The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 986 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Mews 表现出色 在 ease of use and ROI 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
roommaster 表现出色 在 客户支持 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue Management Module and Native Email Marketing.
基于 HTR 上 986 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $900/mo | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 886 | 100 |
在分析了 986 条经验证的评价后,Mews 用户最看重其 customization and flexibility, automation and efficiency, 入职和支持体验,而 roommaster 用户则强调 客户支持, 预订管理, 集中式数据管理。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
+
入职和支持体验
▾
|
+
集中式数据管理
▾
|
|
+
Reservation and Front Desk Automation
▾
|
+
云和移动访问
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
计费复杂性和报告局限性
▾
|
−
报告生成
▾
|
|
−
收益管理
▾
|
−
用户界面体验
▾
|
|
−
定价和费用
▾
|
−
团体预订功能
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #3 329 条评价 | #30 26 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #1 397 条评价 | #13 54 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #3 45 条评价 | #31 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #3 49 条评价 | #32 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #1 483 条评价 | #22 35 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #5 220 条评价 | #34 8 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 170 条评价 | #24 15 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #1 130 条评价 | #27 6 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #8 106 条评价 | #10 62 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #1 660 条评价 | #29 11 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #10 17 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #28 8 条评价 | #27 0 条评价 |
Choosing the right PMS can transform your hotel’s operations, guest experience, and revenue. Both Mews and roommaster aim to streamline workflows and improve management, but Mews’s higher ratings and recent reviews suggest it is the more established, user-friendly choice for modern hoteliers. Do you want a flexible, scalable platform with a broad ecosystem, or a centralized, data-rich system tailored for independent hotels?
Mews and roommaster both address core hotel management needs, including reservations, front desk operations, and guest communications. However, Mews’s cloud-native approach offers real-time access and extensive third-party integrations, giving your team flexibility. Meanwhile, roommaster emphasizes centralized data and detailed reporting, ideal for data-driven decisions but with a potentially steeper learning curve. Which aligns better with your hotel’s operational style and growth plans?
If your hotel needs a modern, scalable, and easy-to-use platform with a strong focus on automation and guest experience, go with Mews. Its superior ratings (99.5 HTR Score, 4.62/5 overall) and extensive recent reviews support its suitability for boutique, city center, and tech-savvy properties. If your hotel prioritizes deep customization, detailed reporting, and multi-property centralization, roommaster’s strengths in these areas make it worth considering, especially if you operate in more traditional markets.
Mews’s UI scores 4.7/5, with recent reviews calling it "very user-friendly" and "easy to train staff on." Its onboarding process is rated 4.39/5, with many users praising its intuitive design and minimal learning curve. In contrast, roommaster’s UI at 4.22/5 is functional but more complex, with some users mentioning repetitive login requirements and a steeper onboarding. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 10 features exclusive to its platform, including multi-lingual support, guest CRM, ancillary revenue tracking, and tablet check-in, supporting a modern, guest-centric approach. roommaster’s unique features include native booking engine, POS, revenue management, and extensive reporting, totaling 11 exclusive features. Overall, Mews’s more diverse set of modern tools and integrations provide a slight edge in flexibility. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support scores 4.27/5, with recent reviews highlighting quick issue resolution and helpful onboarding, despite occasional bugs. roommaster’s rating is close at 4.25/5, with some users praising its support but others citing slow response times and limited help, especially over the phone. Given Mews’s larger review base and recent feedback, it’s better supported overall. Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified partners, including Criton, Orange Hotel Marketing, and Flexipass, among others, enabling extensive customization. roommaster has 56 verified partners, sharing key integrations like Sage and GuestRevu, but with fewer options overall. The broader ecosystem of Mews supports a more adaptable tech environment. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s ratings (4.62/5 overall, 98 recent reviews) reflect a consistently positive hoteliers’ perception, especially around ease of use and support. Most property types, including boutique and city hotels, rate Mews highly, with recent reviews praising its modern design and reliability. roommaster’s lower overall rating (4.33/5, 83 reviews) and focus on traditional markets make it less favored in recent feedback. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s base price is $900/month, with no freemium or trial options. roommaster’s base price is $500/month, also without a trial. While Mews’s higher price reflects its broader features and integrations, your hotel’s budget and needs should guide the decision.
