The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Samenvatting
We hebben 887 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen geanalyseerd, functiesets, prijzen en praktijkcasestudies vergeleken om te bepalen waar elk platform uitblinkt. De juiste keuze hangt af van uw type accommodatie en prioriteiten:
Isidoro blinkt uit .
Mews blinkt uit in ease of use and customer support — vooral voor independent accommodaties (4.9/5) , met exclusieve functies zoals Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Zij-aan-zij beoordelingen op basis van 887 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen op HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen |
|
|
| Gebruiksgemak |
|
|
| Klantenondersteuning |
|
|
| Prijs-kwaliteitverhouding |
|
|
| Vanafprijs | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Geverifieerde beoordelingen | 0 | 887 |
Na analyse van 887 geverifieerde beoordelingen waarderen Isidoro-gebruikers vooral de , terwijl Mews-gebruikers de ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility benadrukken. Klik op een thema om te zien wat beoordelaars zeggen.
| Isidoro |
|
|---|---|
| Voordelen | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Inwerken en ondersteuning
▾
|
|
| Nadelen | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapportage en analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Hoe elk product scoort onder Vastgoedbeheersystemen-leveranciers voor verschillende accommodatiegroottes, -typen en regio's — op basis van geverifieerde beoordelingen van hoteliers in elk segment.
Op hotelgrootte
| Segment | Isidoro |
|
|---|---|---|
| Klein (10-24 kamers) ▾ | — | #3 329 beoordelingen |
| Middelgroot (25-74 kamers) ▾ | — | #1 397 beoordelingen |
| Groot (75-199 kamers) ▾ | — | #3 45 beoordelingen |
| Extra groot (200+ kamers) ▾ | — | #3 49 beoordelingen |
Op accommodatietype
| Segment | Isidoro |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 beoordelingen |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #5 220 beoordelingen |
| Merk / Keten ▾ | — | #2 170 beoordelingen |
| Langverblijf ▾ | — | #1 130 beoordelingen |
Op regio
| Segment | Isidoro |
|
|---|---|---|
| Noord-Amerika ▾ | — | #8 106 beoordelingen |
| Europa ▾ | — | #1 660 beoordelingen |
| Azië-Pacific ▾ | — | #10 17 beoordelingen |
| Midden-Oosten ▾ | — | #28 8 beoordelingen |
Choosing between Isidoro by Isidoro and Mews PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational scale. Both claim to streamline property management, but their capabilities, user base, and support vary significantly. Isidoro’s platform is virtually unreviewed and lacks recent data, while Mews boasts a strong track record backed by hundreds of recent reviews and a high user rating. Which system will truly serve your hotel today and scale with you tomorrow?
If your priority is a proven, highly-rated PMS with a broad ecosystem of integrations and a track record of supporting diverse hotel types, Mews stands out. Conversely, Isidoro's minimal review data and absence of a recent user base make it difficult to assess its true performance or suitability.
Both Isidoro and Mews aim to simplify hotel operations, but their approaches diverge sharply. Isidoro offers no public feature list, no verified integrations, and no recent reviews, raising questions about its capabilities and support. Mews, on the other hand, provides over 59 unique features, more than 336 verified integrations, and hundreds of recent reviews that consistently praise its ease of use, support, and flexibility.
Mews’s recent reviews from nearly 100 hotels in the last six months, with a 93% likelihood to recommend, reinforce its relevance and reliability. Isidoro's lack of recent data and zero reviews make it impossible to determine its effectiveness or user satisfaction. Are you willing to take a chance on an unproven system, or do you prefer a solution with validated performance?
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich system with extensive third-party integrations and proven support, Mews is the clear choice. It caters well to boutique hotels, resorts, and larger properties, offering modules like revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, and real-time reporting—features highly valued by hotels of various sizes.
If your hotel operates a single property with minimal complexity, and you're comfortable with an untested platform, Isidoro might seem appealing, but there's no recent data to confirm this. For hotels prioritizing operational efficiency, guest experience, and long-term scalability, Mews’s proven track record makes it the safer, more strategic investment.
Mews is praised by users for its intuitive, modern interface, with a 4.7/5 ease-of-use rating based on 758 reviews, and a straightforward onboarding process scored similarly. Reviewers consistently highlight how quickly staff adopt Mews, citing its clean design and helpful training resources.
