The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Samenvatting
We hebben 887 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen geanalyseerd, functiesets, prijzen en praktijkcasestudies vergeleken om te bepalen waar elk platform uitblinkt. De juiste keuze hangt af van uw type accommodatie en prioriteiten:
GRAND blinkt uit .
Mews blinkt uit in ease of use and customer support — vooral voor independent accommodaties (4.9/5) , met exclusieve functies zoals Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Zij-aan-zij beoordelingen op basis van 887 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen op HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen |
|
|
| Gebruiksgemak |
|
|
| Klantenondersteuning |
|
|
| Prijs-kwaliteitverhouding |
|
|
| Vanafprijs | From $900/mo | From $900/mo |
| Geverifieerde beoordelingen | 0 | 887 |
Na analyse van 887 geverifieerde beoordelingen waarderen GRAND-gebruikers vooral de , terwijl Mews-gebruikers de ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility benadrukken. Klik op een thema om te zien wat beoordelaars zeggen.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Voordelen | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Inwerken en ondersteuning
▾
|
|
| Nadelen | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapportage en analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Hoe elk product scoort onder Vastgoedbeheersystemen-leveranciers voor verschillende accommodatiegroottes, -typen en regio's — op basis van geverifieerde beoordelingen van hoteliers in elk segment.
Op hotelgrootte
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Klein (10-24 kamers) ▾ | — | #3 329 beoordelingen |
| Middelgroot (25-74 kamers) ▾ | — | #1 397 beoordelingen |
| Groot (75-199 kamers) ▾ | — | #3 45 beoordelingen |
| Extra groot (200+ kamers) ▾ | — | #3 49 beoordelingen |
Op accommodatietype
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 beoordelingen |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #5 220 beoordelingen |
| Merk / Keten ▾ | — | #2 170 beoordelingen |
| Langverblijf ▾ | — | #1 130 beoordelingen |
Op regio
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Noord-Amerika ▾ | — | #8 106 beoordelingen |
| Europa ▾ | — | #1 660 beoordelingen |
| Azië-Pacific ▾ | — | #10 17 beoordelingen |
| Midden-Oosten ▾ | — | #28 8 beoordelingen |
Choosing between GRAND PMS by GRAND and Mews PMS by Mews requires understanding how each addresses your hotel’s operational needs. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but their approaches and market presence differ significantly. GRAND promises a next-generation, AI-powered platform but lacks recent user feedback and reviews, casting doubt on its current reliability. Mews, on the other hand, boasts over 750 reviews, with recent feedback highlighting its ease of use, extensive integrations, and high customer satisfaction. Which system aligns better with your hotel’s growth ambitions?
GRAND positions itself as a forward-thinking, cloud-based platform that unifies hotel and venue operations, emphasizing automation and collaboration. However, with zero recent reviews and a lack of user feedback, it remains an untested option in today’s competitive landscape. Mews, by contrast, benefits from a robust global user base and recent reviews that validate its claims through real-world experiences. The 98 recent reviews in the last six months underscore its ongoing development and responsiveness to user needs.
While GRAND aims to combine event management and proposals into an integrated platform, its current absence of user ratings and independent reviews makes it difficult to validate its performance. Mews’s high 4.62/5 rating and 93% likelihood to recommend reflect consistent user satisfaction. Are you willing to risk an unproven system, or do you prefer a platform already validated by hundreds of hoteliers?
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, well-supported PMS with proven integrations, scalability, and a large community of active users, go with Mews. Its extensive features—over 45 exclusive modules like revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, and integrated channel management—make it a versatile choice for properties of all sizes. Conversely, if your hotel seeks a futuristic, AI-driven platform with built-in event management and proposals, and if you’re comfortable with unverified claims, GRAND might appeal. But given the lack of recent validation, Mews’s proven track record makes it the safer bet.
For hotels prioritizing operational efficiency, seamless integrations, and customer support, Mews delivers a more mature ecosystem. If innovation and experimental features are your priority, GRAND’s promises are enticing, but the absence of recent user experience data makes it a risky choice. Would you rather rely on a platform with proven performance or gamble on an untested, emerging system?
