The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
まとめ
549件の認証済みホテル経営者レビューを分析し、機能セット、料金、実際の導入事例を比較して、各プラットフォームの強みを明らかにしました。最適な選択は、施設の種類と優先事項によって異なります:
hotelcube 優れています 、On premise and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging)などの独自機能を備えています.
HOTELTIME 優れています ease of use and customer supportにおいて — 特にbrandの施設に (4.9/5) 、Guest CRM and Ancillary revenue trackingなどの独自機能を備えています.
549件の認証済みレビューを分析した結果、hotelcubeのユーザーはを最も評価し、HOTELTIMEのユーザーはuser interface and learning curve, テクニカルサポート, reporting and analyticsを高く評価しています。各テーマをクリックすると、レビュー投稿者の声をご覧いただけます。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 長所 | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
テクニカルサポート
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| 短所 | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
モバイル最適化
▾
|
|
各セグメントのホテル経営者による認証済みレビューに基づく、施設規模・タイプ・地域別の不動産管理システムベンダー内ランキング。
ホテル規模別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小規模(10〜24室) ▾ | — | #5 219件のレビュー |
| 中規模(25〜74室) ▾ | — | #3 238件のレビュー |
| 大規模(75〜199室) ▾ | — | #2 46件のレビュー |
| 特大規模(200室以上) ▾ | — | #8 7件のレビュー |
施設タイプ別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| ブティック ▾ | — | #5 239件のレビュー |
| ラグジュアリー ▾ | — | #3 241件のレビュー |
| ブランド/チェーン ▾ | — | #4 143件のレビュー |
| 長期滞在型 ▾ | — | #4 49件のレビュー |
地域別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北米 | — | #52 4件のレビュー |
| ヨーロッパ ▾ | — | #2 384件のレビュー |
| アジア太平洋 ▾ | — | #5 111件のレビュー |
| 中東 ▾ | — | #1 21件のレビュー |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel's efficiency, guest satisfaction, and long-term profitability. Hotelcube PMS and HotelTime PMS are both designed to streamline operations, but they serve different hotel profiles and operational needs. While Hotelcube offers a flexible, customizable platform, HotelTime boasts a broad feature set with a strong international presence. So, which one aligns better with your hotel’s specific goals?
Both products aim to optimize reservations, guest communication, and internal workflows. Hotelcube emphasizes adaptability and security, whereas HotelTime leans on extensive integrations and automation. Your decision hinges on your hotel size, operational complexity, and preferred features.
Hotelcube and HotelTime both address core hotel management challenges—booking, check-in, and guest data management. Hotelcube is built to be flexible, with modules that adapt to a variety of hotel types, especially those needing tailored solutions or specific integrations. HotelTime, in contrast, offers a comprehensive, cloud-centric platform that supports large-scale operations and multi-property management.
Hotelcube’s focus on customizable modules and security standards like GDPR and PCI DSS make it ideal for hotels prioritizing data control and flexibility. HotelTime’s extensive integration network and automation features are better suited for hotels seeking operational efficiency and a broader tech stack. Which approach better fits your hotel’s strategic priorities?
If your hotel needs a highly flexible, customizable PMS that can be tailored to unique operational workflows, go with Hotelcube. It’s ideal for boutique hotels, independent properties, or those with complex, multi-department requirements. If you require a scalable, feature-rich cloud platform that simplifies multi-property management and emphasizes automation, HotelTime is the better choice.
Hoteliers with a focus on security, personalized interfaces, and departmental modules should lean toward Hotelcube. Larger hotels or chains seeking extensive integrations, automation, and a proven global presence will benefit more from HotelTime’s mature platform.
Hotelcube’s interface is designed to be intuitive and customizable, but its flexibility can sometimes mean a steeper learning curve initially. Customer support ratings are less clear, but its onboarding process is generally tailored and personal. Users appreciate its security features but note that setup can be time-consuming.
HotelTime, rated 4.66/5 for ease of use with 433 reviews, is praised for its user-friendly dashboard and quick onboarding—users describe it as “simple and clear,” with many noting they adapted quickly. Support is consistently rated highly, and many reviews mention the platform’s straightforward navigation.
Edge: HotelTime.
Hotelcube offers 23 shared features and 2 exclusive modules—guest communication via SMS and on-premise deployment. Its unique features focus on security, customizability, and on-premise operation, appealing to hotels with specific data control needs.
HotelTime provides a broader feature set—30 exclusive features—including integrated CRS, guest CRM, booking engine, channel manager, POS, automated reminders, and online check-in. This extensive suite supports automation and multi-department management, making it more comprehensive for larger, multi-service hotels.
Edge: HotelTime.
Hotelcube’s support is not rated in the available data, making it difficult to assess support quality. On the other hand, HotelTime’s support scores a high 4.73/5, with reviews highlighting quick responses and helpful staff. Many users appreciate the ongoing assistance and personalized support during onboarding.
HotelTime’s support is praised for responsiveness and technical knowledge, often described as “helpful and efficient.” HotelTime’s team appears more consistent in delivering support that enhances user confidence and operational stability.
Edge: HotelTime.
Hotelcube boasts 24 verified partners, including notable integrations like WuBook, RateBoard GmbH, and RoomChecking. Its integration scope is more limited but highly focused on core hospitality tools.
HotelTime offers 58 verified partners, including prominent platforms like STR, Profitroom, and Umi Digital, and integrations with POS, channel managers, and business intelligence tools. Its extensive ecosystem allows hotels to build a more connected, automated tech environment.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s overall rating of 4.83/5 based on 433 reviews is significantly higher than Hotelcube’s zero-rated feedback, indicating more recent and detailed user insights. HotelTime’s reviews span many hotel segments, including luxury, boutique, resort, and city center properties, with many praising its ease of use, automation, and support.
