The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Samenvatting
We hebben 887 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen geanalyseerd, functiesets, prijzen en praktijkcasestudies vergeleken om te bepalen waar elk platform uitblinkt. De juiste keuze hangt af van uw type accommodatie en prioriteiten:
Acantech blinkt uit .
Mews blinkt uit in ease of use and customer support — vooral voor independent accommodaties (4.9/5) , met exclusieve functies zoals Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Zij-aan-zij beoordelingen op basis van 887 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen op HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen |
|
|
| Gebruiksgemak |
|
|
| Klantenondersteuning |
|
|
| Prijs-kwaliteitverhouding |
|
|
| Vanafprijs | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Geverifieerde beoordelingen | 0 | 887 |
Na analyse van 887 geverifieerde beoordelingen waarderen Acantech-gebruikers vooral de , terwijl Mews-gebruikers de ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility benadrukken. Klik op een thema om te zien wat beoordelaars zeggen.
| Acantech |
|
|---|---|
| Voordelen | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Inwerken en ondersteuning
▾
|
|
| Nadelen | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapportage en analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Hoe elk product scoort onder Vastgoedbeheersystemen-leveranciers voor verschillende accommodatiegroottes, -typen en regio's — op basis van geverifieerde beoordelingen van hoteliers in elk segment.
Op hotelgrootte
| Segment | Acantech |
|
|---|---|---|
| Klein (10-24 kamers) ▾ | — | #3 329 beoordelingen |
| Middelgroot (25-74 kamers) ▾ | — | #1 397 beoordelingen |
| Groot (75-199 kamers) ▾ | — | #3 45 beoordelingen |
| Extra groot (200+ kamers) ▾ | — | #3 49 beoordelingen |
Op accommodatietype
| Segment | Acantech |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 beoordelingen |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #5 220 beoordelingen |
| Merk / Keten ▾ | — | #2 170 beoordelingen |
| Langverblijf ▾ | — | #1 130 beoordelingen |
Op regio
| Segment | Acantech |
|
|---|---|---|
| Noord-Amerika ▾ | — | #8 106 beoordelingen |
| Europa ▾ | — | #1 660 beoordelingen |
| Azië-Pacific ▾ | — | #10 17 beoordelingen |
| Midden-Oosten ▾ | — | #28 8 beoordelingen |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) is a pivotal decision for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest experience. Both Chr365 by Acantech and Mews PMS aim to simplify your daily tasks, but they diverge sharply in maturity, user reception, and capabilities. Is your team ready to adopt a system that’s proven to support modern hospitality or one still establishing its presence?
Chr365 offers a solution that’s less documented and reviewed, while Mews has a proven track record with over 750 recent reviews and a near-perfect rating. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s growth ambitions?
Chr365 by Acantech is a relatively unknown player with zero reviews and a very limited market presence, primarily serving niche or small-scale operators. In contrast, Mews boasts over 750 reviews in the last six months, with a 4.62/5 overall rating and a 9.12/10 NPS score, reflecting broad trust and recent positive experiences from users worldwide.
While Chr365 claims to address property management needs, its lack of user feedback and absence of verified integrations or extensive feature sets make it difficult to evaluate its real-world utility. Mews, however, offers a cloud-native, feature-rich platform that streamlines operations and enhances guest experiences, proven through constant positive reviews.
Are you comfortable choosing an untested system, or do you prefer the confidence that comes with a well-reviewed leader?
If your hotel needs a reliable, scalable solution with extensive integrations, choose Mews. Its ecosystem includes over 336 verified partners, supporting everything from channel management to revenue optimization, and it’s trusted by hospitality brands across the globe.
If your hotel operates on a very small scale or in a niche market where minimal features suffice, Chr365 might seem appealing — but the lack of reviews or proven performance makes this a risky choice. For any hotel seeking a mature, well-supported PMS, Mews is the clear winner.
For hoteliers prioritizing operational automation, guest engagement, and future-proofing, Mews’s extensive capabilities make it the logical pick. Chr365, lacking evidence of effectiveness or support, appears unsuitable for hotels looking to grow or modernize.