In contrast, Isidoro’s ease of use is not documented publicly, with no reviews or ratings available. The absence of user feedback makes it impossible to compare usability directly, but given Mews’s extensive positive reviews, it’s clear that Mews is the more user-friendly option. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 unique features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, advanced booking engines, guest CRM, real-time reporting, automated night audits, and extensive integrations. These features enable a hotel to personalize the guest journey, automate operations, and connect to a broad tech ecosystem.
Isidoro’s feature set is not publicly available or verified, with no specific modules or functionalities listed. Without concrete information, it’s impossible to assess whether it offers comparable capabilities. Based on available data, Mews’s extensive feature set provides a decisive edge. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support has been rated 4.27/5 by users, with recent reviews praising their responsiveness and helpful onboarding. Users often mention that support teams resolve issues swiftly, with some noting their proactive communication during onboarding.
Isidoro’s customer support is unreviewed and unverified, making it impossible to compare support quality confidently. Given Mews’s high support ratings and consistent recent praise, it’s clear that Mews provides more reliable, accessible support. Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, including popular partners like Criton, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing, offering a comprehensive ecosystem. This enables hotels to tailor their tech stack for operations, revenue, and guest experience enhancements.
Isidoro reports no verified partners, raising concerns about its capability to connect with other hotel systems. Without proven integrations, Isidoro’s flexibility is questionable. Mews’s extensive ecosystem offers a significant practical advantage. Edge: Mews.
With over 758 recent reviews, Mews maintains a 4.62/5 overall rating, and a 93% recommendation rate from diverse properties including boutique hotels, hostels, resorts, and chains. Hoteliers praise its ease of use, support, and extensive features, particularly for mid-sized and larger operations.
Isidoro’s reviews are nonexistent, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. The recent and plentiful positive feedback for Mews decisively favors it as the trusted, high-rated choice. Edge: Mews.
Mews costs $900/month with no free tier or trial, which might be a barrier for some small properties. Isidoro’s pricing is not publicly available, and with no recent reviews or user data, it’s unclear whether it offers a competitive or scalable pricing model.
Given Mews’s transparent pricing and proven value, it offers a clear financial benchmark. Without data supporting Isidoro’s cost-effectiveness, Mews’s price point, supported by extensive positive reviews, remains a more concrete indicator of value.
Not ideal if:
Edge: None (uncertain due to lack of data).
Not ideal if:
Edge: Mews.
Mews is a proven, feature-packed PMS supported by a large user community and extensive recent reviews. Its broad ecosystem, high support ratings, and documented success stories make it a reliable partner for hotels aiming to grow and innovate.
Isidoro’s platform remains unreviewed and unverified, with no recent data to confirm its capabilities or support quality. For hotels serious about operational efficiency, guest experience, and future growth, Mews’s established track record makes it the clear choice.
If you want a system with proven functionality, seamless integrations, and happy users, go with Mews.
If your hotel has minimal needs and is willing to take a risk on an untested platform, Isidoro might be worth exploring—but proceed with caution.
In summary, Mews’s recent reviews and extensive features position it as the smarter, safer investment for your hotel’s management system today.
Volgens de productdatabase van HTR delen Isidoro en Mews PMS 0 functies. Dit zijn de belangrijkste verschillen — functies die de een wel heeft en de ander niet.
| Functie | Isidoro |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boekingsmodule | ||
| Gast-CRM | ||
| Gastprofielen | ||
| Meerdere valuta | ||
| Meertalig | ||
| Module voor inkomstenbeheer |
De belangrijkste verschillen worden getoond. 47 meer functies verschillen tussen deze producten.
We hebben 8 geverifieerde casestudies geanalyseerd om te vergelijken wat hotels daadwerkelijk bereiken met elk platform op vier belangrijke bedrijfsdoelstellingen.
