Clock HMS vs. roommaster HMS:
あなたに最適なのはどちら？

Is Clock HMS or roommaster HMS Better for Hotels?

Clock HMS and roommaster HMS both serve the critical function of hotel management software, focusing on reservations, front desk operations, housekeeping, and guest communications. The two diverge primarily in their operational approach and feature set, with Clock emphasizing an intuitive, cloud-based platform designed for busy-day realities, and roommaster offering a comprehensive system with deep reporting and integration options suited to properties needing extensive customization.

Clock excels in ease of use, onboarding, and customer support, reflected in higher overall ratings (4.8/5 vs. 4.4/5) and strong user testimonials praising its intuitive interface and responsive team. roommaster offers a broader feature set including revenue management and spa modules, and a large report library, making it a fit for hotels that require detailed analytics and extensive operational modules. Both solve the fundamental problem of unifying disparate hotel workflows into a single platform that reduces manual effort and operational errors.

Clock HMS vs roommaster HMS: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your property values a modern, easy-to-learn interface with strong customer support and a system designed to reduce daily operational friction, Clock HMS is the better choice, supported by its 4.8/5 ease of use and 4.8/5 support ratings across 83 reviews. It particularly fits boutique hotels and city center properties, where staff turnover demands fast onboarding and a simplified user experience, as seen in its 4.9/5 ratings from boutique hotels (34 reviews) and city center hotels (23 reviews).

Conversely, if you manage a larger or more complex property seeking extensive reporting (270+ reports), direct integration with revenue management, and spa modules, roommaster HMS may be preferable. Its 4.6/5 rating over 17 recent reviews shows stable performance despite some interface criticisms. This product fits well with resorts (4.4/5, 76 reviews) and small-to-medium hotel groups requiring customizable dashboards and multi-property financial visibility.

Data for very small independent properties is limited for both, but roommaster’s longer market presence (since 1994) and broad feature set may appeal to properties needing a mature system. Clock’s more modern cloud-native design suits properties prioritizing operational speed and guest messaging.

Is Clock HMS or roommaster HMS Easier to Use?

Clock HMS holds a clear advantage in ease of use with a 4.8/5 rating on 83 reviews and an onboarding score of 4.7/5. Reviewers consistently describe Clock’s interface as intuitive and quick for new staff to learn, highlighting its visual calendar and drag-and-drop tape chart that simplify reservation management. For example, one user praised Clock’s ability to reduce training time and speed up operations, especially during busy periods.

roommaster HMS scores 4.4/5 in ease of use and 4.2/5 for onboarding across 166 reviews. Reviewers frequently mention its outdated interface and occasional slowness, which can hinder front desk efficiency and staff adoption. Several users report longer onboarding times due to configuration complexity.

Staff adoption matters operationally: Clock’s smooth learning curve reduces training costs and operational errors, while roommaster’s steeper ramp-up may require dedicated administrative resources.

Edge: Clock.

Which Has Better Features: Clock HMS or roommaster HMS?

roommaster HMS offers a larger number of unique features—30 compared to Clock’s 10—covering critical hotel needs such as native email marketing, a revenue management module, spa and wellness modules, a channel manager, and 270+ built-in reports. These features support hotels tracking ancillary revenue, managing discounts, and running complex rate structures. roommaster’s group functionality and automated night audit add operational depth for multi-property or full-service resorts.

Clock HMS differentiates itself with features like tablet/kiosk check-in, online checkout, a guest self-service portal, centralized messaging, and rules-based automated room assignments. These features enhance guest convenience and staff efficiency by automating front desk workflows and guest communications, reducing manual tasks. Clock’s integrated CRS and drag-and-drop tape chart streamline booking management and rate updates.

Operationally, Clock’s mobile housekeeping app and online check-in accelerate room turnover and guest arrival processes, benefiting properties with frequent check-ins and housekeeping coordination. roommaster’s 24/7 support and integrated payment terminal serve properties needing continuous operational support and robust billing.

Edge: roommaster HMS.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Clock HMS or roommaster HMS?

Clock HMS leads in customer support with a 4.8/5 rating across 83 reviews and onboarding at 4.7/5. Users frequently commend Clock’s responsive and helpful support team. One reviewer noted, “The team behind Clock listens to their customers and constantly improves the software.” Support responsiveness reduces downtime and helps resolve issues that impact daily operations swiftly.

roommaster HMS scores 4.3/5 in support and 4.2/5 for onboarding over 166 reviews. While many reviewers describe the support staff as knowledgeable and effective once contacted, several report long wait times averaging 25–40 minutes during calls, especially at peak times. This delays problem resolution, which can frustrate front desk and back-office staff.

Given the direct impact of support responsiveness on hotel operations, Clock’s faster, more attentive support improves the overall return on investment.

Edge: Clock.

Which Has More Integrations: Clock HMS or roommaster HMS?

