The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 289 条经验证的评价后,innRoad 用户最看重其 客户支持质量, 定制和灵活性, 预订仪表板和报告,而 ROIBACK 用户则强调 支持和客户服务, 直接预订优化, 技术改进。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持质量
▾
|
+
支持和客户服务
▾
|
|
+
定制和灵活性
▾
|
+
直接预订优化
▾
|
|
+
预订仪表板和报告
▾
|
+
技术改进
▾
|
|
+
胶带图表和颜色编码
▾
|
+
报告和分析
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
费率和付款管理
▾
|
−
多语言和用户友好界面
▾
|
|
−
用户界面故障
▾
|
−
支付网关
▾
|
|
−
移动可访问性和应用程序功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #4 150 条评价 | #29 8 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #13 41 条评价 | #22 18 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #15 7 条评价 | #14 9 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #16 3 条评价 | #10 6 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #9 86 条评价 | #24 15 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #13 37 条评价 | #23 15 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #12 33 条评价 | #18 13 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #7 18 条评价 | #19 4 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #1 229 条评价 | #18 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #29 6 条评价 | #20 12 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #26 1 条评价 | #10 14 条评价 |
| 中东 | #25 0 条评价 | #14 3 条评价 |
Choosing the right booking engine is critical for your hotel's ability to increase direct bookings, improve revenue, and streamline operations. innRoad’s Booking Engine and Roiback’s platform are two options that serve hotel operators differently: innRoad offers an all-in-one property management system with a booking engine built-in, while Roiback emphasizes enhancing direct sales through its dedicated booking engine and digital marketing services. So, which best fits your hotel’s needs?
innRoad’s booking engine is part of a comprehensive property management ecosystem, providing a unified platform for reservations, housekeeping, and operations. Roiback, on the other hand, focuses on boosting direct bookings with a specialized, feature-rich booking engine complemented by marketing and web design services.
innRoad is designed as a full-service property management system that includes a booking engine, channel management, housekeeping, and billing. It’s ideal if your hotel needs a single platform to manage all operations and increase direct bookings by an average of 20%. Roiback specializes in maximizing online revenue with a powerful booking engine, detailed analytics, and marketing support, aiming to improve conversion rates and reduce reliance on OTAs.
While innRoad boasts a higher overall rating (4.68/5 from 200 reviews) and more recent feedback, Roiback’s ratings are based on fewer reviews but with a strong 9/5 NPS score from recent feedback. innRoad’s broader feature set is a plus if you want an all-in-one solution; Roiback’s focus on sales optimization and marketing tools makes it the better choice for revenue growth. Do you prioritize operational integration or direct sales enhancement?
If your hotel requires an integrated property management system that handles reservations, housekeeping, billing, and booking engine in one, innRoad is the clear choice. It is especially suitable for small to mid-sized hotels looking for a flexible, customizable platform with a proven track record of increasing revenue and operational efficiency.
If your primary goal is to maximize online direct bookings and improve conversion rates through a specialized booking engine combined with digital marketing, go with Roiback. It’s ideal for hotels that want a dedicated e-commerce focus, extensive analytics, and support for international guests with multi-language and multi-currency features. Hotel chains or properties with complex promotional strategies will find Roiback’s flexible tools more aligned with their needs.
innRoad earns a 4.44/5 ease-of-use rating from 200 reviews, with users praising its intuitive interface and straightforward reservation management. However, some mention glitches and slow loading times, which can hinder staff productivity. Roiback’s platform has a similar 4.49/5 rating, with users highlighting its user-friendly booking process and smooth multi-language support.
Recent reviews of Roiback emphasize its responsiveness and simplicity, especially for international guests. Both platforms are rated highly for usability, but innRoad’s broader system complexity might require more staff training. Edge: Roiback.
innRoad offers 29 features exclusive to its system, including multi-currency, multi-lingual support, a channel manager, property management tools, gift vouchers, automated reporting, and group booking modules. Its property management integration and housekeeping modules are notable advantages. Roiback provides 11 unique features such as urgency messaging, booking abandonment recovery, social media integration, loyalty programs, Apple Pay, Google Pay, and multiple payment gateways.
While innRoad’s feature count is higher, Roiback excels in marketing and direct-sales features. For hotels seeking a comprehensive management suite, innRoad’s richer set wins; for those prioritizing advanced booking and promotional tools, Roiback’s specialization is better. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad’s customer support scores 4.44/5, with reviews indicating helpful support but occasional slow responses and system glitches. Many users appreciate their 24/7 live support but note that some support staff may lack fluency in English, which can cause delays. Roiback’s support is rated slightly higher at 4.72/5, with recent reviews praising their responsiveness, personalized consulting, and proactive guidance.
Roiback’s support team offers dedicated account management and strategic advice, which many users find critical in maximizing platform benefits. If immediate, highly responsive support is a priority, Roiback holds the edge.
innRoad features 34 verified partners, including key integrations with OTAs, channel managers, and payment systems such as TripAdvisor, QuickBooks, and Revinate. Roiback has 27 verified partners, with integrations primarily focused on channel managers, PMS, and tech suppliers like RateGain, Triptease, and Winhotel.
