RoomRaccoon HMS vs. Stayntouch HMS: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 September 4, 2026  ·  已分析 579 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 579 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

RoomRaccoon 表现出色 在 onboarding 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Post-stay emails and Pre-stay emails.

Stayntouch 表现出色 .

查看下方完整分析 ↓

RoomRaccoon HMS 与 Stayntouch HMS 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 579 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
81
0
推荐可能性
97%
99%
易用性
4.9/5
5.0/5
客户支持
4.7/5
5.0/5
性价比
4.7/5
4.9/5
起始价格 From $1,000/mo Contact sales
经验证的评价 572 7

RoomRaccoon HMS 与 Stayntouch HMS 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 579 条经验证的评价后,RoomRaccoon 用户最看重其 易用性, 客户服务, 持续改进,而 Stayntouch 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

RoomRaccoon RoomRaccoon Stayntouch Stayntouch
优点
+ 易用性
+ 客户服务
+ 持续改进
+ 集成与自动化
缺点
关键问题
定价问题
访客数据库透明度

RoomRaccoon 对比 Stayntouch:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 RoomRaccoon RoomRaccoon Stayntouch Stayntouch
小型(10-24 间客房) #5 214 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #8 50 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #4 18 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #8 2 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 RoomRaccoon RoomRaccoon Stayntouch Stayntouch
精品酒店 #3 245 条评价
豪华酒店 #4 149 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #5 70 条评价
长住酒店 #3 72 条评价

按区域

细分市场 RoomRaccoon RoomRaccoon Stayntouch Stayntouch
北美 #14 11 条评价
欧洲 #1 445 条评价
亚太 #8 9 条评价
中东 #17 3 条评价

The Decision

Your hotel is evaluating two top-tier hotel management systems: RoomRaccoon HMS and Stayntouch HMS. Both aim to simplify operations, increase direct bookings, and boost revenue, but they approach these goals differently. While RoomRaccoon offers a well-rounded platform with extensive features tailored for small to mid-sized independent hotels, Stayntouch emphasizes mobility and integrated workflows for a broader hotel portfolio. Which system aligns better with your hotel's unique needs?

Is RoomRaccoon or Stayntouch Better for Hotels?

RoomRaccoon and Stayntouch both aim to centralize hotel management, but their core strengths diverge. RoomRaccoon provides an all-in-one platform with a focus on automation, guest communication, and revenue optimization, favored by small and boutique hotels. Stayntouch leans into mobility, multi-property management, and a connected ecosystem suitable for larger or multi-property hotels. Do you prioritize a feature-rich, user-friendly system or a flexible platform emphasizing operational connectivity?

RoomRaccoon vs Stayntouch: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a straightforward, easy-to-implement system that consolidates PMS, channel management, booking engine, and guest communications, RoomRaccoon is the better choice. Its high review count (484 reviews) and 4.95/5 overall rating underscore its reliability, especially for small hotels seeking automation and revenue tools. Conversely, if your hotel requires multi-property management, mobile workflows, and a flexible API-driven environment suitable for larger portfolios, Stayntouch’s platform might be more appropriate—though its review count is currently zero, signaling less user feedback.

Is RoomRaccoon or Stayntouch Easier to Use?

RoomRaccoon boasts a 4.87/5 ease-of-use rating based on extensive reviews, with users praising its intuitive, user-friendly interface that simplifies staff onboarding. Its onboarding process is highly rated at 4.81/5, making staff training quicker and less disruptive. Stayntouch, lacking publicly available recent review data, has no scores or user feedback to compare. Edge: RoomRaccoon.

Which Has Better Features: RoomRaccoon or Stayntouch?

RoomRaccoon offers over 57 unique features, including special offers, automated reporting, multi-currency support, loyalty programs, online check-in, and revenue management—many of which are absent in Stayntouch. Stayntouch provides core reservation and operational functions but lacks the extensive native feature set found in RoomRaccoon. For small hotels seeking a comprehensive toolset, RoomRaccoon’s feature count provides a clear edge.

Which Has Better Customer Support: RoomRaccoon or Stayntouch?

RoomRaccoon’s customer support ratings are strong, at 4.74/5, with reviewers highlighting prompt, knowledgeable responses and proactive assistance. Some users mention occasional delays or technical issues, but overall, support is responsive. As Stayntouch has no recent review data, it's impossible to assess support quality definitively. Edge: RoomRaccoon.

Which Has More Integrations: RoomRaccoon or Stayntouch?

RoomRaccoon integrates with 88 verified partners, including key systems like GuestRevu, Paxxio, and WuBook, offering extensive connectivity for various operational needs. Stayntouch, with 199 verified partners, has broader integration options but fewer shared partners with RoomRaccoon, such as Sage and Volo. If your hotel relies on specific integrations, the larger partner network of Stayntouch is appealing, but RoomRaccoon’s proven compatibility with essential systems offers a dependable ecosystem. Edge: Stayntouch.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: RoomRaccoon or Stayntouch?