Mews scores highly for user-friendliness, with a 4.7/5 ease of use rating from verified reviews. Users highlight its modern, intuitive interface and quick onboarding, with many noting they can set up the platform within days and train staff easily.
Chr365, on the other hand, has no publicly available ratings or reviews, making it impossible to assess its usability or onboarding experience. Its limited documentation and absence of user feedback suggest a less polished, less user-friendly product.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 unique features, including revenue management, booking engine, guest CRM, channel manager, integrated POS, automation tools, and real-time reporting. These features are designed to support a full-scale, modern hotel operation and are regularly updated.
Chr365 provides no verified features or differentiators, which raises questions about its capabilities. Without a clear feature set or user validation, it’s impossible to compare it meaningfully to Mews.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support system has a reputation for responsiveness, with a 4.27/5 support rating from users who appreciate their quick resolution times and active customer success teams. Many reviewers mention that Mews support helps them implement new features effectively and troubleshoot efficiently.
Chr365, with no reviews or support ratings available, cannot be confidently evaluated. The lack of feedback suggests limited support options, which could be a concern for hotels needing reliable assistance.
Edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with over 336 verified partners, covering channel management, payment providers, revenue tools, and more. Its open API and Marketplace enable seamless connectivity, allowing hotels to customize their tech stacks.
Chr365 has no publicly verified integrations or partner list, limiting its utility in multi-system environments. For hotels seeking a flexible, connected platform, Mews’s extensive ecosystem is a decisive advantage.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s reviews are recent, over 98 in the last six months, with a 4.62/5 rating and 93% likelihood to recommend, across diverse property types including boutique hotels, hostels, and large brands. Hoteliers praise its ease of use, automation, and support, with many noting measurable operational improvements.
Chr365 has no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction or confidence. The absence of feedback significantly diminishes its credibility compared to Mews’s proven track record.
Edge: Mews.
Chr365’s pricing is unavailable, which is common among less-established systems. Mews charges a base price of $900 per month, with no implementation fees or optional charges, providing predictable costs.
The lack of transparent pricing for Chr365 hampers your ability to evaluate ROI, whereas Mews’s clear pricing structure supports budget planning and value assessment.
Given the lack of reviews and features, Chr365 is best suited for very small-scale operations with limited future expansion ambitions.
Mews’s versatility and extensive feature set make it suitable across virtually all hotel types aiming for operational excellence and guest satisfaction.
Mews stands out as the more mature, reviewed, and feature-rich solution with a broad ecosystem and proven customer satisfaction. Chr365’s lack of reviews, features, and integrations makes it a risky choice for hotels serious about growth and efficiency.
If your hotel needs a reliable, scalable platform backed by recent positive reviews, go with Mews. Its extensive features, support, and integrations justify its higher price point and make it the smarter long-term investment.
Choose Chr365 only if your requirements are minimal, your budget is tight, and you’re comfortable with the unknown. For most hoteliers, Mews is the safer, more capable choice to support today’s demands and tomorrow’s growth.
Volgens de productdatabase van HTR delen Chr365 en Mews PMS 0 functies. Dit zijn de belangrijkste verschillen — functies die de een wel heeft en de ander niet.
| Functie | Acantech |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boekingsmodule | ||
| Gast-CRM | ||
| Gastprofielen | ||
| Meerdere valuta | ||
| Meertalig | ||
| Module voor inkomstenbeheer |
De belangrijkste verschillen worden getoond. 47 meer functies verschillen tussen deze producten.
We hebben 8 geverifieerde casestudies geanalyseerd om te vergelijken wat hotels daadwerkelijk bereiken met elk platform op vier belangrijke bedrijfsdoelstellingen.
Nog geen gepubliceerde casestudy voor dit doel.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nog geen gepubliceerde casestudy voor dit doel.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nog geen gepubliceerde casestudy voor dit doel.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Wat hoteliers waarderen
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Waar hoteliers kritiek op hebben
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Hoewel Mews degelijke rapportage- en analysefunctionaliteiten biedt, geven verschillende gebruikers aan dat er behoefte is aan meer aanpasbare en flex... Hoewel Mews degelijke rapportage- en analysefunctionaliteiten biedt, geven verschillende gebruikers aan dat er behoefte is aan meer aanpasbare en flexibele rapportagemogelijkheden. Gebruikers geven aan dat ze graag gedetailleerdere data-inzichten willen, met name op het gebied van reserveringen en omzetanalyse.
