The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Samenvatting
We hebben 887 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen geanalyseerd, functiesets, prijzen en praktijkcasestudies vergeleken om te bepalen waar elk platform uitblinkt. De juiste keuze hangt af van uw type accommodatie en prioriteiten:
AsyaSoft blinkt uit .
Mews blinkt uit in ease of use and customer support — vooral voor independent accommodaties (4.9/5) , met exclusieve functies zoals Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Zij-aan-zij beoordelingen op basis van 887 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen op HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen |
|
|
| Gebruiksgemak |
|
|
| Klantenondersteuning |
|
|
| Prijs-kwaliteitverhouding |
|
|
| Vanafprijs | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Geverifieerde beoordelingen | 0 | 887 |
Na analyse van 887 geverifieerde beoordelingen waarderen AsyaSoft-gebruikers vooral de , terwijl Mews-gebruikers de ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility benadrukken. Klik op een thema om te zien wat beoordelaars zeggen.
| AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|
| Voordelen | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Inwerken en ondersteuning
▾
|
|
| Nadelen | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapportage en analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Hoe elk product scoort onder Vastgoedbeheersystemen-leveranciers voor verschillende accommodatiegroottes, -typen en regio's — op basis van geverifieerde beoordelingen van hoteliers in elk segment.
Op hotelgrootte
| Segment | AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| Klein (10-24 kamers) ▾ | — | #3 329 beoordelingen |
| Middelgroot (25-74 kamers) ▾ | — | #1 397 beoordelingen |
| Groot (75-199 kamers) ▾ | — | #3 45 beoordelingen |
| Extra groot (200+ kamers) ▾ | — | #3 49 beoordelingen |
Op accommodatietype
| Segment | AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 beoordelingen |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #5 220 beoordelingen |
| Merk / Keten ▾ | — | #2 170 beoordelingen |
| Langverblijf ▾ | — | #1 130 beoordelingen |
Op regio
| Segment | AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| Noord-Amerika ▾ | — | #8 106 beoordelingen |
| Europa ▾ | — | #1 660 beoordelingen |
| Azië-Pacific ▾ | — | #10 17 beoordelingen |
| Midden-Oosten ▾ | — | #28 8 beoordelingen |
Choosing between AsyaSoft PMS and Mews PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, the size of your operation, and your growth ambitions. While both promise to manage reservations and operations, their core strengths diverge significantly—AsyaSoft offers a minimal presence and limited features, whereas Mews is a comprehensive, cloud-based platform with a large, recent review base. Which solution better aligns with your hotel’s future?
AsyaSoft by AsyaSoft appears to target small, possibly local hotels with limited operational scope, evident from its zero reviews and lack of regional presence. In contrast, Mews boasts over 750 reviews, a 4.62/5 overall rating, and a presence in 54 countries, making it a globally recognized industry leader. Do you want a system that’s tried, tested, and widely adopted?
While AsyaSoft’s rating is nonexistent, Mews’s high scores in ease of use, support, and value—each above 4.2/5—highlight its maturity and user satisfaction. Mews’s recent reviews, especially those from hotels emphasizing enhanced operational efficiency, reinforce its reliability. Are you ready to invest in a proven platform with a broad ecosystem?
If your hotel needs a flexible, feature-rich system capable of scaling across multiple properties, Mews is the clear choice. It’s especially suitable for boutique hotels, hostels, and chains eager for automation, integrations, and modern guest experiences. If your hotel is small, with limited operations and no regional expansion plans, AsyaSoft could suffice—though its lack of recent reviews raises questions about long-term viability.
For hotels prioritizing guest convenience, automation, and growth, Mews’s extensive feature set—including booking engine, guest CRM, channel management, and reporting—delivers immediate value. Conversely, AsyaSoft’s limited profile suggests it’s more of a local, perhaps legacy, solution without the capacity to support complex or expanding operations. Which aligns better with your strategic goals?
Mews scores 4.7/5 for ease of use, with recent reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding. Hotels like Leven Manchester and The Neighborhood Hotel commend its modern design and simple navigation, with many noting quick setup times. Its cloud-native platform allows staff to work remotely, further enhancing usability.
