The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 40 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Orana Software 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 .
Runtriz 表现出色 在 宾客沟通 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile Checkin and Mobile Checkout.
基于 HTR 上 40 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $400/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 2 | 38 |
在分析了 40 条经验证的评价后,Orana Software 用户最看重其 ,而 Runtriz 用户则强调 宾客沟通, 用户体验, 办理登机手续。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
宾客沟通
▾
|
|
|
+
用户体验
▾
|
|
|
+
办理登机手续
▾
|
|
|
+
创收
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
可定制性
▾
|
|
|
−
客人误解
▾
|
|
|
−
通知和警报
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | #24 1 条评价 | #13 1 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 33 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #12 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #24 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #29 2 条评价 | #9 11 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | — | #15 3 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #2 34 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #2 24 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #1 37 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | — | #34 0 条评价 |
Choosing between Orana Stay by Orana Software and Runtriz for your hotel guest app depends on your specific operational needs and guest experience goals. Both solutions aim to improve communication, streamline check-ins, and enhance guest satisfaction, but they diverge significantly in features, reviews, and market presence. Your team needs to weigh these differences carefully to select the platform that aligns best with your property’s size, segment, and digital strategy.
Orana Stay is a niche product with only two recent reviews, but both are exceptionally positive, emphasizing ease of use and cost efficiency. Runtriz, with over 37 reviews, is more established, widely adopted, and offers a broader feature set. Which platform offers the right fit for your property’s scale and ambitions?
Orana Stay’s primary appeal lies in its simplicity and affordability, offering a basic yet reliable digital concierge. Runtriz, on the other hand, delivers a comprehensive guest engagement ecosystem with features like mobile check-in, mobile checkout, and room service ordering, which can directly impact hotel operations and revenue.
While Orana Stay’s reviews highlight its ease of update and environmental benefits, Runtriz’s reviews focus on its ability to facilitate pre-arrival communication and automate guest interactions. Do you prioritize straightforward, budget-friendly solutions or a full-featured platform that covers multiple guest touchpoints?
If your hotel needs an all-in-one guest engagement platform capable of supporting multiple functions—like mobile check-in, in-app room requests, and integrations—Runtriz is the clear choice, especially given its 14 verified partners and extensive feature list. Its high hotel segment coverage and 4.77/5 overall rating, backed by 37 reviews, make it suitable for larger or more complex properties.
If your hotel prioritizes simplicity, cost-efficiency, and quick deployment, Orana Stay’s single base price of $400 and two recent reviews suggest it might be a better fit. It’s perfect for boutique hotels or properties seeking a straightforward digital guest guide without extensive features.
For properties with limited budgets but a desire for a solid digital presence, Runtriz’s broader feature set and proven track record make it the more compelling option.
Orana Stay boasts a perfect ease-of-use rating of 5/5 from its two reviews, with users praising its straightforward setup and intuitive updates. Its onboarding process is rated highly at 5/5, with reviews emphasizing how quickly staff adopted the app and how it simplified guest communication.
Runtriz scores 4.66/5 on ease of use, with reviews describing the platform as "easy to understand" and "simple to use," although some mention that better visual design could improve experience. Its onboarding process is rated slightly lower at 4.23/5, with a few reviews noting initial learning curves.
Edge: Orana Stay.
Runtriz offers 12 features, including mobile check-in, mobile checkout, room service ordering, and in-room controls, which are absent in Orana Stay. Its capacity for in-app booking, mobile payments, and multilingual support broadens its utility for hotels aiming for a full-service guest app.
Orana Stay provides a digital concierge with booking capabilities, maps, weather updates, and direct communication, but it lacks specific features like mobile check-in or room service ordering. Given its limited features, it’s best for hotels seeking a straightforward guest information app.
Runtriz’s additional features make it more suitable for properties aiming for operational automation and revenue growth.
Edge: Runtriz.
Orana Stay’s reviews highlight a perfect 5/5 support rating, with comments praising quick responses and easy communication with the Australian developer. Its small size and recent reviews suggest a personalized, attentive support experience.
