The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
まとめ
549件の認証済みホテル経営者レビューを分析し、機能セット、料金、実際の導入事例を比較して、各プラットフォームの強みを明らかにしました。最適な選択は、施設の種類と優先事項によって異なります:
HOTELTIME 優れています ease of use and customer supportにおいて — 特にbrandの施設に (4.9/5) 、Guest CRM and Guest profilesなどの独自機能を備えています.
Lodgit Hotelsoftware GmbH 優れています 、On premiseなどの独自機能を備えています.
HTRの549件の認証済みホテル経営者レビューに基づく並列評価。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推奨度 |
|
|
| 使いやすさ |
|
|
| カスタマーサポート |
|
|
| コストパフォーマンス |
|
|
| 開始価格 | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| 認証済みレビュー | 549 | 0 |
549件の認証済みレビューを分析した結果、HOTELTIMEのユーザーはuser interface and learning curve, テクニカルサポート, reporting and analyticsを最も評価し、Lodgit Hotelsoftware GmbHのユーザーはを高く評価しています。各テーマをクリックすると、レビュー投稿者の声をご覧いただけます。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 長所 | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
テクニカルサポート
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| 短所 | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
モバイル最適化
▾
|
|
各セグメントのホテル経営者による認証済みレビューに基づく、施設規模・タイプ・地域別の不動産管理システムベンダー内ランキング。
ホテル規模別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小規模(10〜24室) ▾ | #5 219件のレビュー | — |
| 中規模(25〜74室) ▾ | #3 238件のレビュー | #75 0件のレビュー |
| 大規模(75〜199室) ▾ | #2 46件のレビュー | — |
| 特大規模(200室以上) ▾ | #8 7件のレビュー | — |
施設タイプ別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| ブティック ▾ | #5 239件のレビュー | #79 0件のレビュー |
| ラグジュアリー ▾ | #3 241件のレビュー | — |
| ブランド/チェーン ▾ | #4 143件のレビュー | #69 0件のレビュー |
| 長期滞在型 ▾ | #4 49件のレビュー | #53 0件のレビュー |
地域別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北米 | #52 4件のレビュー | — |
| ヨーロッパ ▾ | #2 384件のレビュー | #56 0件のレビュー |
| アジア太平洋 ▾ | #5 111件のレビュー | — |
| 中東 ▾ | #1 21件のレビュー | — |
Choosing between HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME and Lodgit Desk Hotelsoftware hinges on your hotel’s size, operational needs, and strategic priorities. Both aim to streamline hotel management, but HotelTime offers a more extensive set of features and a larger presence in the market, while Lodgit is valued for its simplicity and affordability. Your decision should align with what your team values most: comprehensive integration or straightforward usability.
HotelTime’s extensive review base, with 433 reviews and a 4.83/5 rating, makes it the more reliable choice for insights into real user experiences. Lodgit, with no recent reviews or ratings, offers limited validation, making HotelTime the clearer front-runner.
HotelTime PMS and Lodgit Desk both serve as property management solutions, but they differ significantly in scope and sophistication. HotelTime provides a cloud-based, feature-rich platform designed to cater to a broad range of property types—from boutique hotels to resorts—offering over 50 unique features, including integrated CRS, guest CRM, and automated night audits. Its robust reporting, automation, and extensive integrations support large, complex operations.
Lodgit Desk, in contrast, is a more straightforward, reservation-centric software with a focus on smaller properties, hostels, and guesthouses. It offers core functionalities like booking calendars, email templates, and basic reservation management but lacks the broad feature set and third-party integrations of HotelTime. Its primary appeal is ease of use, not comprehensive automation or enterprise-level analytics.
While HotelTime’s recent reviews highlight its stability, extensive feature suite, and responsive support, Lodgit’s lack of recent user feedback makes assessing its current performance difficult. For hotels seeking a complete system capable of supporting growth and complexity, HotelTime’s proven track record makes it the better choice.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-packed PMS capable of managing multiple departments—reservations, spa, billing, and more—HotelTime is the clear pick. Its suite of over 50 exclusive features, including real-time reporting, integrated payment terminals, and mobile check-in, suits larger or expanding properties looking for operational depth.
Conversely, if you prioritize a simple, cost-effective solution for managing bookings and guest communication, Lodgit may suffice. Its intuitive booking calendar, quick invoicing, and multi-language templates serve small-to-mid-sized properties or those with minimal tech requirements.