AsyaSoft’s UI and onboarding experience are unreviewed, but given its negligible review count, user feedback is unavailable. The absence of recent data suggests it may lack the refinements and modern design features that make Mews so user-friendly. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 unique features, including multi-lingual and multi-currency support, revenue management, integrated channel management, guest CRM, online check-in, and real-time reporting. Its open API and marketplace enable extensive customization, with integrations that cover payments, housekeeping, group bookings, and more.
AsyaSoft has no verified features or integrations listed, indicating a minimal or legacy system that likely lacks the advanced functionalities needed for today’s hospitality demands. The sheer volume and depth of Mews’s features provide your team with tools to optimize operations and guest experiences. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support scores 4.27/5, with recent reviews reflecting prompt responsiveness and ongoing updates. Hotels like The Julius Prague and Hotel Lancaster appreciate Mews’s support teams, citing quick bug fixes and helpful onboarding, especially through its 24/7 live chat and onboarding programs.
AsyaSoft’s review score is unrecorded; with no recent reviews, support quality remains unverified. The lack of feedback and regional presence suggests limited support options, which could hinder your team’s adoption and troubleshooting. Edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with over 336 verified partners, including top channel managers, revenue management systems, and payment providers. Its open API and Mews Marketplace offer access to over 1,000 third-party apps, enabling a tailored tech stack for your hotel.
AsyaSoft has no listed verified integrations, likely limiting its ability to connect with other essential hotel systems. For hotels seeking a connected, scalable ecosystem, Mews’s extensive integrations are a decisive advantage. Edge: Mews.
With over 750 reviews, Mews’s hotelier ratings—4.62/5 overall—are both recent and consistent. Hotels across segments, from boutique to large chains, praise its ease of use, support, and feature set.
AsyaSoft’s rating is nonexistent, and there are no recent reviews or property ratings to consider. The Mews user base’s positive feedback underscores its reliability for modern hotels. Edge: Mews.
AsyaSoft does not publicly disclose pricing, which suggests a bespoke or limited model, possibly with high customization costs. Mews charges a base fee of $900/month, with no implementation or setup fees, providing a transparent, predictable cost structure.
Without clear pricing for AsyaSoft, it’s difficult to compare value directly. However, Mews’s known pricing aligns with its comprehensive features and global support, making it a worthwhile investment for scalable growth. Edge: Mews.
Not ideal if your hotel aims for expansion, automation, or integration with third-party tools. AsyaSoft’s limited features and lack of recent reviews make it less suitable for modern, growth-oriented operations.
Not ideal if your property is very small, with minimal operational complexity, or if you prefer a legacy system with limited support. Mews’s broad capabilities and recent positive reviews suit ambitious hotels aiming for operational excellence.
Mews offers a modern, feature-rich platform supported by a large, active user base and recent reviews. Its cloud-native design supports automation, integrations, and scalability—crucial for hotels wanting to grow efficiently.
Choose Mews if your hotel needs advanced tools, international support, and a system that evolves with hospitality technology. If your operation is tiny, local, and needs only basic management, AsyaSoft might suffice, though its lack of recent reviews signals caution.
For most growing or modern hotels, Mews stands out as the more reliable, scalable, and feature-packed choice. It’s the platform designed to meet the demands of today’s hospitality industry—and tomorrow’s.
Volgens de productdatabase van HTR delen AsyaSoft PMS en Mews PMS 0 functies. Dit zijn de belangrijkste verschillen — functies die de een wel heeft en de ander niet.
| Functie | AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boekingsmodule | ||
| Gast-CRM | ||
| Gastprofielen | ||
| Meerdere valuta | ||
| Meertalig | ||
| Module voor inkomstenbeheer |
De belangrijkste verschillen worden getoond. 47 meer functies verschillen tussen deze producten.
We hebben 8 geverifieerde casestudies geanalyseerd om te vergelijken wat hotels daadwerkelijk bereiken met elk platform op vier belangrijke bedrijfsdoelstellingen.
Nog geen gepubliceerde casestudy voor dit doel.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nog geen gepubliceerde casestudy voor dit doel.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nog geen gepubliceerde casestudy voor dit doel.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Wat hoteliers waarderen
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Waar hoteliers kritiek op hebben
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Hoewel Mews degelijke rapportage- en analysefunctionaliteiten biedt, geven verschillende gebruikers aan dat er behoefte is aan meer aanpasbare en flex... Hoewel Mews degelijke rapportage- en analysefunctionaliteiten biedt, geven verschillende gebruikers aan dat er behoefte is aan meer aanpasbare en flexibele rapportagemogelijkheden. Gebruikers geven aan dat ze graag gedetailleerdere data-inzichten willen, met name op het gebied van reserveringen en omzetanalyse.