Mews scores a near-perfect 4.7/5 for ease of use, with consistent user praise for its intuitive, modern interface and simple onboarding process. Its high ratings (98 recent reviews) indicate ongoing satisfaction, ease of adoption, and positive staff experiences. Conversely, GRAND provides no visible user ratings or recent reviews, making it impossible to evaluate its usability or onboarding experience. The lack of validation suggests potential usability issues or untested features.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers a comprehensive suite of 45+ features exclusive to its platform, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, integrated POS, real-time reporting, and a vast marketplace with over 1,000 integrations. GRAND, on the other hand, claims to unify bookings, housekeeping, billing, and event management but offers no detailed feature count or independent validation of its capabilities.
Given the extensive, proven features and active development, Mews clearly has a more mature and feature-rich ecosystem. Its dedicated modules support a wide range of hotel operations, surpassing GRAND’s unverified offerings. Which platform do you trust to provide a broad, reliable feature set?
Edge: Mews.
Mews maintains a strong reputation for customer support, with an average support rating of 4.27/5 based on recent reviews. Users describe its support team as quick, helpful, and proactive, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting. GRAND’s support experience is unverified, with no recent reviews or independent feedback available, raising concerns about responsiveness and reliability.
Given Mews’s proven support track record and recent positive reviews, it’s the safer choice for hotels that value dependable assistance during implementation and daily operations. Without validation, GRAND’s support remains uncertain. Which support system would you prefer to rely on?
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s recent review count of 758 and a high 93% likelihood to recommend position it as the more trusted platform among hoteliers. Its reviews highlight consistent satisfaction, ease of use, and tangible operational gains across diverse property types. GRAND’s absence of recent reviews and user feedback means it lacks current validation or confidence from the hotel community.
For properties seeking proven stability and peer affirmation, Mews’s large, active user base and recent high ratings make it the clear leader. Are you comfortable adopting a system with no recent user validation, or do you prefer one endorsed by hundreds?
Edge: Mews.
Both GRAND and Mews are priced at a flat $900 monthly fee, with no mention of implementation fees or tiered pricing options. However, the lack of detailed pricing tiers or optional modules makes it difficult to assess long-term value, especially for smaller properties or those seeking flexible packages.
Since Mews is well-documented and includes a clear, comparable pricing structure, hoteliers can better forecast costs and ROI. GRAND’s pricing appears straightforward but lacks transparency about potential additional charges or scalable options. Which pricing approach aligns better with your budget planning?
Not ideal if:
Edge: Not recommended due to lack of recent validation.
Not ideal if:
Edge: Mews.
Grand’s promise of a next-generation, AI-driven platform is compelling but remains unvalidated for real-world hotel operations. Without recent reviews, its reliability, support, and feature set are uncertain, making it a risky choice for most hotels.
Mews, in contrast, is a mature, extensively reviewed platform trusted by hundreds of hoteliers worldwide. Its proven ease of use, broad feature set, and active support network make it a more dependable and scalable option for hotels ready to grow.
If your hotel values stability, proven performance, and extensive integration capabilities, choose Mews. If you’re an innovator willing to accept the risk of unproven technology, GRAND might appeal, but be prepared for potential pitfalls.
In conclusion, for most hotels, Mews’s recent validation and large user community make it the preferable choice.
Volgens de productdatabase van HTR delen GRAND PMS en Mews PMS 14 functies. Dit zijn de belangrijkste verschillen — functies die de een wel heeft en de ander niet.
| Functie |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Aangepaste tarieven | ||
| Gast-CRM | ||
| Gastprofielen | ||
| Meerdere valuta | ||
| Meertalig | ||
| Module voor inkomstenbeheer |
De belangrijkste verschillen worden getoond. 33 meer functies verschillen tussen deze producten.
We hebben 8 geverifieerde casestudies geanalyseerd om te vergelijken wat hotels daadwerkelijk bereiken met elk platform op vier belangrijke bedrijfsdoelstellingen.
Nog geen gepubliceerde casestudy voor dit doel.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nog geen gepubliceerde casestudy voor dit doel.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nog geen gepubliceerde casestudy voor dit doel.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Wat hoteliers waarderen
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Waar hoteliers kritiek op hebben
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Hoewel Mews degelijke rapportage- en analysefunctionaliteiten biedt, geven verschillende gebruikers aan dat er behoefte is aan meer aanpasbare en flex... Hoewel Mews degelijke rapportage- en analysefunctionaliteiten biedt, geven verschillende gebruikers aan dat er behoefte is aan meer aanpasbare en flexibele rapportagemogelijkheden. Gebruikers geven aan dat ze graag gedetailleerdere data-inzichten willen, met name op het gebied van reserveringen en omzetanalyse.
