The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
549件の認証済みレビューを分析した結果、GRANDのユーザーはを最も評価し、HOTELTIMEのユーザーはuser interface and learning curve, テクニカルサポート, reporting and analyticsを高く評価しています。各テーマをクリックすると、レビュー投稿者の声をご覧いただけます。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 長所 | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
テクニカルサポート
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| 短所 | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
モバイル最適化
▾
|
|
各セグメントのホテル経営者による認証済みレビューに基づく、施設規模・タイプ・地域別の不動産管理システムベンダー内ランキング。
ホテル規模別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小規模(10〜24室) ▾ | — | #5 219件のレビュー |
| 中規模(25〜74室) ▾ | — | #3 238件のレビュー |
| 大規模(75〜199室) ▾ | — | #2 46件のレビュー |
| 特大規模(200室以上) ▾ | — | #8 7件のレビュー |
施設タイプ別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| ブティック ▾ | — | #5 239件のレビュー |
| ラグジュアリー ▾ | — | #3 241件のレビュー |
| ブランド/チェーン ▾ | — | #4 143件のレビュー |
| 長期滞在型 ▾ | — | #4 49件のレビュー |
地域別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北米 | — | #52 4件のレビュー |
| ヨーロッパ ▾ | — | #2 384件のレビュー |
| アジア太平洋 ▾ | — | #5 111件のレビュー |
| 中東 ▾ | — | #1 21件のレビュー |
Choosing between GRAND PMS by GRAND and HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational scale. Both products aim to streamline management tasks, improve guest experiences, and centralize operations, but they diverge sharply in features, user feedback, and market presence. With HOTELTIME boasting a significantly higher review count and more recent reviews, it clearly holds a stronger position in the current market. Which system aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?
GRAND PMS and HotelTime PMS are both cloud-based property management systems designed to improve hotel operations. GRAND offers a single, intuitive platform that unifies bookings, housekeeping, billing, and reporting, with additional tools for event management and proposals. HotelTime, meanwhile, provides a broad suite of features, including reservations, spa and restaurant management, and extensive integrations, making it suitable for properties of all sizes. While GRAND’s interface emphasizes automation and simplicity, HotelTime’s strength lies in its extensive, feature-rich environment.
However, the critical difference is in their market credibility: HOTELTIME has over 430 reviews, with most recent feedback from the last six months, giving it a more current and comprehensive understanding of user experiences. GRAND’s lack of reviews makes it difficult to assess its real-world performance. Would you prefer a platform with proven market validation or a newer system with limited feedback?
If your hotel requires a flexible, feature-dense platform capable of handling complex operations across multiple departments and locations, HotelTime is the clear choice. It is suitable for properties of all sizes, including resorts, city hotels, and large groups, thanks to its extensive integrations and modules like POS, guest CRM, revenue management, and automation tools.
On the other hand, if your team prioritizes a straightforward, AI-powered interface that simplifies daily tasks and reduces manual work, GRAND could appeal — although the absence of user feedback makes this less certain. Hotels looking for proven reliability and broad functionality should lean toward HotelTime, especially given its larger, more recent review base.
HotelTime’s user interface scores a 4.66 out of 5 for ease of use, with many reviews highlighting its intuitive design, simple navigation, and quick onboarding. Support and onboarding ratings at 4.73 indicate your team will likely find it straightforward to adopt, with many users mentioning minimal training time and smooth implementation.
In contrast, GRAND’s review score for ease of use is 0, reflecting no data or user feedback. This lack of reviews makes it impossible to assess onboarding or user experience. Based on available data, Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime boasts 38 features exclusive to its platform, including EPoS, integrated CRS, guest CRM, automated night audit, mobile app, revenue management, and online check-in. Its broader feature set allows for comprehensive management of hotel and venue operations, reducing the need for multiple systems.
GRAND offers only one feature exclusive to its platform: guest messaging, with the remaining 13 shared features. Its limited feature count suggests a narrower scope, potentially less suitable for complex, multi-department hotels. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime consistently receives positive reviews about support, with a 4.73 out of 5 rating and comments like, “Support team is responsive and helpful,” and “Support staff are always on the other end of the phone.” Many users praise the onboarding process and continual assistance, which appears to enhance user confidence.
GRAND’s support ratings are at zero; no reviews or data are available to gauge support quality. Without recent customer feedback, the clear edge goes to HotelTime.
HotelTime integrates with 58 verified partners, including popular systems like Profitroom, Bookboost, and STR, offering extensive customization options. Shared integrations are minimal, but the breadth of available partners supports robust hotel tech stacks.
GRAND has no verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other tools and systems. For hotels seeking a highly connected platform, Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s overall rating of 4.83 out of 5, with 433 reviews, indicates strong satisfaction across multiple hotel segments. Recent reviews praise its flexibility, customer support, and features, with property types like resorts and city hotels rating it near perfect.
GRAND, with no reviews, cannot be rated by users. The clear choice based on user ratings and recent feedback is HotelTime.
GRAND’s pricing details are unavailable, but its base price is listed at $900, with no mention of freemium options or monthly plans. Conversely, HotelTime’s base price starts at $600, with similar no-trial, no-implementation fees.
