The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 380 条经验证的评价后,Guestnet 用户最看重其 user-friendly interface, seamless information dissemination, 积极的宾客体验,而 STAY 用户则强调 客户体验优化, 移动和用户体验, 支持和服务。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
+
客户体验优化
▾
|
|
+
Seamless Information Dissemination
▾
|
+
移动和用户体验
▾
|
|
+
积极的宾客体验
▾
|
+
支持和服务
▾
|
|
+
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
+
灵活性和适应性
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Technical Issues and Performance
▾
|
−
CMS 和定制
▾
|
|
−
与外部系统的集成
▾
|
−
集成能力
▾
|
|
−
推送通知和提醒
▾
|
−
分析和报告
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #2 56 条评价 | #9 10 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #2 85 条评价 | #4 83 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #17 2 条评价 | #2 89 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #23 0 条评价 | #2 24 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #3 52 条评价 | #2 77 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #3 66 条评价 | #2 88 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #7 18 条评价 | #3 91 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #3 14 条评价 | #6 7 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #13 3 条评价 | #5 27 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #2 158 条评价 | #3 112 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #16 0 条评价 | #6 3 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #7 2 条评价 |
Choosing between Guestnet by Guestnet and STAY Guest App by STAY hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational size, and guest engagement goals. Both products aim to improve guest communication and streamline hotel services but approach these objectives differently. Guestnet offers a more comprehensive, customizable solution with a focus on integration and upselling, while STAY emphasizes operational efficiency and ease of use. Which solution aligns better with your priorities?
Guestnet’s robust feature set and higher industry recognition position it as a strong contender for hotels seeking deep integration and personalized digital experiences. STAY, with its user-friendly interface and proven track record with large hotel chains, excels at simplifying service delivery and operational workflows. Are you ready to compare these solutions in detail?
Guestnet and STAY both address the need to digitize guest interactions, but their core strengths differ. Guestnet’s platform is fully customizable, supporting multi-channel publishing, PMS integration, and features like mobile check-in and payments. Its focus on personalized, integrated communication enhances guest engagement, particularly for luxury and boutique hotels.
STAY, however, concentrates on operational efficiency, reducing front desk queues and enabling real-time updates via a mobile app, ideal for large chains and resorts aiming to streamline service and reduce costs. While Guestnet’s reviews are mostly older and less recent, its overall higher rating suggests a more established reputation. Which approach best matches your hotel’s digital strategy?
If your hotel needs a flexible, integrated guest platform that supports upselling, digital compendiums, and multiple communication channels, Guestnet is the better fit. Its strong PMS and third-party integrations, along with features like mobile check-in and payments, make it ideal for hotels prioritizing personalized guest experiences and digital engagement.
Meanwhile, if operational efficiency, reducing queue times, and simplifying staff workflows are your priorities, STAY’s intuitive app and automation features serve that purpose well. It’s especially suited for large hotel groups that want streamlined service and robust analytics. Given the recent reviews, Guestnet’s higher scores suggest a more trusted solution for sophisticated, personalized guest journeys.
Guestnet scores slightly higher in ease of use at 4.74/5 compared to STAY’s 4.78/5, indicating both platforms are intuitive. Guestnet’s onboarding process is rated 4.66/5, praised for its customization, but some users note that complex integrations can require IT support, which might pose challenges for smaller teams.
STAY’s interface is simple and user-friendly, with a CMS praised for its straightforward content management and quick content updates. Its implementation is described as intuitive, especially for large hotel chains already familiar with digital systems. Overall, STAY’s focus on simplicity translates into faster staff adoption. Edge: STAY.
Guestnet boasts 12 unique features, including mobile check-in and payments, alongside core services like multi-channel publishing, PMS integration, and guest communication. It also offers digital compendiums and upselling tools, making it a comprehensive platform for personalized guest engagement.
STAY provides 10 core features, emphasizing operational automation, real-time updates, and service digitization. Unique features include chatbots, automated replies, and message routing, tailored for enhancing operational workflows.
While Guestnet offers more features overall, STAY’s focus on automation and service efficiency makes it more suitable for large-scale operations. Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet’s support scores a remarkable 4.82/5, with reviews highlighting fast, helpful responses and proactive onboarding assistance. Users mention that Guestnet’s support team is always available to troubleshoot and help customize the platform, fostering high confidence.
STAY’s support is equally rated at 4.83/5, with users praising its quick, friendly help and effective issue resolution. Some reviews note that support hours are limited in certain regions, but overall, both vendors deliver excellent service.
Given the slightly higher recency and volume of positive feedback, STAY’s customer support edges out slightly. Edge: STAY.
Guestnet and STAY each integrate with 20 verified partners, including common integrations like Mews, enhancing their interoperability. Guestnet’s exclusive integrations include ASA Hotelsoftware, Hotelkit, and Websline, offering deep customization for PMS and service systems.
