The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Samenvatting
We hebben 887 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen geanalyseerd, functiesets, prijzen en praktijkcasestudies vergeleken om te bepalen waar elk platform uitblinkt. De juiste keuze hangt af van uw type accommodatie en prioriteiten:
Mews blinkt uit in ease of use and customer support — vooral voor independent accommodaties (4.9/5) , met exclusieve functies zoals Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
VIPS blinkt uit .
Zij-aan-zij beoordelingen op basis van 887 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen op HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen |
|
|
| Gebruiksgemak |
|
|
| Klantenondersteuning |
|
|
| Prijs-kwaliteitverhouding |
|
|
| Vanafprijs | From $900/mo | From $800/mo |
| Geverifieerde beoordelingen | 887 | 0 |
Na analyse van 887 geverifieerde beoordelingen waarderen Mews-gebruikers vooral de ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, terwijl VIPS-gebruikers de benadrukken. Klik op een thema om te zien wat beoordelaars zeggen.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Voordelen | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Inwerken en ondersteuning
▾
|
|
| Nadelen | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapportage en analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Hoe elk product scoort onder Vastgoedbeheersystemen-leveranciers voor verschillende accommodatiegroottes, -typen en regio's — op basis van geverifieerde beoordelingen van hoteliers in elk segment.
Op hotelgrootte
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Klein (10-24 kamers) ▾ | #3 329 beoordelingen | — |
| Middelgroot (25-74 kamers) ▾ | #1 397 beoordelingen | — |
| Groot (75-199 kamers) ▾ | #3 45 beoordelingen | — |
| Extra groot (200+ kamers) ▾ | #3 49 beoordelingen | — |
Op accommodatietype
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 beoordelingen | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #5 220 beoordelingen | — |
| Merk / Keten ▾ | #2 170 beoordelingen | — |
| Langverblijf ▾ | #1 130 beoordelingen | — |
Op regio
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Noord-Amerika ▾ | #8 106 beoordelingen | — |
| Europa ▾ | #1 660 beoordelingen | — |
| Azië-Pacific ▾ | #10 17 beoordelingen | — |
| Midden-Oosten ▾ | #28 8 beoordelingen | — |
When choosing a property management system (PMS), your goal is to find a solution that streamlines operations, improves guest experiences, and offers robust integrations. Both Mews PMS and VIPS PMS aim to meet these needs, but they differ significantly in maturity, user feedback, and ecosystem support. Your decision hinges on which product aligns best with your hotel's size, complexity, and growth plans.
Mews PMS boasts a proven track record with thousands of reviews, high user ratings, and recent positive feedback, making it the more reliable choice for modern hoteliers. VIPS PMS, while offering a broad feature set, lacks recent reviews or a large user base, which diminishes confidence in its current performance.
Mews PMS is the clear leader based on review volume, recent user experiences, and a comprehensive feature set that appeals to a broad spectrum of hotels. Its 758 reviews and 98 recent ones in the last six months demonstrate ongoing customer satisfaction, especially in ease of use and support. Meanwhile, VIPS PMS has no recent reviews or user ratings available, making it difficult to assess its current effectiveness.
If your hotel values proven stability, extensive ecosystem integrations, and a platform trusted by thousands of properties, Mews is the better choice. For hotels seeking a less proven but potentially adaptable solution, VIPS may be worth exploring, but its lack of recent feedback is a concern.
Both Mews and VIPS aim to automate and simplify hotel operations, but Mews’s established presence provides a more reliable foundation supported by hundreds of reviews and high ratings. Mews excels in streamlining reservations, billing, and guest communication, with a focus on modern, cloud-native hospitality.
VIPS, on the other hand, claims to be an all-in-one, modular system designed to handle bookings, communications, meetings, and self-service check-ins, but lacks recent user feedback to verify its performance. Do you want a platform with recent, proven performance, or are you comfortable testing a less documented solution?
If your hotel needs a mature, widely adopted platform with proven reliability and extensive integrations, go with Mews. Its user base spans boutique hotels, hostels, and larger properties, with a 4.62/5 overall rating backed by 758 reviews and a recent influx of feedback.
Choose VIPS if you prefer an all-in-one, modular solution that promises flexibility for managing bookings, meetings, and self-service options. However, given the lack of recent reviews and only 11 verified partners, VIPS’s current performance remains uncertain for most hoteliers.