For boutique hotels or resorts planning to grow, HotelTime’s comprehensive platform provides the tools necessary to scale efficiently. Smaller properties with limited budgets and straightforward operations should consider Lodgit, but be aware of its limited feature set and lack of recent reviews.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime’s user interface scores a 4.66/5, with many reviews praising its intuitive design and streamlined workflows, facilitating staff onboarding and daily operations. The onboarding process earns a 4.63/5, and support is consistently described as responsive and helpful.
Lodgit Desk boasts a simple, reservation-book-like interface, making it easy for small teams to learn and operate without extensive training. However, because it lacks the richness of HotelTime’s features, its usability is more straightforward but less adaptable as your hotel grows.
Given HotelTime’s recent reviews, its user experience remains highly rated, especially for larger teams needing complex functionalities. Lodgit’s simplicity benefits smaller operations but might become limiting for larger teams or more complex workflows.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime offers over 35 features exclusive to its platform, including integrated CRS, guest CRM, online check-in, automated reminders, revenue management, and mobile apps. Its advanced modules support automation, role management, digital registration, and detailed reporting, making it suitable for multi-departmental management.
Lodgit provides core reservation functions and essential communication tools, with only one unique feature—its offline mode—making it less comprehensive overall. It lacks the extensive automation, integrations, and revenue management features that HotelTime offers.
If your hotel requires advanced automation, real-time reporting, or multi-channel integrations, HotelTime’s feature set clearly outpaces Lodgit. For basic reservation management, Lodgit’s limited features may be adequate, but its lack of recent updates diminishes its competitiveness.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime benefits from a support rating of 4.73/5, with recent reviews emphasizing quick, helpful responses and detailed onboarding assistance. Customers highlight their satisfaction with the support team's responsiveness, especially in complex implementations.
Lodgit, with no recent reviews or support ratings, offers minimal validation of its customer service quality. Its smaller team and limited user feedback suggest less capacity for extensive support, which could affect larger or international hotels.
Given the more recent and frequent positive feedback, HotelTime’s support is the safer choice for hotels requiring reliable assistance and ongoing training.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime’s 433 reviews with a 4.83/5 rating demonstrate strong, recent satisfaction across various hotel segments, especially in larger properties and resorts. The review highlights mention ease of management, automation, and excellent support.
Lodgit does not have recent reviews or publicly available ratings, so its reputation remains unverified. Its lack of validation makes HotelTime the more trusted option, especially given its proven track record and active user base.
For reliable user satisfaction, HotelTime is the clear leader, especially considering recent reviews.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime’s pricing starts at $600 per month, with no free tier or implementation fees. Its pricing reflects its extensive features, integrations, and support services. Details for Lodgit’s pricing are unavailable, which could suggest a more flexible or custom approach but also less transparency.
While HotelTime’s cost is higher, it includes a broad feature set, automation, and support, making it a valuable investment for medium to large properties. Lodgit’s affordability may appeal to small properties with minimal needs but at the risk of limited scalability.
If your hotel seeks an all-in-one, enterprise-capable solution, HotelTime’s pricing aligns with its extensive capabilities. Small hotels or guesthouses may consider Lodgit if budget constraints outweigh advanced features.
Edge: HotelTime PMS (for features and support matching its cost).
Hotels that should consider HotelTime PMS include:
Not ideal if:
HotelTime’s flexibility makes it suitable for various sizes, provided your property benefits from its extensive features and support services.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
Hotels and accommodations that should consider Lodgit include:
Not ideal if:
Lodgit’s simplicity suits small, low-complexity properties but limits scalability for growing operations.
Edge: Lodgit Desk.
HotelTime PMS is a broad, feature-rich platform backed by a large user base and recent positive reviews. It excels in automating processes, integrating systems, and supporting large or expanding properties, offering a solid choice for hotels seeking operational depth.
Lodgit Desk is a straightforward, cost-effective solution ideal for small properties with basic reservation needs. Its simplicity and ease of use appeal to limited-budget operations but lack the scalability and advanced features of HotelTime.