Unieke mogelijkheden
Waar de beoordelingen het meest uiteenlopen
Dat hangt af van uw eisen. AsyaSoft PMS en Mews PMS delen veel kern-Property Management Systems-functies, maar elk heeft unieke mogelijkheden. AsyaSoft PMS biedt 0 geverifieerde integratiepartners, terwijl Mews PMS er 335 biedt. Bekijk de functievergelijking hierboven om te zien waar ze verschillen voordat u overstapt.
Kleine hotels moeten prioriteit geven aan gebruiksgemak en snelle onboarding. Mews PMS scoort het hoogst op gebruiksgemak met 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Let op transparante prijzen en de mogelijkheid van een proefperiode of demo. Filter beoordelingen op elke productpagina op accommodatiegrootte om te horen van hotels zoals het uwe.
AsyaSoft PMS: Nee. Mews PMS: Nee. Geen van beide producten biedt momenteel een gratis abonnement aan. De meeste Property Management Systems-leveranciers bieden demo's of proefperiodes aan — vraag er bij beide een aan om te evalueren voordat u zich vastlegt.
De HT Score is een samengestelde ranglijst die 4 criteriagroepen en meer dan tien variabelen meeweegt om hoteliers te helpen hoteltechnologieproducten objectief te vergelijken. AsyaSoft heeft een HT Score van 0 en Mews heeft 100. Zo wordt de score berekend.
| Criteriagroep | Weging | Wat het meet |
|---|---|---|
| Klantbeoordelingen & reviews |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen gebruikers dit product? Beoordelingsscore, reviewvolume, marktaandeel, reviewdiepte, reviewrecentheid, succesverhalen ▾ De zwaarst gewogen factor. Analyseert gemiddelde tevredenheidsbeoordelingen (waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen, gebruiksgemak, ondersteuning, ROI), het totale aantal reviews ten opzichte van categoriegenoten, recentheid van reviews (minimaal 20 reviews in de afgelopen 6 maanden) en marktaandeel over unieke hotelklanten om selectiebias te detecteren. |
| Partnerecosysteem |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen technologiepartners dit bedrijf? Partneraanbevelingen, integratieaantal, integratiekwaliteit ▾ Evalueert partneraanbevelingen als expertstemmen van vertrouwen, het aantal geverifieerde integraties en ecosysteemkwaliteit — de gemiddelde HT Scores van integratiepartners. Producten met een kwalitatief beter integratie-ecosysteem leveren waarschijnlijker een verbonden technologiearchitectuur. |
| Klantgerichtheid |
|
Hoe klantgericht is deze organisatie? Gecertificeerde ondersteuning, reviewconsistentie, profielvolledigheid ▾ Beoordeelt of het bedrijf HTR Customer Support-certificering heeft verdiend, consistente reviewverzameling in de loop der tijd onderhoudt (een indicator van feedbackgedreven cultuur) en productprofielen compleet houdt met mogelijkheden, schermafbeeldingen, prijzen en functies. |
| Bereik, stabiliteit & middelen |
|
Hoe uitgebreid is het bereik en de middelen van dit bedrijf? Geografisch bereik, stabiliteit, bedrijfsmiddelen, trendscore ▾ Meet wereldwijde aanwezigheid (bediende landen en regio's), aantal jaren in bedrijf als stabiliteitsindicator, teamgrootte als middelenproxy en een trendscore op basis van kopersaanvragen, reviews, partneraanbevelingen en persactiviteit in de afgelopen twaalf maanden. |
Klantbeoordelingen en reviews zijn veruit de belangrijkste factor in het HT Score-algoritme. HTR accepteert geen betaling voor hogere ranglijstposities. Alle reviews zijn geverifieerd — alleen professionals uit de hotelbranche met bevestigde affiliaties kunnen beoordelingen indienen. Bekijk de volledige HT Score-methodologie →
Adviseur productaanbevelingen