Both platforms offer extensive connectivity, but innRoad’s broader partner network offers more options for integrating operational tools. For seamless, multi-channel management, innRoad has a slight edge. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad’s overall rating of 4.68/5 from 200 reviews reflects a higher level of customer satisfaction, especially among independent and small hotel segments. Recent reviews cite improvements in revenue and ease of operation, though some users mention glitches and group reservation challenges.
Roiback’s high NPS score (9/5) from recent feedback indicates strong customer loyalty, particularly among larger, branded hotels seeking direct booking growth. Since innRoad’s review count and recency are stronger, it earns the higher rating. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad does not publicly specify its pricing, but it is generally offered as a customizable SaaS with no hidden fees, which may involve a monthly fee depending on the feature set. Roiback’s starting price is $500 per month, with no free tier or trial available.
Both platforms are priced to cater to hotels investing in direct booking growth, but innRoad’s pricing is less transparent and likely variable based on needs. Roiback’s flat base fee provides clearer expectations for budget planning.
Not ideal if your hotel primarily wants a standalone booking engine without additional management tools or if you prefer minimal systems with simple setups.
Not ideal if your hotel needs a comprehensive property management system or prefers a solution with broader operational features outside of booking and marketing.
innRoad offers a broad, integrated platform that combines property management, reservations, and marketing tools in one system. Its extensive feature set and higher review volume suggest it’s best for hotels seeking operational simplicity and a proven increase in direct bookings.
Roiback excels in direct booking conversion, analytics, and digital marketing, making it ideal for hotels that want to focus on growing online sales and improving guest experience through targeted promotional tools.
If you want an all-in-one management solution, innRoad is the safer, more experienced choice. If your goal is to maximize direct revenue through targeted online strategies, Roiback’s booking engine and marketing support are better suited.
In summary: innRoad’s higher review count and recent positive feedback make it the more reliable choice for most hotels looking for a comprehensive system. For hotels with a strong focus on online sales growth and marketing, Roiback offers a specialized, highly-rated platform that can deliver measurable results.
我们分析了 5 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
"Partnering with Roiback has been a game-changer, as their innovative solutions and close support by our Direct Channel Specialist have empowered Jasmine City Group to reach new h..."
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
客户支持服务通常因响应迅速、知识渊博、及时解决问题而受到称赞。然而,也有人提到响应速度慢,以及与英语不流利的支持人员沟通不畅,这可能会让用户感到沮丧。
用户经常提到 InnRoad 提供的高度定制和灵活性,特别是在房间外观、计费功能和报告方面。这使酒店能够根据其特定需求定制软件,从而提高运营效率和客人满意度。
预订仪表板和综合报告功能因其提供可操作见解和简化数据管理的能力而备受瞩目。这些工具可帮助酒店经理跟踪入住率、收入和其他关键绩效指标,从而更轻松地做出明... 预订仪表板和综合报告功能因其提供可操作见解和简化数据管理的能力而备受瞩目。这些工具可帮助酒店经理跟踪入住率、收入和其他关键绩效指标,从而更轻松地做出明智的决策并提高整体酒店绩效。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户对该系统管理费率和付款(包括费率变更和分期付款)的能力表示赞赏。然而,有些人认为这些功能复杂且耗时,这表明需要更精简的流程来提高效率和客户满意度。
一些用户报告称,用户界面出现故障且加载速度缓慢,这可能会扰乱日常操作。系统冻结和功能错误等问题表明需要增强稳定性和速度。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Roiback 的专业支持团队(包括客户经理和直接渠道专家)获得了高度赞誉。用户对他们的响应能力、专业知识和个性化咨询表示赞赏,这些都对实现业务目标起到了重要... Roiback 的专业支持团队(包括客户经理和直接渠道专家)获得了高度赞誉。用户对他们的响应能力、专业知识和个性化咨询表示赞赏,这些都对实现业务目标起到了重要作用。
Roiback 通过用户友好的预订引擎、创新的直销策略以及忠诚度计划和促销套餐等工具来提高直接预订量。酒店运营商报告称,在线销售量大幅增长,直接渠道可见度也有... Roiback 通过用户友好的预订引擎、创新的直销策略以及忠诚度计划和促销套餐等工具来提高直接预订量。酒店运营商报告称,在线销售量大幅增长,直接渠道可见度也有所提高。
关键反馈包括要求加快系统响应速度、减少重复和 404 错误等技术故障以及统一平台以简化流程。这些技术改进对于实现无缝用户体验至关重要。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
该平台的用户友好型和直观预订引擎受到好评,并提到其流畅的多语言支持和易用性。然而,一些用户要求改进默认语言设置和界面设计,以提供更好的用户体验。
虽然该平台支持多种支付网关,但用户建议需要扩展支付选项,特别是整合更多的本地和国际网关,以避免连接问题。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。innRoad Booking Engine 和 Roiback | Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。innRoad Booking Engine 提供 34 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Roiback | Booking Engine 提供 27 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。innRoad Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
innRoad Booking Engine:否。Roiback | Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。innRoad 的 HT Score 为 34,ROIBACK 的为 72。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问