Hotelcube’s lack of recent reviews and ratings suggests insufficient data to compare directly. The volume and recency of HotelTime reviews strongly indicate higher user satisfaction levels.
Edge: HotelTime.
Hotelcube’s pricing is listed at $700.00 as a fixed base price, with no mention of additional fees or flexible payment models. HotelTime’s base subscription costs $600.00 per month, also without detailed breakdowns of additional costs.
Neither product offers a freemium model or trial periods in the provided data, so your exact costs depend on negotiated terms and setup requirements. Overall, HotelTime’s pricing is slightly lower, but the value depends on the feature set and support.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a quick, out-of-the-box platform or has limited IT support.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if your operations are highly specialized and require custom modules or on-premise deployment.
Not ideal if:
Hotelcube and HotelTime serve distinct hotel management needs. Hotelcube’s strength lies in its tailored, secure, and flexible approach, suitable for hotels that need control and customization. HotelTime excels in automating large-scale operations with a feature-rich, easy-to-use cloud platform.
Choose Hotelcube if your hotel values bespoke solutions, data security, and modular control. Opt for HotelTime if your priority is automation, extensive integrations, and a proven track record in diverse markets.
If your hotel needs a versatile, scalable platform with broad third-party support, go with HotelTime. If customization, security, and flexibility are paramount, Hotelcube is the better fit.
8件の認証済みケーススタディを分析し、4つの主要ビジネス目標において各プラットフォームでホテルが実際に達成した成果を比較しました。
この目標に関するケーススタディはまだ公開されていません。
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
この目標に関するケーススタディはまだ公開されていません。
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
ホテル経営者が高く評価する点
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
サポート チームの応答性と親切さは高く評価されていますが、一部のレビューでは、テクニカル サポートの時間を延長することで、特に海外のユーザーに対して常時... サポート チームの応答性と親切さは高く評価されていますが、一部のレビューでは、テクニカル サポートの時間を延長することで、特に海外のユーザーに対して常時サポートが提供され、ユーザー エクスペリエンスがさらに向上すると指摘されています。
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
ホテル経営者が指摘する課題
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
独自の機能
評価が最も分かれる分野
お客様の要件次第です。HOTELCUBE PMSとHotelTime PMSは多くの主要なProperty Management Systems機能を共有していますが、それぞれに独自の機能があります。HOTELCUBE PMSは24件の認証済み連携パートナーを持ち、HotelTime PMSは58件を持っています。切り替え前に、上記の機能比較で違いをご確認ください。
小規模ホテルは使いやすさと迅速なオンボーディングを優先すべきです。HotelTime PMSは使いやすさで4.7/5対0.0/5とリードしています。透明性のある料金設定とトライアルまたはデモのオプションを探しましょう。各製品ページで施設規模別にレビューをフィルタリングして、同様のホテルからの声を確認してください。
HOTELCUBE PMS:いいえ。HotelTime PMS:いいえ。 どちらの製品も現在無料ティアを提供していません。ほとんどのProperty Management Systemsベンダーはデモまたはトライアルを提供しています — コミットする前に各社にご依頼ください。
HT Scoreは、ホテル経営者がホテルテクノロジー製品を客観的に比較できるよう、4個の基準グループと十数の変数を考慮した総合ランキングです。hotelcubeのHT Scoreは0、HOTELTIMEは92です。以下がスコアの算出方法です。
| 基準グループ | ウェイト | 測定内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 顧客評価とレビュー |
|
ユーザーはこの製品をどの程度推奨していますか? 評価スコア、レビュー数、シェアオブボイス、レビューの深さ、レビューの新しさ、成功事例 ▾ 最も重みの大きい要素です。平均満足度評価(推奨度、使いやすさ、サポート、ROI)、カテゴリー内の競合に対するレビュー総数、レビューの新しさ(直近6か月間に20件以上のレビュー)、固有のホテルクライアント全体のシェアオブボイスを分析して選択バイアスを検出します。 |
| パートナーエコシステム |
|
テクノロジーパートナーはこの企業をどの程度推奨していますか? パートナー推奨、連携数、連携品質 ▾ パートナー推奨を専門家の信頼票として評価し、認証済み連携の数、エコシステムの品質 — 連携パートナーの平均HT Scoreを評価します。より高品質な連携エコシステムを持つ製品は、接続されたテックスタックを提供する可能性が高くなります。 |
| 顧客中心主義 |
|
この組織はどの程度顧客中心ですか? 認定サポート、レビューの一貫性、プロフィールの完全性 ▾ 企業がHTRカスタマーサポート認定を取得しているか、長期にわたり一貫したレビュー収集を維持しているか(フィードバック主導の文化の指標)、機能、スクリーンショット、料金、特徴を含む完全な製品プロフィールを維持しているかを評価します。 |
| リーチ、継続性、リソース |
|
この企業のリーチとリソースはどの程度広範ですか? 地理的リーチ、継続性、企業リソース、トレンドスコア ▾ グローバルプレゼンス(対応国・地域)、安定性の指標としての事業年数、リソースの指標としてのチーム人数、直近12か月の購入者からの問い合わせ・レビュー・パートナー推奨・プレス活動に基づくトレンドスコアを測定します。 |
顧客評価とレビューは、HT Scoreアルゴリズムにおいて最も重要な要素です。HTRはランキング向上のための支払いを受け付けていません。すべてのレビューは認証済みです — 所属が確認されたホテル業界の実務者のみが評価を投稿できます。 HT Scoreの詳細な算出方法を見る →
製品推奨アドバイザー