The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Samenvatting
We hebben 887 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen geanalyseerd, functiesets, prijzen en praktijkcasestudies vergeleken om te bepalen waar elk platform uitblinkt. De juiste keuze hangt af van uw type accommodatie en prioriteiten:
Integrated Design & Build SDN BHD blinkt uit .
Mews blinkt uit in ease of use and customer support — vooral voor independent accommodaties (4.9/5) , met exclusieve functies zoals Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Zij-aan-zij beoordelingen op basis van 887 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen op HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen |
|
|
| Gebruiksgemak |
|
|
| Klantenondersteuning |
|
|
| Prijs-kwaliteitverhouding |
|
|
| Vanafprijs | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Geverifieerde beoordelingen | 0 | 887 |
Na analyse van 887 geverifieerde beoordelingen waarderen Integrated Design & Build SDN BHD-gebruikers vooral de , terwijl Mews-gebruikers de ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility benadrukken. Klik op een thema om te zien wat beoordelaars zeggen.
| Integrated Design & Build SDN BHD |
|
|---|---|
| Voordelen | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Inwerken en ondersteuning
▾
|
|
| Nadelen | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapportage en analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Hoe elk product scoort onder Vastgoedbeheersystemen-leveranciers voor verschillende accommodatiegroottes, -typen en regio's — op basis van geverifieerde beoordelingen van hoteliers in elk segment.
Op hotelgrootte
| Segment | Integrated Design & Build SDN BHD |
|
|---|---|---|
| Klein (10-24 kamers) ▾ | — | #3 329 beoordelingen |
| Middelgroot (25-74 kamers) ▾ | — | #1 397 beoordelingen |
| Groot (75-199 kamers) ▾ | — | #3 45 beoordelingen |
| Extra groot (200+ kamers) ▾ | — | #3 49 beoordelingen |
Op accommodatietype
| Segment | Integrated Design & Build SDN BHD |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 beoordelingen |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #5 220 beoordelingen |
| Merk / Keten ▾ | — | #2 170 beoordelingen |
| Langverblijf ▾ | — | #1 130 beoordelingen |
Op regio
| Segment | Integrated Design & Build SDN BHD |
|
|---|---|---|
| Noord-Amerika ▾ | — | #8 106 beoordelingen |
| Europa ▾ | — | #1 660 beoordelingen |
| Azië-Pacific ▾ | — | #10 17 beoordelingen |
| Midden-Oosten ▾ | — | #28 8 beoordelingen |
Choosing between IDB PMS by Integrated Design & Build SDN BHD and Mews PMS by Mews hinges on your hotel’s operational needs, size, and growth ambitions. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but their approaches and strengths differ significantly. IDB PMS has virtually no recent reviews or active user feedback, raising questions about its reliability and support. Mews, on the other hand, boasts nearly 760 reviews, with over 98 in the past six months, making it a proven choice for modern hoteliers.
Given the data, your decision should favor the platform with the more current user feedback and broader market presence. Does your hotel prioritize a system with a robust community and ongoing enhancements? Or are you exploring a lesser-known solution with limited recent engagement?
Both IDB PMS and Mews PMS serve the core purpose of managing reservations, guest data, and operations, but their market traction and user satisfaction tell a different story. IDB PMS’s lack of reviews and zero ratings indicate no recent user validation, which is a red flag for ongoing support and feature updates. Conversely, Mews’s high rating of 4.62/5 across over 750 reviews highlights consistent satisfaction, especially among boutique, hostel, and city-center hotels.
While IDB PMS claims to offer comprehensive tools, the absence of recent feedback makes assessing its effectiveness impossible. Mews, with its modern interface, extensive integrations, and positive user testimonials, clearly demonstrates its value in today’s hotel environment. Are you comfortable deploying a system without verified, recent user experiences? Or do you prefer a proven solution backed by active users?
Edge: Mews.
If your hotel needs a flexible, cloud-based PMS with a proven track record of supporting diverse property types—especially boutique hotels, hostels, and small resorts—go with Mews. Its extensive features, over 336 integrations, and strong reputation make it suitable for hotels aiming to innovate and scale.
If your hotel operates within a niche or heavily relies on a bespoke, locally developed system, and you’re prepared to manage potential risks associated with limited user feedback, IDB PMS might seem appealing. However, with no recent reviews or active community, its ability to support growth and provide reliable support remains uncertain.