If your hotel aims to grow, manage multiple departments, and benefit from extensive automation, HotelTime is the better choice. For small, budget-conscious properties focusing solely on reservations, Lodgit provides a more affordable, uncomplicated alternative.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
不動産管理システム の料金はわかりにくいことが多いです。各ベンダーの公開料金データから判明している情報をまとめました。施設の規模に合わせたカスタム見積もりを必ずご依頼ください。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
HTRの製品データベースによると、HotelTime PMSとLodgit Desk Hotelsoftwareは16個の機能を共有しています。以下は主な違い — 一方にあって他方にない機能です。
| 機能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| オンライン24時間年中無休のサポート | ||
| クラウドベース | ||
| ゲストCRM | ||
| ゲストプロフィール | ||
| 敷地内に | ||
| 統合CRS | ||
| 自動ナイトオーディター |
主な違いを表示しています。これらの製品間にはさらに24個の異なる機能があります。
8件の認証済みケーススタディを分析し、4つの主要ビジネス目標において各プラットフォームでホテルが実際に達成した成果を比較しました。
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
この目標に関するケーススタディはまだ公開されていません。
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
この目標に関するケーススタディはまだ公開されていません。
ホテル経営者が高く評価する点
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
サポート チームの応答性と親切さは高く評価されていますが、一部のレビューでは、テクニカル サポートの時間を延長することで、特に海外のユーザーに対して常時... サポート チームの応答性と親切さは高く評価されていますが、一部のレビューでは、テクニカル サポートの時間を延長することで、特に海外のユーザーに対して常時サポートが提供され、ユーザー エクスペリエンスがさらに向上すると指摘されています。
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
ホテル経営者が指摘する課題
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
高評価の分野
独自の機能
評価が最も分かれる分野
お客様の要件次第です。HotelTime PMSとLodgit Desk Hotelsoftwareは多くの主要なProperty Management Systems機能を共有していますが、それぞれに独自の機能があります。HotelTime PMSは58件の認証済み連携パートナーを持ち、Lodgit Desk Hotelsoftwareは0件を持っています。切り替え前に、上記の機能比較で違いをご確認ください。
小規模ホテルは使いやすさと迅速なオンボーディングを優先すべきです。HotelTime PMSは使いやすさで4.7/5対0.0/5とリードしています。透明性のある料金設定とトライアルまたはデモのオプションを探しましょう。各製品ページで施設規模別にレビューをフィルタリングして、同様のホテルからの声を確認してください。
HotelTime PMS:いいえ。Lodgit Desk Hotelsoftware:いいえ。 どちらの製品も現在無料ティアを提供していません。ほとんどのProperty Management Systemsベンダーはデモまたはトライアルを提供しています — コミットする前に各社にご依頼ください。
HT Scoreは、ホテル経営者がホテルテクノロジー製品を客観的に比較できるよう、4個の基準グループと十数の変数を考慮した総合ランキングです。HOTELTIMEのHT Scoreは92、Lodgit Hotelsoftware GmbHは0です。以下がスコアの算出方法です。
| 基準グループ | ウェイト | 測定内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 顧客評価とレビュー |
|
ユーザーはこの製品をどの程度推奨していますか? 評価スコア、レビュー数、シェアオブボイス、レビューの深さ、レビューの新しさ、成功事例 ▾ 最も重みの大きい要素です。平均満足度評価(推奨度、使いやすさ、サポート、ROI)、カテゴリー内の競合に対するレビュー総数、レビューの新しさ(直近6か月間に20件以上のレビュー)、固有のホテルクライアント全体のシェアオブボイスを分析して選択バイアスを検出します。 |
| パートナーエコシステム |
|
テクノロジーパートナーはこの企業をどの程度推奨していますか? パートナー推奨、連携数、連携品質 ▾ パートナー推奨を専門家の信頼票として評価し、認証済み連携の数、エコシステムの品質 — 連携パートナーの平均HT Scoreを評価します。より高品質な連携エコシステムを持つ製品は、接続されたテックスタックを提供する可能性が高くなります。 |
| 顧客中心主義 |
|
この組織はどの程度顧客中心ですか? 認定サポート、レビューの一貫性、プロフィールの完全性 ▾ 企業がHTRカスタマーサポート認定を取得しているか、長期にわたり一貫したレビュー収集を維持しているか(フィードバック主導の文化の指標)、機能、スクリーンショット、料金、特徴を含む完全な製品プロフィールを維持しているかを評価します。 |
| リーチ、継続性、リソース |
|
この企業のリーチとリソースはどの程度広範ですか? 地理的リーチ、継続性、企業リソース、トレンドスコア ▾ グローバルプレゼンス(対応国・地域)、安定性の指標としての事業年数、リソースの指標としてのチーム人数、直近12か月の購入者からの問い合わせ・レビュー・パートナー推奨・プレス活動に基づくトレンドスコアを測定します。 |
顧客評価とレビューは、HT Scoreアルゴリズムにおいて最も重要な要素です。HTRはランキング向上のための支払いを受け付けていません。すべてのレビューは認証済みです — 所属が確認されたホテル業界の実務者のみが評価を投稿できます。 HT Scoreの詳細な算出方法を見る →
製品推奨アドバイザー