The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #9 10 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #24 2 条评价 | #4 83 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 89 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #9 4 条评价 | #2 24 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #28 2 条评价 | #2 77 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #21 3 条评价 | #2 88 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #3 91 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #6 7 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #5 27 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #3 112 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 6 条评价 | #6 3 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #7 2 条评价 |
Choosing between innOrder by innOrder and STAY Guest App hinges on what your hotel needs most—whether it’s a straightforward guest-facing ordering system or a comprehensive guest experience platform. Both products aim to improve guest interaction, but they approach this differently. innOrder focuses primarily on in-room ordering and convenience, while STAY offers a broader suite of features aimed at operational efficiency and complete guest service management.
Both solutions address common hotel pain points: reducing front desk queues, increasing service speed, and enhancing guest satisfaction. However, innOrder’s simplicity contrasts with STAY’s extensive feature set and integrations. As you evaluate, consider whether your hotel needs a dedicated service app or a full guest experience operating system. Do these differences align with your strategic goals?
InnOrder excels at streamlining in-room orders, offering a simple, fast QR code-based interface ideal for hotels prioritizing food and beverage services. Its review count — just six — indicates limited user feedback, but recent reviews praise its ease of use and reliable support. Conversely, STAY boasts over 200 reviews, with a recent review count of 206, indicating a larger, more active user base and more recent feedback, which lends it stronger credibility in the current market.
While innOrder delivers a user-friendly experience for quick-service requests, STAY provides a broader set of features like guest messaging, local recommendations, and mobile checkout. innOrder’s ratings are perfect (5/5 for ease of use), but with fewer reviews, its reliability is less proven than STAY’s. Does your hotel want a niche tool or a full guest experience platform? Which aligns better with your growth plans?
If your hotel needs a straightforward in-room ordering system to boost F&B revenue and minimize staff contact, innOrder is the clear choice. Its simple QR code system and high ease-of-use rating (5/5) make staff training quick and guest adoption effortless. On the other hand, if your hotel aims to digitize a wide range of guest services—from reservations to messaging and local info—STAY’s more extensive feature set (8 exclusive features) and 20 verified integrations make it the better option.
For hotels that value operational efficiency, guest engagement, and data-driven insights, STAY’s ability to integrate with major PMS and CRM systems makes it ideal. If your focus is on fast, targeted service delivery, innOrder’s simplicity might suffice. Which scope matches your hotel’s future plans?
InnOrder scores a perfect 5/5 for ease of use based on recent reviews, with users describing its web app as "very simple and easy to use" and "user-friendly." Staff report smooth onboarding and quick adoption for in-room food and drink orders. Conversely, STAY’s rating is slightly lower at 4.78/5, with reviews praising its intuitive interface but noting its broader complexity can require more training.
Both platforms are praised for user-friendliness, but innOrder’s narrow focus makes onboarding faster and more straightforward. STAY’s broader feature set adds some complexity but remains accessible due to its well-designed CMS. Edge: innOrder.
STAY offers 8 exclusive features, including guest messaging, local recommendations, mobile checkout, and guest profiles—none of which innOrder provides. InnOrder’s feature set is limited to basic in-room ordering, but it excels in its core function. STAY’s broader capabilities support more personalized, interactive guest experiences, giving your hotel multiple touchpoints beyond just ordering.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive digital guest engagement system, STAY’s features provide a significant advantage. innOrder’s strength lies in its simplicity and reliability for food and beverage orders. Which feature set aligns with your guest service strategy?
innOrder’s support rating is 4.83/5, with reviews highlighting responsive, professional after-sales support and quick issue resolution. Customers specifically mention the team’s "responsive, professional, and always willing to help." STAY also maintains a 4.83/5 support rating, with users praising its support team but noting some limitations like lack of phone support and slower report updates.
Both products offer strong support, but innOrder’s recent reviews emphasize quick responsiveness and personalized assistance. STAY’s support is solid, especially for larger hotel chains accustomed to digital platforms. Edge: innOrder.
