The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 221 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
NexGenGuest 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile Checkin.
STAY 表现出色 在 客户体验优化 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile App.
基于 HTR 上 221 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $300/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 6 | 215 |
在分析了 221 条经验证的评价后,NexGenGuest 用户最看重其 ,而 STAY 用户则强调 客户体验优化, 移动和用户体验, 运营效率。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户体验优化
▾
|
|
|
+
移动和用户体验
▾
|
|
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
|
|
+
支持和服务
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
CMS 和定制
▾
|
|
|
−
集成能力
▾
|
|
|
−
分析和报告
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #20 2 条评价 | #9 10 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #26 2 条评价 | #4 83 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 89 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #12 2 条评价 | #2 24 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #21 3 条评价 | #2 77 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #16 6 条评价 | #2 88 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #3 91 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #6 7 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #11 4 条评价 | #5 27 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #3 112 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #20 0 条评价 | #6 3 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #7 2 条评价 |
Choosing between NexGenGuest by NexGenGuest and STAY Guest App by STAY hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, scale, and regional focus. Both platforms aim to elevate the guest experience through digital engagement, but they differ markedly in coverage, features, and scope. Your goal is to find a solution that aligns with your operational priorities and guest expectations—so which is the better fit?
NexGenGuest is a niche player with a small but tight review base and limited regional presence. STAY, on the other hand, boasts a much larger user base, more recent feedback, and a global footprint. How do these differences influence your choice?
NexGenGuest offers a web-based, low-touch engagement platform primarily focused on marketing, guest communication, and real-time messaging. Its core strength lies in marketing automation and guest messaging, with a simple, easy-to-navigate interface. Conversely, STAY positions itself as a comprehensive guest experience operating system, integrating a wide array of hotel services—from check-in to request management—delivering a full-service digital environment.
While NexGenGuest emphasizes high engagement through web-based interactions, STAY combines operational efficiency with guest satisfaction, aiming to cut down wait times and streamline internal workflows. NexGenGuest’s limited regional presence (North America only) contrasts with STAY’s extensive international coverage spanning 31 countries. Given these differences, your choice depends on whether you prioritize marketing and guest communication or operational digitization.
Edge: STAY
If your hotel needs a straightforward, web-based platform focused on marketing, guest communication, and pre-arrival engagement, NexGenGuest is the better pick. Its reviews highlight its user-friendly interface and strong marketing tools, making it ideal for boutique hotels or resorts seeking to boost direct engagement.
If your hotel requires a full-service, operational guest experience system that reduces queues, manages requests, and digitizes services like room service or spa bookings, STAY is the clear choice. Its extensive feature set, proven track record with large hotel chains, and wide integration options make it suitable for larger, branded properties or chains aiming for comprehensive service digitalization.
In essence, choose NexGenGuest for marketing-driven engagement; opt for STAY if operational efficiency and service digitization are your priorities.
Edge: STAY
NexGenGuest scores highly on ease of use, with an overall rating of 4.75/5, and reviews consistently praise its simple interface and straightforward onboarding process. Its focus on web-based engagement makes it intuitive for staff and guests alike, with no reported issues in navigating or adopting the platform.
STAY also enjoys a high ease-of-use rating at 4.78/5, with reviews emphasizing its user-friendly CMS and straightforward content management. Despite its broader feature set and complexity, hotel staff find it easy to adapt, even with limited technical background. Both products excel here, but NexGenGuest’s smaller scope lends itself to slightly easier implementation.
Edge: STAY
NexGenGuest offers a core set of 7 shared features, including guest messaging, notifications, and engagement tools, plus one unique feature: Mobile Check-in. Its focus is on guest communication, marketing, and engagement, with the ability to send notifications and connect with guests pre- and post-arrival.
STAY boasts 7 shared features but also provides 7 unique ones, including Mobile App, Chatbot, Automated Replies, Message Routing, Request Management, App Download, and Automatic Translations. These features support a broader range of guest interactions, operational workflows, and language options.
For hotels prioritizing guest messaging and marketing, NexGenGuest’s features are sufficient. But if you need a broader suite that supports service requests, multi-lingual support, and automation, STAY holds the advantage.
Edge: STAY
NexGenGuest maintains a support rating of 4.83/5, with reviews highlighting responsive, attentive customer service and quick responses. One user praises the support team for being “quick to respond” and “extremely user friendly and intuitive,” emphasizing ongoing improvements.