Unieke mogelijkheden
Waar de beoordelingen het meest uiteenlopen
Dat hangt af van uw eisen. Chr365 en Mews PMS delen veel kern-Property Management Systems-functies, maar elk heeft unieke mogelijkheden. Chr365 biedt 0 geverifieerde integratiepartners, terwijl Mews PMS er 336 biedt. Bekijk de functievergelijking hierboven om te zien waar ze verschillen voordat u overstapt.
Kleine hotels moeten prioriteit geven aan gebruiksgemak en snelle onboarding. Mews PMS scoort het hoogst op gebruiksgemak met 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Let op transparante prijzen en de mogelijkheid van een proefperiode of demo. Filter beoordelingen op elke productpagina op accommodatiegrootte om te horen van hotels zoals het uwe.
Chr365: Nee. Mews PMS: Nee. Geen van beide producten biedt momenteel een gratis abonnement aan. De meeste Property Management Systems-leveranciers bieden demo's of proefperiodes aan — vraag er bij beide een aan om te evalueren voordat u zich vastlegt.
De HT Score is een samengestelde ranglijst die 4 criteriagroepen en meer dan tien variabelen meeweegt om hoteliers te helpen hoteltechnologieproducten objectief te vergelijken. Acantech heeft een HT Score van 0 en Mews heeft 99. Zo wordt de score berekend.
| Criteriagroep | Weging | Wat het meet |
|---|---|---|
| Klantbeoordelingen & reviews |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen gebruikers dit product? Beoordelingsscore, reviewvolume, marktaandeel, reviewdiepte, reviewrecentheid, succesverhalen ▾ De zwaarst gewogen factor. Analyseert gemiddelde tevredenheidsbeoordelingen (waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen, gebruiksgemak, ondersteuning, ROI), het totale aantal reviews ten opzichte van categoriegenoten, recentheid van reviews (minimaal 20 reviews in de afgelopen 6 maanden) en marktaandeel over unieke hotelklanten om selectiebias te detecteren. |
| Partnerecosysteem |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen technologiepartners dit bedrijf? Partneraanbevelingen, integratieaantal, integratiekwaliteit ▾ Evalueert partneraanbevelingen als expertstemmen van vertrouwen, het aantal geverifieerde integraties en ecosysteemkwaliteit — de gemiddelde HT Scores van integratiepartners. Producten met een kwalitatief beter integratie-ecosysteem leveren waarschijnlijker een verbonden technologiearchitectuur. |
| Klantgerichtheid |
|
Hoe klantgericht is deze organisatie? Gecertificeerde ondersteuning, reviewconsistentie, profielvolledigheid ▾ Beoordeelt of het bedrijf HTR Customer Support-certificering heeft verdiend, consistente reviewverzameling in de loop der tijd onderhoudt (een indicator van feedbackgedreven cultuur) en productprofielen compleet houdt met mogelijkheden, schermafbeeldingen, prijzen en functies. |
| Bereik, stabiliteit & middelen |
|
Hoe uitgebreid is het bereik en de middelen van dit bedrijf? Geografisch bereik, stabiliteit, bedrijfsmiddelen, trendscore ▾ Meet wereldwijde aanwezigheid (bediende landen en regio's), aantal jaren in bedrijf als stabiliteitsindicator, teamgrootte als middelenproxy en een trendscore op basis van kopersaanvragen, reviews, partneraanbevelingen en persactiviteit in de afgelopen twaalf maanden. |
Klantbeoordelingen en reviews zijn veruit de belangrijkste factor in het HT Score-algoritme. HTR accepteert geen betaling voor hogere ranglijstposities. Alle reviews zijn geverifieerd — alleen professionals uit de hotelbranche met bevestigde affiliaties kunnen beoordelingen indienen. Bekijk de volledige HT Score-methodologie →
Adviseur productaanbevelingen