Nog geen gepubliceerde casestudy voor dit doel.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nog geen gepubliceerde casestudy voor dit doel.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nog geen gepubliceerde casestudy voor dit doel.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Wat hoteliers waarderen
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Waar hoteliers kritiek op hebben
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Hoewel Mews degelijke rapportage- en analysefunctionaliteiten biedt, geven verschillende gebruikers aan dat er behoefte is aan meer aanpasbare en flex... Hoewel Mews degelijke rapportage- en analysefunctionaliteiten biedt, geven verschillende gebruikers aan dat er behoefte is aan meer aanpasbare en flexibele rapportagemogelijkheden. Gebruikers geven aan dat ze graag gedetailleerdere data-inzichten willen, met name op het gebied van reserveringen en omzetanalyse.
Unieke mogelijkheden
Waar de beoordelingen het meest uiteenlopen
Dat hangt af van uw eisen. Isidoro en Mews PMS delen veel kern-Property Management Systems-functies, maar elk heeft unieke mogelijkheden. Isidoro biedt 0 geverifieerde integratiepartners, terwijl Mews PMS er 335 biedt. Bekijk de functievergelijking hierboven om te zien waar ze verschillen voordat u overstapt.
Kleine hotels moeten prioriteit geven aan gebruiksgemak en snelle onboarding. Mews PMS scoort het hoogst op gebruiksgemak met 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Let op transparante prijzen en de mogelijkheid van een proefperiode of demo. Filter beoordelingen op elke productpagina op accommodatiegrootte om te horen van hotels zoals het uwe.
Isidoro: Nee. Mews PMS: Nee. Geen van beide producten biedt momenteel een gratis abonnement aan. De meeste Property Management Systems-leveranciers bieden demo's of proefperiodes aan — vraag er bij beide een aan om te evalueren voordat u zich vastlegt.
De HT Score is een samengestelde ranglijst die 4 criteriagroepen en meer dan tien variabelen meeweegt om hoteliers te helpen hoteltechnologieproducten objectief te vergelijken. Isidoro heeft een HT Score van 0 en Mews heeft 100. Zo wordt de score berekend.
| Criteriagroep | Weging | Wat het meet |
|---|---|---|
| Klantbeoordelingen & reviews |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen gebruikers dit product? Beoordelingsscore, reviewvolume, marktaandeel, reviewdiepte, reviewrecentheid, succesverhalen ▾ De zwaarst gewogen factor. Analyseert gemiddelde tevredenheidsbeoordelingen (waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen, gebruiksgemak, ondersteuning, ROI), het totale aantal reviews ten opzichte van categoriegenoten, recentheid van reviews (minimaal 20 reviews in de afgelopen 6 maanden) en marktaandeel over unieke hotelklanten om selectiebias te detecteren. |
| Partnerecosysteem |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen technologiepartners dit bedrijf? Partneraanbevelingen, integratieaantal, integratiekwaliteit ▾ Evalueert partneraanbevelingen als expertstemmen van vertrouwen, het aantal geverifieerde integraties en ecosysteemkwaliteit — de gemiddelde HT Scores van integratiepartners. Producten met een kwalitatief beter integratie-ecosysteem leveren waarschijnlijker een verbonden technologiearchitectuur. |
| Klantgerichtheid |
|
Hoe klantgericht is deze organisatie? Gecertificeerde ondersteuning, reviewconsistentie, profielvolledigheid ▾ Beoordeelt of het bedrijf HTR Customer Support-certificering heeft verdiend, consistente reviewverzameling in de loop der tijd onderhoudt (een indicator van feedbackgedreven cultuur) en productprofielen compleet houdt met mogelijkheden, schermafbeeldingen, prijzen en functies. |
| Bereik, stabiliteit & middelen |
|
Hoe uitgebreid is het bereik en de middelen van dit bedrijf? Geografisch bereik, stabiliteit, bedrijfsmiddelen, trendscore ▾ Meet wereldwijde aanwezigheid (bediende landen en regio's), aantal jaren in bedrijf als stabiliteitsindicator, teamgrootte als middelenproxy en een trendscore op basis van kopersaanvragen, reviews, partneraanbevelingen en persactiviteit in de afgelopen twaalf maanden. |
Klantbeoordelingen en reviews zijn veruit de belangrijkste factor in het HT Score-algoritme. HTR accepteert geen betaling voor hogere ranglijstposities. Alle reviews zijn geverifieerd — alleen professionals uit de hotelbranche met bevestigde affiliaties kunnen beoordelingen indienen. Bekijk de volledige HT Score-methodologie →
Adviseur productaanbevelingen