Mews’s core advantage is its modern, intuitive platform designed for the needs of the contemporary hotel. Its extensive ecosystem, ease of use, and recent positive reviews make it the clear choice for most hotels aiming to enhance operational efficiency and guest satisfaction.
roommaster excels in centralized data management, detailed reporting, and multi-property control, making it suitable for established, traditional chains or hotels that prioritize deep data insights. However, its older interface and lower recent review counts suggest it may not keep pace with evolving industry demands.
If you want a highly rated, future-proof PMS that’s easy to adopt and supports rapid growth, go with Mews. It’s particularly advantageous if your hotel values automation, integrations, and a positive user experience.
Choose roommaster if your hotel relies heavily on detailed reporting, multi-property centralization, and customized workflows, and you’re comfortable with a more traditional interface. Its strengths lie in data control rather than guest-facing innovation.
In summary, for most hotels today, Mews offers a more compelling combination of features, support, and recent positive feedback. It’s the platform best positioned to help your team operate efficiently, delight guests, and scale smoothly into the future.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Mews PMS 和 roommaster PMS 共享 49 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 销售点 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 9 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 12 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
"From my point of view as an asset manager that has the responsibility to tell the owners about their investment, roommaster gives me all that information. It's easy to report and e..."
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
"We’re an independent hotel surrounded by giants, but roomMaster gave us the tools we needed to stand tall alongside them."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Users value Mews for its customizable workflows and flexibility in adapting to diverse hotel types and operational needs. Despite this, some note that... Users value Mews for its customizable workflows and flexibility in adapting to diverse hotel types and operational needs. Despite this, some note that more advanced configuration options, particularly in report generation and billing, could enhance the platform’s utility further.
The system is praised for automating many routine tasks like billing and invoicing, which reduces manual errors and allows staff to focus on deliverin... The system is praised for automating many routine tasks like billing and invoicing, which reduces manual errors and allows staff to focus on delivering a superior guest experience. However, some reviews mention that while automation works well, the billing process can sometimes be complex.
Mews 的用户引导体验并不稳定,一些用户称赞其亲力亲为的指导方式,而另一些用户则反映初始设置效率低下。随着时间的推移,支持团队的响应速度有所提升,提高了... Mews 的用户引导体验并不稳定,一些用户称赞其亲力亲为的指导方式,而另一些用户则反映初始设置效率低下。随着时间的推移,支持团队的响应速度有所提升,提高了问题解决率和用户满意度。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然 Mews 可以自动计费,但用户反映其复杂性以及报告和分析方面的局限性造成了困扰。改进这些方面可以为管理财务运营的用户提供更深入的洞察和更大的灵活性。
Mews 凭借其集成功能为收益管理提供了强大的基础,但用户指出,动态定价工具和高级分析方面还有改进的空间,尤其是在多物业运营方面。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然有些用户体验到了优质的客户支持,但也有一些用户反映服务存在不一致之处。他们认为,需要提升客服人员的专业水平和对用户问题的理解,才能提供更令人满意的... 虽然有些用户体验到了优质的客户支持,但也有一些用户反映服务存在不一致之处。他们认为,需要提升客服人员的专业水平和对用户问题的理解,才能提供更令人满意的服务体验。
预订管理被认为是RoomMaster的一大优势,用户普遍认为它操作简便、高效,能够妥善管理包括团体预订在内的各种预订。然而,部分用户也指出,RoomMaster在房间分配... 预订管理被认为是RoomMaster的一大优势,用户普遍认为它操作简便、高效,能够妥善管理包括团体预订在内的各种预订。然而,部分用户也指出,RoomMaster在房间分配列表和团体入住登记方面仍有改进空间。
RoomMaster从分散的人工操作方式转向集中式数据管理,因其减少错误、提高酒店运营可靠性而备受赞誉。用户非常欣赏将所有预订、宾客信息和财务数据集中在一个安全... RoomMaster从分散的人工操作方式转向集中式数据管理,因其减少错误、提高酒店运营可靠性而备受赞誉。用户非常欣赏将所有预订、宾客信息和财务数据集中在一个安全平台上的做法,这显著提升了工作流程效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
RoomMaster的报告生成功能虽然实用,但仍被认为有待改进。用户希望在创建和导出报告方面获得更高的效率和效果,这表明改进功能可以简化分析任务。
一些用户指出需要改进用户体验,尤其强调需要消除重复性任务,例如频繁登录,这会影响日常使用该软件的流畅性。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Mews PMS 和 roommaster PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Mews PMS 提供 336 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 roommaster PMS 提供 56 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Mews PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.1/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Mews PMS:否。roommaster PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Mews 的 HT Score 为 100,roommaster 的为 83。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问