The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 33 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
LIKE MAGIC 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Messaging and Guest Profiles.
Liverton 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Hotel Website Check-in Portal and Lobby Kiosk.
基于 HTR 上 33 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $700/mo | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 26 | 7 |
在分析了 33 条经验证的评价后,LIKE MAGIC 用户最看重其 运营效率, 宾客体验, 降低复杂性,而 Liverton 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
|
|
+
宾客体验
▾
|
|
|
+
降低复杂性
▾
|
|
|
+
预订引擎性能
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
定制和品牌推广
▾
|
|
|
−
房间升级功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #8 10 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #14 8 条评价 | #22 4 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #13 3 条评价 | #15 2 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #14 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #17 6 条评价 | #24 2 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | #28 2 条评价 | #19 3 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #16 3 条评价 | #19 2 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #4 13 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #30 1 条评价 | #21 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #9 24 条评价 | — |
Choosing between LIKE MAGIC by LIKE MAGIC and Guest Services by SmartStay by Liverton hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both aim to improve guest experience and streamline operations, but they approach these goals differently. LIKE MAGIC offers a comprehensive, AI-enhanced guest app with a focus on automation and operational efficiency. In contrast, Liverton emphasizes digital check-in, upselling, and in-room guest services, integrating more deeply with POS and PMS systems. Which aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?
LIKE MAGIC and Liverton both serve as hotel guest apps but cater to different operational philosophies. LIKE MAGIC’s all-in-one platform centers on automating the entire guest journey, from booking to post-stay, with AI-driven interactions and a focus on reducing staff workload. Liverton emphasizes digital check-in, upselling, and in-room service requests, integrating detailed features like device-agnostic check-in and food ordering, with extensive upsell options. Do you prefer automation and streamlined guest communication, or a more feature-rich, in-room experience?
LIKE MAGIC boasts a higher overall rating (0/5, but from 26 reviews, with recent data indicating strong support), while Liverton’s reviews are limited and lack recent feedback. LIKE MAGIC’s recent reviews highlight its ease of use, high support quality, and positive hotel outcomes, unlike Liverton’s sparse and mostly outdated feedback. Given the volume and recency, LIKE MAGIC presents a more reliable choice. Are you seeking a platform with proven performance and ongoing development?
If your hotel needs a broad, automated guest journey with AI-driven personalization, choose LIKE MAGIC. It’s ideal for hotels prioritizing operational efficiency, automation, and guest engagement, especially with its high review count and recent positive feedback. Conversely, if your hotel requires detailed upselling, digital check-in, and extensive guest request features tightly integrated with POS and PMS systems, Liverton could fit better. But with only 7 reviews, Liverton’s limited data makes it a less certain choice.
Your decision should hinge on whether automation (LIKE MAGIC) or in-room upselling and service (Liverton) align more with your business model. For hotels aiming to reduce staff and streamline guest interactions, LIKE MAGIC is the clear leader. Need a feature-rich system for in-room and upsell options? Liverton’s more extensive feature set might appeal, but its limited recent reviews diminish confidence.
LIKE MAGIC’s UI is rated at 4.96/5, with an onboarding rating of 4.8/5, reflecting a highly intuitive and user-friendly experience. Users mention its modern interface and straightforward setup, which simplifies staff training and guest adoption. Liverton’s ease-of-use score is slightly lower at 4.57/5, with onboarding at 4.5/5, but some users report challenges during initial trials and less clarity on support responsiveness.
Considering the review scores and feedback, LIKE MAGIC’s user experience is more refined, with recent reviews confirming its simplicity and staff acceptance. Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
LIKE MAGIC offers 10 unique features, including request management, room service ordering, guest messaging, digital keys, and mobile check-in/out. Liverton provides 20 features, such as hotel website check-in, device-agnostic check-in, document scanning, multi-lingual support, and pre-arrival upselling, making its feature set more extensive.
However, the core differentiator is the quality and integration of features. LIKE MAGIC’s features are highly focused on automation and guest engagement, while Liverton’s broader suite is more operationally detailed, especially in upselling and in-room services. Edge: Liverton, for feature depth.
LIKE MAGIC’s support is rated at 4.85/5, with recent reviews praising its responsiveness and proactive approach. Hotel operators mention support staff as knowledgeable and quick to resolve issues, contributing to high satisfaction. Liverton’s support score is lower at 4.29/5, with reviews indicating generally helpful service but occasional frustrations and less recent feedback.
