The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #9 10 条评价 | #34 0 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #4 83 条评价 | #18 4 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #2 89 条评价 | #26 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #2 24 条评价 | #22 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 77 条评价 | #20 2 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #2 88 条评价 | #20 2 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #3 91 条评价 | #30 0 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #6 7 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #5 27 条评价 | #12 2 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #3 112 条评价 | #20 2 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #6 3 条评价 | #17 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | #7 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right guest app can transform your hotel’s operations and guest satisfaction. Both STAY Guest App by STAY and Zaplox Premium Guest App aim to digitize and enhance the guest experience, but they serve different hotel profiles and operational needs. Your decision hinges on the scale of your hotel, regional presence, and priorities like ease of use versus feature depth.
While STAY boasts a larger user base, more recent reviews, and a stronger global presence, Zaplox emphasizes contactless features and mobile convenience. Which solution aligns better with your hotel’s strategic goals?
Both products aim to digitize hotel services, reducing front desk queues, and fostering guest engagement. STAY focuses on streamlining internal operations through a comprehensive guest experience OS, providing features like multi-lingual support, extensive integrations, and analytics. Zaplox, on the other hand, centers on contactless check-in, mobile keys, and minimal staff interaction, emphasizing safety and speed.
STAY’s 206 reviews—many recent—give it a clear edge in credibility and user confidence. Zaplox’s three reviews are outdated and less diverse, making it harder to gauge current performance. Given the recent data, STAY’s solutions are more proven and trusted across a broader range of hotel types.
Your choice depends on your hotel’s size, location, and service model. If you operate a large, international chain or independent property seeking a flexible, feature-rich platform with extensive integrations, STAY is the better pick. Its high ratings for ease of use (4.78/5), support (4.83/5), and value (4.61/5) reflect strong user satisfaction.
If your hotel prioritizes contactless check-in, mobile keys, and safety during the pandemic, Zaplox’s mobile-centric approach might appeal. But with only three reviews—none recent—its credibility is limited. For most hotels, especially those in need of a robust, well-supported solution, STAY is the more reliable choice.
STAY’s user interface scores 4.78/5, and reviewers praise its intuitive CMS, simple implementation, and straightforward content management. The onboarding process is rated 4.63/5, with many users citing minimal training needs and quick adoption. Support responsiveness is high, though some wish for more phone support options.
Zaplox’s usability ratings are less clear, with reviews highlighting its simplicity but also citing issues like limited integration and older feedback about complex manual processes. Given the explicit praise for STAY’s UI and onboarding, edge: STAY.
STAY offers six exclusive features, including a chatbot, automated replies, message routing, web-app access, and multi-lingual translations—tools that enhance operational automation and guest engagement. Zaplox provides seven unique features, like mobile check-in, mobile key, and mobile payments, focusing on contactless convenience.
Both platforms share eight features, but STAY’s broader suite supports more comprehensive guest experience management. For hotels looking to digitize multiple services beyond check-in and keys, STAY’s feature set is more robust. Edge: STAY.
Reviews for STAY highlight a support team rated at 4.83/5, with many hoteliers praising quick response times and dedicated service. Customers appreciate the detailed onboarding and ongoing assistance, despite some feedback about limited phone support hours.
Zaplox support scores 4/5, with users noting quick responses but also mentioning integration issues and challenges with complex PMS systems. Given the higher ratings and more recent positive reviews, edge: STAY.
STAY integrates with 20 verified partners, including major players like Hotelkit, SiteMinder, Amadeus, and Hapi. Zaplox connects with 17 verified partners, including notable integrations like Stayntouch, SALTO, and Protel, but fewer overall.
Both platforms support key PMS and property management systems, though STAY’s broader partner network provides more flexibility. For extensive integration needs, edge: STAY.
In recent reviews, STAY’s overall rating is 3/5, with a high likelihood to recommend (96%) and more recent feedback. Its diverse user base includes large chains like NH Hotels, Riu, and AMR Collection, which praise its operational impact and user-friendliness.
Zaplox’s rating is 3.33/5, with only three reviews, all older, and mixed feedback. Its hotel segments skew towards boutique and city center hotels, but the limited review data weakens its credibility. Edge: STAY.
STAY’s pricing is straightforward at $300 per month, with no implementation or trial fees. Pricing details for Zaplox are not publicly disclosed, which may suggest a customized quote based on hotel size and needs.
Given the transparent, predictable pricing, STAY offers better cost clarity. Without clear data on Zaplox, edge: STAY.
Not ideal if your hotel relies heavily on personal service, or if your property is very small and prefers simple solutions.
Not ideal if you need a comprehensive guest experience OS or extensive multi-language support.
Core Difference:
STAY offers a broad, feature-rich guest experience platform proven across many markets. Zaplox emphasizes contactless, mobile key solutions for quick, safe guest access.
When to Choose STAY:
If your hotel needs a scalable, versatile system with deep integrations, extensive features, and proven support, STAY is the clear winner. Its large review base and recent positive feedback demonstrate reliability and user satisfaction.
When to Choose Zaplox:
If your priority is a contactless, mobile-centric guest journey focusing on speed and safety, and your property is smaller or boutique-style, Zaplox might suit your needs. However, its limited recent reviews and narrower regional presence are drawbacks.
Final Verdict:
For most hotels looking to improve operational efficiency, guest engagement, and future-proof their property, STAY Guest App is the more dependable choice. Zaplox is more niche-focused and better suited for boutique hotels with a specific emphasis on mobile keys and contactless check-in.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Thanks to STAY, we offer our guests an interaction tool with our staff. We can make real-time decisions with it. This simplifies our staff's duties at the same time. The guest expe..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Implementing STAY contributed to a significant increase in our revenue and customer satisfaction. The app pays for itself. We have seen significant increases in consumption for all..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便... 多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便利。
该应用的用户界面和移动体验因其直观和易于操作而广受好评。无论是酒店员工还是客人,用户都发现更新信息和管理内容非常简单。
STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现... STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现可持续发展目标。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
CMS 的亮点在于它的易用性和定制功能,但用户也指出了一些需要改进的地方,特别是在设计和功能方面的灵活性。
用户对 STAY 与各种内部应用程序和系统(包括 PMS 和 CRM 系统)的强大集成功能表示赞赏。这些集成简化了数据管理,并有助于为员工和客人提供无缝体验。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。STAY Guest App 和 Zaplox Premium Guest App 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。STAY Guest App 提供 20 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Zaplox Premium Guest App 提供 17 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。STAY Guest App 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 3.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
STAY Guest App:否。Zaplox Premium Guest App:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。STAY 的 HT Score 为 47,Zaplox 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问