Runtriz scores 4.51/5, with users appreciating the platform's overall responsiveness but sometimes citing issues with communication consistency and integration challenges. Larger hotels and chains may value Runtriz’s broad support network and extensive resources, though.
Edge: Orana Stay.
Runtriz integrates with 14 verified partners, including major PMS and access control brands like Oracle Hospitality, SALTO Systems, and Vingcard, supporting features like mobile keys and in-room controls. This makes it highly adaptable for hotels seeking seamless operational links.
Orana Stay offers 6 verified integrations with PMS and booking engines such as Cloudbeds and Guesty, but it lacks the extensive array of integrations Runtriz provides. If integrations are critical to your property’s tech stack, Runtriz’s broader partner network is advantageous.
Edge: Runtriz.
Runtriz’s reviews, totaling 37, highlight a high overall rating of 4.77/5, with specific praise for its communication features and ease of use across diverse hotel segments. Its recent reviews confirm ongoing satisfaction, especially among branded hotels, resorts, and limited-service properties.
Orana Stay’s reviews are fewer, both rated 5/5, with comments emphasizing simplicity and cost-effectiveness. However, the limited review count diminishes confidence in consistent performance.
Given the volume and recency, Runtriz’s higher ratings reflect broader hotel satisfaction.
Edge: Runtriz.
Orana Stay’s pricing is straightforward at $400 per month, with no free tier or trial. Its single price point simplifies budgeting for boutique hotels or properties with tight operational budgets.
Runtriz does not publicly disclose its pricing, which is typical for enterprise platforms. Its costs can vary based on features, size, and customization needs, often making it more suitable for larger properties with flexible budgets.
If predictable, transparent costs matter to you, Orana Stay offers a clear pricing structure; otherwise, obtain a custom quote from Runtriz.
The core difference lies in scope: Orana Stay offers a simple, budget-friendly app ideal for boutique hotels seeking basic guest information and contactless features. Runtriz provides a more extensive suite of tools suitable for larger or more complex properties that want to automate operations and generate additional revenue.
If your hotel needs a straightforward, low-cost app with excellent support and recent positive reviews, Orana Stay is worth considering. Its limited features and small review base make it less suitable for properties requiring full operational integration.
For hotels looking for a scalable, feature-rich platform with proven performance, extensive integrations, and broader market presence, Runtriz is the more dependable choice. Its high review count and recent ratings confirm its ability to meet diverse hotel needs.
In conclusion, if you prioritize simplicity and value, go with Orana Stay. If your goal is operational automation, guest engagement, and revenue growth, choose Runtriz.
酒店客人应用程序 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Orana Stay 和 Runtriz 共享 8 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 客房服务订购 | ||
| 应用下载 | ||
| 手机值机 | ||
| 移动结帐 |
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Runtriz 因其能够促进酒店员工与客人之间轻松高效的沟通而受到称赞。它支持到达前通知、实时消息和服务请求,从而提高客人满意度和运营效率。
总体而言,该平台对员工和客人来说都十分友好且直观。不过,一些用户指出,界面可以更加现代化和更具视觉吸引力,这表明在审美方面还有待改进。
该工具通过移动预登记和实时通知等功能简化并加快了登记流程,减少了等待时间并提升了客人体验。但是,我们注意到,在正确集成和客人对预登记的理解方面存在一些... 该工具通过移动预登记和实时通知等功能简化并加快了登记流程,减少了等待时间并提升了客人体验。但是,我们注意到,在正确集成和客人对预登记的理解方面存在一些问题。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Runtriz 允许高度自定义设置模板和自动响应,用户发现这对简化操作和增强客户互动大有裨益。但是,建议改进这些功能的后端支持。
有些客人误解了入住前流程,以为这意味着他们已经完全入住,从而导致混乱和不满。更清晰的沟通和指示可以缓解这些问题。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Orana Stay 和 Runtriz 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Orana Stay 提供 6 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Runtriz 提供 14 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Orana Stay 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Orana Stay:否。Runtriz:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Orana Software 的 HT Score 为 0,Runtriz 的为 21。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问