STAY integrates with 20 verified partners, including major PMS and CRM systems like hotelkit, apaleo, and SiteMinder. InnOrder, by contrast, has no verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other hotel systems. This makes STAY significantly more adaptable for hotels seeking a unified digital ecosystem.
If seamless data sharing and operational automation are priorities, STAY’s integrations provide a clear advantage. innOrder may suffice if your hotel operates in a closed system or prefers a standalone solution. Which approach aligns with your hotel’s tech strategy?
Reviews for innOrder are scarce—only six, with no recent feedback—making it difficult to gauge current satisfaction levels. In contrast, STAY has 206 reviews, with recent feedback rating 3/5 and a likelihood to recommend at 96%. Hotels of various sizes, especially large chains and resorts, frequently praise STAY’s impact on operational efficiency and guest satisfaction.
While innOrder’s high ease-of-use rating is promising, the limited review data makes STAY the more credible, higher-rated choice. If recent feedback influences your decision, STAY’s broader adoption makes it the stronger recommendation. Edge: STAY.
Both products are priced at a base rate of $300 per month, with no freemium options, implementation fees, or monthly per-room charges. This straightforward pricing structure simplifies budgeting but offers no tiered options or discounts noted in the available data.
Your decision can focus on value rather than price, as both provide similar entry costs. However, consider whether the broader features of STAY justify potential additional costs down the line for your hotel’s digital plans.
Hotels that prioritize quick, targeted in-room service—such as boutique hotels, small resorts, or properties focusing on F&B revenue—should consider innOrder. Its simplicity and ease of deployment make it perfect for properties that want a dedicated in-room ordering tool without complexity.
Not ideal if your hotel aims for a comprehensive digital guest experience or needs extensive integrations. Hotels needing a multi-service platform or real-time guest engagement should look elsewhere.
STAY is suited for large hotels, resorts, hotel chains, and properties looking to digitize a wide array of guest services. Its robust features support operations like reservations, messaging, local recommendations, and mobile checkouts, making it ideal for hotels seeking a full guest experience platform.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a single-function solution or operates on a tight budget without the need for extensive integrations. Smaller properties with limited digital infrastructure might find STAY’s broader capabilities unnecessary.
STAY clearly provides a broader suite of features, with 8 unique capabilities and 20 verified integrations, making it suitable for hotels that want to elevate guest experiences across multiple touchpoints. innOrder remains a reliable, easy-to-use solution for quick in-room orders and F&B-focused properties.
Choose innOrder if your hotel’s priority is efficient in-room food and beverage service with minimal setup. Opt for STAY if your goal is to digitize and enhance your entire guest journey, streamline operations, and gather valuable data—especially if you’re part of a larger chain or resort.
In summary, if you value proven, recent reviews, and extensive integration options, STAY is the more compelling choice. innOrder offers simplicity and speed but with a narrower scope. Your decision should align with your hotel’s digital ambitions and operational complexity.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Thanks to STAY, we offer our guests an interaction tool with our staff. We can make real-time decisions with it. This simplifies our staff's duties at the same time. The guest expe..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Implementing STAY contributed to a significant increase in our revenue and customer satisfaction. The app pays for itself. We have seen significant increases in consumption for all..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便... 多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便利。
该应用的用户界面和移动体验因其直观和易于操作而广受好评。无论是酒店员工还是客人,用户都发现更新信息和管理内容非常简单。
STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现... STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现可持续发展目标。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
CMS 的亮点在于它的易用性和定制功能,但用户也指出了一些需要改进的地方,特别是在设计和功能方面的灵活性。
用户对 STAY 与各种内部应用程序和系统(包括 PMS 和 CRM 系统)的强大集成功能表示赞赏。这些集成简化了数据管理,并有助于为员工和客人提供无缝体验。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。innOrder 和 STAY Guest App 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。innOrder 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 STAY Guest App 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。innOrder 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
innOrder:否。STAY Guest App:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。innOrder 的 HT Score 为 0,STAY 的为 47。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问