STAY also earns a 4.83/5 support score, with users appreciating its helpful support team. However, some mention the lack of phone support and slower reporting updates, which can hinder urgent troubleshooting.
Given the identical ratings and similar reviews, support quality appears comparable, but NexGenGuest’s smaller customer base might allow for more personalized attention.
Edge: Tie
NexGenGuest integrates with three verified partners, including Opera PMS and Stayntouch, but has a limited ecosystem overall. Its integrations are primarily focused on essential PMS and marketing tools.
STAY outperforms here with 20 verified integrations, including major players like hotelkit, Winhotel, SiteMinder, Oracle Hospitality, and more. Its extensive partnership network enables seamless data flow across multiple systems, simplifying hotel operations and guest management.
If integrations are critical for your hotel’s tech stack, STAY’s broader ecosystem makes it the better choice.
Edge: STAY
NexGenGuest has a small but highly positive review base, with an overall score of 4.92/5 from just six reviews, all recent and glowing. Hotels praise its role as a “great tool for guest communication and engagement,” and many highlight its marketing capabilities.
STAY’s reviews, although more numerous, average around 3/5 based on 200 reviews, with consistent praise for operational improvements but some criticism for language limitations and slower updates. Its larger, more diverse user base results in mixed ratings, especially from larger chain properties.
Given the recency and volume, NexGenGuest’s reviews are more consistent and recent, making it the more confidently rated product.
Edge: NexGenGuest
NexGenGuest does not publicly list pricing, and it offers no freemium model or trial, indicating a custom quote-based approach. This can be advantageous for tailored solutions but less transparent.
STAY charges a flat $300 monthly fee, with no mention of additional implementation or setup costs. Its straightforward pricing model suits hotels seeking predictable expenses.
If transparent, predictable pricing is essential, STAY’s flat fee offers clarity. For tailored, possibly more flexible arrangements, NexGenGuest may be suitable.
Not ideal if you require comprehensive operational tools or extensive integrations outside marketing and messaging.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, primarily regional, or seeking a low-cost, purely marketing-oriented solution.
NexGenGuest excels in guest engagement and marketing, with a highly positive and recent review record. Its limited regional presence and narrow feature set make it best suited for boutique hotels and resorts focusing on guest communication.
STAY offers a broad feature set and extensive integrations, proven in large chains and international markets. Its capacity to digitize multiple guest services and improve operational efficiency makes it ideal for sizable hotels or chains looking for a comprehensive guest experience platform.
If your hotel prioritizes guest messaging and engagement within North America, NexGenGuest’s high ratings and recent reviews make it the superior choice. For larger, multi-property operations seeking extensive service automation and integrations, STAY’s wider feature set and global presence deliver a better fit.
In conclusion, for most hotels with a preference for recent, highly-rated reviews and a focus on guest communication, STAY’s larger review base and more recent feedback make it the recommended option. However, if your hotel’s core need is targeted guest engagement and marketing with a smaller scope, NexGenGuest remains a strong contender.
酒店客人应用程序 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $300/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,NexGenGuest 和 STAY Guest App 共享 7 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 应用下载 | ||
| 手机值机 | ||
| 消息路由 | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 聊天机器人 | ||
| 自动回复 | ||
| 请求管理 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Thanks to STAY, we offer our guests an interaction tool with our staff. We can make real-time decisions with it. This simplifies our staff's duties at the same time. The guest expe..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Implementing STAY contributed to a significant increase in our revenue and customer satisfaction. The app pays for itself. We have seen significant increases in consumption for all..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便... 多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便利。
该应用的用户界面和移动体验因其直观和易于操作而广受好评。无论是酒店员工还是客人,用户都发现更新信息和管理内容非常简单。
STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现... STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现可持续发展目标。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
CMS 的亮点在于它的易用性和定制功能,但用户也指出了一些需要改进的地方,特别是在设计和功能方面的灵活性。
用户对 STAY 与各种内部应用程序和系统(包括 PMS 和 CRM 系统)的强大集成功能表示赞赏。这些集成简化了数据管理,并有助于为员工和客人提供无缝体验。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。NexGenGuest 和 STAY Guest App 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。NexGenGuest 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 STAY Guest App 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。NexGenGuest 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
NexGenGuest:否。STAY Guest App:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。NexGenGuest 的 HT Score 为 0,STAY 的为 47。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问