For hoteliers prioritizing ease of use, support, and a thriving user ecosystem, Mews remains the clear choice. Do you want a system that’s trusted by hundreds of hotels worldwide, or are you willing to gamble on an unverified platform?
Edge: Mews.
Mews excels with a user-friendly, modern interface rated 4.7/5, and over 98 recent reviews confirm high satisfaction with onboarding and daily operations. Its intuitive design reduces training time and encourages staff adoption, especially beneficial for small and boutique hotels.
IDB PMS’s UI and user experience are unverified due to the lack of recent reviews, making it impossible to judge usability or staff acceptance. The absence of recent feedback suggests it may not match Mews’s ease of implementation and operation.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers a suite of 59 features, including multi-lingual, multi-currency support, guest CRM, online check-in, automated reminders, real-time reporting, and a flexible booking engine—features that are absent in IDB PMS. Its extensive marketplace allows integrations with third-party apps, cloud-based operations, and guest engagement tools.
IDB PMS provides no publicly available feature list, and with no recent reviews, its capabilities are unsubstantiated. Without evidence of modern features or integrations, it appears less suited to the demands of current hospitality standards.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support ratings—4.27/5—are backed by over 98 recent reviews that praise its responsiveness and proactive onboarding. Customers describe Mews support as "excellent" and "helpful," with many appreciating the ongoing assistance during implementation.
IDB PMS’s support quality cannot be assessed due to no recent reviews or user feedback, raising concerns about its ability to assist during critical moments. The lack of recent engagement suggests limited or no active support.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, including channel managers, revenue management, CRM, POS, and other hotel tech solutions—making it highly adaptable for various operational needs. Its open API and marketplace facilitate rapid connection with third-party tools, supporting scalability.
IDB PMS has no publicly confirmed integrations, and with zero recent reviews, its connectivity options remain unknown. In today’s tech-driven hospitality environment, limited integrations severely restrict operational flexibility.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s 4.62/5 rating is derived from nearly 760 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use, support, and feature set. Boutique hotels, hostels, and city hotels particularly praise Mews for their operational efficiency and guest experience improvements.
IDB PMS’s review count is zero, and with no recent data, its rating remains unknown. Hotels looking for a trusted, heavily reviewed system should lean toward Mews.
Edge: Mews.
IDB PMS does not list pricing publicly, leaving potential buyers in the dark about costs or contract terms. Mews’s basic pricing starts at $900/month, with no free tier or trial, making it a straightforward, transparent investment.
While the absence of IDB PMS pricing complicates a direct comparison, the transparent and predictable pricing of Mews allows for better budgeting and ROI calculations.
Edge: Mews.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if you want a future-proof, highly-rated platform that supports growth and ease of use.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if your hotel is very niche or prefers a locally developed, non-cloud platform.
Mews is a cloud-based, feature-rich PMS supported by thousands of hotels worldwide, with high ratings, recent reviews, and a vast ecosystem of integrations. Its user-friendly interface, active support, and proven track record make it a dependable choice for modern hoteliers.
IDB PMS, with no recent reviews or active user feedback, offers no clear evidence of support, features, or market relevance. Its limited data and lack of recent validation make it a risky choice for hotels seeking stability and growth.
For hoteliers seeking a reliable, scalable, and well-reviewed platform, Mews is the clear winner. If you require a highly customized or niche system with no need for modern features, IDB PMS might still appeal—though the risks are substantial.
Edge: Mews.
Prijzen voor Vastgoedbeheersystemen zijn zelden eenvoudig. Dit is wat we weten op basis van de openbare prijsgegevens van elke leverancier. Vraag altijd een offerte op maat aan voor uw accommodatie.
| Integrated Design & Build SDN BHD |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Volgens de productdatabase van HTR delen IDB PMS en Mews PMS 0 functies. Dit zijn de belangrijkste verschillen — functies die de een wel heeft en de ander niet.
| Functie | Integrated Design & Build SDN BHD |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boekingsmodule | ||
| Gast-CRM | ||
| Gastprofielen | ||
| Meerdere valuta | ||
| Meertalig | ||
| Module voor inkomstenbeheer |
De belangrijkste verschillen worden getoond. 47 meer functies verschillen tussen deze producten.
We hebben 8 geverifieerde casestudies geanalyseerd om te vergelijken wat hotels daadwerkelijk bereiken met elk platform op vier belangrijke bedrijfsdoelstellingen.