Unieke mogelijkheden
Waar de beoordelingen het meest uiteenlopen
Dat hangt af van uw eisen. GRAND PMS en Mews PMS delen veel kern-Property Management Systems-functies, maar elk heeft unieke mogelijkheden. GRAND PMS biedt 0 geverifieerde integratiepartners, terwijl Mews PMS er 335 biedt. Bekijk de functievergelijking hierboven om te zien waar ze verschillen voordat u overstapt.
Kleine hotels moeten prioriteit geven aan gebruiksgemak en snelle onboarding. Mews PMS scoort het hoogst op gebruiksgemak met 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Let op transparante prijzen en de mogelijkheid van een proefperiode of demo. Filter beoordelingen op elke productpagina op accommodatiegrootte om te horen van hotels zoals het uwe.
GRAND PMS: Nee. Mews PMS: Nee. Geen van beide producten biedt momenteel een gratis abonnement aan. De meeste Property Management Systems-leveranciers bieden demo's of proefperiodes aan — vraag er bij beide een aan om te evalueren voordat u zich vastlegt.
De HT Score is een samengestelde ranglijst die 4 criteriagroepen en meer dan tien variabelen meeweegt om hoteliers te helpen hoteltechnologieproducten objectief te vergelijken. GRAND heeft een HT Score van 0 en Mews heeft 100. Zo wordt de score berekend.
| Criteriagroep | Weging | Wat het meet |
|---|---|---|
| Klantbeoordelingen & reviews |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen gebruikers dit product? Beoordelingsscore, reviewvolume, marktaandeel, reviewdiepte, reviewrecentheid, succesverhalen ▾ De zwaarst gewogen factor. Analyseert gemiddelde tevredenheidsbeoordelingen (waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen, gebruiksgemak, ondersteuning, ROI), het totale aantal reviews ten opzichte van categoriegenoten, recentheid van reviews (minimaal 20 reviews in de afgelopen 6 maanden) en marktaandeel over unieke hotelklanten om selectiebias te detecteren. |
| Partnerecosysteem |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen technologiepartners dit bedrijf? Partneraanbevelingen, integratieaantal, integratiekwaliteit ▾ Evalueert partneraanbevelingen als expertstemmen van vertrouwen, het aantal geverifieerde integraties en ecosysteemkwaliteit — de gemiddelde HT Scores van integratiepartners. Producten met een kwalitatief beter integratie-ecosysteem leveren waarschijnlijker een verbonden technologiearchitectuur. |
| Klantgerichtheid |
|
Hoe klantgericht is deze organisatie? Gecertificeerde ondersteuning, reviewconsistentie, profielvolledigheid ▾ Beoordeelt of het bedrijf HTR Customer Support-certificering heeft verdiend, consistente reviewverzameling in de loop der tijd onderhoudt (een indicator van feedbackgedreven cultuur) en productprofielen compleet houdt met mogelijkheden, schermafbeeldingen, prijzen en functies. |
| Bereik, stabiliteit & middelen |
|
Hoe uitgebreid is het bereik en de middelen van dit bedrijf? Geografisch bereik, stabiliteit, bedrijfsmiddelen, trendscore ▾ Meet wereldwijde aanwezigheid (bediende landen en regio's), aantal jaren in bedrijf als stabiliteitsindicator, teamgrootte als middelenproxy en een trendscore op basis van kopersaanvragen, reviews, partneraanbevelingen en persactiviteit in de afgelopen twaalf maanden. |
Klantbeoordelingen en reviews zijn veruit de belangrijkste factor in het HT Score-algoritme. HTR accepteert geen betaling voor hogere ranglijstposities. Alle reviews zijn geverifieerd — alleen professionals uit de hotelbranche met bevestigde affiliaties kunnen beoordelingen indienen. Bekijk de volledige HT Score-methodologie →
Adviseur productaanbevelingen