RoomRaccoon’s review score of 4.95/5 is backed by 484 recent reviews, predominantly from small boutique and independent hotels. Hoteliers praise its ease of use, automation, and revenue tools, indicating high satisfaction. With no recent reviews for Stayntouch, it's challenging to gauge user sentiment, but the absence of recent feedback suggests less current user engagement. Edge: RoomRaccoon.

How Much Do RoomRaccoon and Stayntouch Cost?

RoomRaccoon is priced at a fixed monthly fee of $1,000, with no trial or freemium options. Stayntouch’s pricing details are not publicly available, which may indicate a customized quote process. If predictable budgeting is essential, RoomRaccoon’s transparent pricing simplifies decision-making; absence of public prices for Stayntouch makes it harder to compare value upfront.

What Type of Hotel Should Use RoomRaccoon?

  • Hotels that operate independently or small boutique properties.
  • Teams seeking an all-in-one PMS, channel manager, and booking engine.
  • Hotels focused on automating guest communication and revenue optimization.
  • Properties aiming for quick onboarding with an intuitive interface.
  • Hotels needing multi-currency and multi-lingual support.
  • Not ideal if your hotel is a large chain requiring extensive multi-property workflows.
  • Not ideal if your property relies heavily on customized integrations outside of RoomRaccoon’s native features.
  • Not ideal if you need a system specifically designed for large hotel groups with complex operational hierarchies.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Stayntouch?

  • Hotels with multiple properties needing centralized management.
  • Larger hotel groups seeking mobility and flexible workflows.
  • Hotels emphasizing a mobile-first experience for staff and guests.
  • Properties looking for a modern, API-driven platform with broad integration options.
  • Hotel chains that prefer a system with customizable booking and operational workflows.
  • Not ideal if your hotel is small, independent, or prefers a straightforward, all-in-one platform.
  • Not ideal if you require extensive native revenue management or automated guest engagement features.
  • Not ideal if your team prefers in-depth, detailed customer support feedback and reviews—these are currently unavailable for Stayntouch.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

RoomRaccoon and Stayntouch aim to streamline hotel operations but serve different hotel profiles. RoomRaccoon excels with its broad feature set, ease of use, and strong reviews from small and boutique hotels, making it the safer choice for most independent hoteliers. Stayntouch’s strengths lie in multi-property management and mobility, which are better suited for larger hotel groups or properties with complex operational needs.

If your hotel prioritizes a highly-rated, user-friendly, all-in-one system with proven support and extensive native features, RoomRaccoon is the clear choice. Its recent review volume and high ratings reinforce its reliability and ongoing development.

Conversely, if managing multiple locations or integrating with a broad array of third-party systems is critical, and your hotel is prepared for a more customizable, API-centric platform, Stayntouch may be suitable, though its lack of recent reviews makes it a less proven option currently.

In summary, for most small to medium-sized hotels seeking a dependable, feature-rich system with strong user satisfaction, RoomRaccoon stands out as the better choice.

RoomRaccoon HMS 和 Stayntouch HMS 的价格是多少?

酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

RoomRaccoon RoomRaccoon Stayntouch Stayntouch
Starting Price From $1,000/mo

功能对比:RoomRaccoon HMS 与 Stayntouch HMS

这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。

功能 RoomRaccoon RoomRaccoon Stayntouch Stayntouch
会计与金融
86%
0%
多币种
礼品卡
直接计费
RevPaR 和 ADR 报告
交易电子邮件(预订、账单等)
自动化夜间审计
付款请求
营销与电子商务
64%
0%
原生电子邮件营销
团体预订引擎
网站开发
预订引擎
频道管理员
礼品卡
交易电子邮件(预订、账单等)
宾客沟通(短信)
原生电子邮件营销
宾客资料
客户关系管理
管理和配置
100%
0%
多种语言
多币种
集中用户和角色管理
用户管理
50%
0%
原生电子邮件营销
客人反馈管理
礼品卡
交易电子邮件(预订、账单等)
宾客资料
集中消息传递
前台
72%
0%
客人反馈管理
家政
物业管理系统
自动化夜间审计
移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本)
移动应用程序
日历视图
任务管理
自动提醒
宾客资料
平板电脑/自助值机
付款请求
集中消息传递
自动空间优化
群组管理
100%
0%
组功能
自动空间优化
宾客体验
70%
0%
客人反馈管理
礼品卡
集成身份证和护照扫描仪
数字注册
访客应用程序
网上值机
网上结账
宾客留言
交易电子邮件(预订、账单等)
平板电脑/自助值机
家政
67%
0%
家政
自动空间优化
客房服务手机应用程序
实时状态更新
自动分配
实时报告
轮班规划
员工信息
网上结账
付款
84%
0%
多币种
礼品卡
付款请求
直接计费
自动提醒
集成支付终端和读卡器
预订管理
75%
0%
评分购物模块
物业管理系统
RevPaR 和 ADR 报告
礼品卡
频道管理员
综合 CRS
拖放式磁带图
费率管理
自动空间优化
自动分配
基于规则的房间分配
交易电子邮件(预订、账单等)
收入管理
75%
0%
评分购物模块
收益管理模块
定价情报
频道管理员
RevPaR 和 ADR 报告
自定义费率
辅助收入跟踪
基本定价
税务与合规
75%
0%
符合 PCI 标准
符合 GDPR 规定
SOC2投诉
税务配置
支持与培训
100%
0%
全天候在线支持
食品与饮料
100%
0%
销售点