Nog geen gepubliceerde casestudy voor dit doel.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nog geen gepubliceerde casestudy voor dit doel.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nog geen gepubliceerde casestudy voor dit doel.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Wat hoteliers waarderen
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Waar hoteliers kritiek op hebben
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Hoewel Mews degelijke rapportage- en analysefunctionaliteiten biedt, geven verschillende gebruikers aan dat er behoefte is aan meer aanpasbare en flex... Hoewel Mews degelijke rapportage- en analysefunctionaliteiten biedt, geven verschillende gebruikers aan dat er behoefte is aan meer aanpasbare en flexibele rapportagemogelijkheden. Gebruikers geven aan dat ze graag gedetailleerdere data-inzichten willen, met name op het gebied van reserveringen en omzetanalyse.
Unieke mogelijkheden
Waar de beoordelingen het meest uiteenlopen
Dat hangt af van uw eisen. IDB PMS en Mews PMS delen veel kern-Property Management Systems-functies, maar elk heeft unieke mogelijkheden. IDB PMS biedt 0 geverifieerde integratiepartners, terwijl Mews PMS er 336 biedt. Bekijk de functievergelijking hierboven om te zien waar ze verschillen voordat u overstapt.
Kleine hotels moeten prioriteit geven aan gebruiksgemak en snelle onboarding. Mews PMS scoort het hoogst op gebruiksgemak met 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Let op transparante prijzen en de mogelijkheid van een proefperiode of demo. Filter beoordelingen op elke productpagina op accommodatiegrootte om te horen van hotels zoals het uwe.
IDB PMS: Nee. Mews PMS: Nee. Geen van beide producten biedt momenteel een gratis abonnement aan. De meeste Property Management Systems-leveranciers bieden demo's of proefperiodes aan — vraag er bij beide een aan om te evalueren voordat u zich vastlegt.
De HT Score is een samengestelde ranglijst die 4 criteriagroepen en meer dan tien variabelen meeweegt om hoteliers te helpen hoteltechnologieproducten objectief te vergelijken. Integrated Design & Build SDN BHD heeft een HT Score van 0 en Mews heeft 99. Zo wordt de score berekend.
| Criteriagroep | Weging | Wat het meet |
|---|---|---|
| Klantbeoordelingen & reviews |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen gebruikers dit product? Beoordelingsscore, reviewvolume, marktaandeel, reviewdiepte, reviewrecentheid, succesverhalen ▾ De zwaarst gewogen factor. Analyseert gemiddelde tevredenheidsbeoordelingen (waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen, gebruiksgemak, ondersteuning, ROI), het totale aantal reviews ten opzichte van categoriegenoten, recentheid van reviews (minimaal 20 reviews in de afgelopen 6 maanden) en marktaandeel over unieke hotelklanten om selectiebias te detecteren. |
| Partnerecosysteem |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen technologiepartners dit bedrijf? Partneraanbevelingen, integratieaantal, integratiekwaliteit ▾ Evalueert partneraanbevelingen als expertstemmen van vertrouwen, het aantal geverifieerde integraties en ecosysteemkwaliteit — de gemiddelde HT Scores van integratiepartners. Producten met een kwalitatief beter integratie-ecosysteem leveren waarschijnlijker een verbonden technologiearchitectuur. |
| Klantgerichtheid |
|
Hoe klantgericht is deze organisatie? Gecertificeerde ondersteuning, reviewconsistentie, profielvolledigheid ▾ Beoordeelt of het bedrijf HTR Customer Support-certificering heeft verdiend, consistente reviewverzameling in de loop der tijd onderhoudt (een indicator van feedbackgedreven cultuur) en productprofielen compleet houdt met mogelijkheden, schermafbeeldingen, prijzen en functies. |
| Bereik, stabiliteit & middelen |
|
Hoe uitgebreid is het bereik en de middelen van dit bedrijf? Geografisch bereik, stabiliteit, bedrijfsmiddelen, trendscore ▾ Meet wereldwijde aanwezigheid (bediende landen en regio's), aantal jaren in bedrijf als stabiliteitsindicator, teamgrootte als middelenproxy en een trendscore op basis van kopersaanvragen, reviews, partneraanbevelingen en persactiviteit in de afgelopen twaalf maanden. |
Klantbeoordelingen en reviews zijn veruit de belangrijkste factor in het HT Score-algoritme. HTR accepteert geen betaling voor hogere ranglijstposities. Alle reviews zijn geverifieerd — alleen professionals uit de hotelbranche met bevestigde affiliaties kunnen beoordelingen indienen. Bekijk de volledige HT Score-methodologie →
Adviseur productaanbevelingen