design, supporting efficient training and ease of user adoption, especially for st... The software is largely favored for its intuitive and user-friendly design, supporting efficient training and ease of user adoption, especially for staff with varying technical proficiencies. This contributes significantly to positive front-desk and operational performances.
Stayntouch的客房管理功能因其简化房间分配和跟踪客房服务状态而备受赞誉。这些功能通过提供实时更新来提升运营效率,从而优化日常工作流程。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然报告功能因其全面性和有助于运营监督而受到赞赏,但多项评论指出,报告的自定义程度和清晰度仍有提升空间。生成详细报告方面的困难也成为部分用户遇到的难题... 虽然报告功能因其全面性和有助于运营监督而受到赞赏,但多项评论指出,报告的自定义程度和清晰度仍有提升空间。生成详细报告方面的困难也成为部分用户遇到的难题。
一些评论指出,在管理团体预订和开票方面存在困难,并指出某些流程可以更加精简和直观。客户账户转移和历史数据访问方面的问题也表明,该功能仍有扩展空间。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Infor HMS 和 Stayntouch 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Infor HMS 提供 113 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Stayntouch 提供 193 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Stayntouch 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 3.9/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Infor HMS:否。Stayntouch:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Infor 的 HT Score 为 21,Stayntouch 的为 91。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案