Given the lack of detailed pricing for GRAND, HotelTime presents a more transparent and competitive model for hotels of various sizes.
Not ideal if...
Edge: Not recommended without more feedback on GRAND’s real-world performance.
Not ideal if...
Edge: Hotels that need a proven, feature-packed platform with broad support.
The core difference is in market presence and user feedback: HotelTime’s large, recent review base confirms its reliability and customer satisfaction, while GRAND remains largely untested in the field. If your hotel values a feature-rich, well-supported system, HotelTime’s extensive modules and integrations make it the stronger choice.
Choose GRAND if your hotel values simplicity, AI automation, and guest messaging, and if you’re willing to accept less proven performance. However, for most hotels seeking a dependable, full-featured platform, HotelTime provides a safer, more validated solution.
In conclusion, HotelTime’s broad features, proven support, and extensive integrations make it the preferred choice for hotels aiming for operational excellence. GRAND’s potential is evident, but without more recent reviews, its suitability remains uncertain. We recommend HotelTime for hotels prioritizing reliability and comprehensive management tools today.
8件の認証済みケーススタディを分析し、4つの主要ビジネス目標において各プラットフォームでホテルが実際に達成した成果を比較しました。
この目標に関するケーススタディはまだ公開されていません。
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
この目標に関するケーススタディはまだ公開されていません。
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
ホテル経営者が高く評価する点
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
サポート チームの応答性と親切さは高く評価されていますが、一部のレビューでは、テクニカル サポートの時間を延長することで、特に海外のユーザーに対して常時... サポート チームの応答性と親切さは高く評価されていますが、一部のレビューでは、テクニカル サポートの時間を延長することで、特に海外のユーザーに対して常時サポートが提供され、ユーザー エクスペリエンスがさらに向上すると指摘されています。
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
ホテル経営者が指摘する課題
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
独自の機能
評価が最も分かれる分野
お客様の要件次第です。GRAND PMSとHotelTime PMSは多くの主要なProperty Management Systems機能を共有していますが、それぞれに独自の機能があります。GRAND PMSは0件の認証済み連携パートナーを持ち、HotelTime PMSは58件を持っています。切り替え前に、上記の機能比較で違いをご確認ください。
小規模ホテルは使いやすさと迅速なオンボーディングを優先すべきです。HotelTime PMSは使いやすさで4.7/5対0.0/5とリードしています。透明性のある料金設定とトライアルまたはデモのオプションを探しましょう。各製品ページで施設規模別にレビューをフィルタリングして、同様のホテルからの声を確認してください。
GRAND PMS:いいえ。HotelTime PMS:いいえ。 どちらの製品も現在無料ティアを提供していません。ほとんどのProperty Management Systemsベンダーはデモまたはトライアルを提供しています — コミットする前に各社にご依頼ください。
HT Scoreは、ホテル経営者がホテルテクノロジー製品を客観的に比較できるよう、4個の基準グループと十数の変数を考慮した総合ランキングです。GRANDのHT Scoreは0、HOTELTIMEは92です。以下がスコアの算出方法です。
| 基準グループ | ウェイト | 測定内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 顧客評価とレビュー |
|
ユーザーはこの製品をどの程度推奨していますか? 評価スコア、レビュー数、シェアオブボイス、レビューの深さ、レビューの新しさ、成功事例 ▾ 最も重みの大きい要素です。平均満足度評価(推奨度、使いやすさ、サポート、ROI)、カテゴリー内の競合に対するレビュー総数、レビューの新しさ(直近6か月間に20件以上のレビュー)、固有のホテルクライアント全体のシェアオブボイスを分析して選択バイアスを検出します。 |
| パートナーエコシステム |
|
テクノロジーパートナーはこの企業をどの程度推奨していますか? パートナー推奨、連携数、連携品質 ▾ パートナー推奨を専門家の信頼票として評価し、認証済み連携の数、エコシステムの品質 — 連携パートナーの平均HT Scoreを評価します。より高品質な連携エコシステムを持つ製品は、接続されたテックスタックを提供する可能性が高くなります。 |
| 顧客中心主義 |
|
この組織はどの程度顧客中心ですか? 認定サポート、レビューの一貫性、プロフィールの完全性 ▾ 企業がHTRカスタマーサポート認定を取得しているか、長期にわたり一貫したレビュー収集を維持しているか(フィードバック主導の文化の指標)、機能、スクリーンショット、料金、特徴を含む完全な製品プロフィールを維持しているかを評価します。 |
| リーチ、継続性、リソース |
|
この企業のリーチとリソースはどの程度広範ですか? 地理的リーチ、継続性、企業リソース、トレンドスコア ▾ グローバルプレゼンス(対応国・地域)、安定性の指標としての事業年数、リソースの指標としてのチーム人数、直近12か月の購入者からの問い合わせ・レビュー・パートナー推奨・プレス活動に基づくトレンドスコアを測定します。 |
顧客評価とレビューは、HT Scoreアルゴリズムにおいて最も重要な要素です。HTRはランキング向上のための支払いを受け付けていません。すべてのレビューは認証済みです — 所属が確認されたホテル業界の実務者のみが評価を投稿できます。 HT Scoreの詳細な算出方法を見る →
製品推奨アドバイザー