Mews scores a 4.7/5 for ease of use, with reviewers praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and mobile app. Many mention how staff adoption is smooth, with support teams offering helpful onboarding, making training less burdensome.
VIPS offers a modern interface with a broad feature set, but lacks recent user feedback to confirm usability and onboarding experience. Without recent reviews, assessing its ease of use remains speculative.
Edge: Mews PMS.
Mews offers 45 shared features with other PMS solutions and 14 features exclusive to it, such as multi-lingual support, guest CRM, integrated ID scanner, online checkout, and SOC2 compliance. Its marketplace boasts over 1,000 integrations, covering various operational needs.
VIPS provides a broad feature set including online bookings, guest communications, and self-service check-ins but has no unique features documented outside its core offerings. Currently, Mews’s extensive ecosystem and unique features give it an edge.
Edge: Mews PMS.
Mews’s support scores 4.27/5, with many reviews praising the professionalism, responsiveness, and helpful onboarding assistance. Users note that issues are addressed swiftly, though some mention occasional bugs, which are typically resolved quickly.
VIPS offers no recent reviews or detailed support ratings, which makes evaluating their support quality impossible. Given Mews’s documented support strengths, it remains the more dependable choice.
Edge: Mews PMS.
Mews has 336 verified integration partners, including major players like SiteMinder, RevControl, and Orange Hotel Marketing, enabling extensive customization. Its marketplace offers a broad range of third-party tools for revenue management, guest engagement, and operations.
VIPS has only 11 verified partners, including some overlaps with Mews (RevControl, SiteMinder), but fewer options overall. For scalable, flexible integrations, Mews’s ecosystem is clearly superior.
Edge: Mews PMS.
Mews’s reviews consistently highlight its ease of use, reliability, and support, resulting in an overall rating of 4.62/5 with 93% likelihood to recommend. It is favored across property types, especially boutique hotels, hostels, and independent hotels.
VIPS has no recent or substantial reviews, so hotel ratings cannot be confidently assessed. Based on available data, Mews’s user ratings are significantly higher and more recent.
Edge: Mews PMS.
Mews’s pricing starts at $900 per month, with no freemium or per-room charges, offering transparent and enterprise-grade pricing. VIPS charges $800 per month, also without additional fees but with less transparency about optional costs.
While both are similar, Mews’s larger ecosystem and proven ROI justify its slightly higher price point for most hotels. The decision should consider value and support quality rather than price alone.
Mews is a mature, extensively reviewed PMS platform with proven reliability, boasting a 4.62/5 rating from 758 reviews, and a rich ecosystem of integrations. Its focus on automation, guest experience, and scalability makes it suitable for a wide range of hotel types, especially those looking to grow or modernize.
VIPS offers a broad, modular solution with potential flexibility, but the absence of recent reviews and limited partner network raise concerns about current performance and support. If stability and proven results matter most, Mews is the clear choice.
For hotels needing a trusted, fast-growing platform with a strong community, Mews delivers on expectations. If your hotel prefers a newer, flexible approach and is willing to test an emerging system, VIPS may be worth consideration—but proceed cautiously.
Volgens de productdatabase van HTR delen Mews PMS en VIPS PMS 45 functies. Dit zijn de belangrijkste verschillen — functies die de een wel heeft en de ander niet.
| Functie |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Applicatie voor de mobiele telefoon | ||
| Gast-CRM | ||
| Gastprofielen | ||
| Meerdere valuta | ||
| Meerdere valuta | ||
| Meertalig |
De belangrijkste verschillen worden getoond. 2 meer functies verschillen tussen deze producten.
We hebben 8 geverifieerde casestudies geanalyseerd om te vergelijken wat hotels daadwerkelijk bereiken met elk platform op vier belangrijke bedrijfsdoelstellingen.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nog geen gepubliceerde casestudy voor dit doel.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nog geen gepubliceerde casestudy voor dit doel.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Nog geen gepubliceerde casestudy voor dit doel.