实际成果:RoomRaccoon 对比 Stayntouch(按业务目标)

我们分析了 9 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

增加收入和降低成本
RoomRaccoon Buff and Fellow 小型
+ 60% increase in RevPAR in a year by implementing RoomRaccoon
+ �s dynamic pricing tools.
+ 781% ROI on RaccoonUpsell subscription - RoomRaccoon

"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."

Frikkie du Toit
Frikkie du Toit
Hotel Owner
Stayntouch Stayntouch

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

提高运营效率
RoomRaccoon O'Two Boutique Hotel 小型
+ 307% ROI on Annual RaccoonUpsell subscription just from ancillary revenue
+ 46% direct bookings
+ Reduced human error by automating payments

"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."

Jayson van Noordwyk
Jayson van Noordwyk
General Manager
Stayntouch The FIDI Hotel 小型
+ Because FIDI Hotel's original Stayntouch build was still largely intact from its first implementation, the switch back required only a payment portal change, and reservations began flowing correctly right away. That was a sharp contrast to the other system, where duplicated reservations had left the hotel's books off for the entire year.
+ Onboarding support made the transition smooth on both ends: implementation specialist Angelique led FIDI Hotel's original Stayntouch go-live, and on-site trainer David supported the return migration. FIDI Hote's GM called David "a wealth of knowledge" who was "really hands-on" throughout.
+ FIDI Hotel also moved its payment processing to Stayntouch Pay, which simplified chargebacks that had previously required faxing and scanning paperwork. The hotel's CRS and its third-party housekeeping platform now both integrate cleanly with the PMS, and front desk staff get through common tasks in fewer steps than they did under the other system.

"We opened the Hotel with Stayntouch and enjoyed the platform. The processes are very streamlined, very simple, and they have really great people who work at implementation."

Lauren Badillo
Lauren Badillo
General Manager
改善宾客体验
RoomRaccoon Steenhof Suites 小型
+ 1836% ROI on RaccoonUpsell
+ 50% of guests check-in online
+ 127% increase in RevPAR

"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."

Stayntouch Stayntouch

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

RoomRaccoon 对比 Stayntouch:总结

RoomRaccoon
RoomRaccoon
4.9/5 来自 572 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

易用性 100% 正面

许多用户称赞 RoomRaccoon 具有用户友好的界面和直观的设计,这减少了培训时间,并能顺利融入日常操作,从而提高了整体效率。

客户服务 63% 正面

虽然一些用户称赞支持团队的响应速度和专业水平,但另一些用户则批评售后服务和响应效率不足,这表明客户服务质量存在不一致之处。

持续改进 67% 正面

用户赞赏 RoomRaccoon 的持续发展,包括 AI 的增强,这些都有助于提高销售和运营功能,展现了其对长期适应性的承诺。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

关键问题 100% 负面

多篇评论指出,售后支持不力、技术问题悬而未决等关键问题严重影响了用户满意度和对系统的信任度。

定价问题 100% 负面

一些用户,尤其是那些经营季节性业务的用户,认为该系统的定价过高,这影响了他们的决策,尽管他们认为该系统包含的功能很有价值。

独特功能

特别优惠和折扣 入住后电子邮件 入住前电子邮件 自动报告 关税
4.9/5 易用性 4.7/5 客户支持 88 个集成
查看资料
Stayntouch
Stayntouch
5.0/5 来自 7 条评价
5.0/5 易用性 5.0/5 客户支持 199 个集成
查看资料

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 RoomRaccoon 5.0 vs 0.0 (+5)
入职培训 RoomRaccoon 4.8 vs 4.4 (+0.4)

关于 RoomRaccoon HMS 与 Stayntouch HMS 的常见问题

RoomRaccoon HMS 能否替代 Stayntouch HMS?

这取决于您的需求。RoomRaccoon HMS 和 Stayntouch HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。RoomRaccoon HMS 提供 88 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Stayntouch HMS 提供 199 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Stayntouch HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.9/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

RoomRaccoon HMS 或 Stayntouch HMS 是否提供免费方案?

RoomRaccoon HMS:否。Stayntouch HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 RoomRaccoon HMS 和 Stayntouch HMS?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。RoomRaccoon 的 HT Score 为 81,Stayntouch 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取您的免费人工智能分析师报告

根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案

Ghostel icon
值得信赖
footer image 1 footer image 2 footer image 3 footer image 4 footer image 5 footer image 6 footer image 7

让我们查找您的酒店信息