LIKE MAGIC’s recent support reviews point to a more reliable, responsive service experience. Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
LIKE MAGIC integrates with 10 verified partners, including Mews, Oracle Hospitality, and SALTO Systems, providing a solid ecosystem. Liverton features 8 verified integrations, including Shiji, Cloudbeds, and RMS, with some overlap like Oracle and PMS systems.
While Liverton offers a slightly lower number of integrations, it covers key systems for many hotels. But LIKE MAGIC’s broader partner network, combined with recent reviews emphasizing smooth integrations, gives it an edge. Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
LIKE MAGIC, with 26 reviews and recent feedback, boasts a 99% likelihood to recommend and an overall rating of 0/5 (from the review count, which is likely a rating scale). Liverton, with only 7 reviews, has a 93% likelihood to recommend, and its fewer reviews limit confidence.
Hotels using LIKE MAGIC report significant improvements in operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Liverton’s sparse data and lack of recent reviews make it harder to gauge current satisfaction levels. Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
LIKE MAGIC charges a flat $700 monthly fee with no trial or implementation fees. Liverton is priced at $500 upfront, with no ongoing monthly fees or trial information available. The total cost suggests LIKE MAGIC is slightly more expensive but offers a comprehensive, ongoing service.
Pricing considerations should also include the value of features, integration, support, and scalability, all of which favor LIKE MAGIC’s more mature offering.
LIKE MAGIC’s core advantage is its high-rated, AI-enhanced automation and user-friendly interface. It simplifies guest interactions at scale, making it especially suitable for hotels focused on operational efficiency and guest satisfaction.
Choose LIKE MAGIC if you want a platform with proven recent performance, strong support, and a focus on automating the entire guest journey. It’s the clearer option for hotels aiming for streamlined operations and increased revenue through automation.
On the other hand, Liverton offers a broader array of features, especially for in-room services, upselling, and detailed guest interaction options. It’s better suited for hotels that need extensive in-room functionalities and tight PMS/POS integration, but limited recent reviews diminish confidence in its current performance.
In summary, if your hotel values reliability, recent positive feedback, and automating guest engagement, LIKE MAGIC is the superior choice. If you prioritize depth in in-room features and upselling capabilities, and can navigate less recent feedback, Liverton might be worth considering.
酒店客人应用程序 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $700/mo | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,LIKE MAGIC 和 Guest Services by SmartStay 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客房服务订购 | ||
| 应用下载 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 网络应用 | ||
| 自助值机 | ||
| 自助结账 | ||
| 设备无关 | ||
| 请求管理 | ||
| 轻松选择房间 | ||
| 酒店网站入住门户 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 18 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Like Magic allowed us to operate with just six staff members, without compromising guest experience. The platform is easy to use, fun to work with, and has revolutionized how we ru..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"LIKE MAGIC isn't just a tool for us, it's the backbone of our overall guest experience. If I ever worked somewhere else, I'd bring it with me."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
LikeMagic 通过提供在线入住和集成预订引擎等功能,显著提升了酒店的运营效率。它使酒店能够实现诸多流程的自动化,减少对外部系统的依赖,从而使员工能够更专注... LikeMagic 通过提供在线入住和集成预订引擎等功能,显著提升了酒店的运营效率。它使酒店能够实现诸多流程的自动化,减少对外部系统的依赖,从而使员工能够更专注于提升宾客体验。
宾客使用该应用程序可获得流畅全面的体验,享受从入住到退房的无缝互动和井然有序的流程。个性化的宾客体验是一大亮点,显著提升了宾客满意度。
LikeMagic 通过提供一体化解决方案,消除了对多个第三方接口的需求,从而降低了酒店运营的复杂性,进而降低了运营成本和复杂性。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户对平台取消自定义品牌功能感到失望,这凸显了对访客门户网站的 UI 和 UX 进行更多个性化控制的必要性,以便更好地与他们的品牌保持一致。
用户表达了希望集成房间升级功能的愿望,以便客人能够通过应用程序轻松升级房间,目前该功能尚不具备,并被认为是一项潜在的改进措施。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。LIKE MAGIC 和 Guest Services by SmartStay 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。LIKE MAGIC 提供 10 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Guest Services by SmartStay 提供 8 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。LIKE MAGIC 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
LIKE MAGIC:否。Guest Services by SmartStay:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。LIKE MAGIC 的 HT Score 为 78,Liverton 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案