Clock HMS has 109 verified integrations, nearly double roommaster’s 60, with 23 shared partners including major platforms like SiteMinder, GuestRevu, Triptease, and Revinate. Clock’s exclusive integrations include hotel investor apps, keyless mobile access with FLEXIPASS, and advanced revenue optimization tools like HQ revenue and RevControl, which support properties seeking cutting-edge revenue management and guest experience enhancements.

roommaster’s unique integrations include Sage accounting, GuestCentric, Vertical Booking, and M3, important for properties with existing financial software or regional OTA relationships. Both connect with popular OTAs and guest review platforms, but Clock’s broader partner network provides more options, especially for hotels focusing on keyless entry and advanced revenue tools.

Hotels with complex integration needs or specialized hardware should favor Clock due to its larger ecosystem. Properties relying on traditional accounting and regional channels may find roommaster sufficient.

Edge: Clock.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Clock HMS or roommaster HMS?

Clock HMS holds a higher overall rating of 4.8/5 from 83 reviews versus roommaster’s 4.4/5 from 166 reviews. Despite roommaster’s larger review base, Clock’s rating is more favorable and consistent. Recent review volume for roommaster is higher (17 in last 6 months vs. 5 for Clock), with roommaster’s recent rating stable at 4.6/5, but Clock’s recent reviews are too few to report a separate score, leaving overall data more reliable for Clock.

Segment ratings show Clock’s strength in boutique hotels (4.9/5 from 34 reviews) and resorts (4.9/5 from 21 reviews), outperforming roommaster’s 4.4/5 in resorts (76 reviews) and 4.4/5 in boutique (62 reviews). Clock also leads in city center hotels with 4.9/5 (23 reviews) versus roommaster’s 4.7/5 (30 reviews). roommaster rates better in vacation rentals (4.7/5) but with fewer reviews (10), limiting confidence.

Edge: Clock.

How Much Do Clock HMS and roommaster HMS Cost?

Clock HMS charges a base price of $600 with no implementation fee, no freemium option, and no published per-room or monthly flat fees. This pricing structure suggests a straightforward licensing model without hidden costs, appealing to hotels wanting predictable expenses.

roommaster HMS offers a base price of $500, also without implementation fees or freemium options. Pricing details beyond the base fee are not published, which may require direct vendor engagement for full cost transparency.

Neither product publishes per-room or monthly flat fees, so pricing comparison rests on base fees alone, with roommaster nominally less expensive upfront but without clarity on additional costs.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Clock HMS?

• Hotels that prioritize rapid staff onboarding and ease of daily operations, supported by Clock’s 4.8/5 ease of use and 4.7/5 onboarding ratings.
• Boutique and city center hotels, where Clock’s 4.9/5 segment ratings and visual, intuitive interface reduce training time and errors.
• Properties seeking a cloud-native, mobile-accessible system with tablet/kiosk check-in and integrated guest messaging that improve guest satisfaction.
• Hotels requiring comprehensive integrations (109 partners), especially those interested in mobile keyless access and advanced revenue tools.
• Teams wanting centralized messaging and rules-based room assignments to automate front desk workflows and housekeeping coordination.

Not ideal if:

• Your property needs extensive revenue management, spa, or wellness modules not available in Clock.
• You require robust native email marketing or 270+ built-in reports for granular operational analysis.
• You prefer on-premise software options, which Clock does not offer.

What Type of Hotel Should Use roommaster HMS?

• Resorts and medium-sized properties needing extensive reporting capabilities, supported by 270+ built-in reports and a revenue management module.
• Hotels requiring multi-property financial visibility and group functionality, as roommaster supports complex organizational structures.
• Properties that want integrated spa and wellness modules and a channel manager for OTA connections.
• Teams that benefit from native email marketing, guest CRM, and integrated payment processing to boost direct bookings and ancillary revenue.
• Hotels with internal admin resources to manage longer onboarding and potentially complex setup.

Not ideal if:

• Your staff requires fast onboarding and an intuitive interface; roommaster’s average 4.2/5 onboarding and interface criticisms may slow adoption.
• You need a mobile-first solution with tablet/kiosk check-in or mobile housekeeping apps.
• You prioritize responsive customer support, as roommaster’s reported long support wait times can delay issue resolution.

Clock HMS vs roommaster HMS: The Bottom Line for Hotels

Clock HMS and roommaster HMS both provide comprehensive hotel management capabilities but cater to different operational priorities. Clock’s strength lies in ease of use, fast onboarding, and superior support, paired with a modern, cloud-native platform that enhances guest engagement and operational automation. roommaster offers a deeper feature set with advanced revenue management, extensive reporting, and modules for spa, wellness, and group management, appealing to resorts and multi-property groups.

Choose Clock HMS if your hotel needs a user-friendly, mobile-accessible PMS that accelerates staff training and reduces operational complexity, supported by 4.8/5 ease of use and 4.8/5 support ratings. It excels in boutique and city center hotels where rapid adoption and guest messaging drive efficiency.

Choose roommaster HMS if your property demands robust analytics, multi-property management, and specific modules like spa or revenue management. Its 270+ reports and group functionality support resorts and larger operations, though it requires more administrative investment to manage the longer onboarding and interface limitations.

This comparison is clear: Clock HMS leads in usability and support, while roommaster HMS offers broader features and reporting depth. Your choice hinges on whether operational simplicity or comprehensive functionality is the priority.