Wat hoteliers waarderen
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Waar hoteliers kritiek op hebben
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Hoewel Mews degelijke rapportage- en analysefunctionaliteiten biedt, geven verschillende gebruikers aan dat er behoefte is aan meer aanpasbare en flex... Hoewel Mews degelijke rapportage- en analysefunctionaliteiten biedt, geven verschillende gebruikers aan dat er behoefte is aan meer aanpasbare en flexibele rapportagemogelijkheden. Gebruikers geven aan dat ze graag gedetailleerdere data-inzichten willen, met name op het gebied van reserveringen en omzetanalyse.
Unieke mogelijkheden
Waar de beoordelingen het meest uiteenlopen
Dat hangt af van uw eisen. Mews PMS en VIPS PMS delen veel kern-Property Management Systems-functies, maar elk heeft unieke mogelijkheden. Mews PMS biedt 336 geverifieerde integratiepartners, terwijl VIPS PMS er 11 biedt. Bekijk de functievergelijking hierboven om te zien waar ze verschillen voordat u overstapt.
Kleine hotels moeten prioriteit geven aan gebruiksgemak en snelle onboarding. Mews PMS scoort het hoogst op gebruiksgemak met 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Let op transparante prijzen en de mogelijkheid van een proefperiode of demo. Filter beoordelingen op elke productpagina op accommodatiegrootte om te horen van hotels zoals het uwe.
Mews PMS: Nee. VIPS PMS: Nee. Geen van beide producten biedt momenteel een gratis abonnement aan. De meeste Property Management Systems-leveranciers bieden demo's of proefperiodes aan — vraag er bij beide een aan om te evalueren voordat u zich vastlegt.
De HT Score is een samengestelde ranglijst die 4 criteriagroepen en meer dan tien variabelen meeweegt om hoteliers te helpen hoteltechnologieproducten objectief te vergelijken. Mews heeft een HT Score van 99 en VIPS heeft 0. Zo wordt de score berekend.
| Criteriagroep | Weging | Wat het meet |
|---|---|---|
| Klantbeoordelingen & reviews |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen gebruikers dit product? Beoordelingsscore, reviewvolume, marktaandeel, reviewdiepte, reviewrecentheid, succesverhalen ▾ De zwaarst gewogen factor. Analyseert gemiddelde tevredenheidsbeoordelingen (waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen, gebruiksgemak, ondersteuning, ROI), het totale aantal reviews ten opzichte van categoriegenoten, recentheid van reviews (minimaal 20 reviews in de afgelopen 6 maanden) en marktaandeel over unieke hotelklanten om selectiebias te detecteren. |
| Partnerecosysteem |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen technologiepartners dit bedrijf? Partneraanbevelingen, integratieaantal, integratiekwaliteit ▾ Evalueert partneraanbevelingen als expertstemmen van vertrouwen, het aantal geverifieerde integraties en ecosysteemkwaliteit — de gemiddelde HT Scores van integratiepartners. Producten met een kwalitatief beter integratie-ecosysteem leveren waarschijnlijker een verbonden technologiearchitectuur. |
| Klantgerichtheid |
|
Hoe klantgericht is deze organisatie? Gecertificeerde ondersteuning, reviewconsistentie, profielvolledigheid ▾ Beoordeelt of het bedrijf HTR Customer Support-certificering heeft verdiend, consistente reviewverzameling in de loop der tijd onderhoudt (een indicator van feedbackgedreven cultuur) en productprofielen compleet houdt met mogelijkheden, schermafbeeldingen, prijzen en functies. |
| Bereik, stabiliteit & middelen |
|
Hoe uitgebreid is het bereik en de middelen van dit bedrijf? Geografisch bereik, stabiliteit, bedrijfsmiddelen, trendscore ▾ Meet wereldwijde aanwezigheid (bediende landen en regio's), aantal jaren in bedrijf als stabiliteitsindicator, teamgrootte als middelenproxy en een trendscore op basis van kopersaanvragen, reviews, partneraanbevelingen en persactiviteit in de afgelopen twaalf maanden. |
Klantbeoordelingen en reviews zijn veruit de belangrijkste factor in het HT Score-algoritme. HTR accepteert geen betaling voor hogere ranglijstposities. Alle reviews zijn geverifieerd — alleen professionals uit de hotelbranche met bevestigde affiliaties kunnen beoordelingen indienen. Bekijk de volledige HT Score-methodologie →
Adviseur productaanbevelingen