STAY’s unique integrations include hotelkit, apaleo, and Oracle Hospitality, enabling extensive automation and data flow across platforms. Both systems are well-connected but Guestnet’s broader range of niche integrations favors hotels with complex digital ecosystems.
Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet’s review score of 0/5 in overall rating reflects a significant gap, but this appears to be a data anomaly or outdated. The more recent and numerous reviews (206 from STAY vs. 152 for Guestnet) suggest STAY’s higher trust and satisfaction rating.
STAY’s reviews emphasize operational simplicity, real-time updates, and quick service, especially appreciated by large hotel groups. Guestnet, despite a high HTR score, has limited recent reviews, making STAY the more trusted choice today.
Edge: STAY.
Guestnet’s pricing starts at $500 per month, with no trial or freemium options. Its higher price point reflects its extensive feature set and integration capabilities, suitable for hotels with larger budgets and complex needs.
STAY’s base price is $300 per month, also without a trial, but offers a more affordable entry point for hotels seeking essential automation and guest engagement tools. Its lower cost combined with ease of implementation makes it attractive for mid-sized and large hotels.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers quick implementation over customization or has a limited digital infrastructure.
Not ideal if your hotel needs extensive customization or complex integrations beyond automation.
Guestnet offers a highly customizable, fully integrated platform designed for personalized guest engagement, especially beneficial for boutique or luxury hotels. Its extensive features and industry recognition make it ideal for properties aiming to elevate their digital guest experience and upsell effectively.
STAY focuses on operational efficiency, reducing wait times, and simplifying staff workflows, making it perfect for large hotel groups and resorts that prioritize seamless service delivery. Its user-friendly design and proven success with major chains underscore its value in streamlining hotel operations.
If your goal is a sophisticated, personalized guest journey with deep integrations, Guestnet is the clear choice. Conversely, if your hotel needs to improve operational workflows and provide instant updates with minimal complexity, STAY is the better option.
In conclusion, prioritize Guestnet if you seek customization and high engagement; choose STAY if operational efficiency and ease of use are your main goals. Both platforms are capable, but the current data favors STAY for reliability and recent performance.
我们分析了 15 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"The tools allow us to reduce paper and manual workflows. At the same time, the optimized communication saves time that we can now invest directly in our guests."
"Thanks to STAY, we offer our guests an interaction tool with our staff. We can make real-time decisions with it. This simplifies our staff's duties at the same time. The guest expe..."
"Guestnet allows us to provide guests with all important information 24/7, which significantly increases satisfaction. At the same time, the platform reduces our team’s workload thr..."
"Implementing STAY contributed to a significant increase in our revenue and customer satisfaction. The app pays for itself. We have seen significant increases in consumption for all..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Customers consistently praise Guestnet for its intuitive and user-friendly design that makes information easily accessible for both guests and hotel s... Customers consistently praise Guestnet for its intuitive and user-friendly design that makes information easily accessible for both guests and hotel staff. This feature is crucial for fast adoption and smooth operation, minimizing training time and error occurrence.
Reviews highlight that Guestnet effectively allows hotels to provide guests with all needed information, including local activities and accommodations... Reviews highlight that Guestnet effectively allows hotels to provide guests with all needed information, including local activities and accommodations, without the need for paper-based resources, enhancing operational efficiency.
许多评论者表示,通过 Guestnet 快速访问酒店服务和设施提高了客人的满意度,从而带来了积极的反馈,并有可能增加回头客的数量。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
While generally reliable, several users pointed out occasional technical performance issues such as slow loading times when used by multiple users, wh... While generally reliable, several users pointed out occasional technical performance issues such as slow loading times when used by multiple users, which could be improved for a better experience.
评论者们对 Guestnet 与当地旅游数据和酒店管理系统的集成表示赞赏,但也有一些评论者提到希望进一步集成,以增强自动化并减少人工操作。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便... 多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便利。
该应用的用户界面和移动体验因其直观和易于操作而广受好评。无论是酒店员工还是客人,用户都发现更新信息和管理内容非常简单。
STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现... STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现可持续发展目标。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
CMS 的亮点在于它的易用性和定制功能,但用户也指出了一些需要改进的地方,特别是在设计和功能方面的灵活性。
用户对 STAY 与各种内部应用程序和系统(包括 PMS 和 CRM 系统)的强大集成功能表示赞赏。这些集成简化了数据管理,并有助于为员工和客人提供无缝体验。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Guestnet 和 STAY Guest App 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Guestnet 提供 20 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 STAY Guest App 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。STAY Guest App 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Guestnet:否。STAY Guest App:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Guestnet 的 HT Score 为 96,STAY 的为 47。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问